Introduction. The prescription of opioids has increased in the last two decades. Recently, several states have developed online Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs aimed at preventing overprescribing of controlled substances. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been shown to provide improved early functional outcomes, faster recovery, and less postoperative morbidity and pain than total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study is to evaluate differences in opioid prescription requirements between patients undergoing TKA and UKA. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive series of primary TKA from January 2017 to July 2017 and primary UKA from January 2016 to July 2017 using standardized perioperative pain protocols. All patients that underwent any other procedure 6 months prior to and after index surgery were excluded, resulting in 740 TKA and 241 UKA. Demographic and comorbidity information was collected for all patients. Opioid prescriptions, morphine milligram equivalents (MME), sedatives, benzodiazepines, and stimulants were collected from State Controlled Substance Monitoring website 6 months prior and after index procedures. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed for patients that had a second prescription and continued use (defined as more than 6 months postoperatively). Results. Patients undergoing UKA had a second opioid prescription filled 50.2% of the time compared to 60.5% for TKA (p=0.006). In addition, continued opioid use after 6 months was 8.3% in UKAs compared to 11.8% in TKAs (p=0.149). When controlling for potential confounders, patients undergoing UKA were less likely to require a second prescription than TKA patients (adjusted odds ratio: 0.603 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.425–0.855). In addition, continued use of opioids after 6 months was also reduced compared to patients undergoing TKA (adjusted OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27–0.97) in the multivariate analysis. Other independent predictors of continued opioid use include obesity (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.07–3.00) and preoperative opioid use (OR 1.66 per script, 95% CI: 1.49–1.86). Our models for second script and continued use reported AUC scores of 0.65 and 0.85, respectively. Conclusion. Patients with UKA are less likely to require a second opioid prescription and have continued opioid use even when controlling for a variety of potential confounders. Given the reduced opioid requirements associated with UKA, this study supports that orthopaedic surgeons should adjust their prescription patterns and educate patients regarding expected analgesic needs. Due to the retrospective nature of this study we were unable to precisely quantify the amount of opioids consumed in these patient groups. An ongoing prospective study will more accurately determine the duration and quantity of opioid use after UKA compared to TKA

Excessive opioid prescriptions after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) increase risks for adverse opioid related events, chronic opioid use, and increase the availability of opioids for unlawful diversion. Thus, decreasing postoperative prescriptions may improve quality after TJA. Concerns exist that a decrease in opioids prescribed may increase complications such as readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits or worsened patient reported outcomes (PROs). The purpose of this quality improvement study was to explore whether a reduction in opioids prescribed after TJA resulted in increased complications. Methods: Data originated from a statewide arthroplasty database (MARCQI). The database collects over 96% of all TJA performed in the state of Michigan, USA. Data was prospectively abstracted and included OMEs prescribed at discharge, readmissions, ED visits within 30 days and PROs. Data was collected one year before and after the creation of an opioid prescribing protocol that had decreased prescriptions by approximately 50% in opioid naive and tolerant patients. Trends were monitored using Shewhart control charts. 84,998 TJA over two-years were included. All groups showed a reduction in opioids prescribed. Importantly, no increased complications occurred concomitant to this reduction. No increases in ED visits or readmissions, and no decreases in KOOSJR/HOOSJR/PROMIS10 scores were noted in any of the groups. Using large data sets and registries can drive performance and improve quality. The MARCQI Postoperative opioid prescription recommendations and performance measures decreased total oral morphine equivalents prescribed over a large and diverse population by approximately 50% without decreasing PROs or increasing ED visits or hospital readmissions. A reduction in opioids prescribed after TJA can be accomplished safely and without an increase in complications across a large population

