The British Orthopedic Association recommends that patients referred to fracture clinic are reviewed within 72 hours. With the increase in referrals and limited clinic capacity it is becoming increasingly difficult to see every referral with in a 72 hour time frame. Some patients are waiting 2 weeks or more before they can be seen in a fracture clinic. With the aim of improving care by seeking to meet BOAST 7 target, waiting times for fracture clinic appointments at the Homerton University Hospital were audited prospectively against this national guideline, before virtual fracture clinic was implemented and 6 weeks after the implementation of virtual fracture clinic at our hospital. Virtual fracture clinic is where an Orthopedic consultant reviews a patients x-rays and A&E documentation and decides if that patients needs to be seen in a face to face fracture clinic to discuss operative vs. non-operative management of their injury or if a treatment plan can be delivered without the patient having to come back to hospital. The study was conducted as a prospective closed-loop audit in which the second cycle took place after the implementation of the new virtual fracture clinic service. The first cycle showed a non-compliant waiting time with only 18% of patients being seen within 72 hours. Following the implementation of virtual fracture clinic, 84% of all patients were reviewed within 72 hours. Virtual fracture clinic delivered a significant reduction in waiting times. Virtual fracture clinic has only just been implemented at the Homerton University Hospital and hopefully at the next audit we will be 100% compliant with the BOA BOAST 7 Guideline. We would recommend that virtual fracture clinics being rolled out in Orthopedic departments in all hospitals which have Orthopedic services

Objectives:. To establish the demand, referral pathways, utility and patient satisfaction of a physiotherapy led post operative spinal surgery review clinic. Methods:. From July 2014 to January 2015 a pilot physiotherapy led clinic was established. The following clinic data was collected: number of patients reviewed, surgical procedure, outcome of clinic assessment, numbers requiring further investigation, numbers requiring review in the consultant led clinic and adverse events. A patient satisfaction survey was also administered to all English speaking patients. Patients were asked to rate the ease of getting through to the service by phone, length of wait, time spent with the clinician, answers to questions, explanation of results, advice about exercise and return to activities, the technical skills of the clinician, their personal manner and their overall visit. Data was anonymised and inserted into an excel spreadsheet for analysis. Descriptive statistical analysis was undertaken. Results:. 28 patients were reviewed in the pilot clinic. 17 (61%) patients were reviewed and discharged. 11 (39%) patients required discussion with the consultant. The outcome was: Referral for further imaging: n=5 (18%), referral to other specialist: n=2 (6%), consultant led OPD clinic review n=4 (14%) and surgical review of wound n=1 (4%). 84% (n=21/25) of eligible patients completed a post operative satisfaction survey. 86% (n= 18/21) rated their overall visit as excellent. There were no adverse events reported. Conclusion:. The pilot clinic has informed the development of a permanent physiotherapy led post op clinic in the National Neurosurgical Spinal Service and demonstrates the value of interdisciplinary care in this population

Background: One stop shoulder clinic was established in the North Tees University Hospital as part of conjoint effort between the department of trauma and orthopaedics and radiology in the year 2005. A consultant shoulder surgeon, consultant radiologist, extended scope shoulder physiotherapist and shoulder nurse practitioners run the clinic on weekly basis. The aims are:. Immediate and more accurate diagnosis and plan accordingly. Avoid unnecessary or inappropriate treatment while waiting for radiological test. High patient satisfaction. Reduce waiting time for definitive treatment. Reduce number of patients’ visits. Improve and advance clinical and radiological skills. Reduce the cost to the NHS. Promote a multi-disciplinary approach to patient healthcare. Methods and materials: A retrospective study of 150 patients who had been seen in the one stop shoulder clinic and conventional clinic. We studied the number of hospital visits, the waiting time for final intervention and or discharge, the accuracy of initial diagnosis and treatment and the cost-benefit analysis. Results and discussions: One-stop clinics have been successfully established in a few fields of medicine. One stop breast lump clinic has been running for almost 10 years with a very good reputation of rapid, accurate and cost-effective diagnosis of breast lumps. Similar successful examples have been emerged in gynaecology such as fertility clinic and uterine bleeding clinic; and in urology such as haematuria clinic. To our best knowledge, this is the first study that investigated the one-stop clinic in shoulder problems. Our results showed similar trend of success in term of reduction of patients’ hospital visits, waiting time to treatment and accuracy of the diagnosis. We also conducted a cost-benefit analysis of the one stop shoulder clinic in comparison with the conventional shoulder clinic and we concluded that it is cost effectiveness

