Abstract. Objective. Short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) aims to preserve the proximal bone stock for future revisions, so that the first revision should resemble a primary intervention rather than a revision. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes in revision THA after failed short stem versus after failed conventional stem THA. Methods. This study included forty-five patients with revision THA divided into three groups (15 each); group A: revision after short stem, group B: revision after conventional cementless stem and group C revision after conventional cemented stem. The studied groups were compared regarding 31 variables including demographic data, details of the primary and revision procedures, postoperative radiological subsidence, hospital stay, time for full weight bearing (FWB), preoperative and postoperative clinical scores. Results. Early stem subsidence (40%) was the main indication of revision in group A compared to peri-prosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) (73.3%) and aseptic loosening (53.3%) in group B and C respectively (P=0.021). The mean time to revision was significantly shorter in group A (15 months) compared to 95.33 and 189.40 months in group B and C respectively. (P=0.005). Sixty % (9 patients) in group A were revised in the first year. The mean operative time, blood loss, postoperative blood transfusion and hospital stay were significantly lower in group A compared to group B and C (P<0.001, <0.001, 0.002 and 0.001 respectively). Revisions in group A were performed using either short stems (13.3%) or conventional stems (86.7%) whilst 80% of patients needed long stems and 20% of patients needed conventional stems in group B and C (P<0.001). The mean postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) at the latest follow up was 87.07, 87.53 and 85.47 in group A, B and C respectively. All PFFS had excellent results according to Beal's and Tower's criteria; all fractures healed and the implants were stable. Conclusion. The most common cause of failure of short stems is early stem subsidence. Short stem THA has specific indications and patient selection is very crucial. Preoperative templating for short stems and a detailed analysis of the individual patient anatomy in anteroposterior and lateral views are mandatory to predict the correct implant size more accurately. The use of intraoperative imaging can verify the sizing, implant position, and sufficient contact with the lateral cortex. Revision of short stem THA resembled the primary THA. If a standard implant can be used in a surgical revision instead of a longer revision stem, this can be considered as an advantage for the hip arthroplasty treatment concept. However, this only applies if the longevity of the first treatment with a short stem is comparable with that of a standard stem. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY. The objective of this study is to establish the medium-term clinical and radiological results with the cementless three-dimensional Vektor-Titan stem compared with conventional cementless stem, such as PerFix stem. The latter stem has a double-wedge design with a rounded distal portion for canal filling (Fig. 1). MATERIALS AND METHODS. From July, 2004, to May, 2010, fifty seven Vektor-Titan stems and 150 PerFix stems were implanted for the patients with osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, femoral neck fracture, and rheumatoid arthritis in our hospital. The results were evaluated clinically using Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and the Merle d’Aubigne and Postel (M&P) scores. Radiographs were analyzed retrospectively. The criteria used for determining loosening were migration or a total radiolucent zone between the prosthesis/bone cement and host bone, wherein the width increased progressively or change of position, i.e., migration or subsidence of the prosthesis. Migration of the socket seen on the radiograph was defined as either the presence of a ≥2-mm position change or rotation. Position changes of the stem seen on the radiograph were defined as the presence of a progressive subsidence of ≥2 mm or change of position, e.g., varus or valgus. The follow-up period was 9.2 ± 2.6 (range, 5.0–14.0) years. RESULTS. One patient had intraoperative femoral shaft fracture and healed by conservative treatment. The mean JOA and M&P scores improved from preoperative 39.3 and 6.8 points to postoperative 90.9 and 17.2 points, respectively. Thigh pain was less frequent for Vektor-Titan stems (Table 1). Radiolucent lines was far less likely to appear for Vektor-Titan stems evaluated by Gruen's zonal analyses (Table 2). On the other hand, there were radiolucent zones of more than 90% in zone 4 with cementless PerFix stems (Table 2). There was no cases of loosening or postoperative infection. Although signs of bone atrophy were found in the proximal femur and the trochanters in 66.7 % of all cases, bone structure was radiologically normal without stress shielding in most cases (Table 2). On the contrary, there was evidence of an even denser bone structure, such as trabeculae, at the tip of the stem and the lateral implant fixation within the greater trochanter in Vektor-Titan stem cases. These findings remained unchanged over observation periods. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. The cementless Vektor-Titan stem is made of Ti6AI7Nb, has got the shape of a straight three-dimensional cone. It has a high proximal volume in the form of a three-dimensional taper with longitudinal ribs. This design achieves strong primary fixation in the proximal metaphysis. Radiologically, newly formed trabeculae toward to the stem were indicative of direct biological fixation at the bone-implant interface. Medium-term results with the cementless Vektor-Titan stem show no implant loosening with stable metaphyseal fixation and preservation of bone structure in the proximal femur and the absence of radiolucent zones around the stem compared with conventional cementless stem