Infection of the musculoskeletal (MSK) system is a dreaded complication that seems to be on the rise. Many factors, such as resistant bacteria or poor host factors, may influence such rise. This increase leads to greater resource consumption, especially due to antibiotic (ATB) prescription. Strategies must be created to detect patients at risk and prevent such infections. Hospital administrators should be made aware of the costs and impact of MSK infections in order to understand the need to prevent such complications. Therefore, our goal is to characterize the infected orthopaedic patient and evaluate the cost associated with ATB prescription in such cases. This is a retrospective and descriptive study, based on patient record analysis of all patients treated at our department, from January 2013 to March 2015. We identified 177 patients with a MSK infection and an isolated infectious agent. There was no predominance of either sex. Approximately 50% of patients were aged between 66 and 85 years old. Most frequent agents were MSSA (30,2%) and MRSA (21,8%), followed by Streptococcus species (8,9%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosas (7,1%). Although most patients were infected by a single agent, 18,6% had two or more causative agents isolated in cultures. Of those, 69,7% had either MSSA or MRSA as one of the isolated agents. Most commonly affected area was the hip (39,5%), followed by the knee (23,2%) and ankle (21,5%). Nearly all patients had had prior surgery, with arthroplasty and osteosynthesis as the most common procedures (52,4% and 33,3%, respectively). Infection related admission was responsible for a total of 6.116 hospital bed-days, with the majority of patients staying in hospital for up to 30 days (77,3%). Total cost of hospital ATB administration was 61.365,61€, with approximately 346,7€ spent in each patient. This corresponds to 42,6% of the total cost of medication during hospital stay (144.146,1€ of total cost, with 814,4€ per patient). The typical infected orthopaedic patient is aged 66 to 85 years old, was operated to his hip or knee, and either an arthroplasty or osteosynthesis was performed. Staphylococcus aureus remains the most common agent. MSK infections have significant costs associated with their treatment, and clinical departments should periodically re-evaluate discharged patients in order to understand what groups are at risk of developing such a complication. Only a correct identification of all these factors makes it possible to create a targeted preventive strategy, in order to reduce costs to the institution

The incidence of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in increasing. Evidence in primary hip and knee arthroplasty suggest that preoperative opioid use is a risk factor for postoperative complication. This relationship in TSA is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate this relationship. The Truven Marketscan claims database was used to identify patients who underwent a TSA and were enrolled for 1-year pre- and post-operatively. Preoperative opioid use status was used to divide patients into cohorts based on the number of preoperative prescriptions received. An ‘opioid holiday’ group (patients with a preoperative, 6-month opioid naïve period after chronic use) was also included. Patient information and complication data was collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were then performed. Fifty-six percent of identified patients received preoperative opioids. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients on continuous preoperative opioids (compared to opioid naïve) had higher odds of: infection (OR 2.34, 95%CI 1.62–3.36, p<0.001), wound complication (OR 1.97, 95%CI 1.18–3.27, p=0.009), any prosthetic complication (OR 2.62, 95%CI 2.2–3.13, p<0.001), and thromboembolic event (OR 1.42, 95%CI 1.11–1.83, p=0.006). The same group had higher healthcare utilization including extended length of stay, non-home discharge, readmission, and emergency department visits (p<0.001). This risk was reduced by a preoperative opioid holiday. Opioid use prior to TSA is common and is associated with increased complications and healthcare utilization. This increased risk is modifiable, as a preoperative opioid holiday significantly reduced postoperative risk. Therefore, preoperative opioid use represents a modifiable risk factor

The correct prescription of antibiotics for in-patients is paramount to patient safety. Trust policy states that all in-patients on antibiotics must have a start date, duration, and indication for antibiotics documented on the drug-card. On a single day all drug-cards were reviewed assessing whether documentation was in line with policy. In the initial audit, 28 antibiotic courses were prescribed; of these courses only 15 (53.5%) had an indication documented and 15 (53.5%) had a review/stop date documented. A monthly league table, coined ‘The Champions League’, was created. This named individuals who had correctly or incorrectly prescribed antibiotics, following identification in the monthly audit. It was published monthly and displayed in the doctors' office, on wards and circulated to all Consultants. After two published league tables, 19 antibiotic courses were prescribed. Indication was documented in 18 (94.7%) and 16 (84.2%) had the review date documented. This improvement has continued to the present day. Prescribing standards appear to have improved with the use of this novel motivational tool. The competitive nature of surgical trainees has led to the Champions League becoming a talking point. Top placed doctors are rewarded with Premiership rugby tickets and those who consistently underperform are sensitively offered remedial instruction

NICE guidelines state that patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty should start as an in-patient and then continue pharmacological VTE prophylaxis for 28–35 days. Retrospective review of all elective hip and knee arthroplasties during one calendar month gave a baseline measurement of how many patients had VTE prophylaxis prescribed on their discharge summary. A new, electronically completed, bespoke Trauma and Orthopaedic discharge summary was created with a discreet area clearly marked for VTE prophylaxis, to serve as a reminder to prescribe it. In March 2012, 93 patients underwent hip/knee arthroplasty. 76% (71/93) were prescribed VTE prophylaxis to take home, there was no clinical reason explaining the failure to prescribe prophylaxis in the remaining 24%. In July 2013, after implementation of the change, 117 patients underwent hip/knee arthroplasty. 99% (116/117) were prescribed VTE prophylaxis to take home. Repeat audit in October 2013 showed that 103 patients underwent hip/knee arthroplasty and 100% were prescribed VTE prophylaxis. A simple but clear change to paperwork, brought about a rapid and seemingly lasting change in the prescription of out-patient VTE prophylaxis. The improvement was seen before and after a change of the Junior Doctor workforce suggesting the change in documentation was the main influencing factor

