Purpose: This cadaveric study examines how changes in femoral entry point for intramedullary instrumentation of total knee replacements affects femoral component positioning. Methods: Twelve cadaveric lower limb specimens with intact hip, knee and ankle joints were obtained. Total knee navigation instrumentation was secured. Anatomical landmarks required for axes generation were obtained. An initial entry point was made at the center of the distal femur. An intramedullary rod was the introduced into the femur. Five and seven degree cutting blocks were placed onto the rod and positioned against the distal femur with the rotation parallel to the epicondylar axis. The navigation system was then used to generate a varus/valgus angle and flexion/extension angle with respect to the previously generated femoral mechanical axes. This allowed determination of an angle at which the distal femoral cutting block would need to be set to make a neutral distal femoral cut. The guide rod was removed and reinserted five times and measurements recalculated. Data was then collected with entry points 5mm medial, 5mm anterior and 5mm medial and anterior to the initial entry point. Results: There was no significant difference in varus/ valgus angle with a central compared with 5mm anterior entry point and no difference with a 5mm medial versus 5 mm medial and anterior entry point. The valgus angle required to give a neutral distal femoral cut with a central entry point was 4.98o (SD 0.91o; range 3.5o–6.0o). The valgus angle for a 5mm medial entry point was 6.92o (SD 0.97o, range 5.5o–8.0o). With regards to the sagittal plane a 5mm anterior translation of the entry point changed the flexion/extension angle by 1.58o (SD 0.52o, range 0.5o–2.5o). Conclusions: Small changes in the entry point can significantly affect component alignment. When moving more medial with the entry point a more valgus angle is required for the cutting block. An entry point at the deepest point of the trochlea may be more reproducible than an anteromedial one but requires a valgus cutting block closer to 5 degrees. Funding: Commerical funding. Funding Parties: Stryker

Results in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral head osteonecrosis (ON) when compared with primary osteoarthritis (OA) are controversial. Different factors like age, THA type or surgical technique may affect outcome. We hypothesized that patients with ON had an increased revision rate compared with OA. We analysed clinical outcome, estimated the survival rate for revision surgery, and their possible risk factors, in two groups of patients. In this retrospective cohort analysis of our prospective database, we assessed 2464 primary THAs implanted between 1989 and 2017. Patients with OA were included in group 1, 2090 hips; and patients with ON in group 2, 374 hips. In group 2 there were more men (p<0.001), patients younger than 60 years old (p<0.001) and with greater physical activity (p<0.001). Patients with lumbar OA (p<0.001) and a radiological acetabular shape type B according to Dorr (p<0.001) were more frequent in group 1. Clinical outcome was assessed according to the Harris Hip Score and radiological analysis included postoperative acetabular and femoral component position and hip reconstruction. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probability of not having revision surgery for different reasons. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess risk factors for revision surgery. Clinical improvement was better in the ON at all intervals. There were 90 hips revised, 68 due to loosening or wear, 52 (2.5%) in group 1, and 16 (4.3%) in group 2. Overall, the survival rate for revision surgery for any cause at 22 years was 88.0 % (95% CI, 82-94) in group 1 and 84.1% (95% CI, 69 – 99) in group 2 (p=0.019). Multivariate regression analysis showed that hips with conventional polyethylene (PE), compared with highly-cross linked PEs or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings, (p=0.01, Hazard Ratio (HR): 2.12, 95% CI 1.15-3.92), and cups outside the Lewinnek´s safe zone had a higher risk for revision surgery (p<0.001, HR: 2.57, 95% CI 1.69-3.91). Modern highly-cross linked PEs and ceramic-on-ceramic bearings use, and a proper surgical technique improved revision rate in patients undergoing THA due to ON compared with OA

Inverse Kinematic Alignment (iKA) and Gap Balancing (GB) aim to achieve a balanced TKA via component alignment. However, iKA aims to recreate the native joint line versus resecting the tibia perpendicular to the mechanical axis. This study aims to compare how two alignment methods impact 1) gap balance and laxity throughout flexion and 2) the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK). Two surgeons performed 75 robotic assisted iKA TKA's using a cruciate retaining implant. An anatomic tibial resection restored the native joint line. A digital joint tensioner measured laxity throughout flexion prior to femoral resection. Femoral component position was adjusted using predictive planning to optimize balance. After femoral resection, final joint laxity was collected. Planned GB (pGB) was simulated for all cases posthoc using a neutral tibial resection and adjusting femoral position to optimize balance. Differences in ML balance, laxity, and CPAK were compared between planned iKA (piKA) and pGB. ML balance and laxity were also compared between piKA and final (fiKA). piKA and pGB had similar ML balance and laxity, with mean differences <0.4mm. piKA more closely replicated native MPTA (Native=86.9±2.8°, piKA=87.8±1.8°, pGB=90±0°) and native LDFA (Native=87.5±2.7°, piKA=88.9±3°, pGB=90.8±3.5°). piKA planned for a more native CPAK distribution, with the most common types being II (22.7%), I (20%), III (18.7%), IV (18.7%) and V (18.7%). Most pGB knees were type V (28.4%), VII (37.8%), and III (16.2). fiKA and piKA had similar ML balance and laxity, however fiKA was more variable in midflexion and flexion (p<0.01). Although ML balance and laxity were similar between piKA and pGB, piKA better restored native joint line and CPAK type. The bulk of pGB knees were moved into types V, VII, and III due to the neutral tibial cut. Surgeons should be cognizant of how these differing alignment strategies affect knee phenotype