Medical Genetics is a transversal discipline with the potential to impact on every specialty and subspecialty in medicine and the allied health sciences. The completion of the human genome project resulted in technical advancements in genomics, genomic testing and our understanding of genetic disorders in general. These advancements have greatly enhanced our understanding of the role of genetics in Orthopaedic practice, with respect to both monogenic and complex disorders. Tygerberg Hospital is currently the only state hospital in South Africa to support genetic testing in the form of gene panels as part of routine care. This is complemented by more comprehensive research testing in the form of exome and genome sequencing as part of the Undiagnosed Disease Programme. We audit the genetic and genomic testing done on patients referred from the Orthopaedic clinic over a period of 3 years (2020–2022) and review diagnostic rates and interesting results. The largest group of patients referred (n=50) had a clinical diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). A 100% diagnostic yield was achieved for these patients with the identification of recurring variants (FKBP10, COL1A2). Further families (n=20) with much rarer conditions are presented with important implications on the orthopaedic and medical management, prognosis, and genetic counselling for the families. We highlight the impact of genomic testing in the Orthopaedic clinic. Management changes and precision orthopaedic intervention were only possible due to a genetic diagnosis. We motivate for increased access to testing, especially for younger patients presenting with complex orthopaedic phenotypes

Introduction. Virtual fracture clinics (VFC's) aim to reduce the number of outpatient appointments while improving the clinical effectiveness and patients experience through standardisation of treatment pathways. With 4.6% of ED admissions due to trauma the VFC prevents unnecessary face to face appointments providing a cost savings benefit to the NHS. Methods. This project demonstrates the importance of efficient VFC process in reducing the burden on the fracture clinics. We completed preformed a retrospective cross-sectional study, analysing two cycles in May (n=305) and September (n=332) 2021. We reviewed all VFC referrals during this time assessing the quality of the referral, if they went on to require a face to face follow up and who the referring health care professional was. Following the cycle in May we provided ongoing education to A&E staff before re-auditing in September. Results. Between the two cycles there was an average 19% improvement in quality of the referrals, significant reduction in number of inappropriate referrals for soft tissue knee and shoulder injuries from 15.1% (n=50) to 4.5% (n=15) following our intervention. There was an 8% increase in number of fracture clinic appointments to 74.4% (n=247), primarily due to an increase number of referrals from nurse practitioners. Radial head fractures were targeted as one group that were able to be successfully managed in VFC, despite this 64% (n=27) of patients were still seen in the outpatient department following VFC referral. Conclusion. Despite the decrease in the number of inappropriate referrals, and the increase in quality of referrals following our intervention. The percentage of VFC referrals in CAVUHB is still higher than other centres in with established VFCs in England. This possibly highlights the need for further education to emergency staff around describing what injuries are appropriate for referral, specifically soft tissue injuries and radial head fractures. In order to optimise the VFC process and provide further cost savings benefits while reducing the strain on fracture clinics

