To elaborate upon the complex variety of successful reconstructive techniques for limb salvage surgery for the management of aggressive juxta-articular and peri-acetabular bone tumors. Limb sparing surgery, while complex, continues to gain wider acceptance among an increasing number of highly specialised musculoskeletal oncology surgeons. The collective experience of the Musculoskeletal Sarcoma Group at The University of Calgary has utilised a variety of limb and joint salvage techniques in its armamentarium for reconstruction of such cases. Whether malignant or benign, aggressive lesions occur at or near the joint resulting in marked subchondral bone destruction or pathologic fractures. comprehensive stepwise plan can result in a stable, pain free and functional joint with limb sparing. The author has utilised local tumor removal and cementation with polymethylmethacrylate with and without secondary internal fixation. ome cases have been amenable to massive osteoarticular allografts, and more recently, tumor endoprostheses. The North American experience with massive oncology prostheses is growing, resulting in increased opportunities for limb and joint salvage surgery with decreased morbidity and complications. his presentation will review the experience of the principal author’s work in limb and joint-sparing bone tumor surgery over the past 18 years

Introduction. Large osteochondral defects (OCD) of the talus present a difficult management conundrum. We present a series of Maioregen xenograft patches applied through an open approach, early lessons from the technique and good early outcomes, in patients who are otherwise looking at ankle salvage techniques. Results. 16 patients underwent open patch procedures, performed by a single surgeon, over a 30 month period. 12 males, and 4 females with age at presentation from 21–48. The majority were young, male, in physical employment with active sporting interest. MoxFQ, and E5QD were collected preop, 3, 6, 12 month postoperatively. There were significant improvements in ROM, pain, and scores in the cohort. 3 cases returned to Theatre, 1 for a concern about late infection, which settled with good outcome, and a further 2 with metalwork / adhesions. Conclusion. Early results suggest that this patch technique may be useful in prolonging the longevity of the TTJ, where micro fracture has failed, or the lesion is so large that it would likely be futile. Patients rescoped demonstrated good integration of the patch material, with stability and functional improvement. There may be a place for this technique in the management of large lesions, particularly in young patients where preservation is desired over joint salvage

Benign aggressive tumors are common and can be debilitating for patients especially if they are in peri-articular regions or cause pathological fracture as is common for giant cell tumor of bone (GCT). Although GCT rarely metastasize, the literature reports many series with high rates of local recurrence, and evidence about which risk factors influence recurrence is lacking. This study aims to evaluate the recurrence rate and identify local recurrence risk factors by reviewing patient data from a single high-volume orthopedic oncology center. A retrospective analysis of all patients treated for GCT at a tertiary orthopedic oncology center was conducted. In total 413 patients were treated for GCT between 1989 and 2017. Multiple patient and tumour characteristics were analysed to determine if they influenced local recurrence including: age, gender, anatomical site, Campanacci stage, soft tissue extension, presence of metastasis, pathologic fractures, and prior local recurrence. Additional variables that were analysed included type of treatment (en bloc resection or aggressive intralesional curettage) and use of local adjuvants. The main outcome parameters were local recurrence- free survival, metastasis-free survival and complications. Patients treated with Denosumab were excluded from analysis given its recently documented association with high rates of local recurrence. “There were 63/413 local recurrences (15.3%) at a mean follow-up of 30.5 months. The metastatic rate was 2.2% at a mean 50.6 months follow-up and did not vary based on type of treatment. Overall complication rate of 14.3% was not related to treatment modality. Local recurrence was higher (p=0.019) following curettage (55/310; 17.7%) compared to resection (8/103; 7.8%) however, joint salvage was possible in 87% of patients (270/310) in the curettage group. Use of adjuvant therapy including liquid nitrogen, peroxide, phenol, water versus none did not show any effect on local recurrence rates (p= 0.104). Pathological fracture did not affect local recurrence rates regardless of treatment modality (p= 0.260). Local recurrence at presentation was present in 16.3% (58/356) patients and did not show any significance for further local recurrence (p= 0.396). Gender was not associated with local recurrence (p=0.508) but younger patient age, below 20 years (p = 0.047) or below 30 years (p = 0.015) was associated with higher local recurrence rates. GCT in distal radius demonstrated the highest rate of local recurrence at 31.6% compared to other sites, although this was not significant (p=0.098). In addition, Campanacci stage and soft tissue extension were not risk factors for recurrence. The overall GCT local recurrence rate was 15.3%, but varied based on the type of resection: 17.7% following joint sparing curettage compared to 7.8% following resection. Local recurrence was also higher with younger patient age (30 years or less) and in distal radius lesions. In addition, neither Campanacci stage, soft tissue extension or presence of a pathologic fracture affected local recurrence. Most patients with GCT can undergo successful curettage and joint sparing, while only a minority require resection +/− prosthetic reconstruction. Even in the presence of soft tissue extension or a pathologic fracture, most joints can be salvaged with curettage

