Purpose of study. We hypothesised that Vitamin D deficiency could be related to SUFE in children without endocrinological abnormalities. We therefore sought to examine prevalence and severity of Vitamin D insufficiency in a cross-section of SUFE patients. Methods. Vitamin D levels were tested for at time of hospital admission for operative treatment of SUFE. Seven patients, between the months of July 2011 to November 2011, presented to our institution. All were chronic, stable slips treated with in-situ screw fixation. All patients presented in the summer months and were operated on within 3 weeks of presentation. Results. 5/7 children were boys, age range (9–15yr). Symptoms had been present for 3–12 months prior to presentation, 5/7 patients had onset of symptoms during the winter and spring months – known to accord with lowest Vitamin D serum concentrations in population studies. All seven patients had low Vitamin D concentrations (<75nmol/L), and six patients had values that were considered insufficient (<50nmol/L). All patients were of dark-skinned ethnic origin but only one had a BMI of above 25kg/m. 2. (range 21–30). Conclusion. The true prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the general population is not known although small studies suggest that it could be relatively common, particularly in children from ethnic minorities. Deficient levels (<25nmol/L) concord with increased risk of pathological fracture but associated risks of insufficient levels (25–50nmol/L) are unknown. SUFE is known to be more common in African-American, Polynesian and Aborigine children – as is vitamin D deficiency. We are raising the possibility that Vitamin D deficiency may be a relevant associated risk factor in SUFE

Aims

The aim of this study was to inform the epidemiology and treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE).

Aims. Slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) has well documented biochemical and mechanical risk factors. Femoral and acetabular morphologies seem to be equally important. Acetabular retroversion has a low prevalence in asymptomatic adults. Hips with dysplasia, osteoarthritis, and Perthes’ disease, however, have higher rates, ranging from 18% to 48%. The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of acetabular retroversion in patients presenting with SUFE using both validated radiological signs and tomographical measurements. Methods. A retrospective review of all SUFE surgical cases presenting to the Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, from 2012 to 2019 were evaluated. Preoperative plain radiographs were assessed for slip angle, validated radiological signs of retroversion, and standardized postoperative CT scans were used to assess cranial and mid-acetabular version. Results. In all, 116 SUFEs presented in 107 patients who underwent surgical intervention; 47 (52%) were male, with a mean age of 12.7 years (7.5 to 16.6). Complete radiological data was available for 91 patients (99 hips) with adequate axial CT imaging of both hips. Overall, 82 patients (82%) underwent pinning in situ (PIS), with subcapital realignment surgery (SRS) performed in 17 patients (18%) (slip angles > 75°). Contralateral prophylactic PIS was performed in 72 patients (87%). On the slip side, 62 patients (68%) had one or more radiological sign of retroversion. Tomographical acetabular retroversion was more pronounced cranially than caudally of the acetabulum on both the affected side and the contralateral side (p < 0.001) as expected in the normal population. Increasing severity of the slip was found to be directly proportional to the degree of reduction in cranial and central acetabular version (p < 0.05) in the SUFE hips. Conclusion. Acetabular retroversion is more prevalent in patients with SUFE than previously reported, and have been shown be correlated to the severity of the slip presentation. The presence of radiological signs of acetabular retroversion could be used to justify prophylactic contralateral pinning. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(2):158–164

Purpose. The decision to undertake prophylactic pinning to prevent contralateral slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) remains controversial; we hypothesised that the grade of initial SUFE could predict the grade of a second SUFE and risk of poor outcome. Method. We retrospectively reviewed radiographs of all children who presented to Alder Hey with a new diagnosis of SUFE between 2007–2014. Of those who developed a contralateral SUFE, grade of first and second SUFE was determined radio-graphically using % slip and Southwick angle on frog lateral radiograph. Results. 100 patients that presented with a new diagnosis of SUFE were identified. 73 had no contralateral surgery at first presentation. Of these, 56 reached skeletal maturity with no contralateral slip. 17 re-presented acutely with a contralateral slip requiring operative intervention. 4 presented with unilateral symptoms but radiographic evidence of bilateral slips and underwent bilateral surgery at time of first presentation. No cases of severe slip where seen in children with initial mild or moderate slips. 100% of children presented with a contralateral SUFE of the same or less severe grade. In cases of initial severe SUFE, grade of second SUFE was unpredictable; 3 pre-slip, 1 mild, 1 moderate, 2 severe. Conclusion. Grade of initial SUFE may be a useful adjunct to decision making when considering risk- benefit of prophylactic contralateral surgery. In cases of initial mild slip re-presentation with a severe contralateral SUFE is unlikely and a higher threshold for prophylactic intervention may be appropriate