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common paediatric hip condition and is a major cause of hip replacement or osteoarthritis in young adults. Due to potential impact on quality of life, every child is checked at birth for unstable hips. Should instability be detected, or the infant has other DDH risk factors, they are referred for an ultrasound exam and orthopaedic surgeon consultation. Since the implementation of a DDH screening program at our institution, the Radiology Department has seen a dramatic increase in hip ultrasounds performed. While helping prevent the complications of missed DDH diagnoses, this program has placed strain on radiology resources, and often families must attend multiple appointments before receiving a diagnosis and beginning treatment. To mitigate this, we have implemented a pilot point-of-care DDH clinic, where an ultrasound technician performs hip ultrasound exams using a portable ultrasound in the orthopaedic clinic in conjunction with surgeon consultation. The aim of this clinic is to enable diagnosis and treatment in one appointment, reduce referral-to-treatment delays, wait times, and decrease costs and travel time for families while also alleviating strain on radiology resources. A point-of-care DDH test clinic was implemented in the Orthopaedic Department at our institution. Patients referred with suspected/confirmed DDH attended a single orthopaedic clinic appointment. An ultrasound technician was present to perform scans in conjunction with the orthopaedic surgeon's clinical assessment. Surveys were distributed at the end of the appointment to collect feedback on the family's satisfaction with the program, as well as other pertinent demographic information (i.e. occupation, geographic location, travel time to hospital). To date, 40 patients have attended the pilot clinic. Families spent an average 61.3 minutes (range 15–420 minutes) traveling to the hospital for an appointment (122.6 minutes round-trip). This program reduced the number of hospital visits for DDH screening from three (initial consultation, radiology, follow-up) to one per patient, saving an average 245.2 minutes of travel time to/from the hospital per family. Appointment time averaged 35.9 minutes and families rated their satisfaction with appointment length an average of 9.6/10 (35/40 families rated satisfaction 10/10, 1 = very unsatisfied, 10 = very satisfied). Additionally, 33/40 families were also asked to rate their satisfaction with check-in/check-out processes (average 9.4/10), ultrasound screening (average 9.9/10), and time with specialist (average 9.9/10). Satisfaction scores did not differ based on variables such as survey taker's gender, occupation, or geographic location. The pilot point-of-care ultrasound DDH clinic has considerably reduced the number of clinic visits and travel time for families, reduced aggregate clinic wait times, and has resulted in high family satisfaction. This specialized clinic may have potential to free up hospital staff time and resources, possibly decreasing wait times in other clinical areas, ultimately improving quality of care for patients and families across our institution

Abstract. Introduction. Clinic letters to the general practitioner (GP) form an essential part of communication in a patient's care. One essential variable requiring 100% compliance is the laterality/side of the diagnosis. Rationale of this audit was to check compliance of the same in clinic letters, to implement changes within the department initially followed by trust wide change in policy to improve the same. Material and Methods. Clinic letters over a period of time were read through in retrospect to see for mention of side. The exclusion criteria were COVID consenting letters over phone, “did not attend” letters and letters for spinal pathology. After 1st limb of audit following actions were taken: doctor education, secretaries to remind the dictating doctor to mention side in the letter and putting up of laminated prompters in all T&O clinic rooms to remind doctors. Following this a 2nd limb was conducted with similar parameters. Results. 1st Limb:. Total letters 271: Fracture clinic- 126. Elective/orthopaedic clinic – 106. Excluded letters– 39. 2nd Limb:. Total letters 169: Fracture clinic- 91. Elective/orthopaedic clinic – 62. Excluded letters– 16. Letters without the mention of side of diagnosis. 1st Limb: Fracture clinic – 28 out of 126 (22.3%). Orthopaedic clinic – 12 out of 106 (11.3%). 2nd Limb: Fracture clinic – 2 out of 91 (2.2%). Orthopaedic clinic – 2 out of 62 (3.2%). Conclusion. With the changes there was an overall compliance of 97.8% in fracture clinic and 96.8% compliance elective clinic dictations

It is known that Osteoporosis is the pathology of bone mass and tissue loss resulting in an increase of fragility, risk of fracture occurrence, and risk of fracture recurrence. We noted there was no definitive pathway in our last audit, therefore recommended: availability of the Osteoporosis clinic referral form in an accessible place, the form be filled by the doctor reviewing the patient in the first fracture clinic, and a liaison nurse to ensure these forms were filled and sent to the Osteoporosis clinic. This second audit analyses our Trust's response to these recommendations and effect achieved in Osteoporosis care. We reviewed our local data base from the 7/27/2020 – 10/2/2021 retrospectively for distal radius fractures who were seen in fracture clinic. We analysed a sample size of 59 patients, excluding patients who had already commenced bone protection medications. 67.7% of our patients had neither been on bone protection medications nor recorded referrals and 13.5% were already on bone protection medications when they sustained the fragility fracture. Ten out of the 51 patients were offered referral to the osteoporosis clinic, and one refused. This makes 20% (10 out of 50) of the patients had completed referrals. In comparison, in our first audit, 11% had already been on bone protection medications and 18% had completed referrals. The second cycle showed a slight increase in compliance. Majority of the referrals were completed by Orthopaedic Consultants in both audits and ana awareness increase noted among non-consultants in starting the referral process. Based on our analysis, our Trust has a slight improvement in commencing bone protection medications, associated with slight improvement in completing referrals to the Osteoporosis clinic. Despite our recommendations in the first audit, there is still no easily accessible definitive pathway to ensure our Trust's patients have timely access to bone protection and continued care at the Osteoporosis clinic. We recommend streamlining our recommendations to have a more effective approach in ensuring our Trust meets national guidelines. We will implement a Yes or No question assessment for patients visiting clinic in our electronic database which should assist in referral completions

