A common location for radius fracture is the proximal radial head. With the arm in neutral position, the fracture usually happens in the anterolateral quadrant (Lacheta et al., 2019). If traditional surgeries are not enough to induce bone stabilization and vascularization, or the fracture can be defined grade III or grade IV (Mason classification), a radial head prosthesis can be the optimal compromise between bone saving and recovering the “terrible triad”. A commercially available design of radial head prosthesis such as Antea (Adler Ortho, Milan, Italy) is characterized by flexibility in selecting the best matching size for patients and induced osteointegration thanks to the Ti-Por. ®. radial stem realized by 3D printing with laser technique (Figure 1). As demonstrated, Ti-Por. ®. push-out resistance increased 45% between 8 −12 weeks after implantation, hence confirming the ideal bone-osteointegration. Additional features of Antea are: bipolarity, modularity, TiN coating, radiolucency, hypoallergenic, 10° self-aligning. The osteointegration is of paramount importance for radius, in fact the literature is unfortunately reporting several clinical cases for which the fracture of the prosthesis happened after bone-resorption. Even if related to an uncommon activity, the combination of mechanical resistance provided by the prosthesis and the stabilization due to the osteointegration should cover also accidental movements. Based upon Lacheta et al. (2019), after axial compression-load until radii failure, all native specimens survived a compression-load of 500N, while the failure happened for a mean compression force of 2560N. The aim of this research study was to test the mechanical resistance of a radial head prosthesis obtained by 3D printing. In detail, a finite element analysis (FEA) was used to understand the mechanical resistance of the core of the prosthesis and the potential bone fracture induced in the radius with simulated bone- resorption (Figure 2a). The critical level was estimated at the height for which the thickness of the core is the minimum (Figure 2b). Considered boundary conditions:. - Full-length prosthesis plus radius out of the cement block equal to 60mm (Figure 2a);. - Bone inside the cement equal to 60mm (Figure 2b);. - Load inclined 10° epiphysiary component (Figure 2c);. - Radius with physiological or osteoporotic bone conditions;. - Load (concentrated in the sphere simulating full transmission from the articulation) of 500N or 1300N or 2560N. Figure 3 shows the results in terms of maximum stress on the core of the prosthesis and the risk of fracture (Schileo et al., 2008). According to the obtained results, the radial head prosthesis shows promising mechanical resistance despite of the simulated bone-resorption for all applied loads except for 2560N. The estimated mechanical limit for the material in use is 200MPa. The risk of fracture is in agreement with the experimental findings (Lacheta et al. (2019)), in fact bone starts to fail for the minimum reported failure load, but only for osteoporotic conditions. The presented FEA aimed at investigating the behavior of a femoral head prostheses made by 3D printing with simulated bone-resorption. The prosthesis shows to be a skilled solution even during accidental loads. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Purpose: We reviewed retrospectively 22 patients with recent and old fractures of the radial head treated with the GUEPAR radial head prosthesis which has a mobile metal cup derived from the GUEPAR gliding total elbow prosthesis. Material and methods: Among the 22 patients, 13 underwent surgery in an emergency setting and four underwent a secondary procedure. Mean age was 41 years and follow-up was 18 months. The Mayo Clinic score was noted. Fractures were total or disengaged cervical fractures and in 72% of the elbows dislocation was associated. The coronoid process was fixed in one elbow, the olecranon in one and the medial ligaments were repaired in five. The status of the humeral condyle was examined in detail before insertion of the prosthesis. We also were particularly attentive concerning the height position of the prosthesis. Results: There were no complications. Outcome was good among the patients undergoing an emergency procedure with a mean Mayo Clinic score of 83/100, mean force 75%, good motion, particularly 77° pronation, and 79° supination, with good stability and absence of wrist problems. The patients who underwent a secondary procedure had less satisfactory results, particularly for motion (44° pronation and 54° supination). The distal radioulnar index was not perfectly restored. Finally four patients had arthrolysis for limited flexion/extension, three of them in the secondary group. Discussion: Resection of the radial head is an alternative for complex fractures that has its inconveniences. The first is that it destabilises the elbow in valgus position in the event of injury to the medial ligaments and the second is the ascension of the radius in the event of injury to the interosseous membrane. Fixation is another alternative, but it is difficult and has not provided good results in our hands or in the literature (we have compared this series with a series of 20 fixations for equivalent fractures). The prosthesis appears to be a good solution: it stabilises the elbow, prevents ascension of the radius, allows early rehabilitation, and provides good subjective outcome, particularly in emergency cases