Aims. Pelvic tilt (PT) can significantly change the functional orientation of the acetabular component and may differ markedly between patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients with stiff spines who have little change in PT are considered at high risk for instability following THA. Femoral component position also contributes to the limits of impingement-free range of motion (ROM), but has been less studied. Little is known about the impact of combined anteversion on risk of impingement with changing pelvic position. Methods. We used a virtual hip ROM (vROM) tool to investigate whether there is an ideal functional combined anteversion for reduced risk of hip impingement. We collected PT information from functional lateral radiographs (standing and sitting) and a supine CT scan, which was then input into the vROM tool. We developed a novel vROM scoring system, considering both seated flexion and standing extension manoeuvres, to quantify whether hips had limited ROM and then correlated the vROM score to component position. Results. The vast majority of THA planned with standing combined anteversion between 30° to 50° and sitting combined anteversion between 45° to 65° had a vROM score > 99%, while the majority of vROM scores less than 99% were outside of this zone. The range of PT in supine, standing, and sitting positions varied widely between patients. Patients who had little change in PT from standing to sitting positions had decreased hip vROM. Conclusion. It has been shown previously that an individual’s unique spinopelvic alignment influences functional cup anteversion. But functional combined anteversion, which also considers stem position, should be used to identify an ideal THA position for impingement-free ROM. We found a functional combined anteversion zone for THA that may be used moving forward to place total hip components. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):834–841

Background. Proper femoral component placement plays a key role in the success of a total knee replacement (TKR). Controversy exists on which technique should be used to ensure proper femoral component placement. This two-part study compares gap balancing (GB) and measured resection (MR) techniques used in TKR, investigating femoral component position and early clinical outcomes. Methods. Femoral component position was analyzed in 95 consecutive knees that underwent primary TKR. Both GB and MR cutting blocks from the same knee system were sequentially placed on the operative knee, marking the pin sits. A standardized photograph (Figure) was taken prior to making final femoral cuts. Relative rotation was determined based on measurements made from a commercially available software. Clinical comparison was made using 50 consecutive GB patients and 50 consecutive MR patients. Clinical outcome measures were Knee Society Scores (KSS), knee range of motion (ROM), functional ROM (FROM), tourniquet time, and patients having manipulations under anesthesia (MUA). Results. The GB technique resulted in relative external and internal rotation of the femoral component in 41% and 17% knees respectively. Forty 42% of knees had no relative rotation. Mean pre and 1 year post-operative knee ROM for the MR cohort was 116.4±14.3. °. and 115±12.9. °. respectively, with FROM of 103.0±17.2. °. The GB cohort had mean pre and 1 year post-operative knee ROM values of 113.9±10.8. °. and 116.8±13.6. °. respectively, with FROM of 96.0±22.5. °. Mean 1 year pain and function KSS in the MR cohort were 92.5±10.7 and 85.4±18.9. In the GB cohort, the mean 1 year KSS values were 95.7±6.7 and 84.9±19.58 for pain and function respectively. Clinical outcome measures were not statistically different. Conclusion. We found that the GB technique resulted in external rotation relative to the MR technique. Despite these intraoperative findings we found no significant clinical differences