In current practice in the UK there are three main approaches to investigating suspected scaphoid fractures not seen on initial plain film x-rays. Early MRI of all cases. Review all cases in clinic at two weeks with repeat x-rays. Hybrid model. Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFC) triage to reduce those who are seen in clinic at two weeks by:. ∘. Organising early MRI for those with high-risk presentation. ∘. Discharging those with an alternative more likely diagnosis. Our unit uses the VFC model. We aimed to evaluate its efficiency, safety, clinical outcomes and economic viability. All patients attending the emergency department with either a confirmed or suspected scaphoid fracture between March and December 2020 were included (n=305). Of these 297 were referred to the VFC: 33 had a confirmed fracture on x-ray and 264 had a suspected fracture. Of the suspected fractures reviewed in VFC 14% had an MRI organised directly owing to a high-risk presentation, 79% were brought for fracture clinic review and 17% discharged with an alternative diagnosis such as osteoarthritis. Of those subsequently reviewed in fracture clinic at two weeks: 9% were treated as scaphoid fractures (based on clinical suspicion and repeat x-rays), 17% had MRI or CT imaging organised, 5% did not attend and 69% were discharged. Overall, 17% of cases initially triaged, had further imaging – 41 MRIs and 5 CTs. MRI detected: 5% scaphoid fracture, 17% other fracture, 24% bone contusion, complete ligament tear 10%, partial ligament tear 39% and normal study 10%. The results of MRI minimally affected management. 3 patients were taken out of plaster early, 1 patient was immobilized who was not previously and no patients underwent operative management. In the following 12-month period one patient re-presented with a hand or wrist issue. This approach avoided 218 MRIs, equating to £24000 and 109 hours of scanner time. VFC triage and selective use of MRI scanning is a safe, efficient and cost-effective method for the management suspected scaphoid fractures. This can be implemented in units without the resource to MRI all suspected scaphoid fractures from the emergency department

Abstract. Introduction. A spotlight has been placed upon virtual assessment of patients during the coronavirus pandemic. This has been particularly prevalent in the assessment of acute knee injuries. In this study we aim to assess the accuracy of telephone triage, confirmed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of acute knee injuries. Methods. Case records of patients triaged by telephone in the acute knee clinic at Leeds General Infirmary were analysed. Provisional diagnoses made following telephone triage were compared to radiological diagnoses made on subsequent MRI scans. Diagnostic accuracy was compared between those patients assessed virtually and those assessed in face-to-face clinics. Results. 1160 patients were referred to the acute knee injury clinic during the study period. 587 of these were triaged telephonically. MRI scans were requested for 107 (18%) virtually reviewed patients. Of these patients, 92 (79%) had an MRI scan requested after making a provisional diagnosis over the phone. Of the MRI requests made after virtual consultation, there was a 75% diagnostic accuracy of the pre-imaging diagnosis. Of the patients seen in face-to-face appointments, a diagnostic accuracy of 73% was observed. Conclusion. Virtual assessment can provide an efficient and cost-effective establishment of diagnosis of acute knee injuries whilst reducing hospital attendance. A combination of virtual and in-person clinics may allow quicker access to specialist opinion and therefore reduce patient waiting times