Introduction: Disagreement exists in the literature as to whether hip resurfacing requires more acetabular reaming than uncemented hip replacement. Materials and Methods: Thirty-nine patients underwent total hip arthroplasty with a large metal on metal resurfacing acetabular cup and large metal head with a conventional uncemented femoral stem. Although there was no change in routine operative technique the femoral neck was measured (as if for resurfacing) before being cut. The size of the acetabular component actually inserted was compared with the smallest size which could have been used had a resurfacing been carried out for each patient. A two tailed paired t test was carried out. Results: We found that there was no difference in female patients but in men the actual cup used was 2.44mm smaller than the smallest possible resurfacing cup which equates to 6.39cm. 3. less bone (p < 0.0001). Discussion: By using paired samples we have reduced confounding factors and shown that a large metal on metal bearing on a conventional stem is more conservative of acetabular bone than hip resurfacing in male patients

Introduction

Adverse Local Tissue Reactions (ALTR) have been reported in association with both wear and corrosion. Tissue reactions have been reported in association with corrosion at CoCr head-CoCr neck, CoCr head-TiAl6V4 neck, and CoCr modular neck on beta-titanium (TMZF) stem junctions. The current abstract reports on 3 cases of ALTR in association with CoCr modular necks on convention titanium (TiAl6V4) stem junctions.

Case 1. A 67 year old male (87 kg, 1.73 m, BMI 29.1) presented with new onset hip irritation 11 months after surgery. Radiographs show no abnormalities. Further investigation revealed the following: ESR = 95, CRP = 5, Cr level = 1.0, Co level = 4.1, leukocyte transformation testing = highly reactive to nickel. Hip aspiration was culture negative with 11,250 wbc. Metal artifact reduction MR showed cystic local reaction in the region of the greater trochanter.

Case 2. A 52 year old male (89 kg, 1.83 m, BMI 26.5) presented with new onset hip irritation 30 months after surgery. Radiographs show no abnormalities. Further investigation revealed the following: ESR = 7, CRP = 5.4, Cr level = 2.1, Co level = 4.8, leukocyte transformation testing = reactive to nickel. Hip aspiration was culture negative with 3995 wbc. Metal artifact reduction MR showed cystic local reaction in the region of the iliopsoas.

Case 3. A 52 year old male (104 kg, 1.85 m, BMI 30.1) presented with new onset hip irritation 26 months after surgery. Radiographs show no abnormalities. Further investigation revealed the following: ESR = 33, CRP = 34.9, Cr level = 1.0, Co level = 3.7, leukocyte transformation testing = no reactivity to any of the biomaterials. Hip aspiration was culture negative with 3,780 wbc. Metal artifact reduction MR showed cystic local reaction in the region of the iliopsoas.