Prosthetic radial head replacement is usually performed for trauma or post traumatic reconstruction. Therefore pain caused by a loose prosthesis might be incorrectly attributed to other causes. We lack reliable guidelines for diagnosing a loose radial head prosthesis that is symptomatic. Experience in Hip Arthroplasty has identified thigh pain as originating from the bone-prosthesis interface in the femoral canal, as opposed to the acetabulum or hip joint itself. The authors have recognized a similar phenomenon with radial head prostheses that has not yet been reported in the literature. Pain from a loose stem within the proximal radius may present as forearm pain. The medical records and radiographs of 14 consecutive cases (13 patients) with proximal radial forearm pain associated with a loose radial head prosthesis were reviewed retrospectively. From August 1999 to December 2006, 9 consecutive patients (10 cases) required revision surgery for painful aseptic loosening of a primary metal prosthetic radial head implant. One of the 9 patients required re-revision with a longer stem. A further 4 patients with symptomatic aseptic loosening have not yet been revised. The indication for revision surgery was painful loosening of the prosthesis within the canal of the proximal radius in 7 patients (8 cases) and pain with no evidence of loosening in 2 patients (2 cases). Various prosthetic designs had been used in the primary operations. In 12 of 14 cases the loosening was evident radiographically, but in 2 the only indication of a loose prosthesis (confirmed surgically) was proximal forearm pain. Revision or prosthetic removal eliminated the pain in 7 of 10 cases and decreased it in 1 Most of the patients who had relief of their forearm pain could tell in the first few days that the pain was gone following revision or removal of the loose radial head prosthetic component. One patient with moderate pain had an arthritic elbow and had no significant lasting relief from surgery. One patient was lost to follow-up. Follow-up averaged 27 months (range 1 to 66 months). Three of the 4 patients who had not yet undergone revision, were still awaiting revision and one did not want further surgery. In conclusion, the presence of radial sided proximal forearm pain in a patient with a radial head prosthesis is a strong indicator of symptomatic aseptic loosening. If the prosthesis has a textured surface for bone ingrowth, and was inserted without cement, we now consider this symptom to be diagnostic even in the absence of radiographic signs of loosening

Background. Comminuted radial head fractures are challenging to treat with open reduction and internal fixation. Complicating matters further, radial head fractures are often associated with other elbow fractures and soft tissue injuries. Radial head arthroplasty is a favorable technique for the treatment of radial head fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes of radial head arthroplasty using Modular Pyrocarbon radial head prosthesis in patients with unreconstructible radial head fractures. Methods. This single surgeon, single centre study retrospectively reviewed the functional and radiological outcomes of 21 consecutive patients requiring radial head arthroplasty for unreconstructible radial head fractures between July 2003 and July 2009. Patients were at least one year post-op and completed a Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI). These patients were independently physically examined and their post-operative radiographs were independently reviewed. Results. 21 patients (9 males and 12 females) were reviewed at a minimum of 12 months follow-up. The mean DASH score was 10.8 (0-34.1), the mean SF-36 physical score was 76.9 (35-96), the mean SF-36 mental score was 83.8 (60-94), and their MEPI score was 86.4 (70-100). Patients maintained 90% of their grip strength in their injured arm when compared to their un-injured arm and had 17. o. of fixed flexion in the affected arm. Radiologically, 14 cases had some degree of post-traumatic osteoarthritis, 12 cases had evidence of heterotrophic ossification, 5 had some evidence of periprosthetic lucency and 3 of our cases were radiologically but not functionally ‘overstuffed’. Conclusion. Radial Head Arthroplasty with Pyrocarbon Radial Head Prosthesis is a safe and effective option when treating unreconstructable comminuted radial head fractures yielding good functional and radiological outcomes and remains the treatment option of choice at our institution