Introduction. The objectives of this study were to compare the systemic inflammatory reaction, localised thermal response and macroscopic soft tissue injury outcomes in conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty (conventional TKA) versus robotic total knee arthroplasty (robotic TKA). Methods. This prospective randomised controlled trial included 30 patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis undergoing conventional TKA versus robotic TKA. Predefined serum markers of inflammation and localised knee temperature were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 hours, day 1, day 2, day 7, and day 28 following TKA. Blinded observers used the Macroscopic Soft Tissue Injury (MASTI) classification system to grade intraoperative periarticular soft tissue injury and bone trauma. Plain radiographs were used to assess the accuracy of achieving the planned limb alignment and implant positioning in both treatment groups. Results. Conventional TKA and robotic TKA had comparable changes in the postoperative systemic inflammatory reaction and localised thermal response at 6 hours, day 1, day 2 and day 28 after surgery. Robotic TKA had reduced levels of interleukin-6 (p<0.001), tumour necrosis factor-α (p=0.021), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p=0.001), C-reactive protein (p=0.004), and creatine kinase (p=0.004) at day 7 after surgery compared to conventional TKA. Robotic TKA was associated with improved intraoperative preservation of the periarticular soft tissue envelope (p<0.001) and reduced bone trauma (p=0.015) compared to conventional TKA. Robotic TKA improved accuracy of achieving the planned limb alignment (p<0.001), femoral component positioning (<0.001), and tibial component positioning (<0.001) compared to conventional TKA. Conclusion. Robotic TKA was associated with a transient reduction in the early (day 7) postoperative inflammatory response but there was no difference in the immediate (<48 hours) or late (day 28) postoperative systemic inflammatory responses compared to conventional TKA. Robotic TKA was associated with decreased iatrogenic periarticular soft tissue injury, reduced bone trauma and improved accuracy of implant positioning compared to conventional TKA

INTRODUCTION. The capsular releasing sequence is crucial to safely conduct the Direct Anterior Approach for THA on a regular OR table. The release of the anterior capsule is the first step of the releasing sequence and allows for optimal exposure. This can be done by either resecting a part of the anterior capsule or by preserving it. Our zero hypothesis was that clinical outcomes would not be different between both techniques. MATERIALS & METHODS. 190 Patients operated between November 2017 and May 2018, met the inclusion criteria and were randomly allocated in a double blinded study to either the capsular resection (CR)(N=99) or capsular preservation (CP)(N=91) cohort. The same cementless implant was used in all cases. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) were collected pre- and post-operatively at 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year. Adverse events were recorded. Outcomes were compared with the Mann-Withney U test and a significance level of p<0,05. RESULTS. Both cohorts had significant improvements of all PROMS post-operatively. There was no significant difference in HSS, HOOS or SF-36 between both cohorts (p>0,05). The incidence of peri-articular muscle soreness and transient tenderness in the groin was 7.5% of patients in the CR cohort and in 9.3% in the CP cohort, at 6 weeks to 3 months post-operatively (p>0.05). At one year, 80% of patients had a forgotten hip (p>0.05). There were no dislocations, readmissions or reoperations in both groups. Acetabular and femoral component position was similar in both groups (p>0,05). CONCLUSION. No clinical differences were found between resection or preservation of the anterior capsule when performing a primary THA through the anterior approach on a regular OR table. During the learning curve, it might be advisable to resect a part of the capsule in order to optimize the acetabular exposure, without compromising the clinical outcomes

Anterior knee pain (AKP) is the commonest complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aims to assess whether sagittal femoral component position is an independent predictor of AKP after cruciate retaining single radius TKA without primary patellofemoral resurfacing. From a prospective cohort of 297 consecutive TKAs, 73 (25%) patients reported AKP and 89 (30%) reported no pain at 10 years. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and at 1, 5 and 10 years using the short form 12 and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Variables assessed included demographic data, indication, reoperation, patella resurfacing, and radiographic criteria. Patients with AKP (mean age 67.0 (38–82), 48 (66%) female) had mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain scores of 34.3 (range 5–100). VAS scores were 0 in patients with no pain (mean age 66.5 (41–82), 60 (67%) female). Femoral component flexion (FCF), anterior femoral offset ratio, and medial proximal tibial angle all differed significantly between patients with AKP and no pain (p<0.001), p=0.007, p=0.009, respectively). All PROMs were worse in the AKP group at 10 years (p<0.05). OKSs were worse from 1 year (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed FCF and Insall ratio <0.8 as independent predictors of AKP (R. 2. = 0.263). Extension of ≥0.5° predicted AKP with 87% sensitivity. AKP affects 25% of patients following single radius cruciate retaining TKA, resulting in inferior patient-reported outcome measures at 10 years. Sagittal plane positioning and alignment of the femoral component are important determinants of long-term AKP with femoral component extension being a major risk factor