Post-operative peri-prosthetic femoral fracture (PO-PPFF) is one of the most relevant complications in primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (pTHA), accountable for a significant clinical and socio-economic burden both in revision and fixation settings. We retrospectively reviewed of our series of 1586 cementless total hip arthroplasty performed between 1999 and 2019 (achieving a minimum of 5-years follow-up) with different short stems. We have observed a cumulative low incidence of PO-PPFF of 0,33% (5 cases): we divided Po-PPFF in two groups: fracture occurred around a short stem (A) and around a standard shortened stem (B), according to French Hip & Knee Classification of Short Stems. Despite the length of observed period (mean follow-up 12 years, min 5 years max 24 years) a total of 1512 cases (mean age at surgery 61 years, max 74, min 40 years) were available to clinical and radiographic follow-up, being this population enrolled in elective surgery clinical protocols. Our data exceed the low incidence of post-operative femoral fracture around bone -preserving previously reported by Kim in 2018 (12 fracture out of 1089 cases:1.1%). No correlation have been observed among occurrence of PO-PPF age of the patient and no fracture occurred around cemented short stems despite patient's characteristics were unfavourable in term of age and bone quality. This result is not unexpected, giving the lower incidence of peri-prosthetic fracture even cemented conventional stems, as reported in all registry and systematic reviews. A similar behaviour was reported in 2020 Australian Joint Registry, where Post-operative periprosthetic femoral fracture showed a steep curve in early period, but remaining firmly below 1% during the following 12 years. Our clinical data seems to confirm previous studies by Jones (conducted on synthetic bone and fresh-frozen cadaveric femurs) where higher fracture angles and higher fracture torque were detected in short hips compared to standard stems

Short stems have been developed to conserve bone stock, especially in younger populations undergoing a total hip arthroplasty (THA), and showed similar functional outcomes compared to conventional stems. Recent literature suggested that stem length might be an independent risk factor for acute periprosthetic femoral fracture in direct anterior THA (1) or with different short stem designs (2). The purpose of the present study was to compare the incidence of acute periprosthetic femoral fractures, between stems of the same manufacture (Taperloc microplasty vs Taperloc complete), which have the same stem characteristics, except for the stem length which is 35 mm shorter in Taperloc microplasty during posterior and lateral THA. Our institution's arthroplasty database was searched for all primary total hip arthroplasties utilizing short femoral stems performed between August 2016 and August 2023. Pre-operative X-rays for each case were analysed to characterize the proximal femoral geometry, specifically the canal bone ratio (CBR) and canal flare index (CFI). Data analysis was performed to identify risk factors for periprosthetic fractures. For the time period assessed, 2107 femoral stems (Taperloc Microplasty:1727, Taperloc complete: 380) were implanted. Females constituted 53% of the cohort. The average patient age was 70±11 years. The periprosthetic fracture rate was 0.94%, with 20 periprosthetic fractures (Taperloc Microplasty:17, Taperloc complete: 3) excluding 2 greater trochanteric fractures (1 at each group), identified at follow-up of three months. There was no significant difference between the periprosthetic fracture rates between the two stems (0.98% vs 0.79%, p>0.72) The multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the stem length, CBR, CFI, age, and gender were not risk factors for periprosthetic fracture. The present study demonstrated that both Taperloc Microplasty and Taperloc complete stems had similar rates of periprosthetic fractures, and the stem length was not a risk factor for a periprosthetic fracture during uncemented THA. 1. Tamaki T, Cementless Tapered-Wedge Stem Length Affects the Risk of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):805-809. 2. Staunton P. Acute Periprosthetic Hip Fracture with Short Uncemented Femoral Stems. J Arthroplasty 2024 accepted

