Objectives: To review the changing pattern of orthopaedic injury encountered by deployed troops with regard to the importance of hand trauma. Methods: A literature review of orthopaedic practice in recent conflict. The search period extended from 1990–2007. A subsequent search was performed to identify papers relating to hand injuries from 1914 to the present day. Papers were graded according to Levels of Evidence. Results: 210 published works were analysed. Review of the literature revealed a lack of statistical analysis and a tendency towards the anecdotal. The evidence is overall level 5 with the majority of papers comprising reviews, individual sub-unit experiences, historical perspectives and individual database analyses. The evolving importance of extremity trauma is clear from the quantity of its reporting. The paucity of life threatening cavity trauma is highlighted. Casualty survival off the battlefield is increasing perhaps due to the impact of personal protective equipment. The combination of changing ballistics and increasing survivability leads to an apparent increase in limb threatening and complex hand trauma being encountered by military surgeons. Despite being rarely reported in isolation, the proportion of complex hand trauma is broadening with an increase in open fractures and mutilated soft tissue injuries resultant from high and low energy transfer ballistics. Hand trauma is also shown to occur in deployed troops during activities unrelated to war fighting. Sporting activities and inappropriate use of equipment are responsible for soft tissue and bony injury with considerable morbidity. The literature was analysed with regard to the classification of hand trauma. Articles relating to recent conflicts were notable for their lack of classification of these injuries. The bulk of papers retrieved concerning military hand trauma management were published prior to the conflicts of the last decade. It is within these papers that classification and treatment priorities including the nature of debridement and fracture stabilisation are discussed and highlighted as core knowledge. Conclusion: The nature of injuries sustained by troops in conflict is evolving. Changing survivability is resulting in increasingly complex hand trauma presenting to military surgeons. Despite a culture of ensuring that today’s trauma surgeons learn from mistakes made by their predecessors, in the field of hand trauma this is not the case. A comprehensive review of changing orthopaedic conflict related injury patterns with special regard to hand trauma and the key learning points from historical literature are highlighted. Proposals for improving management are discussed with regard to improved training opportunities and dialogue between military trauma surgeons

To review the changing pattern of orthopaedic injury encountered by deployed troops with special regard to the importance of hand trauma sustained in conflict and non- war fighting activities. Literature review relating to recent military operations (1990–2007) encompassing 100 conflicts worldwide. A subsequent search was performed to identify papers relating to hand injuries from 1914 to the present day. Papers were graded by Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Two hundred and ten published works were analysed. Review of the literature revealed a lack of statistical analysis and a tendency towards the anecdotal. These works were primarily level five evidence comprising reviews, correspondence, sub-unit experiences and individual nation database analyses. The importance of extremity trauma is clear. The combination of changing ballistics and increasing survivability off the battlefield leads to a previously under emphasised increase in complex hand trauma. Hand trauma is also shown to occur in deployed troops during activities unrelated to war fighting. Articles concerning military hand trauma management were mainly published prior to the conflicts of the last decade. Within these papers injury classification and treatment priorities are highlighted as core knowledge for trauma surgeons. This paper provides a review of conflict related injury patterns with special regard to hand trauma. The key learning points from historical literature are highlighted. Proposals for improving management of these injuries from battlefield to home nation are discussed with regard to training opportunities and dialogue to ensure past lessons are not forgotten

Results are presented of a prospective audit of wound infection rates in patients undergoing surgery for hand injuries in a designated hand trauma day surgery unit. Hand trauma patients with suitable injuries referred from peripheral accident and emergency departments to the Hand Surgery Unit at Queen Victoria Hospital undergo surgery after a variable delay. Initial wound toilet is undertaken at referral and all patients are prescribed oral antibiotics while waiting up to five days for theatre. Time to operation and results of microbiological wound swabs in theatre were correlated with post operative wound infection rates in fifty patients. Initial analysis suggests little difference in subsequent wound infection rates between patients operated on within 48 hours and those delayed three to five days

