Amputation is one of the most feared injuries in service personnel, particularly a worry that it will mean the end of their military career. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome, in relation to military service in UK military amputees. UK service personnel who sustain an amputation undergo rehabilitation and prosthetic limb fitting at the Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre Headley Court. This includes a realistic assessment of their employment capabilities, and they are graded by a Functional Activity Assessment (FAA). FAA ranges from 1 (fully fit) to 5 (unfit all duties). In addition the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) is completed on initial admission and at follow-up. We reviewed this information to determine the outcome of military amputees. We identified 53 casualties who had sustained amputations. 8 had sustained an upper limb amputation, 41 a lower limb amputation, and 4 had sustained both an upper and lower limb amputation. 9 patients (including 1 Reservist) have left the forces by medical discharge, with the remaining 44 continuing to serve. 32 of the 44 have returned to work, albeit at a lower level. 49 patients have FAA grades and are at least 6 months post-injury. No patients were graded as FAA 1, 8 as FAA 2 (Fit for Trade and fit for restricted General or Military Duties), 18 as FAA 3 (Unfit for Trade but fit for restricted General or Military Duties), 18 as FAA 4 (Unfit for all but Sedentary Duties) and 5 as FAA 5. All bilateral and triple amputees were FAA 4 or 5. Other injuries such as blindness, severe brain injury or mental health issues also increased the FAA. Of the 32 patients who have returned to work, 8 are FAA 2, 12 are FAA 3, 11 are FAA 4, and 1 has not been graded. SF-36 data was available in 40 patients, available as paired scores for 34. The mean time between SF-36 scoring was 6.7 months (range 0.2 – 17.4). The mean SF-36 scores for Physical Component Summary (PCS) increased from 34.40 (SD 9.3) to 42.06 (SD 11.1), with Mental Component Summary (MCS) 52.01 (SD12.9) remaining similar at 52.92 (SD 12.0). Pre- and post-rehabilitation PCS scores improved with rehabilitation (p=0.0003). MCS scores were similar in these patients to the normal population, 50 (SD 10). No differences could be found within the unilateral lower limb amputation group regarding amputation level (trans-tibial, through-knee disarticulation, trans-femoral) and SF-36 scoring. Furthermore due to the low numbers, no conclusion could be made comparing the unilateral lower limb amputation group with the bilateral lower limb group, the unilateral lower limb plus upper limb, the bilateral lower limb and upper limb (trilateral), and the isolated upper limb groups. This study is the first to report the outcomes, with regards to return to work, of the UK military amputee population injured in Afghanistan and Iraq. There is an almost even distribution of FAA score between 2, 3, and 4 for those back at work. Level of amputation and SF-36 scores do not seem to correlate, partly due to other injuries sustained that confound the patients’ perception of their health. SF-36 PCS scores increase significantly with rehabilitation, whilst MCS remain similar to the normal population

The aim of the study was to investigate the attitudes and beliefs of military physiotherapists utilising the ‘Health care providers beliefs attitudes and impairments scale’ devised by Rainville et al (1994). The scale is a valid and reliable tool which indicates the likelihood of advice given to patients with a low back pain is either pro active or fear avoidant. The scale has been utilised amongst health care professionals and has shown a high degree of correlation with patient vignettes. A high score on the HC- PAIRS, is indicative of that advice given to patients is generally fear avoidant and cautious. Conversely, a low score supports current research and indicates that pro-active advice is more likely to be given to the patient. The HC PAIRS questionnaire was distributed to all 90 military physiotherapists currently serving in a clinical role. The questionnaire was accompanied by a letter explaining that the nature of the study and requesting the questionnaire be completed and that the biographical information of gender, rank, age range, years military service, years physiotherapy experience, qualification to practice as a physiotherapist and highest academic qualification obtained be recorded. A total of 83 returns were received. Statistical analysis was undertaken using the SPSS (version 14) statistical package. Results indicated a mean score of 50.86(SD 10.189). Military service equated to a mean of 8.86 years (SD 9.153), whilst physiotherapy experience gave a mean of 8.87 years (SD 6.327). Further statistical analysis was undertaken to establish whether there was a correlation between any of the biographical data collected and of the HC-PAIRS score. No correlation of statistical significance was identified in any of the categories. The results obtained from the military physiotherapists are very similar to those obtained in similar studies utilising civilian physiotherapists, moderately fear avoidant. Attitudes and beliefs would appear to be developed very early in the physiotherapist’s career, exposure to both clinical experience and military culture would appear to have minimal impact on these beliefs. This has important implications when changes to traditional management strategies are being considered and implemented. Correspondence should be addressed to Major M Butler RAMC, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, Devon