Background. Short bone-conserving femoral stem implants were developed to achieve more physiological, proximal bone loading than conventional femoral stems. Concerns have arisen, however, that improved loading may be offset by lower primary stability because of the reduced potential area for bony contact. Aims. The aim of this study was to determine the primary stability of a novel short femoral stem compared with a conventional femoral stem following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA), in a prospective, blinded, randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. Methods. Fifty-three patients were randomised to receive cementless THA with either a short femoral stem or a conventional femoral stem. The CONSORT diagram is shown (Figure I). Surgery was performed at one institution by three surgeons. 26 patients received the short stem and 23 received the conventional stem. Complete follow-up was available on 40 patients (82%). All patients received the same cementless acetabular component. The primary outcomes were dynamically inducible micromotion and migration of the femoral stems at two years. Both were measured using radiostereometric analysis. Radiographs for radiostereometric analysis were taken post-operatively and at three, six, 12, 18 and 24 months. Validated geometric algorithms were used to determine the relative three-dimensional position of the prosthetic stem and host bone. Results. At two years, there was significantly less subsidence (inferior migration) of the short femoral stem (head: 0.28mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] +/−0.17; SD 0.38; tip: 0.10mm; 95% CI +/− 0.18; SD 0.41) compared with the conventional stem (head: 0.61mm, 95% CI +/−0.26, SD 0.55, P=0.03; tip: 0.44mm, 95% CI +/−0.21, SD 0.43, P=0.02) (Figure II). There was no significant difference in dynamically inducible micromotion. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that the short femoral stem has a stable and predictable migration. However, longer-term survival analysis remains important. For any figures and tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction: Aim of the study was to investigate the fixation patterns of cementless short-stem designs compared to the fixation patterns of well-known conventional stems artificially shortened in several steps. Method: Primary rotational stability and tilting were measured in a standardized and validated simulator set-up. The tested short-stem designs included the Mayo (Zimmer), the CFP (Link), and the CUT (Eska). The “conventional” group consisted of the ABG (Stryker), the S-Rom (DePuy), and the G2 (DePuy). Additionally, these systems were tested when gradually shortened in several steps. Results: The Mayo stem showed a 2/3 fixation pattern with 11.5 mdeg/Nm relative movement at the level of the lesser trochanter. The CFP showed a more distal fixation with 6.8 mdeg/Nm, and the CUT a proximal fixation with 7.6 mdeg/Nm. The Mayo and the CFP adapted to the femoral canal during ventro-dorsal tilting. The CUT tilted like a rigid body. This pattern of tilting was also shown by the ABG after it was shortened from 12.5 cm to 8.5 cm, by the G2 after a reduction from 15 to 6 cm, and the S-Rom after shortening from 18 to 6.9 cm. Discussion: The shortened conventional stems showed a similar fixation pattern compared to the short-stem designs, the rotational stability was even better than with the Mayo and CFP stem. The CUT design acts like an extensively shortened conventional stem and seems to tilt in the femoral canal like a rigid body with a pressure increase at the lateral cortex of the femur

Background. Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) has long been the standard treatment for cases in which non-surgical alternatives have failed to improve pain and function in hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Outcomes from THA have improved over time with better surgical techniques and improved implant designs. While conventional neck-sacrificing implants have been associated with favorable outcomes, there is evidence to suggest biomechanical advantages of newer, femoral neck-preserving short-stem implants, including the Corin MiniHip. However, there is a still a gap of knowledge regarding the potential benefits of the MiniHip stem over conventional neck-sacrificing stems in regards to patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In this study, we investigated the differences between a neck-sacrificing stem design and neck-preserving short-stem design (MiniHip, Corin Inc.) arthroplasty concerning PROs, and considering the known features of the short stem design, we hypothesized that MiniHip THA would be associated with improved PROs in comparison to a neck-sacrificing implant system. We further sought to investigate gender effects related to MiniHip or conventional stem surgery. Methods. Neck-sacrificing implant patients (n=90, age 57±7.9 years, female=58, male=32) and a matched (matching criteria: follow-up period, BMI, age) cohort group of MiniHip patients (n=105, age 55.16±9.88 years, female: 25, male: 80) reported both pre-operative and post-operative Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS) at a minimum interval of 6 months post-operatively and up to three years postoperatively. We applied MANCOVA analysis to compare patient-reported outcome subscores from each group using follow-up period as a covariate and employing gender as an additional grouping factor to evaluate gender effects. Statistical significance was set at α=0.05 and Bonferroni corrections were applied to account for multiple comparisons. Results. There was a main effect of time, showing that all HOOS subscores of both groups increased significantly after surgery (p<0.001). There was a main effect of surgery for subscores Symptoms (p=0.038), ADL (p=0.046), and Sports and Recreation (p=0.039). There was a gender effect only for the subscore Symptoms (p=0.007). There were significant time by surgery interactions for HOOS subscores Symptoms (p=0.002), Pain (p=.009), Sports and Recreation (p=0.004), and QOL (p<0.001) subscores. We also observed a significant time by gender interaction effect for all HOOS subscores (p<0.001). Discussion. The interaction effects regarding most HOOS subscores and surgery/implant type indicate an advantage of MiniHip surgery regarding post-operative reported outcomes. The observed results may be due to previously described improved physiological loading and native hip structure preservation with neck-preserving short-stem designs. While longer-term studies are required for further investigation, evidence suggests the MiniHip may provide a significant benefit to primary THA patients. The additional gender/time interaction effect observed in our study highlights the necessity to consider potential sex differences regarding both the potential/expected improvement in PROs from THA and the requirement to account for such differences when designing osteoarthritis outcome studies based on PROs