Introduction. Patients undergoing complex limb reconstruction are often under immense physical, psychological and financial stress. We already provide psychological support within our unit. We have identified that patients struggle to obtain proper advice on the financial support to which they are entitled. In September 2019, . rebuildcharity.org. commissioned a Citizens Advice Clinic. One advisor from the local Citizens Advice staffs the clinic. Currently we have no set criteria for referral and patients can be referred by any member of the limb reconstruction team. Although severely affected by the coronavirus pandemic and the disruption of all routine work we were able to run clinics from September 2019 to March 2020 and September 2020 to January 2021. We present our initial results. Materials and Methods. In total 19 patients (68% male) have been seen. There have been 58 clinic appointments which have been a combination of face to face and virtual. The majority (80%) of issues dealt with relate to benefits – including claiming tax credits, universal credits and Personal Independence Payments. Other issues include housing problems, employment and claiming for travel and transport. Results. Through the advice given our cohort of patients have been able to claim back £51,175 in total. The cost for the charity is £11,000 per annum based on one clinic per week. Patient satisfaction is high with 100% expressing satisfaction with the service and reporting decrease levels of stress. 100% of patients are better able to pay for essential bills and 50% to pay for their travel to hospital. Conclusions. Our study identified the difficulties our patients have negotiating the complexities of the benefit system and how Citizens Advice can help. This project is in its early days with an initial slow uptake and then severely affected by the coronavirus pandemic such that no clinics were held for 6 months. Despite this our early results are promising

The purpose of this study was to measure the effect of the implementation of a LEAN continuous process improvement initiative on the waitlist in an ambulatory pediatric orthopaedic clinic. LEAN is a set of principles that guide organizational thinking and form a comprehensive approach to continuous process improvement. In 2016, our health centre began its journey towards becoming a LEAN organization. The health centre's Strategy and Performance portfolio collaborated with the Orthopaedic Clinic Team to facilitate a Value Stream Analysis, which mapped the clinic process from referral to discharge from care. This informed the plan for targeted improvement events designed to identify and reduce non-value added activity, while partnering with patients and families to share their experiences with care in the clinic. Improvement events included: In-Clinic Patient Flow; Scheduling Process Review; Standardized Triage Process; Clinician Schedule; 5-S Large Cast and Sample Exam Rooms; Booking Orthopedics Clinic; and Travelling and Remote Care. During each event, solutions were identified to improve the patient experience, access, and clinic flow. These solutions have been standardized, documented, and continuously monitored to identify additional improvement opportunities. Comparison of wait-list and percentage of new patients seen within target window was performed from August 2017 to December 2018. The LEAN initiative resulted in a 48% decrease in wait-list for new patients, which translated to an improvement from 39% to 70% of new patients seen within their target window. There was a 19% decrease in the 3400+ patient wait-list for follow-up appointments, an 85% reduction in follow-up patients waiting past their target date for an appointment, and the number of patients waiting over a year beyond their target appointment improved from over 300 patients to 0 patients. There was a 15% improvement in average length of clinic visit. Without the addition of new resources, the implementation of a LEAN continuous process improvement initiative improved the waitlist for new patients in an ambulatory pediatric orthopaedic clinic by almost 50%. Solutions identified and implemented through the LEAN process have contributed to unprecedented improvements in access to care. In fulfilling one of the LEAN theory principles to “pursue perfection”, the paediatric orthopaedic clinic team has embraced a culture of continuous improvement and continues to use LEAN tools such as daily huddles and visual management to monitor solutions and identify gaps