The majority of patients who develop hip arthritis have a mechanical abnormality of the joint. The structural abnormalities range from instability (DDH) to impingement. Impingement leads to osteoarthritis by chronic damage to the acetabular labrum and adjacent cartilage. In situations of endstage secondary DJD, hip arthroplasty is the most reliable treatment choice. In young patients with viable articular cartilage, joint salvage is indicated. Treatment should be directed at resolving the structural abnormalities that create the impingement. Femoral abnormalities corrected by osteotomy or increased head-neck offset by chondro-osteoplasty creating a satisfactory head-neck offset. This can safely be done via anterior surgical dislocation. The acetabular-labral lesions can be debrided and/or repaired. Acetabular abnormalities should be corrected by “reverse” PAO in those with acetabular retroversion or anterior acetabular debridement in those with satisfactory posterior coverage and a damaged anterior rim. Often combinations of the above are indicated. This talk will also update issues related to hip impingement and joint salvage surgery that have arisen over the past year

The majority of patients who develop hip arthritis have a mechanical abnormality of the joint. The structural abnormalities range from instability (DDH) to impingement. Impingement leads to osteoarthritis by chronic damage to the acetabular labrum and adjacent cartilage. In situations of end-stage secondary DJD, hip arthroplasty is the most reliable treatment choice. In young patients with viable articular cartilage, joint salvage is indicated. Treatment should be directed at resolving the structural abnormalities that create the impingement. Femoral abnormalities corrected by osteotomy or increased head-neck offset by chondro-osteoplasty creating a satisfactory head-neck offset. This can safely be done via anterior surgical dislocation. The acetabular-labral lesions can be debrided and/or repaired. Acetabular abnormalities should be corrected by “reverse” PAO in those with acetabular retroversion or anterior acetabular debridement in those with satisfactory posterior coverage and a damaged anterior rim. Often combinations of the above are indicated

Aims

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) treatment changed since the introduction of denosumab from purely surgical towards a multidisciplinary approach, with recent concerns of higher recurrence rates after denosumab. We evaluated oncological, surgical, and functional outcomes for distal radius GCTB, with a critically appraised systematic literature review.

INTRODUCTION. Post-operative infections following end-stage joint salvage reconstruction, tumor resection and megaprosthetic reconstruction is a major problem because of increasing infection rates in this patient cohort. The success of treatment and longevity is limited because current prosthetic composites do not decrease infection rates in these patients. Silver coating is an innovative development in the prevention of post-operative infection. Presented here is the current knowledge of the use of silver for this patient population including;. The current knowledge of the use of silver coated prostheses for infection control,. Concerns with ion release and toxicity,. Present current published results and USA experience. Discuss current regulatory issues both domestically (USA) and worldwide. METHODS. We report the results of a comprehensive review of the technology of silver coating application to prostheses and the published clinical results of the success of decreasing the incidence of post-operative infection following tumor resection and limb salvage. The current regulatory status of silver use for orthopaedics will also be discussed. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. The potential for the use and success of silver coated megaprostheses following limb salvage and tumor resection is great importance and, based on our review shows significance in the decrease of post-operative infection without adverse issues of silver toxicity (Argyria). This option is an alternative to permanent fusion or the finality of amputation. While the majority of the regulatory world has allowed the routine use of silver coated megaprostheses for infection control, there still exists a few regulatory panels, including the US-FDA, that have yet to approve the routine use of silver coated megaprostheses for infection control following tumor resection and limb salvage

The majority of patients who develop hip arthritis have a mechanical abnormality of the joint. The structural abnormalities range from instability (DDH) to impingement. Impingement leads to osteoarthritis by chronic damage to the acetabular labrum and adjacent cartilage. In situations of endstage secondary DJD, hip arthroplasty is the most reliable treatment choice. In young patients with viable articular cartilage, joint salvage is indicated. Treatment should be directed at resolving the structural abnormalities that create the impingement. Femoral abnormalities corrected by osteotomy or increased head-neck offset by chondro-osteoplasty creating a satisfactory head-neck offset. This can safely be done via anterior surgical dislocation or arthroscopically. The acetabular-labral lesions can be debrided and/or repaired. Acetabular abnormalities should be corrected by “reverse” PAO in those with acetabular retroversion or anterior acetabular debridement in those with satisfactory posterior coverage and a damaged anterior rim. Often combinations of the above are indicated

The use of massive endoprostheses following bone tumour resection is well recognised. Where possible, joint salvage rather than joint replacement is usually attempted. However cases arise where there is insufficient bone following tumour resection to allow adequate fixation of a joint sparing prosthesis. We reporta series of 4 patients (aged 4–12), treated between 1994 and 2008, in which irradiated autologous bone has been combined with a diaphyseal or distal femoral replacement in order to preserve the native hip joint. There were 3 cases of osteosarcoma and 1 case of Ewing‘s sarcoma. After a mean follow-up of 53.5 months (range 9–168), all four patients are alive without evidence of local recurrence or metastases. One implant was revised after 14 years following fracture of the extending component of the growing endoprosthesis. There have been no cases of loosening or periprosthetic fracture. This is the first report of irradiated autologous bone with joint sparing endoprostheses in skeletally immature patients