Introduction:. Significant proximal femoral remodeling occurs after total hip arthroplasty (THA), with regions of bone loss, and regions of hypertrophy. This study compared three implants for changes in femoral bone mineral density over 2 years following primary uncemented hip arthroplasty with a conventional stem (THA), a novel femoral neck-sparing short hip stem (NS-THA), and resurfacing hip arthroplasty (RHA). Methods:. Seventy-one patients participated in this non-randomized, prospective study. All patients had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis and underwent primary uncemented hip arthroplasty. Dual Energy XRay Absorptomitry (DXA) scans were performed at preoperative, 3–7 days post-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, one, and two years post-op. Using custom 2 cm zones, 19 zones were observed for percent changes in bone mineral density (BMD). Radiographs and Harris Hip scores were obtained at each visit. Results:. Age, gender, and BMI were found to be statistically different with fewer females and lower age in the RHA group, and a lower age in the NS-THA group. In all three groups, regions that were located proximally were shown to be the most susceptible to bone loss. Combined 2 cm zones 1C/7C, 2A/6A, and 2B/6B showed statistical significance (p < 0.05). Bone loss in the proximal regions was 8–10% lower with the femoral neck-sparing short stem, and least in the RHA group, causing little to no BMD loss in proximal regions. Radiographic outcomes and clinical results including Harris Hip scores were equal between the groups. Conclusion:. Consistent with our hypothesis, it was found that hip arthroplasty with a conventional stem resulted in the highest proximal femoral bone loss, and resurfacing arthroplasty was associated with the least bone loss. The femoral neck-sparing short stem ameliorated the bone loss seen with traditional hip arthroplasty, and approximated the bone preservation seen with hip resurfacing. The short stem neck-sparing device may provide some of the benefits of hip resurfacing, but could potentially have wider indications for use

The Exeter. ™. V40 cemented polished tapered stem system has demonstrated excellent long-term outcomes. This paper presents a systematic review of the existing literature and reports on a large case series comparing implant fractures between the Exeter V40 series; 125 mm and conventional length stem systems. A systematic literature search was performed adhering to PRISMA criteria. In parallel we performed a retrospective single centre study of Exeter. ™. V40 femoral stem prosthetic fractures between April 2003– June 2020. There are 25 reported cases of such prosthetic fractures confined to small case series and case reports within the literature. We report an additional 19 cases to the literature (mean age 66.3 ± 11.7 years; 12 female [63%]; body mass index 32.9 ± 5.9 kg/m. 2. ). The mean time from index procedure to fracture was 7.8 years (2.5–16.3, ±3.6). Exeter V40 stem fracture incidence was 0.27%. Incidence was significantly higher in 125 mm length stems compared to ≥150 mm length stems (1.26% vs 0.13%, respectively, p <0.001) and revision arthroplasty (1.209% vs 0.149%, p <0.001). When comparing different stem length cohorts, 125-mm short-stem were associated with stem body fractures (92% vs 29%, p = 0.0095), earlier time to fracture (6.2 vs 11.0 years, p = 0.0018), younger patient age at time of fracture (62.7 vs 72.6 years old, p = 0.037) and female sex (75% vs 43%, p = 0.33). This case series in conjunction with the systematic review provides evidence stem morphology plays a role in femoral implant fracture. This complication remains rare, although we report a significantly higher incidence at up to 17 years follow-up than in the literature. As femoral geometries remain the same, increasing BMIs in THR patients should raise concern. Short 125 mm length Exeter V40 stems undoubtedly have a role in restoring anatomy and biomechanics in smaller femoral geometries, although the surgeon has to appreciate the higher risk of stem fracture and the associated predisposing factors which may necessitate meticulous surgical technique and planning