Introduction. Valgus deformity in an end stage osteoarthritic knee can be difficult to correct with no clear consensus on case management. Dependent on if the joint can be reduced and the degree of medial laxity or distension, a surgeon must use their discretion on the correct method for adequate lateral releases. Robotic assisted (RA) technology has been shown to have three dimensional (3D) cut accuracy which could assist with addressing these complex cases. The purpose of this work was to determine the number of soft tissue releases and component orientation of valgus cases performed with RA total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. This study was a retrospective chart review of 72 RATKA cases with valgus deformity pre-operatively performed by a single surgeon from July 2016 to December 2017. Initial and final 3D component alignment, knee balancing gaps, component size, and full or partial releases were collected intraoperatively. Post-operatively, radiographs, adverse events, WOMAC total and KOOS Jr scores were collected at 6 months, 1 year and 2 year post-operatively. Results. Pre-operatively, knee deformities ranged from reducible knees with less than 5mm of medial laxity to up to 12° with fixed flexion contracture. All knees were corrected within 2.5 degrees of mechanical neutral. Average femoral component position was 0.26. o. valgus, and 4.07. o. flexion. Average tibial component position was 0.37. o. valgus, and 2.96. o. slope, where all tibial components were placed in a neutral or valgus orientation. Flexion and extension gaps were within 2mm (mean 1mm) for all knees. Medial and lateral gaps were balanced 100% in extension and 93% in flexion. The average flexion gap was 18.3mm and the average extension gap was 18.7mm. For component size prediction, the surgeon achieved their planned within one size on the femur 93.8% and tibia 100% of the time. The surgeon upsized the femur in 6.2% of cases. Soft tissue releases were reported in one of the cases. At latest follow-up, radiographic evidence suggested well seated and well fixed components. Radiographs also indicated the patella components were tracking well within the trochlear groove. No revision and re-operation is reported. Mean WOMAC total scores were improved from 24±8.3 pre-op to 6.6±4.4 2-year post-op (p<0.01). Mean KOOS scores were improved from 46.8±9.7 pre-op to 88.4±13.5 2-year post-op (p<0.01). Discussion. In this retrospective case review, the surgeon was able to balance the knee with bone resections and avoid disturbing the soft tissue envelope in valgus knees with 1–12° of deformity. To achieve this balance, the femoral component was often adjusted in axial and valgus rotations. This allowed the surgeon to open lateral flexion and extension gaps. While this study has several limitations, RATKA for valgus knees should continue to be investigated. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

INTRODUCTION. The Woodpecker pneumatic broaching system facilitates femoral preparation to achieve optimal primary fixation of the stem in direct anterior hip replacement using a standard operating table. The high-frequency axial impulses of the device reduce excess bone tension, intraoperative femoral fractures and overall operating time. The Woodpecker device provides uniformity and enhanced control while broaching, optimizing cortical contact between the femur and implant and thereby maximizing prosthetic axial stability and longevity. This study aims to describe a single surgeon's experience using the Woodpecker pneumatic broaching system in 649 cases of direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasties to determine the device's safety and efficacy. METHODOLOGY. All consecutive patients undergoing elective anterior bikini total hip arthroplasties (THA) performed by a single surgeon between July 2013 and June 2018 were included. Patients undergoing a THA with the use of the Woodpecker device through a different surgical approach, revision THA or arthroplasties for a fractured neck of femur were excluded (n=219). The pneumatic device was used for broaching the femoral canal in all cases. Pre-operative and post-operative Harris Hip Scores (HHS) and post-operative radiographs were analyzed to identify femoral fractures and femoral component positioning at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-operative. Any intra-operative or post-operative surgical complications and component survivorship until most recent follow up were recorded in the clinical notes. RESULTS. A total of 649 patients (L THA=317, R THA=328 and bilateral=2) with a mean age of 69 (range 46–91yrs) and mean BMI of 28.3 (range = 18.4–44.0) underwent a DAA THA using a Woodpecker device were included in the study. Of these patients, 521 (80%) underwent uncemented and 128 (20%) underwent cemented femoral components. The time taken to broach the femur using Woodpecker broaching this system averaged 2.8 minutes (1.4 to 7.5 minutes) in both cemented and uncemented cases. In 91% of cases the templated broach size was achieved with the remaining 9% within +/− 1 size of the planned template. Radiographic analysis revealed 67.3% of the stems placed in 0–1.82 degrees of varus and 32.7% placed in 0–1.4 degrees of valgus. Average HHS were 24.4 pre-operatively, with drastic improvements shown at 6 weeks (80.95), 6 months (91.91) and 12 months (94.18) after surgery. Intraoperative femoral fractures occurred in three patients (0.4%) during trial reduction, a further three patients had periprosthetic post-operative fractures (0.4%) from falls, two patients had stem subsidence (0.3%) and a further two patients had wound infections (0.3%). At the most recent follow up, the survivorship of the acetabular component was 99.7% and the femoral component was 99.1%, with mean follow up of 2.9 years (0.5 to 5 years). No intraoperative or post-operative complications could be directly attributed to the Woodpecker broaching system. CONCLUSION. The pneumatic Woodpecker device is a safe and effective alternative tool in minimally invasive direct anterior hip replacement surgery for femoral broaching performed on a standard operating table. The skill and experience of the surgeon must be taken into consideration when utilizing new surgical devices