The purpose of this prospective pilot study is to examine the feasibility of a physiotherapist led rapid access shoulder screening clinic (RASC). The goal of this study is to assess for improvements in patient access to care, patient reported outcome measures, patient reported experience measures, and cost outcomes using time driven activity based costing methods. Patient recruitment began in January 2021. Consultation requests from general practitioners and emergency rooms are analyzed and triaged through a central system. One half of patients awaiting consultation were triaged to the traditional route used at our center while the other half were triaged to be assessed at the RASC. Outcome measures consisting of the Simple Shoulder Test and SF-12 were recorded at the initial consultation and at follow up appointments. Cost benefit analysis was conducted using time driven activity based costing methods (TD-ABC). From January to August of 2021, 123 new patients were triaged for RASC assessment. On average, the RASC gets 10 new referrals per month. As of September 2021, there are 65 patients still on waitlist for RASC assessment with 58 having been assessed. Of the 58, 11% were discharged through the RASC, 48% pursued private physiotherapy, 14% had injections, 19% proceeded on for surgical consultation, and 8% did not show. Over time same time period, approximately 15 new patients were seen in consultation by the surgeon's office. Thirty-five responses were obtained from RASC patients during their initial intake assessment. The average age of respondents was 54.7 with 21 females and 14 males. Median SF-12 scores in the physical dimension (PCS-12) for RASC patients were 36.82 and mental (MCS-12) 49.38927. Median Simple Shoulder Test scores measured 6. Of the patients who responded to the follow up questionnaires after completing physiotherapy at the RASC, both the SF-12 and Simple Shoulder Test scoring improved. Median PCS-12 measured 47.08, MCS-12 of 55.87, and Simple Shoulder Test measured 8. RASC assessments by PT saved $172.91 per hour for consultation and $157.97 per hour for patient follow ups. Utilization of a physiotherapy led rapid access shoulder clinic resulted in improvements in patient outcomes as measured by the SF-12 and Simple Shoulder Test as well as significant direct cost savings. Proper triage protocols to identify which patients would be suitable for RASC assessment, buy-in from physiotherapists, and timely assessment of patients for early initiation of rehabilitation for shoulder pain is paramount to the success of a RASC system at our centre. Future research direction would be geared to analyzing a larger dataset as it becomes available

Abstract. INTRODUCTION. Geniculate nerve blocks (GNB) and ablation (GNA) are increasing in popularity as strategies for the management of knee pain in patients unsuitable for surgical intervention. Typically these simple blocks have been performed by specialists in pain medicine. We present the results of a GNB clinic run by a surgical care practitioner (SCP). METHODOLOGY. An SCP clinic was created where ultrasound-guided GNBs comprising local anaesthetic and steroid were administered. Patients considered unsuitable for surgery were referred with knee pain by orthopaedic knee surgeons and specialist physiotherapists. A VAS pain score and an Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were completed prior to and immediately following blockade. Serial VAS diaries were completed. Further OKS were requested at 6 weeks and 6 months. Patients could request GNA at any point during follow-up and their follow-up ceased at this stage. RESULTS. 50 patients were identified between December 2020 and 2021. Patients are followed up until 6 months post-block or until referral for GNA. Pre-blockade mean OKS was 13.4, mean VAS 8.6, post procedure mean VAS 2.7. Six-week mean OKS was 20.9 in those not referred for ablation, mean improvement of 7.3. Of the cohort of 50, 25 have progressed to ablation. CONCLUSION. GNB is a simple procedure which can provide both lasting symptomatic relief and prognostic information in the treatment of patients with knee pain not amenable to surgical intervention, a growing subset of patients. This SCP-led clinic increases capacity for the provision of GNBs, helping to identify patients suitable for GNA

Background. Due to the overwhelming demand for trauma services, resulting from increasing emergency department attendances over the past decade, virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) have become the fashion to keep up with the demand and help comply with the BOA Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines. In this article, we perform a systematic review asking, “How useful are VFCs?”, and what injuries and conditions can be treated safely and effectively, to help decrease patient face to face consultations. Our primary outcomes were patient satisfaction, clinical efficiency and cost analysis, and clinical outcomes. Methods. We performed a systematic literature search of all papers pertaining to VFCs, using the search engines PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. Searches were carried out and screened by two authors, with final study eligibility confirmed by the senior author. Results. In total, 21 records were relevant to our research question. Six orthopaedic injuries were identified as suitable for VFC review, with a further four discussed in detail. A reduction of face to face appointments of up to 50% was reported with greater compliance to BOAST guidelines (46.4%) and cost saving (up to £212,000). Conclusions. This systematic review demonstrates that the VFC model can help deliver a safe, more cost-effective, and more efficient arm of the trauma service to patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-11:683–690

Cell therapies hold significant promise for the treatment of injured or diseased musculoskeletal tissues. However, despite advances in research, there is growing concern about the increasing number of clinical centres around the world that are making unwarranted claims or are performing risky biological procedures. Such providers have been known to recommend, prescribe, or deliver so called ‘stem cell’ preparations without sufficient data to support their true content and efficacy. In this annotation, we outline the current environment of stem cell-based treatments and the strategies of marketing directly to consumers. We also outline the difficulties in the regulation of these clinics and make recommendations for best practice and the identification and reporting of illegitimate providers. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(2):148–154