Aims. The Exeter V40 cemented polished tapered stem system has demonstrated excellent long-term outcomes. This paper presents a systematic review of the existing literature and reports on a large case series comparing implant fractures between the Exeter V40 series; 125 mm and conventional length stem systems. Methods. A systematic literature search was performed adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. In parallel, we performed a retrospective single centre study of Exeter V40 femoral stem prosthetic fractures between April 2003 and June 2020. Results. There are 25 reported cases of such prosthetic fractures confined to small case series and case reports within the literature. We report an additional 19 cases to the literature (mean age 66.3 years (SD 11.7); 12 (63%) females; BMI 32.9 kg/m. 2. (SD 5.9)). The mean time from index procedure to fracture was 7.8 years (SD 3.6; 2.5 to 16.3). Exeter V40 stem fracture incidence was 0.15% and 1.21% for primary and revision arthroplasty, respectively. Incidence was significantly higher in revision arthroplasty (p < 0.001) and 125 mm length stems compared to ≥ 150 mm length stems (1.25% vs 0.13%, respectively; p < 0.001). When comparing different stem length cohorts, 125 mm short-stems were associated with stem-body fractures (92% vs 29%; p = 0.0095), earlier time to fracture (6.2 years vs 11.0 years; p = 0.0018), younger patient age at time of fracture (62.7 years vs 72.6 years; p = 0.037), and female sex (75% vs 43%; p = 0.326). Conclusion. This complication remains rare, although we report a significantly higher incidence at up to 17 years follow-up than in the literature. Short 125 mm length Exeter V40 stems undoubtedly have a role in restoring anatomy and biomechanics in smaller femoral geometries, although the surgeon has to appreciate the higher risk of stem fracture and the associated predisposing factors which may necessitate particular attention to surgical technique and planning. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(6):443–456

INTRODUCTION. Short femoral stem use in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased due to positive short-term clinical and biomechanical success. A neck preserving femoral stem not only preserves proximal bone volume, but preserves the high quality bone of the medial neck. The short stem design allows for less invasive surgical exposure and less invasive violation of the femoral canal (Figure 1). Additionally, it facilitates future revision THA, if needed, with a conventional primary stem. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early clinical outcomes of the Alteon® Neck Preserving Femoral Stem (Exactech, Inc.). METHODS. Forty-nine subjects (25 males, 24 females; mean age: 58.3±7.6 years; mean BMI: 29.8±5.6) from 2 sites underwent primary THA with the Alteon Neck Preserving Femoral Stem. All participants signed the informed consent, and both sites received IRB approval prior to conducting the study. Clinical data outcomes for this study included the Harris Hip Score (HHS), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), revisions, and subsidence at 3-month, 1-year, and 2-year post-operative time points. Subsidence was measured by an independent third party. Student t-tests were used to identify significant mean differences between genders (p<0.05). RESULTS. The means and standard deviations for the HHS and OHS are shown in Figures 2 and 3 respectively. For patients reaching the 2-year post-operative time point (n=28), the HHS improved by 51.3 points to 96.1 from 44.8 and the OHS improved by 23.0 points to 43.8 from 20.8. There was no significant difference between genders with regard to BMI or post-operative HHS or OHS scores. However, the females were significantly older (61.4 vs. 55.3) and had a significantly lower pre-operative HHS (44.3 vs. 53.5). There were 2 revisions reported, and there was one report of subsidence at 1 year (n=33); zero reports of subsidence at 2 years (n=24). DISCUSSION. The neck preserving femoral stem exhibited positive early clinical results as demonstrated by the marked improvement in functional outcome scores from the pre-operative visit to 2-years post-operative. These 2-year improvements are better than moderate clinically important improvements reported in the literature (40.1 points for HHS). Functional outcomes scores kept improving at the 3-month, 1-year, and 2-year post-operative visits. Additional 2-year outcomes data will be incorporated into this dataset as they become available. For the two revisions, one was due to a calcar fracture and one was due to a patient fall. The patient who fell reported weight-bearing pain after the fall at the 1-year post-operative visit and was subsequently revised. Stem movement was documented as a result of the fall; this was the only report of subsidence. SIGNIFICANCE. The neck preserving femoral stem evaluated in this study demonstrated positive early clinical performance with no reports of subsidence (except for one case that was revised due to a fall). This neck preserving stem design is a promising alternative to conventional femoral stems. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Aims