ARI is a busy trauma unit (catchment: 500 000 people). In September 2010 a day-case Hand Trauma Service (HTS) started. Previously cases were often postponed due to prioritisation of orthopaedic emergencies; therefore increasing inpatient stay and associated costs. We aim to characterise presenting cases, evaluate improvements in service provision and financial costs. Data was collected from the first HTS year (Sept 10–11), and the preceding year (Sept 09–10). Data was collected on patient characteristics, operation, operative time, anaesthetic type and number of inpatient days. The cost of inpatient stay was calculated from the NHS Scotland resource allocation committee data. Pre HTS there were 410 cases (500 operative hours). 141 wound explorations, 22 nail-bed repairs, 34 metacarpal ORIF, 68 phalangeal ORIF, 5 scaphoid fixations, 69 tendon repairs, 30 terminalisations, 5 MUA, 19 nerve repairs, 17 unclassified. Accounting for 510 inpatient nights (mean: 1.25, range: 0–8), costing £204,387.60 (mean: £500.95). 123 cases required image intensification (II). Most patients had GA. During the first HTS year there were 282 operations. Most operations were day-case. 77 cases were performed under LA, 81 regional blocks and 34 under GA. During this year cases requiring II continued to be performed in the main theatre. The HTS has increased time available in main theatres. It has reduced inpatient stay costs, potentially saving £141,267.90. Performing more operations under LA/regional block decreases the risks associated with anaesthesia. Provision of II for the HTS would permit more cases to be performed, improving the service provision and further reducing costs

Aims. The current global pandemic due to COVID-19 is generating significant burden on the health service in the UK. On 23 March 2020, the UK government issued requirements for a national lockdown. The aim of this multicentre study is to gain a greater understanding of the impact lockdown has had on the rates, mechanisms and types of injuries together with their management across a regional trauma service. Methods. Data was collected from an adult major trauma centre, paediatric major trauma centre, district general hospital, and a regional hand trauma unit. Data collection included patient demographics, injury mechanism, injury type and treatment required. Time periods studied corresponded with the two weeks leading up to lockdown in the UK, two weeks during lockdown, and the same two-week period in 2019. Results. There was a 55.7% (12,935 vs 5,733) reduction in total accident and emergency (A&E) attendances with a 53.7% (354 vs 164) reduction in trauma admissions during lockdown compared to 2019. The number of patients with fragility fractures requiring admission remained constant (32 patients in 2019 vs 31 patients during lockdown; p > 0.05). Road traffic collisions (57.1%, n = 8) were the commonest cause of major trauma admissions during lockdown. There was a significant increase in DIY related-hand injuries (26% (n = 13)) lockdown vs 8% (n = 11 in 2019, p = 0.006) during lockdown, which resulted in an increase in nerve injuries (12% (n = 6 in lockdown) vs 2.5% (n = 3 in 2019, p = 0.015) and hand infections (24% (n = 12) in lockdown vs 6.2% (n = 8) in 2019, p = 0.002). Conclusion. The national lockdown has dramatically reduced orthopaedic trauma admissions. The incidence of fragility fractures requiring surgery has not changed. Appropriate provision in theatres should remain in place to ensure these patients can be managed as a surgical priority. DIY-related hand injuries have increased which has led to an increased in nerve injuries requiring intervention

Aims. Hand trauma, consisting of injuries to both the hand and the wrist, are a common injury seen worldwide. The global age-standardized incidence of hand trauma exceeds 179 per 100,000. Hand trauma may require surgical management and therefore result in significant costs to both healthcare systems and society. Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common following all surgical interventions, and within hand surgery the risk of SSI is at least 5%. SSI following hand trauma surgery results in significant costs to healthcare systems with estimations of over £450 per patient. The World Health Organization (WHO) have produced international guidelines to help prevent SSIs. However, it is unclear what variability exists in the adherence to these guidelines within hand trauma. The aim is to assess compliance to the WHO global guidelines in prevention of SSI in hand trauma. Methods. This will be an international, multicentre audit comparing antimicrobial practices in hand trauma to the standards outlined by WHO. Through the Reconstructive Surgery Trials Network (RSTN), hand surgeons across the globe will be invited to participate in the study. Consultant surgeons/associate specialists managing hand trauma and members of the multidisciplinary team will be identified at participating sites. Teams will be asked to collect data prospectively on a minimum of 20 consecutive patients. The audit will run for eight months. Data collected will include injury details, initial management, hand trauma team management, operation details, postoperative care, and antimicrobial techniques used throughout. Adherence to WHO global guidelines for SSI will be summarized using descriptive statistics across each criteria. Discussion. The Hand and Wrist trauma: Antimicrobials and Infection Audit of Clinical Practice (HAWAII ACP) will provide an understanding of the current antimicrobial practice in hand trauma surgery. This will then provide a basis to guide further research in the field. The findings of this study will be disseminated via conference presentations and a peer-reviewed publication. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(4):361–366

