Aims. The extended wait that most patients are now experiencing for hip and knee arthroplasty has raised questions about whether reliance on waiting time as the primary driver for prioritization is ethical, and if other additional factors should be included in determining surgical priority. Our Prioritization of THose aWaiting hip and knee ArthroplastY (PATHWAY) project will explore which perioperative factors are important to consider when prioritizing those on the waiting list for hip and knee arthroplasty, and how these factors should be weighted. The final product will include a weighted benefit score that can be used to aid in surgical prioritization for those awaiting elective primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Methods. There will be two linked work packages focusing on opinion from key stakeholders (patients and surgeons). First, an online modified Delphi process to determine a consensus set of factors that should be involved in patient prioritization. This will be performed using standard Delphi methodology consisting of multiple rounds where following initial individual rating there is feedback, discussion, and further recommendations undertaken towards eventual consensus. The second stage will then consist of a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) to allow for priority setting of the factors derived from the Delphi through elicitation of weighted benefit scores. The DCE consists of several choice tasks designed to elicit stakeholder preference regarding included attributes (factors). Results. The study is co-funded by the University of Aberdeen Knowledge Exchange Commission (Ref CF10693-29) and a Chief Scientist Office (CSO) Scotland Clinical Research Fellowship which runs from 08/2021 to 08/2024 (Grant ref: CAF/21/06). Approval from the University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences School Ethics Review Board was granted 22/03/2022 - Reference number SERB/2021/12/2210. Conclusion. The PATHWAY project provides the first attempt to use patient and surgeon opinions to develop a unified approach to prioritization for those awaiting hip and knee arthroplasty. Development of such a tool will provide more equitable access to arthroplasty services, as well as providing a framework for developing similar approaches in other areas of healthcare delivery. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):753–758

Aims

The aim of this modified Delphi process was to create a structured Revision Hip Complexity Classification (RHCC) which can be used as a tool to help direct multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussions of complex cases in local or regional revision networks.

Abstract. Introduction. In recent years, CTA has been an effective training adjunct for orthopaedic procedures. ACLR is a complex procedure with a steep learning curve. Aim. To design a multimedia CTA learning tool for ACLR using a modified Delphi methodology. Methodology:. CTA generation: A modified Delphi method was used to generate a list of Technical Steps (TS), Decision Points (DP) and errors/solutions for an ACLR that was approved by an expert consensus amongst four, fellowship-trained knee surgeons. A technical workflow was designed to generate the audio-visual tool. Pilot study: 30 novice trainees were granted access to the CTA tool and then performed the ACLR in a cadaveric simulation workshop. A 5-point Likert scale aimed to qualitatively assess if the CTA was useful to their learning. Results:. CTA generation: 156 TS and 79 DP were included for an ACLR procedure which was divided into 7 phases. The audio-visual component was combined with the written tool to design the final CTA tool. Pilot study: 95% of trainees suggested the CTA tool would be useful before carrying out an ACLR in the operating theatre. They agreed it made their ACLR learning more effective. Conclusion:. We have designed a novel and easily accessible CTA tool to standardise teaching of ACLR surgery. Novice surgeons verify the value of the CTA as an adjunct to their apprenticeship training. Future work: A Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) is currently being planned to evaluate whether there are any objective benefits of this CTA to train surgeons performing an ACLR

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) is the most common orthopaedic disorder in newborns. Whilst the Pavlik harness is one of the most frequently used treatments for DDH, there is immense variability in treatment parameters reported in the literature and in clinical practice, leading to difficulties in standardising teaching and comparing outcomes. In the absence of definitive quantitative evidence for the optimal Pavlik harness management strategy in DDH, we addressed this problem by scientifically obtaining international expert-based consensus on the same. An initial list of items relevant to Pavlik harness treatment was derived by systematic review of the literature according to PRISMA criteria and reviewed by two expert clinicians in DDH management. Delphi methodology was used to guide serial rounds of surveying and feedback to content matter experts from the International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI), a collaborative group of paediatric orthopaedic surgeons with expertise in the management of DDH. Rounds of surveying continued in the same manner until consensus was reached. Importance ratings were derived from each round of surveying by calculating median score responses on the 5-point Likert scale for each item. Items requiring clarification or those with a median score of below 4 (“agree”) were modified as needed prior to each subsequent round. Consensus was considered reached when 90% or more of the items had an interquartile range (IQR) of ≤ 1. This value indicates low sample deviation and is accepted as having achieved consensus. This was followed by a corroboration of face validity to derive the final set of management principles. The literature search and expert review identified an initial list of 66 items in 8 categories relevant to Pavlik harness management. Four rounds of structured surveying were required to reach consensus. Following a final round of face validity, a definitive list of 33 items in 8 categories met consensus by the experts. These items were tabulated and presented as “General Principles of Pavlik Harness Treatment for DDH” and “Pavlik Harness Treatment by Severity of Hip Dysplasia”. Furthermore, highly contentious items were identified as important future areas of study and will be discussed. We have developed a comprehensive set of principles derived by expert consensus to assist clinicians, and for use as a teaching resource, in the non-operative management of DDH using the Pavlik harness. We have gained consensus on both the general principles of Pavlik harness treatment as well as the detailed treatment of hip subtypes seen across the spectrum of pathology of DDH. Furthermore, this study has also served to generate a list of the most controversial areas in the non-operative management of DDH which should be considered high priority for future study to further refine and optimise the outcomes of children with developmental hip dysplasia

Aims

The aim of this study was to produce clinical consensus recommendations about the non-surgical treatment of children with Perthes’ disease. The recommendations are intended to support clinical practice in a condition for which there is no robust evidence to guide optimal care.

Aims

The aim of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK) Meniscal Consensus Project was to develop an evidence-based treatment guideline for patients with meniscal lesions of the knee.