In-hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition following arthroplasty could act as surrogate measures for improvement in patient pathways, and have major cost saving implications for healthcare providers. With the ever-growing adoption of robotic technology in arthroplasty, we wished to evaluate its impact on LOS. The objectives of this study were to compare LOS and discharge disposition following robotic-arm assisted (RO THA) versus conventional technique Total Hip Arthroplasty (CO THA). This large-scale, single institution study included patients of any age undergoing primary THA (N = 1,732) for any cause between May 2019 and January 2023. Data extracted included patient demographics, LOS, need for Post Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) admission, anaesthesia type, readmission within 30 days and discharge dispositions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were also employed to identify factors and patient characteristics related to delayed discharge. The median LOS in the RO THA group was 54 hours (34, 78) versus 60 (51, 100) in the CO THA group, p<0.001. Discharge disposition was comparable between the two groups. In the multivariate model, age, need for PACU admission, ASA score > 2, female gender, general anaesthesia and utilisation of the conventional technique were significantly associated with LOS > 2 days. Our study showed that robotic-arm assistance was associated with a shorter LOS in patients undergoing primary THA and no difference in discharge destination. Our results suggest that robotic-arm assistance could be advantageous in partly addressing the upsurge of hip arthroplasty procedures and the concomitant health care burden; however, this needs to be corroborated by long-term cost effectiveness analyses and data from randomised controlled studies

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to determine if better outcomes occur with use of robotic-arm assistance by comparing consecutive series of non-robotic assisted (NR-TKA) and robotic-arm assisted (NR-TKA) total knee arthroplasties with the same implant. Methods. 80 NR-TKAs and then 101 RA-TKAs were performed consecutively. 70 knees in each group that had a minimum two-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Range of motion, Knee Society (KS) scores, and forgotten joint scores (FJS) were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Tourniquets, used for all cases, had their inflation time recorded. Component realignment to minimize soft tissue releases was used in both groups with the goal to stay within a mechanical alignment of 3° of varus to 2° of valgus. The use of soft tissue releases for balance were compared. Results. There were no statistical differences in baseline characteristics including pre-operative Knee Society scores between cohorts. The two-year NR-TKA and RA-TKA median KS knee and functional scores were 99.0 and 90.0 and 100.0 and 100.0 respectively. Mann-Whitney U test indicated a statistically significant difference in KS-KS (p<.00001) and near statistically significant difference in KS-FS (p=0.075). The 10-point higher KS-FS is considered a minimal clinically important difference. The median FJS at two years for the NR-TKA was 61.5 and the RA-TKA was 75.0. Although not statistically significant (p=0.1556), the 13.5-point increase in the RA-TKA cohort also represents a minimal clinically important difference. RA-TKA patients had statistically significant 5° higher knee flexion (p<.00001). Desired post-operative coronal alignment was present in 92.9% of NR-TKAs and 94.3% of RA-TKAs. 28.6% more of the RA-TKA cases were able to be balanced without a soft tissue release. Median tourniquet time was only 3.9 minutes longer for the robotic-arm assisted cohort. Conclusion. This comparison study demonstrates potential benefits in use of robotic-arm assistance over manual instrumentation in TKA

Outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) has remained controversial and challenging. Traditional hospital stays following total joint arthroplasty were substantial and resulted in increased rates of morbidity, significant pain, and severe restriction in mobility. Advancements in the surgical approach, anesthetic regimens, and the initiation of rapid rehabilitation protocols have had an impact on the length of recovery following elective THA. Still, very few studies have specifically outlined outpatient hip arthroplasty and, thus far, none have addressed the use of robotic-arm navigation in outpatient THA. This article describes in detail the technique used to perform outpatient THA with the use of robotic-arm assistance. We believe that outpatient THA using robotic-arm assistance in combination with tissue-preserving surgery, multi-modal pain and nausea management, early rehabilitation, and stringent patient selection yields a suitable alternative to inpatient joint replacement