Abstract. Objective. To assess the prevalence of acetabular retroversion in patients presenting with Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis using both validated radiological signs and CT-angle measurements. Methods. A retrospective review of all cases involving surgical management for acute SUFE presenting to the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne were assessed from 2012–2018. Pre-operative plain radiographs were assessed for slip angle, validated radiological signs of retroversion (post wall/crossover/ischial spine sign) and standardised post-operative CT Scans were used to assess cranial and mid-acetabular version. Results. 116 SUFEs presented in 107 patients who underwent surgical intervention; 47 females and 60 boys, with an average age of 12.7 years (range 7.5–16.6 years). Complete radiological data was available for 91 patients (99 hips) with adequate axial CT imaging of both hips. 82% patients underwent pinning in situ (PIS) with subcapital realignment surgery (SRS) performed in 18% (slip angles >75°). Contralateral prophylactic hip PIS was performed in 72 patients (87%). On the slip side, 68% of patients had 1 or more radiological signs of retroversion in the slipped hip, with 60% on the contralateral side. The mean cranial and mid-acetabular version measurements were −8°(range −30 – 8°) and 10.5°(range −10 – 25°), respectively. Conclusions. Acetabular retroversion is rare in the normal population with studies reports ranging from 0–7%. This study showed an increased prevalence of 68% in SUFE patients, which is likely to be a primary anatomical abnormality, subsequently increasing the shear forces across the proximal femoral growth plate due to superior over-coverage. The resulting CAM lesion from SUFE in combination with the pincer lesion due to retroversion can lead to premature hip impingement and degeneration. Further larger studies are required to assess if acetabular retroversion is a true risk factor, and its role in helping guide management including prophylactic pinning. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

The ideal treatment of the unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) is not clearly defined in the literature. Unstable SUFE occurs with less frequency than the stable SUFE. The incidence of unstable SUFE is between 14–25% of all SUFE’s. The literature reports a variety of accepted methods of treatment of the unstable SUFE, consequently, in Auckland there are various methods of treatment. The unstable SUFE is at risk of development of avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. The reported incidence of AVN in unstable SUFE is between 15–50%. We expect that different treatment will influence the rate of AVN. Our aim was to determine current practice and outcomes in Auckland. We reviewed the records and radiographs of all SUFE’s treated in Auckland from 2000–2007. In this time period there were 463 patients across the Auckland region, 109 of which had bilateral SUFE’s which allowed 572 treated hips to be followed. Over this time period there were 34 unstable SUFE representing 6% of treated hips. There was a difference in average weight, with unstable SUFE on average 10kgs lighter (60.5 vs 70.3kgs). Average time to surgery was 43 hours (range: 4–360hrs). Cases operated within 24 hours have a reduced rate of AVN (20%) compared to those operated after 24 hours (AVN 50%). Of the 34 cases, 13 cases had radiological evidence of AVN (35%). Of these there were 11 cases of pin penetration requiring further surgery. There was no difference in rate of AVN when comparing single screw to double screw fixation (SS 44% v DS 38%). There were 11 cases of pin penetration, 8 with single screw and 3 with double screw fixation. Our review of unstable SUFE in Auckland has shown a difference in the weight of patients when compared to stable SUFE’s presenting from the same population. We have also found that cases operated on within 24 hours have a lower rate of AVN. Single screw fixation is more common than double screw fixation. There was no statistical difference in the rate of AVN but there was a higher rate of screw penetration when using a single screw fixation