Introduction. Circular frames in the lower limbs have been removed by Specialist nurses in our clinics for the past 20 years using Entonox. This standard of care has helped reduce the burden of health care cost by avoiding removal of frames in theatres. We have recently started using Penthrox and present our encouraging initial data suggestive of superior efficacy when compared to Entonox. Materials and Methods. We included in this study the last ten patients on whom Entonox was used during frame removal and the first ten patients on whom Penthrox was used. Visual analogue pain scale was used to quantify pain at the beginning, middle and at the end of frame removal in both groups. The data was found to be normally distributed and Unpaired T test was used to analyse it. Confidence interval of 95% and p-value 0.05 deemed significant. Results. At the beginning of frame removal the Entonox group had a mean VAS score of 5.3 and Penthrox group had 3 (p-value 0.1194). During the middle of frame removal the Entonox group had a mean VAS score of 7.3 and Penthrox group had 4.5 (p-value 0.0379, statistically significant). At the end of frame removal the Entonox group had a mean VAS score of 4.2 and Penthrox group had 2.3 (p-value 0.1734). Penthrox group showed a statistically significant improvement in the mean VAS pain score when assessed in the middle of frame removal. The mean VAS score of both groups were not statistically significant at the beginning and end of frame removal. Conclusions. We found Penthrox to offer better pain relief when compared to Entonox during circular frame removal. This will encourage more patients to choose the option of frame removal in the clinic thereby reducing health care cost to the NHS. This pilot study will be followed by a multicentre comparative study where Entonox is in use in comparison to patients at Salford where the practice has shifted to Penthrox

To our knowledge, we are the only centre in the UK where Achilles tenotomies (TA) for CTEV Ponseti correction are performed in outpatient clinic under local anaesthetic by an Advanced Physiotherapy Practitioner (APP) in orthopaedics. This study aims to present the outcomes and safety of this practice. Retrospective analysis of cases of idiopathic CTEV undergoing Ponseti correction January 2020 to October 2022. Demographic data: Pirani score and number of casts before boots and bar. Patients were divided into five groups: Group 1: TA performed by an Orthopaedic consultant under general anaesthetic (GA) in theatre. Group 2: TA performed by an Orthopaedic consultant under local anaesthetic (LA) in theatre. Group 3: TA performed by APP under GA in theatre. Group 4: TA performed by APP under LA in theatre. Group 5: TA performed by an APP under LA in outpatient clinic. Complications recorded: revision TA, infection, neurovascular injury or need for re-casting. Mean follow up 18 months. 45 feet included. Mean Pirani score 5.5, age started casting 33 days and total number of casts 6. No significant difference in demographic details between groups. 6, 4, 20, 5 and 10 tenotomies were performed in groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 respectively. Complications were 1 revision tenotomy from group 2, one from group 4 and 1 renewal of cast from 3. This study demonstrates that TAs performed in outpatient clinic under LA by an APP is safe and feasible. No increase in complications were observed compared to TAs performed by orthopaedic consultants