Essex-Lopresti injuries are often unrecognized acutely with resulting debilitating adverse effects. Persistent axial forearm instability may affect load transmission at both the elbow and wrist, resulting in significant pain. In the setting of both acute and chronic injuries metallic radial head arthroplasty has been advocated, however there is little information regarding their outcome. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a radial head arthroplasty to address both acute and chronic Essex-Lopresti type injuries. A retrospective review from 2006 to 2016 identified 11 Essex-Lopresti type injuries at a mean follow-up of 18 months. Five were diagnosed and treated acutely at a mean of 11 days (range, 8 to 19 days) from injury, while 6 were treated in a delayed fashion at a mean of 1.9 years (range, 2.7 months to 6.2 years) from injury with a mean 1.5 (range, 0 to 4) prior procedures. The cohort included 10 males with a mean age was 44.5 years (range, 28 to 71 years). A smooth stem, modular radial head arthroplasty was used in all cases. Outcomes included range of motion and radiographic findings such as ulnar variance, capitellar erosion, implant positioning and implant lucency using a modification of the method described by Gruen. Reoperations, including the need for ulnar shortening osteotomy, were also recorded. Three patients in each group (55%) reported persistent wrist pain. The mean ulnar variance improved from +5 mm (range, 1.8 to 7 mm) to +3.7 mm (range, 1 to 6.3 mm) at the time of final follow-up or prior to reoperation. Three (50%) patients in the chronic group underwent a staged ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) to correct residual ulnar positive variance and to manage residual wrist pain. There were no reoperations in the acute group. Following USO, the ulnar variance in those three cases improved further to +3.5, +2.1, and −1.1 mm. No radial head prostheses required removal. Capitellar erosion was noted in five (45%) elbows, and was rated severe in one, moderate in two, and mild in two. Lucency about the radial head prosthesis stem was noted in eight (73%) cases, and rated as severe in 2 (18%), based on Gruen zones. Treatment of acute and chronic Essex-Lopresti lesions with radial head arthroplasty often results in persistent wrist pain. In the chronic setting, a planned USO was often necessary to restore axial forearm stability after radial head arthroplasty. Essex-Lopresti lesions represent a rare clinical entity that are difficult treat, particularly in the chronic setting. Early recognition and management with a smooth stem modular radial head arthroplasty may provide improved outcomes compared to chronic reconstruction

INTRODUCTION:. Radial head arthroplasty is a reliable procedure with good functional outcomes when faced with irreparable radial head fractures. Since the first attempt at arthroplasty by Speed in 1941, there have been a variety of different designs created for radial head prostheses. There has been considerable recent interest in bipolar radial head components. However, to date, there have been few biomechanical studies comparing bipolar components to their monopolar counterparts. We examine the effects of alteration of axial length of the radial head prosthesis and force conveyed at the radiocapitellar joint in a head-to-head comparison of bipolar implants to monopolar implants. METHODS:. Sixteen fresh-frozen, sided cadaveric arms were utilized. Radial heads were resected and either a monopolar, rigid, metal radial head prosthesis (Solar, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) was implanted or a bipolar metal prosthesis used (Katalyst, Integra, Plainsboro, NJ). Adjustments of radial head length were made in 2 mm increments using radiolucent washers to create an understuffed (−2), neutral (0), and overstuffed (+2, +4) effect, see Fig. 1. Forearms were cyclically loaded in compression from 13N to 130N with the forearm in neutral. Radiocapitellar forces were measured using Tekscan (Tekscan, Inc., Boston, MA) pressure sensors with radial head length set at −2 mm, 0, +2 mm and +4 mm and comparisons were made with the neutral (0) radial head, see Fig. 2. Multivariant ANOVA with Tukey's HSD correction was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS:. Radiocapitellar average peak pressures using monopolar and bipolar radial heads in arms that were understuffed (−2 mm), were 0.54 and 0.39 MPa, respectively; neutral (0 mm), 0.68 and 0.36 MPa; and overstuffed (+2 mm), 0.44 and 0.39 MPa; (+4 mm), 0.48 and 0.40 MPa, respectively. There was a noticeable stepwise increase in force transmitted with progressive radial head lengthening regardless of implant design. Radiocapitellar forces were almost 1.5 times greater with monopolar radial head overstuffing (+4) compared to neutral (0) while they essentially doubled with bipolar radial head overstuffing (+4) compared to neutral (0) (p < 0.01). The average change in measured values for the monopolar prostheses compared to the bipolar prostheses in the same arm are shown in Figure 2. DISCUSSION:. Progressive radial head lengthening regardless of implant design was associated with a stepwise increase in radiocapitellar joint force. Radiocapitellar forces where notably lower with the bipolar radial head when compared to their monopolar counterparts. This may in part be due to the bipolar design which allows for increased play at the radiocapitellar junction., see Fig. 3. Significance: Sizing and selection of the radial head implant plays a critical role in restoring native radiocapitellar loads and may prevent accelerated wear at the radiocapitellar joint after radial head arthroplasty. Figure 1 – Radial head length was controlled by applying 2 mm thick washers beneath the head, shown here with a monopolar prosthesis. Figure 2 – The bipolar radial head transmitted less force, greater contact area and lower peak pressures than with monopolar prostheses. Figure 3 – This radiographic image shows the potential for the bipolar radial head implant to realign to the joint under load