Hip arthroplasty aims to accurately recreate joint biomechanics. Considerable attention has been paid to vertical and horizontal offset, but femoral head centre in the anteroposterior (AP) plane has received little attention. This study investigates the accuracy of restoration of joint centre of rotation in the AP plane.

Introduction:. In an attempt to reduce stress shielding in the proximal femur multiple new shorter stem design have become available. We investigated the load to fracture of a new polished tapered cemented short stem in comparison to the conventional polished tapered Exeter stem. Method:. A total of forty-two stems, twenty-one short stems and twenty-one conventional stems both with three different offsets were cemented in a composite sawbone model and loaded to fracture. Results:. study showed that femurs will break at a significantly lower load to failure with a shorter compared to conventional length Exeter stem. Conclusion:. This Both standard and short stem design are safe to use as the torque to failure is 7–10 times as much as the torques seen in activities of daily living

Aims

There are concerns regarding initial stability and early periprosthetic fractures in cementless hip arthroplasty using short stems. This study aimed to investigate stress on the cortical bone around the stem and micromotions between the stem and cortical bone according to femoral stem length and positioning.

Aims

Hip arthroplasty does not always restore normal anatomy. This is due to inaccurate surgery or lack of stem sizes. We evaluated the aptitude of four total hip arthroplasty systems to restore an anatomical and medialized hip rotation centre.

Introduction. Femoral neck fracture is a common injury in elderly patients. To restore the activity with an acceptable morbidity and to decrease of mortality, surgical procedures are thought to be superior to conservative treatments. Osteosynthesis with internal fixation for nondisplaced type, and hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement (hip arthroplasties) for displaced type are commonly performed. Cemented arthroplasty has been preferred over non-cemented arthroplasty because of less postoperative pain, better mobility and excellent initial fixation of the implant, especially for osteoporotic and stove-pipe bones. However, pressurizing bone cement may cause cardiorespiratory and vascular complications, and occasionally death, which has been termed as “bone cement implantation syndrome”. To avoid the occurrence of this syndrome, non-cemented implants have been developed. However, most implants with the press fit concepts and flat wedge taper designs have a risk of intraoperative and early postoperative periprosthetic fracture. Recently, we have employed a non-cemented femoral component, which has a lateral expansion to the proximal body as compared to a conventional hip stem. Because of this shape, which is called a “lateral flare”, this stem provides a physiological loading on both the medial and lateral endosteal surfaces of the femur. This is in contrast to conventional hip stem which prioritizes loading on the medial and metaphyseal /dyaphyseal surfaces of the femur. Moreover, the cross section of this stem is trapezoid with the flat posterior surface. This shape provides the stem with rotational stability along the long axis of the femur, and maximizes loading transfer to the posterior aspect of the proximal femur. These mechanical features avoid the need for aggressive impaction of the stem at the time of insertion. It is necessary to only tap gently to achieve the secure initial implant fixation by a “rest fit”. Thus, this technique reduces the risk of fracture. Patients and methods. We employed this technique using a non-cemented lateral flare design device for displaced femoral neck fractures since 1996. Surgical procedures were performed with posterior approach under the spinal or epidural anesthesia. Full weight bearing ambulation with a walker was allowed on post-op day one. Results and discussion. Since that time, we have had no femoral fracture, no dislocation of the hip, nor severe complications intraoperatively and post operatively. There has been no evidence of radiographic aseptic loosening or axial migration of the stems during this time period. Conclusions. “Rest fit” surgical technique avoids complications associated with cemented and traditional non-cemented arthroplasties for displaced femoral neck fractures. It however requires specific geometric features to be included the designs of the femoral component to assure secure initiate fixation at the time of arthroplasty. Therefore, this lateral flare implants are effective for the treatment of the displaced type of femoral neck fracture