Introduction. Hip arthrodiastasis for paediatric hip conditions such as Perthes disease is growing in popularity. Intended merits include halting the collapse of the femoral head and maintaining sphericity by minimising the joint reaction force. This can also be applied to protecting hip reconstruction following treatment of hip dysplasia. Our aim was to assess functional outcomes and complications in a cohort of paediatric patients. Materials and Methods. A retrospective single-surgeon cohort study was performed in a University teaching hospital from 2018–2021. Follow-up was performed via telephone interview and review of patient records. Complications, time in frame and functional scores using the WOMAC hip score were recorded. Results. Following review, 26 procedures were identified in 24 patients. Indications included 16 cases of Perthes disease, 4 following slipper upper femoral epiphysis, 3 avascular necrosis, and single cases following infection, dysplasia and a bone cyst. Pre-treatment WOMAC scores averaged 53.9, improving to 88.5 post-removal. Pin site infections were encountered in 11 patients, all treated with oral antibiotics. Two patients required early removal of frame due to pin loosening. Average time in frame was 3.9 months. Conclusions. This series displays how hip arthrodiastasis can be used to manage paediatric hip conditions. Complex reconstructions may be required in patients with severe deformity following perthes disease, DDH or SUFE. The use of arthrodiastasis in these patients aims to protect the reconstruction and potentially improve outcomes. A dedicated team of specialist nurses, physiotherapists and psychologists are crucial to the treatment program

Slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) is a condition, which affects the immature hip joint. Many theories have been postulated as to its underlying aetiology however; its exact cause is, as yet unknown. The final common pathway appears to be failure of the of the growth plate to resist shearing forces, giving rise to displacement of the femoral head. We hypothesized that the lubricating ability of the synovial fluid in hip joints of children with SUFE was defective, thereby allowing increasing shear forces on the physis to occur, so that when the joint is loaded it will fail at its weakest point, namely the capital epiphysis. Aim: The aim of this study was to establish a biomechanical porcine cadaveric model to study SUFE and use this model to determine how defective joint lubrication may increase the probability of SUFE. Methods: Using immature porcine femurs and a custom-made rig, a torsional load was applied about an axis perpendicular to the growth plate in order to cause the femur to fail along the growth plate. The Hounsefield testing machine applied a tensile load and recorded the associated elongation. From these figures the torque applied to the femoral head and the associated angular rotation could be computed. Using Weibel analysis we were able to determine the probability of SUFE occurring for a range of synovial fluid coefficients of friction, a range of joint reaction forces and neck-shaft angles. Results: We found that it is possible to induce a SUFE in an immature porcine loaded hip joint and that there was an increased probability of slip with increased coefficient of friction of synovial fluid, increased percentage body weight and increased neck-shaft angle. Conclusion: Defective lubrication may be a key underlying aetiological factor responsible for SUFE

Historically avoidance of avascular necrosis (AVN) has been the primary objective in the management of an acute unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE). When achieved through pinning in situ it was invariably associated with significant malunion. With increasing appreciation of the consequences of femoroacetabular impingement, modern techniques aim to correct deformity and avoid AVN. Exactly what constitutes an acute unstable SUFE is a source of debate but should represent 5–10% of all cases. This audit reviewed cases over the past 25 years treated in one region. Of 89 patients with 113 slips, 21 hips were recorded as unstable. During this period the management has evolved from closed reduction and stabilization through pinning in situ, to open reduction. Radiographic outcomes following these three treatment methods were compared with record of any subsequent surgery in the form of osteotomy or total hip arthroplasty. Currently the lowest reported incidence of AVN in patients with an acute unstable slip is associated with the Parsch technique which combines open arthrotomy, digital reduction and screw fixation. Early outcomes with this technique are in accordance with those reported in the literature and represents a significant improvement in outcome when compared to earlier techniques used in the management of the severe unstable SUFE