The proper management of radial head fractures is difficult and controversial. The radial head is intra-articular, part of the forearm ring and participates in both flexion and extension as well as in pronosupination. Our main goal in treating those fractures is anatomic restoration of the joint surface and early mobilization. Excision of the radial head, a well described procedure, may result in elbow instability and proximal migration of the radius. In this work we tried to avoid those complications by either conserving the head (ORIF) or by using a Radial head prosthesis. Material and Methods: 20 Patients were enrolled into the study between 2003–2004. They were divided into 2 groups. 10 patients had ORIF and in patients the Corin Radial head prosthesis was used. Post-op all patients started immediate CPM. All patients were followed-up for 12–28 months (average 18.6). XR were taken each time and clinical examination was done, ROM was noted as well as muscle strength. Elbow stability was tested only on the 2. nd. month post op. Patient satisfaction was noted based of their function ability, and the amount of pain. Pain was rated on a scale of 1–10. Results: Both groups passed the surgery uneventfully. No neurovascular damage nor infection were noted. In clinical examination the elbow was found to be stable in both groups. Decreased ROM in compare with the other elbow was found in both groups, but was more prominent in he ORIF group. One patient in the ORIF group in which biodegradable rod was used developed moderate synovitis that passed without intervention after 9 weeks. XR reveled that one patient in the ORIF group developed Heterotopic ossification, no dislocation or subluxation of the prosthesis was seen. Regarding to pain, in the ORIF group the patients rated their pain as milder in compare to those in the prosthetic group. Conclusions: Both methods result in stable elbow but the ORIF group showed tendency to experience less pains and the prosthesis group showed tendency to better ROM

Purpose: We conducted a retrospective study of 20 total elbow prostheses GUEPAR humerocubital and humeroradial (G3) implanted in 19 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. This anatomic metal-polyethylene prosthesis is available in a left and right model and in two sizes, large and small. A radial head prosthesis is now available in addition to the humerocubital prosthesis. The radial head prosthesis has an intramedullary metallic stem and a mobile polyethylene cup which comes in several sizes. Material and methods: Among 20 prostheses implanted between 1997 and 2001, four were first-generation prostheses which did not have a radial head. At three to four years, these four prostheses developed valgus instability with deterioration of the polyethylene of the cubital piece requiring revision with a new generation GUEPAR associated with a radial head. This gave two good results and two failures revised with a semi-constrained prosthesis. For the 16 other cases of rheumatoid disease, the G3 humerocubital prosthesis associated with a radial head was inserted. These 16 prostheses were followed two years and were retained for this analysis. The posterior approach was used with inverted-V section of the triceps using the surgical technique recommended by the promoters. Patients had permanent severe to moderate pain. The Mayo Clinic score (1992 including daily life activities) was 33/100. Radiographically, seven elbows were Larsen grade III, nine grade IV, seven grade IIA and nine grade IIIb (Larsen classification modified by the Mayo Clinic). Results: All patients were reviewed with mean follow-up of two years (1–5). The Mayo Clinic score improved from 33/100 to33/90 with outcome considered excellent in 15 elbows and fair in one. Discussion: We recommend total elbow prostheses for rheumatoid arthritis patients. Semi-constrained prostheses have indications in certain cases of massive destruction, but the minimally or non-constrained gliding prostheses, such as the GUEPAR prosthesis, are part of the evolution of these prostheses, just as was the case for knee prostheses. These good results can be expected to persist over time