The use of massive endoprostheses following bone tumour resection is well recognised. Where possible, joint salvage rather than joint replacement is usually attempted. However cases arise where there may be insufficient bone stock following tumour resection to allow fixation of a joint sparing prosthesis. We report a series of 4 patients (age4–12) treated between 1994 and 2008, in which irradiated autologous bone has been combined with a diaphyseal or distal femoral replacement in order to preserve the native hip joint. There were 3 cases of osteosarcoma and 1 cases of Ewings sarcoma. After a mean follow up of 53 months (range 9–168) all patients had survived without evidence of local recurrence or metastases. One implant was revised after 14 years following fracture of the extending component of the growing endoprosthesis. There have been no cases of loosening or peri-prosthetic fracture. This is the first report of irradiated autologous bone with joint sparing endoprostheses in the skeletally immature patient. Introduction: Reconstruction of segmental skeletal defects after malignant bone tumour removal has been a topic of much debate. Autoclaved or irradiated autologous bone used in the treatment of malignant bone tumours of the proximal femur in skeletally mature patients has been well reported with a high incidence of fracture and non-union. On follow up, our series of skeletally immature patients showed excellent osteo-integration with native bone and allowed preservation of the native hip joint. Results: We review survival of the patient, implant, any complication and the presence of disease progression

Purpose: Giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is a rare, usually benign, primary skeletal lesion. The disease’s clinical course may be complicated by local recurrence subsequent to surgical treatment or the development of benign pulmonary metastases. Intra-lesional curettage is the standard treatment of primary GCT of bone. However, the value of intralesional procedures in recurrent GCT has not been well established. Method: Forty-six patients with recurrent GCT of long bones treated between 1983 and 2005 were followed retrospectively. Minimum follow-up was three years; mean follow-up was 11.1 (±4.8) years. Results: Wide resections were performed in 18 patients. Intralesional, joint preserving procedures were performed in 28 patients. Subsequent recurrence occurred in nine patients (20%). Wide resection was performed if joint salvage was not achievable due to expansion of the tumor. Reconstructions following wide resection included arthroplasty (n=4), osteoarticular allograft (n=3), APC (n=1) and fibular autograft reconstruction of the wrist (n=3). Amputations were performed in two patients. Patients undergoing wide resections for local recurrence had a significantly smaller risk of subsequent recurrence as compared to patients treated with intra-lesional surgery (6% versus 32%, hazard ratio: 0.28, p< 0.05). In patients treated with intralesional surgery, application of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in addition to local phenol treatment significantly reduced the risk of subsequent recurrence (PMMA + phenol: 7% vs. Phenol: 25%, hazard ratio: 0.23, p< 0.05). Soft tissue expansion was not associated with an increased risk of subsequent recurrence. At follow-up, all patients with subsequent recurrence were without local disease after additional intralesional surgery (n=3) or wide resection (n=5). Metachronous benign pulmonary metastases evolved in five cases. There was no correlation between the development of pulmonary metastases and the type of treatment of recurrent disease found. Conclusion: In recurrent disease of GCT of long bones and the possibility to salvage the adjacent joint intra-lesional surgery is the treatment of choice independent of whether soft tissue expansion is present. Intra-lesional surgery does not increase the risk of development benign pulmonary metastases. In cases with extensive tumor formation and without the possibility to preserve the adjacent joint wide resection has a high chance for long-term recurrence free disease

Aims: The results of arthrodesis of the þrst metatarso-phalangeal joint as salvage procedures after failure in bunion surgery are well documented in the medical literature. Usually, the results may be equivalent to those of primary arthrodeses. On the other hand, joint conserving methods in case of recurrence have not the same reputation in respect to arthrodesis which appears as the gold standard. Methods: We reviewed 27 patients (28 feet) with a mean follow-up of 6.5 years (range: 1–18 years) after treatment for recurrence after bunion surgery. The patients were submitted to a joint conserving procedure on grounds of absence of degenerative condition on the metatarsophalangeal joint. The procedure corrected point by point all the characteristics of the deformity: lateral release, mobilisation of the joint, tightening of the medial capsule and osteotomies on the þrst ray. Results: Preoperatively valgus of the great toe was on average of 38.9û. At time of follow-up (6.5 years on average) after revisional procedure, valgus of the great toe was on average 21.3û. Postoperatively 23 out of 27 patients were satisþed. The result was considered as good in 20 cases, fair in one, and poor in 7 cases. Conclusions: In spite of technical difþculties, these results can equal those of primary bunion procedure, if all the morphological disorders are corrected. Conservative methods may be rational when the joint remains ßexible with no pain and when the morphological particularities on the forefoot are sufþciently indisputable so that their correction could cure the patient

Objectives

The primary purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine whether statin usage could reduce the risk of glucocorticoid-related osteonecrosis in animal models.

The April 2015 Oncology Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: New hope for skull base tumours; Survival but at what cost?; Synovial sarcoma beginning to be cracked?; Wound complications facing soft-tissue sarcoma surgeons; Amputation may offer no survival benefit over reconstruction; Giant cell tumour in the longer term; Intralesional treatment comparable with excision in GCT of the radius?; Imaging prior to oncological referral; And finally…