Accepted landmarks for determining rotation include the posterior condyles, Whiteside’s line, arbitrary 3-4° of external rotation, and transepicondylar axis (TEA). All methods require anatomical identification, which may be variable. The purpose of this study was to radiologically evaluate femoral component rotation (CT analysis) based on a method that references to the tibial axis and balanced flexion-tension. Methods: CT scans of 38 randomly selected TKA were evaluated to determine femoral component positioning. Spiral CT scans of the femoral epicondylar region with eight 4mm cuts were performed to accurately identify medial and lateral epicondyles. Rotational alignment was measured in relation to the transepicondylar axis using CT-implemented software by two independent radiologists. Results: Femoral component rotation ranged from 4° internal rotation to 5° external rotation with a mean of 0.0° = parallel to the TEA. All 38 cases had satisfactory clinical results, range of motion of over 90°, and showed perfect patello-femoral tracking and patellar congruency. Conclusions: Femoral rotation position based on tibial axis and balanced flexion tension is patient specific, reproducible and results in predictable patella tracking. CT analysis in this study confirms that the tibial axis method produces a consistent femoral component positioning that relates accurately to the TEA. Tibial axis method avoids the need for arbitrary landmark identification, placing the femoral component predictably in an optimum position in relation to the tibia and patella

Background. Navigation in total knee replacement is controversially discussed in the literature. In our previous study, femoral component positioning was more accurate with computed navigation than with conventional implantation techniques, however tibial positioning showed similar results. Moreover there were no differences between image-free and image-based navigation techniques. To what extent more accurate femoral positioning has an impact on the clinical mid-term follow up is not known. Methods. At a mean follow-up interval of 5.3 years, seventy-one patients (84.5%) returned for a review and were examined clinically and radiographically, with use of a methodology identical to that used preop and at 2 years, using the subjective value, the Knee Society Score (KSS), and a.p. and true lateral standard radiographs respectively. Complications, re-operations, persisting pain and resulting range of motion were registered. Results. Four patients in the image-based (2x late-onset infection, 1x femoral impingement, 1x component malalignment), 2 in the conventional group (2x component malalignment) and 1 patient in the image-free navigated group (arthoscopic debridement for arthrofibrosis) needed reoperation in the mean time. 59 of the 71 patients were very satisfied and satisfied at 5.3 years folllow up: (conventional: 19 of 25 (77±8 years); image-based navigation: 18 of 22 (77±10 years); image-free navigation: 22 of 24 (78±7 years)). The mean average of the Knee Society Score was 92.3(range 47 to 98). Compared to the conventional (KSS: 93.9±8,0) and image-free (KSS: 94.0±6,43) group, the KSS in the image-based group was insignificantly lower (KSS: 90±13,6) (p< 0,05). Radiographically, two patients in the conventional group showed a lysis on the lateral and medial tibia plateau of <1 mm without any clinical significance. There was no need for reintervention. There were no significant differences concerning remainig pain (conventional: 24%; image-based 18%; image-free: 8,5%), ROM and ligamental stability. Conclusion. Radiographical and clinical mid-term results after TKA yielded good and excellent results independent of the computed navigation and its type. Even a more accurate femoral component positioning in the patients cohort has been shown, we couldn't find a significant difference concerning the clinical outcome 5.3 years after conventional, image-based and image-free total knee arthroplasty. Despite of increased costs and time for navigated techniques we cannot show a mid-term benefit in functional and subjectiv outcome compared to conventional techniques