Introduction. Rehabilitation after shoulder arthroplasty is a fundamental in enabling patients achieve a good functional outcome. Therapists must consider the underlying diagnosis, operative technique employed and rotator cuff integrity, amongst other factors, in order to select the most appropriate exercise regime. There is an absence of comprehensive studies in the literature with regard to shoulder rotational exercises. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the shoulder girdle muscle activation strategies during eight commonly cited rotational shoulder exercises. Method. Thirty healthy subjects with no history of shoulder problems participated in the study. EMG was recorded from 16 shoulder girdle muscles (surface electrodes: anterior, middle and posterior deltoid, upper, middle and lower trapezius, upper and lower latissimus dorsi, upper and lower pectoralis major; fine wire electrodes: supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis and rhomboid major) using a telemetry based EMG system. Five external and three internal rotation exercises were included (table 1). Signal acquisition and processing were in accordance with standardised guidelines. Amplitude normalisation was to external and internal rotation maximum voluntary contraction as appropriate. Mean EMG amplitudes between exercises were compared using repeated measures ANOVA. Data for muscle groups was calculated by averaging the activation of the component muscles. Results. External Rotation Exercises: significantly higher levels of deltoid activation were seen in external rotation at 90° abduction compared to the other external rotation exercises (73.7% vs 12.4–27.2%; p < 0.001). Peri-scapular muscle activation was highest in external rotation at 90° abduction and prone external rotation (76.7–83.2% vs 28.2–45.5%; p = 0.013 − <0.001). Activation of latissimus dorsi and teres major was significantly higher during prone external rotation (64.1% vs 18.1–48.4%; p < 0.001). Activation of the rotator cuff muscles was similar across all exercises. Internal Rotation Exercises: the highest deltoid activity was seen during internal rotation at 90°abduction, followed by zero-position internal rotation. It was lowest during internal rotation at 0°abduction (261.6% vs 190.1% vs 40.9%; p = 0.003 − <0.001). A similar activation pattern was also seen for peri-scapular muscles. The highest activation of pectoralis major was seen during zero-position internal rotation (25.4% vs 4.9–15.7%; p = 0.002 − <0.001). Significantly higher levels of rotator cuff activation were seen during internal rotation at 90° abduction (325.0% vs 94.0–188.3%; p = 0.005–0.017). Discussion and Conclusion. This study provides a comprehensive description of muscles activation during common rotational shoulder exercises. It enables therapists to target specific muscles for rehabilitation following shoulder surgery, while minimising the activation of others. Understanding the activation profile of the shoulder girdle muscles during individual exercises forms the basis for exercise prescription and the development of tailored and individual physiotherapy protocols

Object: To assess the benefit of prescribed Iron supplementation on the recovery of patient’s Haemoglobin level after elective joint replacement. Design: A Prospective, Randomised Trial was undertaken. All patients undergoing elective arthroplasty (Hip, Knee, and Revision Hip) at our unit were considered. Qualifying parameters included: a normal store of Iron (Fe) prior to surgery (based on the serum Ferrittin level) and normal markers of inflammation (serum C - reactive protein [CRP] and erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]). Elevated CRP and ESR are known to be factors affecting the serum Ferrittin level. Method: 318 patients undergo joint replacement from May 2004 to Oct 2004 were considered for the study. 208 patients were excluded for the following reasons: 52 patients had low serum Ferrittin level or elevated ESR and CRP levels pre-operatively. 156 patients was normal post operative Haemoglobin (> 11 mg %). This left 110 patients with normal pre-operative inflammatory markers and Iron stores. This cohort formed the basis of the study and was randomised to either receiving prescribed Iron Supplementation (Oral Ferrous Sulphate) twice a day for 8 week or no supplementation. Randomisation was performed based on the month of surgery. Even numbered months received the intervention, odd numbered did not. Post-operatively all patients had serum Haemoglobin checked at intervals 2. nd. –7. th. day and 8 weeks. Results: There was no significant different in mean Haemoglobin level between treatment group i.e. 12.72 mg% (10.8–15.4) and controlled group 12.71 mg% (11–15.3) at 8 weeks follow up. Conclusion: The prescription of oral Iron in healthy postoperative joint replacement patients did not hasten the recovery of Haemoglobin level provided adequate tissue Iron stores were present. The use of Fe supplementation provides no benefit in these patients and our study confirms this. Iron supplementation therapy should be reserved for patients identified pre-operatively with either low Iron stores or elevated serum inflammatory markers