Introduction. Isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis (OA) occurs in 5–10% of knees with OA [1, 2]. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (LUKA) emerged as a treatment to this disease in the early 80s but challenging surgical technique has limited the prevalence of this treatment option [1–3]. A robotic-arm assisted surgical technique (MAKO Surgical Corp.) has emerged as a way to achieve precise implant positioning which can potentially improve surgical outcomes. Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate short term outcomes for patients that received LUKA using a novel robotic-arm assisted surgical technique. Methods. Thirty-seven (37) patients (12 male, 25 female - mean age 63.7 years) with lateral OA received a robotic-arm assisted LUKA between July 2011 and September 2013 from 3 surgeons. All patients were evaluated by an independent surgeon not involved in the treatment of these patients at an average follow-up of 15.9 months (8–27). Range of motion and limb alignment was compared pre- and post-operatively. Results. Lateral UKA using robotic-arm assistance improved the post-operative range of motion an average of 4.8 ± 7.1º (p<0.0001) from a starting value of 136.5 ± 8.6º to a post-operative value of 141.6 ± 8.0º. In addition, patients began with a pre-operative deformity of 3.1 ± 3.2º of valgus and resulted in a post-operative alignment of 0.8 ± 1.9º of valgus corresponding to an average correction of 2.4 ± 2.3º less valgus (p<0.000001). The average operative time was 44.0 ± 10.8 minutes with 97% of the cases completed within 60 minutes. Conclusion. These results suggest that LUKA with robotic-arm assistance provides excellent post-operative alignment and demonstrate a reliable option for management of isolated lateral knee OA

Background. Intraoperative balancing of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be accomplished by either more prevalent but less predictable soft tissue releases, implant realignment through adjustments of bone resection or a combination of both. Robotic TKA allows for quantifiable precision performing bone resections for implant realignment within acceptable final component and limb alignments. Objective. To provide a direct comparison of patient reported outcomes between implant realignment and traditional ligamentous release for soft tissue balancing in TKA. Methods. IRB approved retrospective single surgeon cohort study of prospectively collected operative and clinical data of consecutive patients that underwent TKA with a single radius design utilizing kinematic sensors to assess final balance with or without robotic assistance allowing for a minimum of 12 months clinical follow up. Operative reports were reviewed to characterize the balancing strategy. In surgical cases using robotic assistance, pre-operative plan changes that altered implant placement were included in the implant realignment group. Any patient that underwent both implant realignment and soft tissue releases was analyzed separately. Kinematic sensor data was utilized to quantify ultimate balance to assure that each cohort had equivalent balance. Patient reported outcome data consisting of Knee Society- Knee Scores (KS-KS), Knee Society- Function Scores (KS-FS), and Forgotten Joint Scores (FJS) were prospectively collected during clinical follow up. Results. 182 TKA were included in the study. 3-Month clinical follow up was available for 174/182 knees (91%), 1-Year clinical follow up was available for 167/182 knees (92%) and kinematic sensor data was available for 169/182 knees (93%). Kinetic sensor data showed that on average all of the balancing subgroups achieved clinically equivalent balance. Use of robotic-arm assistance provided the tools and confidence to decrease from ligament release only in 40.8% of non-robotic cases to 3.8% in the robotic group, and the use of component realignment alone increased from 23.7% in the non-robotic cases to 48.1% in the robotic TKA group. KS-KS, KS-FS and FJS scores showed improvements in outcomes at both the 3-month and 1-year time points in the implant realignment cohort compared to the ligamentous release cohort. KS-KS, KS-FS, and FJS at 1-year were 1.6, 7.6, and 17.2 points higher respectively. While none of the comparisons reached statistical significance, KS-FS at 1 year showed a statistically and clinically significant difference (MCID 6.1–6.4) increase of 7.7 points in the implant realignment cohort compared to the ligamentous cohort. The 1-year trend can be further explained by the outperformance (MCID increase of 6.4 points) of the implant realignment robotic cohort at 1-year compared to the non-robotic ligamentous cohort. Conclusions. Directly comparing TKA patients balanced with implant realignment alone versus ligamentous release alone versus combined technique, a trend toward clinical improvement above a minimally clinical significant difference in KS-FS scores benefiting the implant realignment technique was seen at both 3-months and 1-year post-operatively. We hypothesize that the benefit of implant realignment is achieved through decreased soft tissue trauma as well as potentially greater predictability and sustainability of soft tissue balance than with soft tissue releases alone