Aim. With the link between obesity and Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis (SUFE) well established and a rising number of paediatric orthopaedic patients presenting with vitamin D deficiency, the aim of our study was to establish the incidence of vitamin D deficiency in SUFE patients and whether low vitamin D levels increases the time to proximal femoral physeal fusion post surgical fixation. Method. All paediatric patients presenting to the orthopaedic department at University Hospital Southampton with a SUFE and tested for vitamin D between June 2007 to present day and who were subsequently found to have low levels of vitamin D, were eligible for inclusion in the study. A deficient level of vitamin D (25-(OH)D) was determined as < 52 nmols/L and insufficiency between 52–72 nmols/L. Levels > 72 nmols/L were considered to be normal. The normal time for 50% of physeal fusion on anteroposterior radiograph quoted in the literature is 9 months. Results. This study includes a cohort of 28 patients and 45 hips. All of these patients were treated with pinning insitu. Eighty six per cent were found to be vitamin D deficient. The mean physeal closure for these patients post fixation, including those yet to fuse and which have exceeded 12 months, was 23 months (range 9–64 months). Conclusion. This study has shown a correlation between vitamin D deficiency and prolonged physeal closure in SUFE patients. With an increasing prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, it is recommended that all patients presenting with a SUFE, be tested for low vitamin D levels, so that early treatment with supplementation can be initiated

Introduction. Prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in the treatment of slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) has been shown to be safer than continued observation of the contralateral hip. This treatment remains controversial due to the potential for harm caused to an apparently unaffected hip. There is evidence that pinning of an already slipped epiphysis causes growth disturbance of the proximal femur, however this has been questioned in that the slip occurs at the hypertrophic layer of the growth plate with no damage to the germative layer. Aim. To determine whether prophylactic pinning affects subsequent growth of the unaffected hip in cases of unilateral SUFE. Method. In order to determine the effect of prophylactic pinning we compared radiographs of skeletally mature patients who had either undergone prophylactic pinning (group 1), pinning of the affected side only (group 2), and adults with no history of SUFE (group 3). We measured the articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD) and calculated the ratio of the trochanteric-trochanteric distance to articulo-trochanteric distance. These measures have been used in previous studies and have been shown to be reliable indicators of disturbed proximal femoral growth. As this was a pilot study we recruited 8 to each group. Results. The absolute sum of the ATDs were 219mm (average 27.3mm) Group 1, 213mm (average 26.6mm) Group2 and 258mm (average 32.5mm). The average trochanter-trochanter: ATD ratio in group 1 was 2.7 (1.9–3.8) compared to 2.7 (2.3–3.2) and 2.3 (1.9–2.7) in groups 2 and 3 respectively. Conclusion. Our results suggest no difference in subsequent growth between hips that are prophylactically pinned and those that are not. Abnormal growth was observed in unpinned hips suggesting undiagnosed SUFE in some cases. In this series pinning had no effect on proximal femoral growth in patients with SUFE

Introduction: Percutaneous in situ pinning of severe SUFE can lead to problems. We describe our technique and results for surgical dislocation to reduce severe SUFE. Method: Ganz’s approach of greater trochanteric flip, safe dissection and surgical dislocation to preserve the femoral head blood supply was followed to anatomically reduce the femoral head. We have treated 16 cases in this way, but describe nine with a minimum follow up of 2 years. Their mean age was 13.6 years (9 to 16 years). All had severe SUFE with four acute on chronic and two unstable slips. Two were previously pinned and another had a partially fused growth plate. The mean follow up was 3.1 years (2.1 to 4.6 years). Results: All patients had a good to excellent outcome. Their pre-operative deformity was 84 degrees (65 to 110) measured by AP and cross table lateral x-rays, CT or MRI scans. The average hip external rotation deformity was 70 degrees. Post operatively internal and external rotation and all other movements were similar to the contra-lateral uninvolved hip. None developed avascular necrosis (AVN) or chondrolysis. Conclusions: This technique is demanding but can give good results for severe SUFE

Prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in unilateral Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis (SUFE) persists as a source of debate with the majority of surgeons selecting this option in a proportion of patients whom they regard as at increased risk of a subsequent slip. Universal prophylactic pinning was introduced in our region in 2005 after an audit of ten years local practice identified 25% of unilateral cases presented with a subsequent slip. This study reports our experience between 2005 and 2020. In this prospective study, 44 patients presented with 55 affected hips compared with 60 patients with 67 affected hips in the original study. Two patients were excluded as their initial slip had not been treated in our unit. Of the 42 hips seven were bilateral, 34 of the 35 unilateral hips underwent prophylactic pinning. The one exception subsequently underwent prophylactic pinning due to developing pain. Consistent with our original series, at a minimum follow up of 13 months there have been no complications of infection, fracture, chondrolysis or avascular necrosis subsequent to prophylactic pinning. Over 25 years 70 patients have undergone prophylactic pinning without complication. On the premise that 25% of our unpinned hips presented with subsequent slips before instituting our policy we estimate that we have prevented 17 subsequent slips over 25 years including the consequences which can be significant. We continue to advocate universal prophylactic pinning as an effective and safe practice in the management of SUFE