Total hip arthroplasty is well established as a successful treatment modality for end stage arthritis, with a variety of components currently available. However, utilising traditional stemmed implants in patients with distorted proximal femoral geometry can be technically challenging with increased risk of complications. We present seven patients with distorted proximal femoral anatomy or failed hip arthroplasty in whom a technically challenging primary or revision operation was simplified by use of a Proxima stem. This is a short, stemless, metaphyseal loading implant with a pronounced lateral flare. At twelve months follow up there have been no complications with average improvement in Oxford and Harris scores of forty and forty-nine respectively. Radiological analysis shows all stems to be stable and well fixed. Designed primarily as a bone conserving implant for primary hip arthroplasty we propose that the Proxima prosthesis also be considered in cases where a conventional stemmed implant may not be suitable due to challenging proximal femoral anatomy. The use of the stemless Proxima implant provided a simple solution in seven difficult and potentially lengthy complex primary and revision hip arthroplasties with gratifying clinical and radiological outcomes

Over the past 10 years, the orthopedic community has witnessed an increased interest in more conservative surgical techniques for hip arthroplasty. During this time, second-generation hip resurfacing and minimally invasive surgery enjoyed extensive marketing attention. After a decade of this renewed interest, both of these methods have met with serious concerns. As hip resurfacing numbers decline, both patients and surgeons are looking for other potentially successful conservative treatments to THA. This search has focused surgeon interest toward short-stem designs. Today, a variety of short-stem implants are available with very little clarification of design rationale, fixation features, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes. Virtually every major implant company now offers a “short stem,” and now there are a plethora of different designs. It is important to note, however, that not all short stems achieve initial fixation at the same bone interface region. Furthermore, surgical techniques vary greatly, and postoperative radiographic interpretation of short-stem position and fixation need to be carefully scrutinized. The purpose of this paper is to review past, present, and potential future developments of short femoral stems and to present a classification system that can offer guidance when reporting on the many different stem variations. Short Curved neck-sparing stem (JISRF classification 2a). Recently, new designs are following Pipino's Biodynamic stem style of saving the femoral neck. These designs feature a short curved stem that finds its stabilization contact region in the femoral neck and saves considerable bone in the medial calcar region. In addition, the curvature of the stem prevents violation of the lateral trochanteric region. The shorter stem also reduces blood loss by not reaming the femoral canal distally. These style stems generally have a variable stem length between 90 and 135 mm. This might not appear much shorter than conventional cementless stems (110 to 150 mm). However, the shorter curved neck sparing stems penetrate on average 1 to 2 cm less distally in the femoral canal. Short stems have a definite role in modern THA, as greater emphasis is being placed on soft tissue and bone sparing techniques and as refinements continue in the understanding of proximal femoral fixation. Metaphyseal short stems have significantly less surface contact area compared with conventional length stems and as a result, they might have less torsional and axial resistance. Neck-retaining short stems provide additional axial and torsional stability and reduced stress at the implant– bone interface and may be a consideration in the more active patient profile. Bone quality and the patient's physical activity should be considered prior to the selection of short-stem devices. Many short-stem designs have considerably different style features that may alter bone remodeling. Knowing the design and the required technique is vital to fit the device properly to the patient. The variations of short stems available call for caution in their overall use until there is better understanding of how dependent these stems are on individual stem features, bone quality, and surgical techniques. Overall, the authors are cautiously optimistic and continue advocating their selective use