Arthrofibrosis remains a dominant post-operative complication and reason for returning to the OR following total knee arthroplasty. Trauma induced by ligament releases during TKA soft tissue balancing and soft tissue imbalance are thought to be contributing factors to arthrofibrosis, which is commonly treated by manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). We hypothesized that a robotic-assisted ligament balancing technique where the femoral component position is planned in 3D based on ligament gap data would result in lower MUA rates than a measured resection technique where the implants are planned based solely on boney alignment data and ligaments are released afterwards to achieve balance. We also aimed to determine the degree of mechanical axis deviation from neutral that resulted from the ligament balancing technique. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 301 consecutive primary TKA cases performed by a single surgeon. The first 102 consecutive cases were performed with a femur-first measured resection technique using computer navigation. The femoral component was positioned in neutral mechanical alignment and at 3° of external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis. The tibia was resected perpendicular to the mechanical axis and ligaments were released as required until the soft tissues were sufficiently balanced. The subsequent 199 consecutive cases were performed with a tibia-first ligament balancing technique using a robotic-assisted TKA system. The tibia was resected perpendicular to the mechanical axis, and the relative positions of the femur and tibia were recorded in extension and flexion by inserting a spacer block of appropriate height in the medial and lateral compartments. The position, rotation, and size of the femoral component was then planned in all planes such that the ligament gaps were symmetric and balanced to within 1mm (Figure 1). Bone resection values were used to define acceptable limits of implant rotation: Femoral component alignment was adjusted to within 2° of varus or valgus, and within 0–3° of external rotation relative to the posterior condyles. Component flexion, anteroposterior and proximal-distal positioning were also adjusted to achieve balance in the sagittal plane. A robotic-assisted femoral cutting guide was then used to resect the femur according to the plan (Figure 2). CPT billing codes were reviewed to determine how many patients in each group underwent post-operative MUA. Post-operative mechanical alignment was measured in a subset of 50 consecutive patients in the ligament balancing group on standing long-leg radiographs by an independent observer. Results. Post-operative MUA rates were significantly lower in the ligament balancing group (0.5%; 1/199) than in the measured resection group (3.9%; 4/102), p=0.051. 91.3% (42/46) of knees were within 3° and 100% (46/46) were within 4° of neutral alignment to the mechanical axis post-operatively in the ligament balancing group. Conclusions. Gap driven femoral based planning in TKA resulted in a significantly lower post-operative manipulation rate than in the measured resection approach, while maintaining acceptable overall alignment to the mechanical axis

Introduction. Acetabular component positioning, offset, combined anteversion, leg length, and soft tissue envelope around the hip plays an important role in hip function and durability. In this paper we will focus on acetabular positioning of the cup. Technique. The axis of the pelvis is identified intra-operatively as a line drawn from the highest point of the iliac crest to the middle of the greater trochanter. Prior to reaming the acetabulum, an undersized trial acetabular component is placed parallel and inside the transverse ligament, inside the anterior column and projecting posterior to the axis of the pelvis. This direction is marked and the subsequent reaming and final component placement is performed in the same direction. The lateral opening is judged based on the 45-degree angle from the tear drop to the lateral margin of the acetabulum on anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. The final anteversion of the cup is adjusted based on increased or decreased lumbar lordosis and combined anteversion. Methods. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of 100 consecutive patients undergoing posterior THR between September 2010 and March 2011 with this method were evaluated for cup inclination angle and anteversion using EBRA software. Results. There were no malalignments or dislocations. The mean cup inclination angle and anteversion were 41 ± 5.1 degrees (range 37.1 – 48.4) and 22.1 ± 4.8 degrees (range 16.6 – 29.3), respectively. Conclusion. This is a reproducible method of cup positioning and with proper femoral component position and restoring leg length, offset, combined anteversion, and balance soft tissue around the hip. These factors affect the incidence of dislocation, infection, reduced wear, and durability

Purpose:. Accepted landmarks for determining femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include the posterior condyles, Whiteside’s line, arbitrary three to four degrees of external rotation, and transepicondylar axis (TEA). All methods require anatomical identification, which may be variable. The purpose of this study was to radiologically evaluate femoral component rotation (CT analysis) based on a method that references to the tibial shaft axis and balanced flexion tension without identification of femoral anatomical landmarks. Methods:. Out of a cohort of 3058 mobile bearing low contact stress TKA, CT scans of 38 randomly selected well functioning TKA were evaluated to determine femoral component positioning. Spiral CT scans of the femoral epicondylar region with four mm cuts were performed to accurately identify medial and lateral femoral epicondyles. Rotational alignment was measured in relation to the transepicondylar axis using CT-implemented software by two independent radiologists. Results:. Mean femoral rotational alignment was parallel to the TEA (average 0. 3 degrees internal rotation) ranging from six degrees internal to four degrees external rotation. All thirty-eight cases had satisfactory clinical results, range of motion of over 90°, and showed perfect patello-femoral tracking and patellar congruency on axial views. Conclusions:. Femoral rotation position based on tibial shaft axis and balanced flexion tension gap is patient specific, reproducible and results in predictable femoral rotational positioning and patella tracking. CT analysis in this study confirms that the tibial shaft axis method produces a consistent femoral component positioning that relates accurately to the TEA. Tibial shaft axis method avoids the need for arbitrary landmark identification, placing the femoral component predictably in an optimum position in relation to the tibia and patella. Address for correspondence: 
 . jgboldt@hotmail.com