The second wave of COVID-19 infections in 2021 resulting from the delta strain had a significantly larger impact on the state of New South Wales, Australia and with it the government implemented harsher restrictions. This retrospective cohort study aims to explore how the increased restrictions affected hand trauma presentations and their treatment. Retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent hand surgery from the period of June 23 – August 31 in 2020 and 2021 at a level one trauma centre in Western Sydney. During the second-wave lockdown there was an 18.9% decrease in all hand trauma presentations. Despite widespread restrictions placed on the manufacturing, wholesale, retail and construction industries, there was an insignificant difference in work injuries. Stay-at-home orders and reduced availability of professional tradespersons likely contributed to an increase in DIY injuries. Significant reductions in metacarpal and phalangeal fractures coincided with significantly curtailed sporting seasons. The findings from this study can assist in predicting the case-mix of hand trauma presentations and resource allocation in the setting of future waves of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases

Aims. Hand trauma accounts for one in five of emergency department attendances, with a UK incidence of over five million injuries/year and 250,000 operations/year. Surgical site infection (SSI) in hand trauma surgery leads to further interventions, poor outcomes, and prolonged recovery, but has been poorly researched. Antimicrobial sutures have been recognized by both the World Health Organization and the National Institute for Clinical Excellence as potentially effective for reducing SSI. They have never been studied in hand trauma surgery: a completely different patient group and clinical pathway to previous randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of these sutures. Antimicrobial sutures are expensive, and further research in hand trauma is warranted before they become standard of care. The aim of this protocol is to conduct a feasibility study of antimicrobial sutures in patients undergoing hand trauma surgery to establish acceptability, compliance, and retention for a definitive trial. Methods. A two-arm, multicentre feasibility RCT of 116 adult participants with hand and wrist injuries, randomized to either antimicrobial sutures or standard sutures. Study participants and outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation. Outcome measures will be recorded at baseline (preoperatively), 30 days, 90 days, and six months, and will include SSI, patient-reported outcome measures, and return to work. Conclusion. This will inform a definitive trial of antimicrobial sutures in the hand and wrist, and will help to inform future upper limb trauma trials. The results of this research will be shared with the medical community through high impact publication and presentation. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):529–535

Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the need for hand trauma services during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, specifically related to surgical requirements. This will provide useful information for planning and resource allocation in the event of any further lockdown. Methods. A prospective analsysis of all patients attending our hand trauma unit throughout the UK COVID-19 lockdown period (24 March to 10 May 2020) was carried out. Prospectively collected departmental data from the same period in 2019 was obtained and reviewed for comparison. The number of patients attending clinic, undergoing surgery, the type of surgical procedure, and rate of surgery was compared. Results. In all, 463 patients attended hand trauma services during the lockdown period compared to 793 in 2019 (32% reduction); 190 surgical procedures were carried out during lockdown compared to 236 in 2019 (20% reduction). Intervention rate was higher during the lockdown period (41% compared to 30%). There was no difference in the type of cases. In the first half of lockdown, 47% fewer procedures were performed than in 2019, but in the second half of lockdown 13% more procedures were carried out than the same period in 2019. Conclusion. Requirements for hand trauma surgery remain high during a pandemic lockdown. Attendances and surgical requirements can be expected to steadily return to normal levels during a prolonged lockdown period. Throughout any future lockdown period adequate surgical provision must be maintained for patients with hand injuries. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-10:639–643