The clinical case refers to a male patient, 34 years old, admitted at the Emergency Department after a fall of 2 meters. Of that trauma, resulted an exposed Monteggia fracture type III – Gustillo & Anderson IIA – on his left arm. With this work, the authors intend to describe the evolution of the patient's clinical condition, as well as the surgical procedures he was submitted to. The authors used the patient's records from Hospital's archives, namely from the Emergency Department, Operating Room, Infirmary and Consultation, and also the diagnostic exams performed throughout the patient's clinical evolution. The clinical case began in December 2011, when the patient suffered a fall of 2 meters in his workplace. From the evaluation in the Emergency Department, it was concluded that the patient presented, at the left forearm, an exposed Monteggia type III fracture – Gustillo & Anderson IIA – combined with a comminuted fracture of the radial head. At the admission day, the wound site was thoroughly rinsed, the fracture was reduced and immobilized with an above-the-elbow cast, and antibiotics were initiated. Six days after admission, the patient was submitted to open reduction with internal fixation with plate and screws of the fracture of the ulna and radial head arthroplasty. The postoperative period was uneventful. Two months after the surgical procedure, inflammatory signals appeared with purulent secretion in the ulnar suture. Accordingly, the patient was submitted to fistulectomy, rinsing of the surgical site and a cycle of antibiotics with Vancomycin, directed to the S. aureus isolated from the purulent secretion. The clinical evolution was unfavorable, leading to the appearance of a metaphyseal pseudarthrosis or the ulna and dislocation of the radial head prosthesis. The previously implanted material was therefore removed, 4 months after the traumatic event; at the same time an external fixation device was applied and the first part of a Masquelet Technique was conducted. The second part of the aforementioned procedure was carried out in December 2012. The patient was discharged from the consultation after a 2 years follow-up, with a range of motion of the left elbow acceptable for his daily living activities. In spite of the multiple surgical rinsing procedures and directed antibiotics, the development of a metaphyseal pseudarthrosis of the ulna was inevitable. This clinical case illustrates how the Masquelet Technique presents itself as a good solution for the cases of non-union of fractures in the context of infection

Purpose. Assess and report the functional and post-operative outcomes of complex acute radial head fractures with elbow instability treated by arthroplasty using an uncemented modular anatomic prosthesis. Methods. Over a 3-year period (2007–2010), 21 patients (mean age 51.9 years) were treated primarily with modular radial head arthroplasty (mean follow up of 27.1 months). Data was collected retrospectively using clinical notes, operation documentation and prospectively using validated scoring systems namely the Oxford Elbow Index, Quick DASH and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Associated elbow fractures, ligamentous injury and short to mid term post-operative outcomes including radiographic assessment were recorded. Results. The mean Oxford Elbow Score was 34.80 (range 20–48). The mean Quick Dash score was 26.01 (range 0–68.2). The Mayo Performance score showed 6 scored excellent, 5 scored good, 3 scored fair and 2 scored poor. Regarding post-operative outcomes, 1 patient had a radial head dislocation, 1 patient had prosthesis removal for ongoing pain and 1 patient had a total elbow replacement due to associated proximal ulna fracture non-union. 11 patients had an associated ligamentous injury of which 6 had an associated coronoid fracture. Of note, 7 patient's radiographs showed early signs of implant loosening; this was mainly asymptomatic. Conclusions. With regard to complex radial head fractures with elbow instability, patient outcome measures showed good functionality and overall patient satisfaction despite radiographic evidence of loosening. Post-operative complication rates were low. These findings support the use of this radial head prosthesis in arthoplasty surgery for the treatment of complex acute radial head fractures with elbow instability

To study the surgical outcome of multi-fragmentary, un-reconstructable radial head fractures managed acutely by a radial head prosthetic replacement, we retrospectively reviewed nineteen radial head fractures that were treated acutely with a radial head replacement, over a four-year period in three district general hospitals. Nineteen patients were clinically and radiologically assessed for this study. Functional assessment was performed with the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS). No patient achieved full functional range of motion. The average range of flexion was 110° (range 80° to 120°), average extension deficit of 35° (range 30° to 45°), average pronation was 35° (range 0° to 65°), and average supination was 50° (range 30° to 85°). Complications included implant removal due to loosening (n=1), elbow stiffness (n=2), and instability (n=1), the latter case requiring a revision of the radial head prosthesis. Some degree of persistent discomfort was noticed in all cases. Five patients were tolerant of the final functional outcome. The average Mayo elbow score was 68/100 (range 55 to 80). One patient had an intra-operative fracture of the radial metaphysis during insertion of the implant. Conclusions. Radial head replacement in general orthopaedic, low volume practice failed to achieve satisfactory results. Contrary to popular belief, it is a technically demanding operation, for which surveillance should be continued for a minimum of one year. Strict indications for prosthetic replacement should be followed and implant selection has yet to be proven to make a significant positive contribution. Our review highlights the need for a stricter adherence to indications; surgery should not be under-estimated and devolved to trainees, and our understanding of the radial axis of the elbow and forearm remains relatively rudimentary