Aim: To identify the incidence of regular medication not being prescribed on initial admission of emergency surgical cases

Material and Method: The data for this audit was taken from all surgical admissions over an approximately one month period between December 2004 and January 2005. Prescribed drugs for each patient were checked the morning after admission. If the patient was unable to provide this information, we obtained their regular medication list from the GP.

A total of 71 admissions were studied, 58% were referred from A& E, whereas 34% from the GP or primary care and a small percentage came from referrals from other wards within the hospital.

Results: Out of the 71 admissions, 46 patients were receiving at least one regular medication. Obviously, some patients were on medications for more than one disease and these were looked at individually.

From all 71 admissions, 21% of them had at least one error, i.e. at least one regular medication was not prescribed on admission.

If there was a documented reason for the omission of a particular drug then this was not counted as an error.

Analysing each co morbidity individually, 42% of IHD medication were not prescribed despite being taken on a regular basis by the patient, 33% for hypertensive and diabetic medication, 50% for asthmatic and psychiatric medication and 29% for medication for other less serious conditions.

81% of the errors made were on patients referred from A& E, while 15% where from patients received from the GP/primary care. Only 4% of the errors was made on patients referred from other wards. However, A& E referrals were almost double those of GPs. Hence, in a total of 41 A& E referrals 21 errors were made, while in a total of 24 GP referrals only 4 errors were made. Only 1 error was made in the total of 6 ward referrals.

Conclusion and Discussion: The results of this audit are surprising and alarming. 21% of admissions had at least one regular medication not prescribed by the admitting doctors.

Missing out on regular medication can have potentially life-threatening effects on patients as well as severe medico-legal implications.

Most of the mistakes were being made with patients that are referred from the accident and emergency department. These patients are generally more unwell than the ones referred from the GP or primary care, and quite often are elderly patients on a multitude of drugs that are unable to remember some or all of their tablets. Patients admitted out of hours present an added difficulty in that GPs are not available for confirmation of the patient’s regular medication.

So, more care and emphasis need to be given on drug history when admitting a patient.

Aims. The increase in prescription opioid misuse and dependence is now a public health crisis in the UK. It is recognized as a whole-person problem that involves both the medical and the psychosocial needs of patients. Analyzing aspects of pathophysiology, emotional health, and social wellbeing associated with persistent opioid use after injury may inform safe and effective alleviation of pain while minimizing risk of misuse or dependence. Our objectives were to investigate patient factors associated with opioid use two to four weeks and six to nine months after an upper limb fracture. Methods. A total of 734 patients recovering from an isolated upper limb fracture were recruited in this study. Opioid prescription was documented retrospectively for the period preceding the injury, and prospectively at the two- to four-week post-injury visit and six- to nine-month post-injury visit. Bivariate and multivariate analysis sought factors associated with opioid prescription from demographics, injury-specific data, Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Instrumentation System (PROMIS), Depression computer adaptive test (CAT), PROMIS Anxiety CAT, PROMIS Instrumental Support CAT, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), and measures that investigate levels of social support. Results. A new prescription of opioids two to four weeks after injury was independently associated with less social support (odds ratio (OR) 0.26, p < 0.001), less instrumental support (OR 0.91, p < 0.001), and greater symptoms of anxiety (OR 1.1, p < 0.001). A new prescription of opioids six to nine months after injury was independently associated with less instrumental support (OR 0.9, p < 0.001) and greater symptoms of anxiety (OR 1.1, p < 0.001). Conclusion. This study demonstrates that potentially modifiable psychosocial factors are associated with increased acute and chronic opioid prescriptions following upper limb fracture. Surgeons prescribing opioids for upper limb fractures should be made aware of the screening and management of emotional and social health. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(2):119–124