It has been shown that extremity injuries form a large proportion of the operative surgical workload in conflict situations. Injuries to the hands are an important subgroup and hand surgery has a long association with military surgery. While most hand injuries do not require surgical intervention, those that do, require that military surgeons should be well versed in the principles of hand surgery. The concepts of staging and/or damage control surgery are well applied to this region. The nature of military medical support necessarily changes in the transition from war fighting to a post-conflict phase. We examine the activity in the sole British Military Hospital serving a multi-national divisional area in Iraq over 2004. During this post conflict phase, the spectrum of hand trauma is characterised. The overwhelming majority of hand trauma resulted in soft tissue injury. There was a clear predisposition to hand trauma for males, manual workers, combat soldiers and engineers/mechanics. X-ray imaging is heavily used in this environment. Even where soldiers are returned to duty they are often restricted in the duties that they can perform. The results of this study reinforce the relevance of basic principles of hand trauma management, particularly in challenging environments. These knowledge and skill requirements should be emphasised for the war surgeon and the emergency physician. Hand surgery is an evolving speciality that continues to find clear and direct applications for the military surgeon

Introduction: Complex extremity injury remains a challenge to those involved in both its emergent and definitive care. Anecdotal concerns exist regarding exposure of orthopaedic trainees to such cases in the light of recent changes in surgical training. We aim to establish the perceived confidence, exposure to caseload and adequacy of training of United Kingdom (UK) Orthopaedic Specialist Trainees in the management of significant extremity trauma. Method: A web-based survey was sent to a sample of orthopaedic trainees. 222 responses from 888 trainees were required to achieve a 5% error rate with 90% confidence. 232 responses were received. Results: Perceived confidence and adequacy of training in wound debridement and fasciotomy is high despite infrequent exposure and training is perceived as adequate. With regards to assessment of limb viability and amputation for extremity injury, exposure is minimal, perceived confidence is lower, particularly in the case of amputation and for this scenario over a third of trainees report their training as inadequate. Perceived confidence in dealing with hand trauma is low and is associated with sparse exposure to cases resulting in a quarter of trainees reporting their training as inadequate. For all scenarios, confidence is seen to increase with time spent in training with the notable exception of post-CCT trainees whom report a lower confidence to their colleagues in the latter years of training. Discussion: Despite infrequent exposure, it has been demonstrated that perceived confidence and adequacy of training in many aspects of extremity injury is high. Concerns are apparent with the management of hand trauma and amputation surgery. This study is the first of its kind to offer a valuable insight into the current training perceptions and requirements of junior orthopaedic surgeons at a national level

Background. Patients with hand injuries frequently present to Emergency Departments. The ability of junior doctors to perform an accurate clinical assessment is crucial in initiating appropriate management. Objectives. To assess the adequacy of junior doctor hand examination skills and to establish whether further training and education is required. Methods. A double-centre study was conducted using an anonymous survey assessing hand examination completed by junior doctors (Foundation year 1 and Senior House Officer grades) working in Trauma & Orthopaedics or Emergency Departments. The survey covered all aspects of hand examination including assessment of: Flexor and Extensor tendons, Nerves (motor and sensory) and Vascular status. Surveys were marked against answers pre-agreed with a Consultant hand surgeon. Results. 32 doctors completed the survey. Tendons: 59% could accurately examine extensor digitorum, 41% extensor pollicis longus, 38% flexor digitorum profundus and 28% flexor digitorum superficialis. Nerves – Motor: 53% could accurately examine the radial nerve, 37% the ulnar nerve, 22% the median nerve and 9% the anterior interosseous nerve. Nerves – Sensory: 88% could accurately examine the radial nerve, 81% the ulnar nerve, 84% the median nerve and 18.8% digital nerves. Vascular: 93% could describe 3 methods of assessing vascularity. Conclusions. Tendon and neurological aspects of hand clinical examination were poorly executed at junior doctor level in this pragmatic survey. This highlights the need for targeted education and training to improve the accuracy of junior doctor hand injury assessment and subsequent improving patient treatment and safety. Recommendations include dedicated hand examination teaching early in Orthopaedic/A&E placements and introduction of an illustrated Hand Trauma Examination Proforma. Level of evidence. III - Evidence from case, correlation, and comparative studies

Aims

The evidence demonstrating the superiority of early MRI has led to increased use of MRI in clinical pathways for acute wrist trauma. The aim of this study was to describe the radiological characteristics and the inter-observer reliability of a new MRI based classification system for scaphoid injuries in a consecutive series of patients.

Aims

This is a multicentre, prospective assessment of a proportion of the overall orthopaedic trauma caseload of the UK. It investigates theatre capacity, cancellations, and time to surgery in a group of hospitals that is representative of the wider population. It identifies barriers to effective practice and will inform system improvements.