Purpose. Radial head implant over-lengthening, a common cause of capitellar wear and clinical failure, is difficult to diagnose using radiographs of the injured elbow. The purpose of this study was to determine if a novel measurement technique based on contralateral elbow radiographs, termed the RACER method, could be used to accurately estimate the magnitude of radial head implant over-lengthening. Part I of this study examined the side-to-side consistency of radiographic landmarks used in the measurement technique. Part II of this study validated the technique using simulated radial head implant over-lengthening in a cadaveric model. Method. Part I: A side-to-side comparison of elbow joint dimensions was performed in 50 patients (100 radiographs). Part II: Radial head prostheses of varying lengths (0,+2mm,+4mm,+6mm,+8mm) were implanted in 4 paired cadaveric specimens (8 elbows). Radiographs were obtained and measurements were performed by 2 examiners blinded to implant size to determine if contralateral radiographs could diagnose and provide a valid estimate of the magnitude of implant over-lengthening. Intra and inter-rater reliability was determined. Results. No significant side-to-side differences (p>0.2) in radiographic measurements were identified between paired elbows. The RACER measurement technique using contralateral radiographs was successful in predicting the implant size (1mm) in 104 of 120 (87%) of scenarios tested. The sensitivity of the technique, the ability of the test to correctly identify over-lengthening when it was present within 1mm, was 98%. The intra-rater agreement for a single orthopaedic surgeon measuring on 2 separate occasions was excellent (ICC>0.90). The inter-rater agreement between two separate surgeons was also excellent, with the 95% lower confidence interval exceeding 0.90 in all cases. Conclusion. A novel measurement technique based on contralateral elbow radiographs can be used to diagnose and calculate the magnitude of radial head implant over-lengthening. Clinical Significance: Implantation of an incorrectly sized radial head prosthesis is not uncommon. The described technique can be used to effectively diagnose and determine the magnitude of over-lengthening

Introduction: Radial Head Arthroplasty is considered the treatment of choice for unreconstructable radial head fractures. Short-term results in the current literatue are promising. Due to the lack of long-term results, radial head arthroplasty is looked at critically by many surgeons. In our the study we provide the 8.4 years results after treatment with the floating radial head prosthesis by Judet (Tornier, France). Methods: In our department 19 patients were treated with bipolar radial head arthroplasty between 1997 and 2001. 11 prostheses were implantated primary and 6 secondary. The other two were implanted because of a loosening of a prior implanted prosthesis and one after resection of a vast chondrosarcoma. 12 of these patients − 10 men and 2 women – were now examined retrospectively after 101 months (78–132). Results: 6 Patients were treated primary, 5 secondary and one was treated because of a vast chondrosarcoma. There were 5 proximal ulna fractures and 8 processus coronoideus fractures as concomitant injuries of the elbow. Following complications were seen: 2 dislocations, 2 capitellar erosions and 4 cases of heterotopic ossifications. According to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score 4 patients achieved an excellent result, 7 a good, and one a satisfactory result. The mean DASH was 13.7 (0–44). No differences were seen between primary and secondary implantation. The flexion arc was 123° (110–140°), the extension deficit was 20° (0–40°), pronation 61° (30–90°) and supination 62° (40–90°). Conclusion: Our 8.4 years results show that radial head arthroplasty with Judet’s bipolar prosthesis leads to mostly excellent and good – subjective as well as objective – results

Purpose of the study: To present our experience in managing Sterno-Clavicular Joint (SCJ) problems. SCJ pain is caused by a number of pathological conditions that include primary, post-infection, and post-traumatic OsteoArthritis (OA), Sterno-Costo-Clavicular Hyperotosis (SCCH) and posttraumatic instability. Methods: All cases of painful SCJ problems treated surgically by the senior author over the past 20 years have been reviewed. Results: All operations have been carried out using a “necklace” thyroid type incision. OA in which the pain becomes chronic and disabling, has been treated surgically. Medial clavicle reshaping (2), or hemiarthroplasty with a radial head prosthesis (3), sometimes combined with an interpositional arthroplasty using a GraftJacket is a new technique, developed to obliterate dead space, improve wound cosmesis, and prevent regeneration of the medial clavicle. SCCH is strongly associated with seronegative spondyloarthropathy, and can from part of the SAPHO syndrome (Synovitis, Acne, Pustulosis, Hyperostosis, and Osteitis), Patients with severe excruciating pain and those with restricted motion resulting from complete fusion of the clavicle and sternum may be candidates for surgical treatment. Excision of the medial end of the clavicle (1), the whole clavicle (1) and replacement hemiarthroplasty using a radial head as well as a pectoralis major flap interposition between the first rib and the clavicle (1), is a technique that has not been described previously. Instability for persistent subluxation or dislocation of the SCJ has been treated with interposition with Graft-Jacket +/− medial clavicle resection (2) or a sterno-mastoid tendon stabilisation (2). Conclusions: Previous surgical treatment of SCJ problems has been disappointing. Rockwood’s success rate with excision of the medial end of the clavicle alone has been poor (40% good only) – these newer techniques show greater promise