Canada is second only to the United States worldwide in the number of opioid prescriptions per capita. Despite this, little is known about prescription patterns for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to detail preoperative opioid use patterns and investigate the effect it has on perioperative quality outcomes in patients undergoing elective total hip and total knee arthroplasty surgery (THA and TKA). The study cohort was constructed from hospital Discharge Abstract Data (DAD) and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS) data, using Canadian Classification of Health Intervention codes to select all primary THA and TKA procedures from 2017-2020 in Nova Scotia. Opioid use was defined as any prescription filled at discharge as identified in the Nova Scotia Drug Information System (DIS). Emergency Department (ED) and Family Doctor (FD) visits for pain were ascertained from Physician Claims data. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test for associations controlling for confounders. Chi-squared statistics at 95% confidence level used to test for statistical significance. In total, 14,819 TJA patients were analysed and 4306 patients (29.0%) had at least one opioid prescription in the year prior to surgery. Overall, there was no significant difference noted in preoperative opiate use between patients undergoing TKA vs THA (28.8% vs 29.4%). During the period 2017-2019 we observed a declining year-on-year trend in preoperative opiate use. Interestingly, this trend failed to continue into 2020, where preoperative opiate use was observed to increase by 15% and exceeded 2017 levels. Within the first 90 days of discharge, 22.9% of TKA and 20.9% of THA patients presented to the ED or their FD with pain related issues. Preoperative opiate use was found to be a statistically significant predictor for these presentations (TKA: odds ratio [OR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29 to 1.62; THA: OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.65). Preoperative opioid consumption in TJA remains high, and is independently associated with a higher risk of 90 day return to the FD or ED. The widespread dissemination of opioid reduction strategies introduced during the middle of the last decade may have reduced preoperative opiate utilisation. Access barriers and practice changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic may now have annulled this effect

Aim. The primary aim of this quality improvement project was to assess compliance with BOAST 4 guidelines for the delivery of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients presenting to a major trauma centre with open limb fracture and evaluate the impact of implemented changes on attainment of these guidelines. Secondary aims were to assess adherence to local guidelines for the type of antibiotic prescribed. Method. A multi-cycle audit and quality improvement project was carried out for all patients presenting to Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust (BSUH) with open limb fractures from 1st September 2018 to 31st January 2019, and 1. st. November 2019 to 31. st. March 2020. Patients were identified through retrospective screening of electronic operation records (Bluespier) by authors, and paper records were subsequently reviewed for data pertaining to antibiotic prescriptions. Following the initial audit cycle, targeted teaching was carried out for orthopaedic trainees, new posters were placed in key clinical areas to highlight local guidelines, and alterations to the trauma clerking proforma were implemented, to include BOAST 4 guidelines. Results. In cycle 1, a total of 52 patients received surgical treatment for open limb fractures, of which 48 (92.3%) were prescribed antibiotics prior to definitive management, with a mean time to administration of 271 minutes. Of these, 41 (78.8%) received prescriptions according to BSUH guidelines. The use of STAT prescriptions was found to significantly reduce the mean time to administration from 298 minutes to 144 minutes (p = 0.044). In cycle 2, a total of 29 patients received surgical treatment for open limb fractures, of which all 100% were prescribed antibiotics prior to definitive management, with a reduced mean time to administration (233 minutes). Of these, 26 (89.7%) received prescriptions according to BSUH guidelines, and a significantly greater proportion (p = 0.0003) received initial STAT ‘once-only’ prescriptions (51.7% vs. 15.4%). Conclusions. This quality improvement project has demonstrated the successful implementation of targeted changes to improve the attainment of BOAST 4 guidelines. Following a multi-cycle audit, all patients now receive antibiotic prophylaxis, with a higher proportion receiving antibiotics according to local BSUH guidelines. Furthermore, the use of STAT ‘once-only’ prescriptions, which was shown to be beneficial during the first audit cycle, has now significantly increased following intervention

