This study reports the ten-year polyethylene liner wear rates, incidence of osteolysis, clinical outcomes and complications of a three-arm, multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing Cobalt-Chrome (CoCr) and Oxidised Zirconium (OxZr) femoral heads with ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) versus highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) liners in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Patients undergoing THA from four institutions were prospectively randomised into three groups. Group A received a CoCr femoral head and XLPE liner; Group B received an OxZr femoral head and XLPE liner; and Group C received an OxZr femoral head and UHMWPE liner. Blinded observers recorded predefined outcomes in 262 study patients at regular intervals for ten years following THA.

At ten years follow-up, increased linear wear rates were recorded in group C compared to group A (0.133 ± 0.21 mm/yr vs 0.031 ± 0.07 mm/yr respectively, p<0.001) and group B (0.133 ± 0.21 mm/yr vs 0.022 ± 0.05 mm/yr respectively, p<0.001). Patients in group C were associated with increased risk of osteolysis and aseptic loosening requiring revision surgery compared with group A (7/133 vs 0/133 respectively, p=0.007) and group B (7/133 vs 0/135 respectively, p=0.007). There was a non-significant trend towards increased liner wear rates in group A compared to group B (0.031 ± 0.07 mm/yr vs 0.022 ± 0.05 mm/yr respectively, p=0.128). All three groups were statistically comparable preoperatively and at ten years follow-up when measuring normalised Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index(p=0.410), short-form-36 (p = 0.465 mental, p = 0.713 physical), and pain scale scores (p=0.451).

The use of UHMWPE was associated with progressively increased annual liner wear rates after THA. At ten years follow-up, this translated to UHMWPE leading to an increased incidence of osteolysis and aseptic loosening requiring revision THA, compared with XLPE. Femoral heads composed of OxZr were associated with a non-significant trend towards reduced wear rates compared to CoCr, but this did not translate to any differences in osteolysis, functional outcomes, or revision surgery between the two treatments groups.

Introduction. Surface wear of polyethylene is still considered a long-term risk factor for clinical success, particularly as life expectancy and activity levels increase. Computational models have been used extensively for preclinical wear prediction and optimization of total knee replacements (TKR). In most cases, the input wear parameters (wear factors and coefficients) to the computational models have been experimentally measured under average contact stresses to simulate standard activities. These wear studies are not therefore applicable for more adverse conditions that could lead to edge loading and high stress conditions, including higher levels of activities and severe loading conditions. The current study investigated the multidirectional pin-on-plate wear performance of moderately cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) under high applied nominal contact stress, to be used as inputs to a computational model investigating adverse high stress conditions. Materials/Methods. Moderately cross-linked UHMWPE (GUR_1020,5Mrad gamma irradiation) pins were tested against cobalt–chrome alloy (CoCr) plates in a multidirectional pin-on-plate wear simulator. The CoCr metallic plates were polished to an average surface roughness of 0.01μm. The pin rotation and the plate reciprocation of ±30º and 28mm were in phase, having a common frequency of 1Hz, and resulted in a multidirectional motion at the pin-plate contact surface in a flat-on-flat configuration. Six different pin diameter and applied load combinations were tested, resulting in applied nominal contact stresses from 4 to 80[MPa](Fig.1). Each set was run for 1million cycles in 25% bovine serum as a lubricant. The volumetric wear was calculated from the weight loss measurements using a density 0.93mg/mm. 3. for the UHMWPE material. The wear factor and wear coefficient were calculated as (volumetric wear/(load x sliding distance)) and (volumetric wear/(contact area x sliding distance)) respectively[1]. Statistical analysis of the data was performed in ANOVA and significance was taken at p<0.05. Results. Changing the load from 80 to 216[N] (5mm_pins) and from 212 to 283[N] (3mm_pins), increased the volumetric wear from 1.38±0.12 to 1.66±0.07 and from 0.8±0.12 to 1.03±0.05[mm. 3. ] respectively (mean±95% confidence interval (CI), n=6). However, under the same load of 216N, changing the pin diameter from 5 to 3 [mm] decreased the volumetric wear from 1.66±0.07 to 0.86±0.02[mm. 3. ] (mean±95% CI, n=6) (Fig.1). For stress levels from 4 to 30[MPa] the wear factor significantly decreased from 3.06±0.27 to 0.67±0.11×10. −7. mm. 3. /N.m] (mean±95%CI, n=6, p<0.001). Any further increase in the stress level (up to 80MPa) did not affect the measured wear factor (ANOVA, p=0.44) (Fig.2-a). In contrast, the measured wear coefficient increased from 1.25±0.11 to 4.88±0.14×10. −9. ] (mean±95% CI, n=6, p<0.001) while increasing the stress from 4 to 80[MPa](Fig.2-b). Discussion. For the same level of motion at the contact surfaces, the two main parameters that significantly contributed to the volumetric wear were the applied load and contact area. The measured wear parameters were significantly dependent on the applied nominal contact stress. Future work will consider different motions at the contact surfaces with different degrees of cross-shear. Conclusion. The stress level significantly affected the wear performance of moderately cross-linked UHMWPE in this pin-on-plate configuration. Computational simulations of TKR should therefore account for these effects when considering adverse high stress conditions

Objectives

Third-body wear is believed to be one trigger for adverse results with metal-on-metal (MOM) bearings. Impingement and subluxation may release metal particles from MOM replacements. We therefore challenged MOM bearings with relevant debris types of cobalt–chrome alloy (CoCr), titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) and polymethylmethacrylate bone cement (PMMA).

Objectives

To quantify and compare peri-acetabular bone mineral density (BMD) between a monoblock acetabular component using a metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing and a modular titanium shell with a polyethylene (PE) insert. The secondary outcome was to measure patient-reported clinical function.