Background: Posterior dislocation of the elbow with fractures of the radial head and coronoid process is a rare injury which, when treated conservatively, has a high redislocation rate and poor results (7/11 in the largest published series). Methods: Six patients with this injury were treated with triple reconstruction, involving exploration of the joint via a lateral approach with insertion of a radial head prosthesis. The coronoid fracture and anterior capsule was repaired (using an in-to-out technique) and the lateral collateral ligament was reat-tached, using Mitek Super Anchors. All patients were evaluated prospectively. Results: The average age was 52 years (37–75y). At one year follow up all elbows remained in joint and all were pain free or causing slight pain only. The average range of ulno-humeral movement was 55 degrees (range 38–68) and the average forearm rotation was 67 degrees (range 18–104). Functional assessment showed an average Liverpool score of 23/36 (range 17–29) and average Broberg and Morrey score of 74/100 (range 68–84). Conclusions: Triple reconstruction recognises and remedies the three elements of this devastating injury. All of these must be addressed in order to fulþll the short-term goal of restoring and maintaining stability. Our patients have a stable, pain free, though stiff, elbow in contrast to the poor results reported from previous conservative and operative treatments

Purpose: Unrepairable fractures of the radial head are often treated with radial head arthroplasty. Insertion of a radial head prosthesis that is too thick, or overstuffed, is believed to be a common complication that may result in pain, arthrosis, capitellar wear and decreased elbow range of motion. The purpose of this study was to develop guidelines for determining the appropriate thickness of radial head implants. We hypothesized that. radiographic incongruity of the medial facet of the ulnohumeral joint and that. the macroscopic presence of a gap in the lateral facet of the ulnohumeral joint correlate with radial head overstuffing. Method: Six human cadaveric upper extremities were used to evaluate the clinical and radiographic effects of overstuffing of a radial head arthroplasty. Each specimen received an anatomic radial head replacement and then underwent overstuffing with +2 mm, +4 mm, +6 mm and +8 mm lengths. Gross lateral ulnohumeral joint spaces were measured, and anteroposterior radiographs were taken of the elbow from which radiographic medial and lateral ulnohumeral joint spaces were measured. Results: Intraoperative gapping of the lateral ulnohumeral facet was shown to be highly reliable for detecting radial head overstuffing, increasing from a mean of 0.0 mm at standard length to 1.0 mm with 2 mm overstuffing (p < 0.05). Radiographically, the congruity of the lateral ulnohumeral facet was significantly different with 2 mm of overstuffing as compared to the anatomic length (p < 0.05). The congruity of the medial ulnohumeral facet only became significantly different with +6 mm of overstuffing as compared to the anatomic length (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Radiographic incongruity of the medial facet of the ulnohumeral joint was an unreliable indicator of radial head overstuffing. Radiographic gapping of the lateral ulnohumeral facet demonstrated sufficient sensitivity to diagnose radial head overstuffing when compare to the standard length implant radiographs. Visual gapping of the lateral ulnohumeral facet on the cadaver specimens reliably indicated radial head overstuffing and should be a useful anatomic feature to assess intraoperatively

Purpose of the study: Complex fracture-dislocation of the elbow, and subsequent surgical treatment, is often the source of a stiff joint. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a therapeutic protocol combining systematic insertion of a dynamic external fixator allowing early mobilization of the elbow with restitution of the radial height and the coronoid process. Material and methods: This consecutive series of ten patient, six men and four women, mean age 49 years, age range 27–67 years, underwent surgery from 2002 to 2004. Three patients presented a posterior Monteggia fracture (two type IIA, one type IId associated with comminutive fracture of the trochlea), four patients presented a dislocation associated with a Masson 4 fracture of the radial head and two presented inveterated dislocations diagnosed three weeks after the traumatic event. In all, seven patients presented a fracture of the radial head and six a fracture of the coronoid process. For all patients, the operation consisted in stabilization with a dynamic external fixator of the elbow associated or not with restoration of the radial height with a radial head prosthesis (n=4) and reconstitution of the coronoid process (n=6). The lateral ligaments had to be reinserted in four elbows. The comminutive fracture of the rochlea was treated with an iliac crest graft. Results: One patient died early. One patient presented pin tract infection and four developed heterotopic ossifications. At mean follow-up of twelve months, outcome was excellent in our patients, good in four, fair in one (Mayo clinic classification). All patients had a stable elbow. The mean range of motion was 89° flexion-extension and 145° pronationsupination. Conclusion: In this series, systematic use of external fixation for complex fracture-dislocation of the elbow joint yielded satisfactory results when the element stabilizing the joint were appropriately restored and when rehabilitation was undertaken early