The June 2013 Hip & Pelvis Roundup. 360 . looks at: failure in metal-on-metal arthroplasty; minimal hip approaches; whether bisphosphonates improve femoral bone stock following arthroplasty; whether more fat means more operative time; surgical infection; vascularised fibular graft for osteonecrosis; subclinical SUFE; and dentists, hips and antibiotics

The December 2015 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup. 360 . looks at: Paediatric femoral fractures: a single incision nailing?; Lateral condylar fractures: open or percutaneous?; . Forearm refracture: the risks; Tibial spine fractures; The child’s knee in MRI; The mechanics of SUFE; Idiopathic clubfoot

Prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip remains controversial in the management of unilateral SUFE. This paper reviews our experience, with particular reference to the fate of the non-operated hip. We reviewed the charts and radiographs of 218 patients who were admitted to Starship Children’s Hospital between 1988 and 2000 with a diagnosis of SUFE. Of the 211 patients with data sufficient for analysis, 168 (80%) had unilateral hip pinning and 43 (20%) had bilateral pinning. 32.8% of patients with a unilateral slip were subsequently readmitted for pinning of the contralateral hip. The time between the two operations averaged 7.5 months and did not vary with race or gender. European females had an almost 50% readmission rate for pinning of the opposite hip while Maori females had the lowest readmission rate (15%). All European females less than 11.5 years with unilateral slips returned for pinning of the opposite hip. 28 of the initial unilateral hip pinnings were for an unstable SUFE. Only 8 of the 28 patients were readmitted for pinning of the opposite hip, all with stable slips. Only one patient with a stable first slip presented with an unstable second slip. Despite a high incidence of bilateralism, this study shows that it is very uncommon for a patient to present with an unstable second slip. Prophylactic pinning can have complications. We therefore recommend follow-up rather than prophylactic pinning for patients presenting with unilateral SUFE. Caucasian females less than 11.5 years represent a group at high risk of a second slip

Introduction. Retention and removal of children's orthopaedic metalwork is a contentious issue that has implications for current resource allocation, health economics, complication risks and can impact on future treatments. Understanding how to guide families make informed choices requires an overview of all the relevant evidence to date, and knowledge of where the evidence is lacking. Our aim was to systematically review the literature and provide a meta-analysis where possible, recommending either retention or removal. Materials and Methods. A search of the literature yielded 2420 articles, of which 22 papers were selected for the study analysis. Inclusion criteria: Any paper (evidence level I-IV) assessing the risks or benefits of retaining or removing orthopaedic metalwork in children. Exclusion criteria: Spinal implants; implant number < 40; < 75% recorded follow up; papers including implants in their analysis that always require removal; patients aged >18 years. Results. In total, 4988 patients (6412 implants) were included across all 22 studies. There was a significant amount of heterogenicity between studies. Overall the short term risks of metalwork retention and removal are low, with a few exceptions. In forearm plating re-fracture rates following removal were lower than those seen in studies looking at retained metalwork, provided removal occurred later than 12 months from the initial operation. Forearm re-fracture rates after removal of flexible nails significantly increased if removal was performed before 6 months. Major complications following routine metalwork removal from the proximal femur are relatively rare, with re-fracture rates of 1–5%. The majority of these re-fractures are seen in neuromuscular patients or in patients where removal occurs earlier than 6 months. Routine metalwork removal following SUFE had a complication rate of 30–60%. Conclusions. We found that there are certain subgroups of children that benefit from retention of metalwork and some that benefit from removal. There are several subgroups that we have identified which do not yet have sufficient long term evidence to make a balanced recommendation. We advise that families are made aware of what is known and what is unknown in order to allow for shared decision making