This study aims to 1) determine reported cannabis use among patients waiting for thoracolumbar surgery and to 2) identify demographics and health differences between cannabis-users and non-cannabis users. This observational cohort study is a retrospective national multicenter review data from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network registry. Patients were dichotomized as cannabis users and non-cannabis users. Variables of interest: age, sex, BMI, smoking status, education, work status, exercise, modified Oswestry Disability Index (mODI), the Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) for leg and back pain, tingling/numbness scale, SF-12 Quality of Life Questionnaire - Mental Health Component (MCS), use of prescription cannabis, recreational cannabis, and narcotic pain medication. Continuous variables were compared using an independent t-test and categorical variables were compared using chi-square analyses. Cannabis-use was reported by 28.4% of pre-operative patients (N=704), 47% of whom used prescription cannabis. Cannabis-use was reported most often by patients in Alberta (43.55%), British Colombia (38.09%) and New Brunswick (33.73%). Patients who reported using cannabis were significantly younger (mean=52.9 versus mean=61.21,). There was a higher percentage of concurrent narcotic-use (51.54 %) and smoking (21.5%) reported in cannabis-users in comparison to non-cannabis users (41.09%,p=0.001; 9.51%, p=0.001, respectively). There were significant differences in cannabis-use based on pathology (p=0.01). Patients who report using cannabis had significantly worse MCS scores (difference=3.93, p=0.001), and PHQ-8 scores (difference=2.51, p=0.001). There was a significant difference in work status (p=0.002) with cannabis-users reporting higher rates (20%) of being employed, but not working compared to non-cannabis users (11.13%). Non-cannabis users were more likely to be retired (45.92%) compared to cannabis-users (31.31%). There were no significant differences based on cannabis use for sex, education, exercise, NRS-back, NRS-Leg, tingling-leg, mODI, or health state. Thoracolumbar spine surgery patients are utilizing cannabis prior to surgery both through recreational use and prescription. Patients who are using cannabis pre-operatively did not differ in regards to reported pain or disability from non-users, though they did in demographic and mental health variables

This study aims to 1) determine reported cannabis use among patients waiting for thoracolumbar surgery and to 2) identify demographics and health differences between cannabis-users and non-cannabis users. This observational cohort study is a retrospective national multicenter review data from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network registry. Patients were dichotomized as cannabis users and non-cannabis users. Variables of interest: age, sex, BMI, smoking status, education, work status, exercise, modified Oswestry Disability Index (mODI), the Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) for leg and back pain, tingling/numbness scale, SF-12 Quality of Life Questionnaire - Mental Health Component (MCS), use of prescription cannabis, recreational cannabis, and narcotic pain medication. Continuous variables were compared using an independent t-test and categorical variables were compared using chi-square analyses. Cannabis-use was reported by 28.4% of pre-operative patients (N=704), 47% of whom used prescription cannabis. Cannabis-use was reported most often by patients in Alberta (43.55%), British Colombia (38.09%) and New Brunswick (33.73%). Patients who reported using cannabis were significantly younger (mean=52.9 versus mean=61.21,). There was a higher percentage of concurrent narcotic-use (51.54 %) and smoking (21.5%) reported in cannabis-users in comparison to non-cannabis users (41.09%,p=0.001; 9.51%, p=0.001, respectively). There were significant differences in cannabis-use based on pathology (p=0.01). Patients who report using cannabis had significantly worse MCS scores (difference=3.93, p=0.001), and PHQ-8 scores (difference=2.51, p=0.001). There was a significant difference in work status (p=0.002) with cannabis-users reporting higher rates (20%) of being employed, but not working compared to non-cannabis users (11.13%). Non-cannabis users were more likely to be retired (45.92%) compared to cannabis-users (31.31%). There were no significant differences based on cannabis use for sex, education, exercise, NRS-back, NRS-Leg, tingling-leg, mODI, or health state. Thoracolumbar spine surgery patients are utilizing cannabis prior to surgery both through recreational use and prescription. Patients who are using cannabis pre-operatively did not differ in regards to reported pain or disability from non-users, though they did in demographic and mental health variables

Aims. This study was designed to develop a model for predicting bone mineral density (BMD) loss of the femur after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using artificial intelligence (AI), and to identify factors that influence the prediction. Additionally, we virtually examined the efficacy of administration of bisphosphonate for cases with severe BMD loss based on the predictive model. Methods. The study included 538 joints that underwent primary THA. The patients were divided into groups using unsupervised time series clustering for five-year BMD loss of Gruen zone 7 postoperatively, and a machine-learning model to predict the BMD loss was developed. Additionally, the predictor for BMD loss was extracted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). The patient-specific efficacy of bisphosphonate, which is the most important categorical predictor for BMD loss, was examined by calculating the change in predictive probability when hypothetically switching between the inclusion and exclusion of bisphosphonate. Results. Time series clustering allowed us to divide the patients into two groups, and the predictive factors were identified including patient- and operation-related factors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for the BMD loss prediction averaged 0.734. Virtual administration of bisphosphonate showed on average 14% efficacy in preventing BMD loss of zone 7. Additionally, stem types and preoperative triglyceride (TG), creatinine (Cr), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and creatine kinase (CK) showed significant association with the estimated patient-specific efficacy of bisphosphonate. Conclusion. Periprosthetic BMD loss after THA is predictable based on patient- and operation-related factors, and optimal prescription of bisphosphonate based on the prediction may prevent BMD loss. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(4):184–192