Background. Discrepancies in patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty have encouraged the development of different treatment options including early preventive interventions. In addition, improvements in surgical techniques and instrumentation have increased the accuracy of the surgeries. In this case study, we review the first robotic-arm assisted modular tricompartmental knee arthroplasty in which bone and soft tissues are conserved by employing a precise planning and execution technique. Materials and Methods. A 63 year old Caucasian female with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 27 presented to the surgeon (SK) with knee pain and a varus mechanical alignment. The patient received modular tri-unicompartmental arthroplasty performed with robotic-arm assistance; (see figure 1 for post-op radiograph). Range of Motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) were measured pre-operatively and post-operatively at 6, 16, and 23 months. At 6 months post-op an in-depth in vivo kinematic analysis was conducted by using a validated fluoroscopic assessment technique [1]. The patient simulated stair climbing, kneeling activity, and deep lunge while under single plane fluoroscopy. Three dimensional models were created from CT scans and were matched to 2D fluoroscopic images for kinematic assessment. Results. ROM, KSS, KOOS improved post-operatively, see Table 1. Patient displayed tibial internal rotation and screw home mechanism like that of normal knees, (Figure 2). Anterior-posterior translation of medial and lateral compartments was observed (Figure 3). The patient demonstrated a maximum flexion of 115 and 114.9 in kneeling and lunge activity, respectively. Tibial external rotation was seen in both kneeling and lunging, although rotation was greater during the lunge activity (3.1 versus 11.5 degrees). Both medial and lateral compartments showed posterior translation during these activities (Table 2). Conclusion. Clinical, radiographic and functional outcomes were achieved for this patient. This case report was the first case of robotically assisted, modular, ACL and PCL sparing tricompartmental arthroplasty. It was anticipated that preserving more soft tissues, particularly the ACL would contribute to improved kinematic function of the knee following arthroplasty, which was the primary differentiating factor between a bicompartmental design and a traditional tricompartmental knee design. The use of robotic techonlogy as described herein has not yet been approved by the FDA

Introduction:. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been proven to be an effective treatment for degenerative joint disease confined to a single tibiofemoral compartment. Recently, UKAs have been performed with robotic-arm assistance (RAA) devices to build and improve upon previous computer-assisted navigation. As a pilot study, we have analyzed short term outcomes for a series of robotic-arm assisted medial UKAs and compared them to a comparable cohort of traditionally instrumented medial UKAs. Methods:. Ninety-eight fixed-bearing medial UKAs were isolated in our prospective data collection database for short-term analysis for this study. Included patients completed pre and post-operative Short Form 12 version 1 Health Survey (SF12), Western Ontario and McMaster University Outcome Scores (WOMAC), and Knee Society Function Score (KSFS) questionnaires. Forty-eight RAA UKAs were performed using the MAKO RIO system with Restoris implants, and fifty manual UKAs were performed with the Zimmer® Unicompartmental High-Flex Knee System (ZUK). Results:. Both cohorts experienced increased gains in all categories, except for the change in SF12 mental subscore in the MAKO cohort. Only the WOMAC pain subscore at 1 year showed statistically significant differences between the two cohorts, with MAKO subjects experiencing less pain than ZUK subjects (92.4 MAKO vs. 82.0 ZUK, p = 0.03). The SF12 mental score at three months and the change in SF12 mental score from pre-op to 1 year were also statistically significant; however, the pre-op differences between the two groups in the SF 12 mental category were also significantly different. Within the groups that were not significantly different, ZUK subjects experienced greater changes from pre-operative to three months in SF12 mental, all WOMAC subsets, and KSFS, while MAKO subjects had a greater change in SF12 physical subscore. This pattern held true with changes between pre-operative and 1 year, with the exception that MAKO patients experienced a greater positive change in WOMAC pain scores than ZUK patients. Additionally, age and body mass index were not significantly different between cohorts; however, operative time was significantly longer in the MAKO cohort (p < 0.001). Discussion:. These results suggest that despite the lower WOMAC pain scores at one year, the extra expense and operative time required for RAA UKA may not translate into immediate functional gains. These conclusions are however limited due to the short follow-up time period and the randomization of patients. Future studies must also analyze implant alignment, rotation and position in order to fully analyze the operations

Aims

The purpose of this study was to compare the radiological outcomes of manual versus robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).