Purpose:. Accepted landmarks for determining femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include the posterior condyles, Whiteside’s line, arbitrary three to four degrees of external rotation, and transepicondylar axis (TEA). All methods require anatomical identification, which may be variable. The purpose of this study was to radiologically evaluate femoral component rotation (CT analysis) based on a method that references to the tibial shaft axis and balanced flexion tension without identification of femoral anatomical landmarks. Methods:. Out of a cohort of 3058 mobile bearing low contact stress TKA, CT scans of 38 randomly selected well functioning TKA were evaluated to determine femoral component positioning. Spiral CT scans of the femoral epicondylar region with four mm cuts were performed to accurately identify medial and lateral femoral epicondyles. Rotational alignment was measured in relation to the transepicondylar axis using CT-implemented software by two independent radiologists. Results:. Mean femoral rotational alignment was parallel to the TEA (average 0. 3 degrees internal rotation) ranging from six degrees internal to four degrees external rotation. All thirty-eight cases had satisfactory clinical results, range of motion of over 90°, and showed perfect patello-femoral tracking and patellar congruency on axial views. Conclusions:. Femoral rotation position based on tibial shaft axis and balanced flexion tension gap is patient specific, reproducible and results in predictable femoral rotational positioning and patella tracking. CT analysis in this study confirms that the tibial shaft axis method produces a consistent femoral component positioning that relates accurately to the TEA. Tibial shaft axis method avoids the need for arbitrary landmark identification, placing the femoral component predictably in an optimum position in relation to the tibia and patella. Address for correspondence: 
 . jgboldt@hotmail.com

The exact alignment of the femoral component is crucial for the success of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. This prospective study was performed to find whether the imageless computer-assisted navigation surgery can improve the accuracy during hip resurfacing arthroplasty by comparing the alignment of the femoral component implanted with navigation system and conventional-mechanical guided system. Forty patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups for resurfacing hip arthroplasty using Birmingham hip resurfacing system. In the conventional group, femoral component positioning was assisted by mechanical alignment guides. In the navigation group, it was assisted by an imageless computer-assisted surgical system of Vectorvision. ®. (BrainLAB, Germany). We measured the difference between the preoperative plan of femoral component’s position and postoperative results on radiographs in the 2 groups. In the conventional group, a median difference of the stem alignment was 5.4° (range, 0.2°–10.9°) and a median difference of the stem anteversion was 2.6° (range, 0°–6.5°). In the navigated group, a median difference of the stem alignment was 2.3° (range, 0.2°–4.9°) and a median difference of the stem anteversion was 1° (range, 0°–3.6°). These differences between the 2 groups were statistically significant (P< 0.05). In resurfacing arthroplasty with a hip navigation, the procedure showed a good performance and reliability. It is achieved with greater precision with a navigation system than a mechanical alignment system

Introduction: Acetabular component positioning, offset, combined anteversion, leg length, and soft tissue envelope around the hip plays an important role in hip function and durability. In this paper we will focus on acetabular positioning of the cup. Technique: The axis of the pelvis is identified intra-operatively as a line drawn from the highest point of the iliac crest to the middle of the greater trochanter. Prior to reaming the acetabulum, an undersized trial acetabular component is placed parallel and inside the transverse ligament, inside the anterior column and projecting posterior to the axis of the pelvis. This direction is marked and the subsequent reaming and final component placement is performed in the same direction. The lateral opening is judged based on 45-degree angle from the tear drop to the lateral margin of the acetabulum on anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. The final anteversion of the cup is adjusted based on increase or decrease of lumbar lordosis and combined anteversion. Methods: Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of 100 consecutive patients undergoing posterior THR between September 2010 and March 2011 with this method were evaluated for cup inclination angle and anteversion using EBRA software. Results: There were no malalignment or dislocation. The mean cup inclination angle and anteversion were 41 ± 5.1 degrees (range 37.1 – 48.4) and 22.1 ± 4.8 degrees (range 16.6 – 29.3), respectively. Conclusion: This is a reproducible method of cup positioning and with proper femoral component position, restores leg length, offset, combined anteversion, and balances soft tissue around the hip. These factors affect the incidence of dislocation, infection, reduced wear, and durability

The stem of a femoral component can be helpful in assuring proper implant orientation. However, recent interest in short femoral components with which to better accommodate smaller incisions has resulted in technical challenges to proper implant positioning. In order to avoid component malposition and potential compromise of implant longevity, surgeons may rely upon intra-operative x-rays. However this has major drawbacks: radiation exposure of the OR staff; and accommodation of x-ray equipment without compromise of operating field sterility. There has been created a simple, precise instrument which will ensure proper implant positioning in varus/valgus and flexion/extension planes without the need of intra-operative x-ray. Its reliability has been confirmed by both cadaveric and clinical studies. It has been demonstrated to be 100% accurate in providing proper short femoral component positioning