Success treating AIS with bracing is related to time worn and scoliosis severity. Temperature monitoring can help patients comply with their orthotic prescription. Routinely collected temperature data from the start of first brace treatment was reviewed for 14 patients. All were female with an average age of 12.4 years (range 10.3–14.6) and average 49o Cobb angle (30–64). Our current service recommendation is brace wear for 20 hours a day. Patients complied with this prescription 38.0% of the time, with four patients averaging this or more. Average brace wear was 16.3 hours per day (3.5–22.2). There were 13 patients who had completed brace treatment. The majority had surgery (7/13; 54%) or were considering surgery (1/13; 8%). There were 5 who did not wish surgery at discharge (5/13; 38%); 1 achieved a 40o Cobb angle, with 4 larger (53o;53o;54o;68o). The Bracing in AIS Trial (BrAIST) study measured “success” as less than a 50o Cobb angle, so using this metric our cohort has had a single “success”. Temperature monitors allowed an analysis of when patients were achieving their brace wear. When comparing daywear (8am-8pm) to nightwear (8pm-8am), patients wore their brace an average of 7.6 hours a day (2.5–11.2) and 8.7 hours a night (0.4–11.5). We conclude the minority of our patients comply with our current 20 hour orthotic prescription. The “success” of brace treatment is lower than comparison studies despite higher average compliance but starting with a larger scoliosis. Brace wear is achieved during both the day and night

Orthopaedic surgeons prescribe more opioids than any other surgical speciality. Opioids remain the analgesic of choice following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery. There is growing evidence that opioid-sparing protocols may reduce postoperative opioid consumption while adequately addressing patients’ pain. However, there are a lack of prospective, comparative trials evaluating their effectiveness. The objective of the current randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modal, opioid-sparing approach to postoperative pain management in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder and knee surgery. The NO PAin trial is a pragmatic, definitive RCT (NCT04566250) enrolling 200 adult patients undergoing outpatient shoulder or knee arthroscopy. Patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an opioid-sparing group or standard of care. The opioid-sparing group receives a three-pronged prescription package consisting of 1) a non-opioid prescription: naproxen, acetaminophen and pantoprazole, 2) a limited opioid “rescue prescription” of hydromorphone, and 3) a patient education infographic. The control group is the current standard of care as per the treating surgeon, which consists of an opioid analgesic. The primary outcome of interest is oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption up to 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcomes are postoperative pain scores, patient satisfaction, quantity of OMEs prescribed and number of opioid refills. Patients are followed at both 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Data analysts and outcome assessors are blinded to the treatment groups. As of December 1, 2021 we have enrolled 166 patients, reaching 83% of target enrolment. Based on the current recruitment rate, we anticipate that enrolment will be completed by the end of January 2022 with final follow-up and study close out completed by March of 2022. The final results will be released at the Canadian Orthopaedic Association Meeting in June 2022 and be presented as follows. The mean difference in OME consumption was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in OMEs prescribed was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in Visual Analogue Pain Scores (VAS) and patient satisfaction are XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The absolute difference in opioid refills was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The results of the current study will demonstrate whether an opioid sparing approach to postoperative outpatient pain management is effective at reducing opioid consumption while adequately addressing postoperative pain in patients undergoing outpatient shoulder and knee arthroscopy. This study is novel in the field of arthroscopic surgery, and its results will help to guide appropriate postoperative analgesic management following these widely performed procedures