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) occur in 10% of combat casualties. In the immediate field-hospital setting, an insensate limb can affect the surgeon's assessment of limb viability and in the long-term PNI remain a source of considerable morbidity. Therefore the aims of this study are to document the recovery of combat PNI, as well as report on the effect of current medical management in improving functional outcome. In this study, we present the largest series of combat related PNI in Coalition troops since World War II. From May 2007 – May 2010, 100 consecutive patients (261 nerve injuries) were prospectively reviewed in a specialist PNI clinic. The functional recovery of each PNI was determined using the MRC grading classification (good, fair and poor). In addition, the incidence of neuropathic pain, the results of nerve grafting procedures, the return of plantar sensation, and the patients' current military occupational grading was recorded. At mean follow up 26.7 months, 175(65%) of nerve injuries had a good recovery, 57(21%) had a fair recovery and 39(14%) had a poor functional recovery. Neuropathic pain was noted in 33 patients, with Causalgia present in 5 cases. In 27(83%) patients, pain was resolved by medication, neurolysis or nerve grafting. In 35 cases, nerve repair was attempted at median 6 days from injury. Of these 62%(22) gained a good or fair recovery with 37%(13) having a poor functional result. Forty-two patients (47 limbs) initially presented with an insensate foot. At final follow up (mean 25.4 months), 89%(42 limbs) had a return of protective plantar sensation. Overall, 9 patients were able to return to full military duty (P2), with 45 deemed unfit for military service (P0 or P8). This study demonstrates that the majority of combat PNI will show some functional recovery. Adherence to the principles of war surgery to ensure that the wound is clear of infection and associated vascular and skeletal injuries are promptly treated will provide the optimal environment for nerve recovery. Although neuropathic pain affects a significant proportion of casualties, pharmacological and surgical intervention can alleviate the majority of symptoms. Finally, the presence of an insensate limb at initial surgery, should not be used as a marker of limb viability. The key to recovery of the PNI patient lies in a multi-disciplinary approach. Essential to this is regular surgical review to assess progress and to initiate prompt surgical intervention when needed. This approach allows early determination of prognosis, which is of huge value to the rehabilitating patient psychologically, and to the whole rehabilitation team

UK personnel have been deployed in Afghanistan since 2001 and over this time a wealth of experience in contemporary war surgery has been developed. Of particular note in the latter Herrick operations the injury pattern suffered by personnel is largely blast wounds, primarily from improvised explosive devices. With the development of improved body armour, previously unsurvivable blasts now result in a large number of traumatic amputations, predominantly affecting the lower limb. Faced with this, deployed medical personnel in the Role 3 facility, Camp Bastion, have developed, by a process of evolution, a standard process for timely management of these injuries. We present a documented schema and photographic record of the ‘Bastion’ process of management of traumatic amputation through the resuscitation department, radiology, theatres and post-operatively. In resuscitation the priority is control of catastrophic haemorrhage with exchange of CAT tourniquets to Pneumatic tourniquets. While undergoing a CT, time can be used to complete documentation. In theatre a process of social debridement & wash then sterile prep followed by formal debridement allows rapid management of the amputated limbs. This work provides a record of current best practice that generates maximum efficiency of personnel and time developed over a large number of procedures. This allows reflection both now in relation to continuing Herrick operations and when military medical services are faced with a future conflict and an inevitable change in injury patterns

Topical Negative Pressure Therapy (TNPT) has gained increasing acceptance as a useful tool in wound management. Since 2002, the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (RCDM) in South Birmingham has gained considerable experience with managing complex combat trauma with TNPT. The mainstay of managing high-energy combat wounds has changed little over the last century of conflict and remains early debridement, wound lavage, fracture stabilisation and delayed closure. Over the last 10 years the use of TNPT has proved to be a useful adjunct in promoting delayed primary and secondary closure, and is now common practise in the US and UK military medical services. There is however, little level 1 evidence to support the use of TNPT in military trauma. All military patients admitted to Selly Oak Hospital between April 2007 and March 2008 that were treated with TNPT were identified, those whose notes were available were included. 37 cases were included. There was a strong correlation between ISS, NISS, and antibiotic use during TNPT use and the total duration of secondary care. However, we found no correlation between delay to first TNPT application, the frequency or location of TNPT dressing changes and any of our surrogate markers of outcome. TNPT is just one of a number of techniques for managing military high-energy injuries and should not be seen as an alternative to the established principles. The high frequency of TNPT dressing changes is not supported by this research and this should be reflected in the clinical management of patients requiring prolonged TNPT

Satisfactory military orthopaedic service provision in the UK suffers significantly from a lack of basic resources, notably overall consultant numbers and host trust support. The waiting time to see an appropriate consultant (uniformed or contracted) can be as long as nine months. Many of these referrals from the primary care sector do not, in fact, need to see a consultant. Appropriately trained individuals such as; GP’s with special interests, Nurse Practitioners and Extended Scope Practitioners may all have a role to play in patient management. Military Physiotherapists are uniquely qualified to deal with these referrals. They can provide military input, advice on grading, order appropriate investigations (including MRI scans and X-rays) and give guidance on further management and arrange follow-on treatment. Although popular in spinal assessment clinics, we are unaware of this facility being formally used in a general military orthopaedic setting. We have now reviewed the results of our first 100 patients. The average waiting time to first appointment was 2 weeks. 75 patients were dealt with solely by the screening clinic. 21 MRI scans, were ordered. Only 25 patients required review by the orthopaedic team. 7 patients required surgery. Our conclusion is that such clinics represent a clinically beneficial and cost-effective screening tool at the primary/secondary care interface. A high patient satisfaction at the short waiting times and outcomes was also noted

The October 2015 Trauma Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: PCA not the best in resuscitation; Impact of trauma centre care; Quality of life after a hip fracture; Recovery and severity of injury: open tibial fractures in the spotlight; Assessment of the triplane fractures; Signs of an unstable paediatric pelvis; Safe insertion of SI screws: are two views required?; Post-operative delirium under the spotlight; Psychological effects of fractures; K-wires cost effective in DRAFFT

The August 2013 Foot & Ankle Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: mobility, ankles and fractures; hindfoot nailing: not such a bad option after all?; little treatment benefit for blood injection in tendonitis; fixed bearing ankles successful in the short term; hindfoot motion following STAR ankle replacement; minimally invasive calcaneal fracture fixation?; pes planus in adolescents; and subluxing peroneals and groove deepening