Stem cells represent an exciting biological therapy for the management of many musculoskeletal tissues that suffer degenerative disease and/or where the reparative process results in non-functional tissue (‘failed healing’). The original hypothesis was that implanted cells would differentiate into the target tissue cell type and synthesise new matrix. However, this has been little evidence that this happens in live animals compared to the laboratory, and more recent theories have focussed on the immunomodulatory effects via the release of paracrine factors that can still improve the outcome, especially since inflammation is now considered one of the central processes that drive poor tendon healing. Because of the initial ‘soft’ regulatory environment for the use of stem cells in domestic mammals, bone and fat-derived stem cells quickly established themselves as a useful treatment for naturally occurring musculoskeletal diseases in the horse more than 20 years ago (Smith, Korda et al. 2003). Since the tendinopathy in the horse has many similarities to human tendinopathy, we propose that the following challenges and, the lessons learnt, in this journey are highly relevant to the development of stem cells therapies for human tendinopathy:. Source – while MSCs can be recovered from many tissues, the predominant sources for autologous MSCs have been bone and fat. Other sources, including blood, amnion, synovium, and dental pulp have also been commercialised for allogenic treatments. Preparation – ex vivo culture requires transport from a licensed laboratory while ‘minimally manipulated’ preparations can be prepared patient-side. Cells also need a vehicle for transport and implantation. Delivery – transport of cells from the laboratory to the clinic for autologous ex vivo culture techniques; implantation technique (usually by ultrasound-guided injection to minimise damage to the cells (or, more rarely, incorporated into a scaffold). They can also be delivered by regional perfusion via venous or arterial routes. Retention – relatively poor although small numbers of cells do survive for at least 5 months. Immediate loss to the lungs if the cells are administered via vascular routes. Synovially administered cells do not engraft into tendon. Adverse effects – very safe although needle tracts often visible (but do not seen to adversely affect the outcome). Allogenic cells require careful characterisation for MHC Class II antigens to avoid anaphylaxis or reduced efficacy. Appropriate injuries to treat – requires a contained lesion when administered via intra-lesional injection. Intrasynovial tendon lesions are more often associated with surface defects and are therefore less appropriate for treatment. Earlier treatment appears to be more effective than delayed, when implantation by injection is more challenging. Efficacy - beneficial effects shown at both tissue and whole animal (clinical outcome) level in naturally-occurring equine tendinopathy using bone marrow-derived autologous MSCs Recent (licenced) allogenic MSC treatment has shown equivalent efficacy while intra-synovial administration of MSCs is ineffective for open intra-synovial tendon lesions. Regulatory hurdles – these have been lighter for veterinary treatments which has facilitated their development. There has been greater regulation of commercial allogenic MSC preparations which have required EMA marketing authorisation

Osteoporosis is a disease when bone mass and tissue is lost, with a consequent increase in bone fragility and increase susceptibility to develop fracture. The osteoporosis prevalence increases markedly with age, from 2% at 50 years to more than 25% at 80 years. 1. in women. The vast majority of distal radius fractures (DRFs) can be considered fragility fractures. The DRF is usually the first medical presentation of these fractures. With an aging population, all fracture clinics should have embedded screening for bone health and falls risk. DRF is the commonest type of fracture in perimenopausal women and is associated with an increased risk of later non-wrist fracture of up to one in five in the subsequent decade. 2. . According to the national guidelines in managing the fragility fractures of distal radius with regards the bone health review, we, as orthopedic surgeons, are responsible to detect the risky patients, refer them to the responsible team to perform the required investigations and offer the treatment. We reviewed our local database (E-trauma) all cases of fracture distal radius retrospectively during the period from 01/08/2019 to 29/09/2019. We included total of 45 patients who have been managed conservatively and followed up in fracture clinic. Our inclusion criteria was: women aged 65 years and over, men aged 75 years and over with risk factors, patients who are more than 50 years old and sustained low energy trauma whatever the sex is or any patient who has major risk factor (current or frequent recent use of oral or systemic glucocorticoids, untreated premature menopause or previous fragility fracture). We found that 96% of patients were 50 years old or more and 84% of the patients were females. 71% of patients were not referred to Osteoporosis clinic and 11% were already under the orthogeriatric care and 18% only were referred. Out of the 8 referred patients, 3 were referred on 1st appointment, 1 on the 3rd appointment, 1 on discharge from fracture clinic to GP again and 3 were without clear documentation of the time of referral. We concluded that we as trust are not compliant to the national guidelines with regards the osteoporosis review for the DRF as one of the first common presentations of fragility fractures. We also found that the reason for that is that there is no definitive clear pathway for the referral in our local guidelines. We recommended that the Osteoporosis clinic referral form needs to be available in the fracture clinic in an accessible place and needs to be filled by the doctor reviewing the patient in the fracture clinic in the 1st appointment. A liaison nurse also needs to ensure these forms have been filled and sent to the orthogeriatric team. Alternatively, we added a portal on our online database (e-trauma), therefore the patient who fulfils the criteria for bone health review should be referred to the orthogeriatric team to review