Orthopaedic surgeons prescribe more opioids than any other surgical speciality. Opioids remain the analgesic of choice following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery. There is growing evidence that opioid-sparing protocols may reduce postoperative opioid consumption while adequately addressing patients’ pain. However, there are a lack of prospective, comparative trials evaluating their effectiveness. The objective of the current randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modal, opioid-sparing approach to postoperative pain management in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder and knee surgery. The NO PAin trial is a pragmatic, definitive RCT (NCT04566250) enrolling 200 adult patients undergoing outpatient shoulder or knee arthroscopy. Patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an opioid-sparing group or standard of care. The opioid-sparing group receives a three-pronged prescription package consisting of 1) a non-opioid prescription: naproxen, acetaminophen and pantoprazole, 2) a limited opioid “rescue prescription” of hydromorphone, and 3) a patient education infographic. The control group is the current standard of care as per the treating surgeon, which consists of an opioid analgesic. The primary outcome of interest is oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption up to 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcomes are postoperative pain scores, patient satisfaction, quantity of OMEs prescribed and number of opioid refills. Patients are followed at both 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Data analysts and outcome assessors are blinded to the treatment groups. As of December 1, 2021 we have enrolled 166 patients, reaching 83% of target enrolment. Based on the current recruitment rate, we anticipate that enrolment will be completed by the end of January 2022 with final follow-up and study close out completed by March of 2022. The final results will be released at the Canadian Orthopaedic Association Meeting in June 2022 and be presented as follows. The mean difference in OME consumption was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in OMEs prescribed was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in Visual Analogue Pain Scores (VAS) and patient satisfaction are XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The absolute difference in opioid refills was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The results of the current study will demonstrate whether an opioid sparing approach to postoperative outpatient pain management is effective at reducing opioid consumption while adequately addressing postoperative pain in patients undergoing outpatient shoulder and knee arthroscopy. This study is novel in the field of arthroscopic surgery, and its results will help to guide appropriate postoperative analgesic management following these widely performed procedures

Aims. National hip fracture registries audit similar aspects of care but there is variation in the actual data collected; these differences restrict international comparison, benchmarking, and research. The Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) published a revised minimum common dataset (MCD) in 2022 to improve consistency and interoperability. Our aim was to assess compatibility of existing registries with the MCD. Methods. We compared 17 hip fracture registries covering 20 countries (Argentina; Australia and New Zealand; China; Denmark; England, Wales, and Northern Ireland; Germany; Holland; Ireland; Japan; Mexico; Norway; Pakistan; the Philippines; Scotland; South Korea; Spain; and Sweden), setting each of these against the 20 core and 12 optional fields of the MCD. Results. The highest MCD adherence was demonstrated by the most recently established registries. The first-generation registries in Scandinavia collect data for 60% of MCD fields, second-generation registries (UK, other European, and Australia and New Zealand) collect for 75%, and third-generation registries collect data for 85% of MCD fields. Five of the 20 core fields were collected by all 17 registries (age; sex; surgery date/time of operation; surgery type; and death during acute admission). Two fields were collected by most (16/17; 94%) registries (date/time of presentation and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade), and five more by the majority (15/17; 88%) registries (type, side, and pathological nature of fracture; anaesthetic modality; and discharge destination). Three core fields were each collected by only 11/17 (65%) registries: prefracture mobility/activities of daily living; cognition on admission; and bone protection medication prescription. Conclusion. There is moderate but improving compatibility between existing registries and the FFN MCD, and its introduction in 2022 was associated with an improved level of adherence among the most recently established programmes. Greater interoperability could be facilitated by improving consistency of data collection relating to prefracture function, cognition, bone protection, and follow-up duration, and this could improve international collaborative benchmarking, research, and quality improvement. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(9):1013–1019

Aims. The overall aim of this study was to determine the impact of deprivation with regard to quality of life, demographics, joint-specific function, attendances for unscheduled care, opioid and antidepressant use, having surgery elsewhere, and waiting times for surgery on patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. Postal surveys were sent to 1,001 patients on the waiting list for THA or TKA in a single Northern Ireland NHS Trust, which consisted of the EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), visual analogue scores (EQ-VAS), and Oxford Hip and Knee Scores. Electronic records determined prescriptions since addition to the waiting list and out-of-hour GP and emergency department attendances. Deprivation quintiles were determined by the Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure 2017 using postcodes of home addresses. Results. Overall, 707 postal surveys were returned, of which 277 (39.2%) reported negative “worse than death” EQ-5D scores and 219 (21.9%) reported the consumption of strong opioids. Those from the least deprived quintile 5 had a significantly better EQ-5D index (median 0.223 (interquartile range (IQR) -0.080 to 0.503) compared to those in the most deprived quintiles 1 (median 0.049 (IQR -0.199 to 0.242), p = 0.004), 2 (median 0.076 (IQR -0.160 to 0.277; p = 0.010), and 3 (median 0.076 (IQR-0.153 to 0.301; p = 0.010). Opioid use was significantly greater in the most deprived quintile 1 compared to all other quintiles (45/146 (30.8%) vs 174/809 (21.5%); odds ratio 1.74 (95% confidence interval 1.18 to 2.57; p = 0.005). Conclusion. More deprived patients have worse health-related quality of life and greater opioid use while waiting for THA and TKA than more affluent patients. For patients awaiting surgery, more information and alternative treatment options should be available. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(5):444–451