The alignment of prostheses components has a major impact on the longevity of total knee protheses as it significantly influences the biomechanics and thus also the load distribution in the knee joint. Knee joint loads depend on three factors: (1) geometrical conditions such as bone geometry and implant position/orientation, (2) passive structures such as ligaments and tendons as well as passive mechanical properties of muscles, and (3) active structures that are muscles. The complex correlation between implant position and clinical outcome of TKA and later in vivo joint loading after TKA has been investigated since 1977. These investigations predominantly focused on component alignment relative to the mechanical leg axis (Mikulicz-line) and more recently on rotational alignment perpendicular to the mechanical axis. In general four different approaches can be used to study the relationship between implant position and knee joint loads: In anatomical studies (1), the influence of the geometrical conditions and passive structures can be analyzed under the constraint that the properties of vital tissue are only approximated. This could be overcome with an intraoperative load measurement approach (2). Though, this set up does not consider the influence of active structures. Although post-operative in vivo load measurements (3) provide information about the actual loading condition including the influence of active structures, this method is not applicable to investigate the influence of different implant positions. Using mathematical approaches (4) including finite element analysis and multi-body-modeling, prostheses positions can be varied freely. However, there exists no systematical analysis of the influence of prosthesis alignment on knee loading conditions not only in axial alignment along and rotational alignment perpendicular to the mechanical axis but in all six degrees of freedom (DOF) with a validated mathematical model. Our goal was therefore to investigate the correlation between implant position and joint load in all six DOF using an adaptable biomechanical multi-body model. A model for the simulation of static single leg stance was implemented as an approximation of the phase with the highest load during walking cycle. This model is based on the AnyBody simulation software (AnyBody Technology A/S, Denmark). As an initial approach, with regard to the simulation of purely static loading the knee joint was implemented as hinge joint. The patella was realised as a deflection point, a so called “ViaNode,” for the quadriceps femoris muscle. All muscles were implemented based on Hill's muscle model. The knee model was indirectly validated by comparison of the simulation results for single and also double leg stance with in-vivo measurements from the Orthoload database (www.orthoload.de). For the investigation of the correlation between implant position and knee load, major boundary conditions were chosen as follows:. •. Flexion angle was set to 20° corresponding to the position with the highest muscle activity during gait cycle. •. Muscle lengths and thereby also muscle loads were adapted to the geometrical changes after each simulation step representing the situation after post-operative rehabilitation. As input parameters, the tibial and femoral components' positions were independently translated in a range of ±20mm in 10 equally distant steps for all three spatial directions. For the rotational alignment in adduction/abduction as well as flexion/extension the tibial and femoral components' positions were varied in the range of ±15° and for internal/external rotation within the range of ±20°, also in 10 equally angled steps. Changes in knee joint forces and torques as well as in patellar forces were recorded and compared to results of previous studies. Comparing the simulation results of single and double leg stance with the in-vivo measurements from the Orthoload database, changes in knee joint forces showed similar trends and the slope of changes in torques transmitted by the joint was equal. Against the background of unknown geometrical conditions in the Orthoload measurements and the simplification (hinge joint) of the initial multi-body-model compared to real knee joints, the developed model provides a reasonable basis for further investigations already – and will be refined in future works. As influencing parameters are very complex, a non-ambiguous interpretation of force/torque changes in the knee joint as a function of changes in component positions was in many cases hardly possible. Changes in patella force on the other hand could be traced back to geometrical and force changes in the quadriceps femoris muscle. Positional changes mostly were in good agreement with our hypotheses based on literature data when knee load and patellar forces respectively were primarily influenced by active structures, e.g. with regard to the danger of patella luxation in case of increased internal rotation of the tibial component. Whereas simulations also showed results contradicting our expectations for positional changes mainly affecting passive structures, e.g. cranial/caudal translation of the femoral component. This shows the major drawback of the implemented model: Intra-articular passive structures such as cruciate and collateral ligaments were not represented. Additionally kinematic influences on knee and patella loading were not taken into account as the simulations were made under static conditions. Implementation of relative movements of femoral, tibial and patella components and simulation under dynamic conditions might overcome this limitation. Furthermore, the boundary condition of complete muscle adaptations might be critical, as joint loads might be significantly higher shortly after operation. This could lead to a much longer and possibly ineffective rehabilitation process