Today there is a great interest in the use of the autol-ogous platelet growth factors (APGF) in the field of orthopaedic surgery. The platelets are like a cellular laboratory and secrete, store, and leave many growth factors. These APGF are able to increase the reproduction of futtock, mesenchymal, fibroblast, osteoblast, and endothelial cells, which have a homothetic effect on macrophages and mono- and polymorphonuclear cells. Between 2001 and 2003 about 60 patients were treated with APGF in the form of gel. It was used for osteosynthesis of high energy fractures with soft tissue and bone loss, in arthrodesis of scoliotic spine, and in the emergency treatment of hand trauma. The platelet gel was used for 4 weeks. The average time for recovery was about 1 month for the soft tissue lesions. The use of APGF enables a speedy recovery and quick resumption of work. The healing time of the fractures decreases by 50% and the fingertip lesions with exposed bone can be treated with APGF without shortening or plastic surgery being necessary. It is possible to use platelet gel for replacement of soft tissue, for osteosynthesis of fractures, and to fill up defect cavities. Thus, this opens new perspectives for treatment in orthopaedic surgery. The patients could return to normal daily activity in a short time and it is possible to reach good results, offering a better quality of life

Purpose: Appropriate management of complex trauma of the upper limb (CTUL) is a significant therapeutic challenge. The main difficulty is to determine in an emergency situation when ambitious conservative surgery is legitimate and when amputation in necessary. We propose a prognostic lesion score to determine the best option in the emergency setting. Material and methods: This study included 48 patients operated on between 1987 and 1997. These patients presented total or partial amputation (n=23), devascularising injury with continuous limb (=7), complex non-devascularising injury with continuous limb (n=18) (Gustilo IIIa and IIIb). Isolated hand trauma was excluded. Each patient was attributed retrospectively a lesion score taking into account each tissue (bone, vessels, nerves, muscles, skin). At minimum two-year follow-up, the outcome was evaluated for the amputated or non-amputated limb. For each non-amputated patient, a more precise outcome was established using the Chen classification. Operative procedures used the same protocol for all patients. Results: Considering the functional results, the statistical analysis enabled identifying prognostic factors for amputation among the five variables studied. Analysis using a classification tree enabled development of a decisional algorithm based on the muscle, nerve and skin injuries which provided 64.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity with a 100% positive predictive value and an 83.8% negative predictive value. A multiple logistic model was used to confirm these results and led to the selection of the same variables. Discussion: The CTUL score is easy to use and is the only one in the literature using only variables statistically proven to have significant prognostic value for CTUL. Surgical experience is however indispensable for appropriate decision making in these emergency situations. This score thus provides an important therapeutic aid useful in borderline cases where amputation is discussed. Conclusion: A prospective study including a larger number of patients would be helpful to better detail indications and preserve the 100% specificity for an irreversible therapeutic decision

Aims

To determine the role of early MRI in the management of suspected scaphoid fractures.

Aims

It is imperative to understand the risks of operating on urgent cases during the COVID-19 (SARS-Cov-2 virus) pandemic for clinical decision-making and medical resource planning. The primary aim was to determine the mortality risk and associated variables when operating on urgent cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. The secondary objective was to assess differences in the outcome of patients treated between sites treating COVID-19 and a separate surgical site.

Aims

This observational study examines the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic upon the paediatric trauma burden of a district general hospital. We aim to compare the nature and volume of the paediatric trauma during the first 2020 UK lockdown period with the same period in 2019.

Australia is a foundation member of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association—thus, recognising our geographical position in the most rapidly advancing region in the world. It is a serious mistake to think of Asia as ‘third world’. Research, education and surgical techniques are at the forefront of modern technology. Australia has to be a part of this ‘learn and teach’ movement. We have much to gain through exchange and travelling fellowships; paediatric, spinal, trauma and arthroplasty fellowships are available. The Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Travelling Fellowship is co-ordinated with corresponding organisations in Europe, North America and South America and previous travelling fellows become part of the influential Magellan Society. APOA has many sections (knee, hip, hand, spine, trauma, infection, sports medicine and paediatrics), with each having regular Congresses. Join APOA and attend the Triennial Congress in Taipei November 2010 and be impressed at the level of research