Introduction: Obligatory external rotation during flexion is well recognised as a cardinal feature of Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphyses (SUFE). We have evaluated the significance of acetabular version in contributing to the external rotational deformity that is seen in otherwise normal hips. We present a small case series focussing on the characteristics of this pathology, highlighting its significance and outlining a treatment strategy. Method: Five patients (eight hips) presented with disabling hip pain during non-sporting activities. All their hip radiographs had been reported as normal. The rotational profile of both acetabulum and femur in these patients was evaluated by MRI and CT scans. Results: Clinical examination revealed otherwise normal hips but for an external rotation deformity which got worse on hip flexion. The average external rotation deformity with the hip in extension was 60 degrees, which worsened to 90 degrees during hip flexion. Three of these hips had been previously treated with in situ pinning for SUFE. Other hips were in patients who were either skeletally mature or close to skeletal maturity. We found that all were “profunda hips” with severe acetabular retroversion. The abnormality in acetabular version was best defined on axial imaging. Conclusions: The femoral head is a spherical conchoid. The concept of version of the hip (both femoral and acetabular) as described by McKibbin, Tonnis and Ganz is reviewed. Femoral retroversion is common in patients with SUFE, but the addition of acetabular retroversion makes these hips disproportionately symptomatic. This deformity causes a combination of pincer and cam impingement, which is responsible for the marked disability. SUFE alone causes cam impingement, whilst a corresponding degree of slip without retroversion and profunda of the acetabulum is not that disabling

Purpose of study: A single dynamic hip screw is the recommended method of fixation for slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE). Current practice favours placement of the screw in the centre of the femoral head on both anteroposterior and lateral planes. This study investigated screw placement in the femoral head for SUFE and the prevalence of AVN, chondrolysis, late slippage, and time to physeal closure. Method: Clinical notes and radiographs of 38 consecutive patients (61 hips), who underwent single screw fixation for SUFE, were evaluated retrospectively with a minimum follow up of 24 months (24–56). Two way ANOVA and post hoc tests were performed to analyse the correlation between the different variables and the outcome, at a 5% significance level. Results: There were 16 acute slips, 18 chronic slips and 10 acute on chronic slips. 17 slips were treated prophylactically. Mild slip was noted in 39 hips, moderate in 4 and severe in 1 hip. A central-central position was only achieved in 50% of cases. No significant difference between the time to physeal closure and the screw position was found. No late slippage, AVN or chondrolysis occurred in this series. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that positions of the screw, other than in the centre of the femoral head, provide adequate stability. There is no correlation between screw position and the time to physeal closure, the risk of avascular necrosis or chondrolysis. We recommend that positions other than the “optimal central-central position” be accepted if not initially achieved, especially for mild SUFE. The potential hazards from several attempts to achieve the optimum position outweigh the benefits

Since 2003 we have adopted an aggressive approach to the management of the SUFE deformity, an important cause of anterior femoro-acetabular impingement, associated with the development of early adult hip arthritis. 16 patients aged 16.7 years (range 11–20, 3 female, 13 male, 8 right, 8 left hips) underwent surgery to manage their SUFE deformity. 7 patients had secondary correction of deformity after previous in-situ pinning and 9 underwent primary surgical management using a Ganz approach (7) or primary in-situ pinning with femoral neck resection via a Smith-Peterson approach (2). Of the 7 patients who had primary in-situ pinning 26 months (range 4–44 months) earlier, 2 had acetabular chondral flap tears with eburnated bone and 6 had significant labral degenerative changes associated with calcification or tears. Only one of the nine patients who underwent primary aggressive management of their SUFE, had a labral tear. 4 patients underwent mobilisation of the femoral head on its vascular pedicle followed by anatomical realignment. At an average follow-up of 22.3 months (range 1–41 months) 15 remained well with excellent function. Leg lengths remained equal in 12, with an average shortening of 2cm in the remaining 4 patients. Segmental AVN occurred in the first patient after damage to the vascular pedicle during drilling of the neck; the technique has been modified to prevent further occurrences. Removal of the trochanteric osteotomy screws has been performed in 4 cases. Despite having performed over 400 surgical hip dislocation, the authors continue to find the management of this condition challenging; nevertheless, having seen the direct consequences of femoro-acetabular impingement at an early stage in these young patients, we believe that aggressive management to correct anatomical alignment is essential for the future well being of the hip