Where reconstruction is deemed impossible, excision of the radial head has been the mainstay of treatment for shattered radial head and neck fractures. While some patients seem to do well after the procedure, some develop progressive instability and pain because of proximal translocation of the radius. We looked at a new procedure in which a metal radial head is inserted to provide greater stability after the excision. Historically silicone prostheses have been used, but these were found to fail dramatically after a time. We recruited 11 patients requiring radial head replacements. Their ages ranged from 26 to 54 years. In five patients the dominant arm was affected. The radial head was deemed non-reconstructable in all patients, and the alternative method of treatment would have been radial head excision. In one patient, radial head replacement was performed 14 years after previous radial head excision. A standardised procedure was performed, replacing the radial head with an Evolve modular radial head prosthesis. At follow-up, we assessed patient satisfaction, range of movement, overall stability of the prostheses, grip strength and return to full activity. The postoperative range of movement was assessed at three and six weeks, and the outcome in terms of mobility at six months. Supination ranged between 40( and 90( and pronation between 40( and 85(. Elbow extension ranged between -5( and -30 and flexion between 100( and 150(. We concede that the follow-up period has been short, but early results suggest that radial head replacement may be a good option in patients in whom radial head reconstruction is not possible

Introduction and Aims: To evaluate the results of radial head replacement in the primary management of radial head fractures. The recommended indications for prosthetic radial head replacement include unreconstructable Mason 3 fractures associated with ligament disruption or axial forearm instability. Method: We retrospectively reviewed all radial head fractures that were treated with a radial head replacement, over a four-year period, in two district general hospitals. All seven patients were finally assessed specifically for this study, either in person or by telephone/ postal questionnaire, with final radiographs obtained for this study. Results: Routine clinical follow-up was three months, following which the patient was discharged. No patient achieved full functional range of motion. The average range of flexion was 110 degrees (range 80 to 120 degrees), average extension deficit of 35 degrees (range 30 to 45 degrees), average pronation was 35 degrees (range 0 to 65 degrees), and average supination was 50 degrees (range 30 to 85 degrees). Three patients required implant removal due to loosening (1/3), elbow stiffness (2/3), and instability (1/3), the latter case requiring a revision of the radial head prosthesis. Persistent discomfort was noticed in all cases. Four patients were tolerant of the final functional outcome, although the average Mayo elbow score was 78/100 (range 55 to 80). Conclusion: Radial head replacement in general orthopaedic, low volume, practice failed to achieve satisfactory results. Contrary to popular belief, it is a technically demanding operation, for which surveillance should be continued for a minimum of one year. Strict indications for prosthetic replacement should be followed and implant selection has yet to be proven to make a significant positive contribution

Purpose- To study the surgical outcome of multi-fragmentary, un-reconstructable radial head fractures managed acutely by a radial head prosthetic replacement. Materials- We retrospectively reviewed fifteen radial head fractures that were treated acutely with a radial head replacement, over a four-year period, in three district general hospitals. Fifteen patients were clinically and radiologically assessed for this study. Functional assessment was performed with the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS). Results- No patient achieved full functional range of motion. The average range of flexion was 110° (range 80° to 120°), average extension deficit of 35° (range 30° to 45°), average pronation was 35° (range 0° to 65°), and average supination was 50° (range 30° to 85°). Complications included implant removal due to loosening (n=1), elbow stiffness (n=2), and instability (n=1), the latter case requiring a revision of the radial head prosthesis. Some degree of persistent discomfort was noticed in all cases. Five patients were tolerant of the final functional outcome. The average Mayo elbow score was 68/100 (range 55 to 80). One patient had an intra-operative fracture of the radial metaphysis during insertion of the implant. Conclusions- Radial head replacement in general orthopaedic, low volume, practice failed to achieve satisfactory results. Contrary to popular belief, it is a technically demanding operation, for which surveillance should be continued for a minimum of one year. Strict indications for prosthetic replacement should be followed and implant selection has yet to be proven to make a significant positive contribution. Our review highlights the need for a stricter adherence to indications, surgery should not be under-estimated and devolved to trainees, and our understanding of the radial axis of the elbow and forearm remains relatively rudimentary