Introduction and Aims: We undertook this study to detemine the results of acetabular fixation using the Duraloc 300 uncemented acetabular component in patients with inflammatory joint disease and poor bone stock. Method: Fifty consecutive total hip replacements using a Duraloc 300 cup in patients with imflammatory joint disease were reviewed at an average of 8.2 years. Postoperative x-rays were analysed for cup placement and interface gaps. Follow-up films were analysed for lucent lines, osteolysis, wear and migration. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed. Results: All components were found to be stable with no evidence of loosening or migration. One patient developed sepsis seven years post-surgery. There was no evidence of excessive wear or osteolysis. Conclusion: The Duraloc 300 cementless acetabular component has excellent fixation with no cases of loosening at an average of 8.2 years in patients with inflammatory joint disease. The low rate of wear and pelvic osteolysis may be indicative of the decreased demands placed on the prosthesis in this cohort of patients. The poor bone stock has not however adversely effected acetabular fixation

Summary Sentence: Cementless solid tri-spiked titanium shells, with a polished inner surface and improved locking mechanism, demonstrated excellent fixation and survivorship at mid-term (minimum 5 years) follow-up.

Introduction: The tri-spiked Reflection cup (Smith & Nephew, Memphis) is a second-generation solid titanium shell with a polished inner surface, no screw holes and an improved locking mechanism. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the minimum 5-year clinical & radiographic results and survivorship of this second-generation acetabular component.

Methods: Between 1997 and 2003, 659 primary THA were performed using the Reflection tri-spiked socket. None of the shells had adjuvant fixation with screws. The mean follow-up time was 7.0 years (5 to 11 yrs). The patients were followed prospectively using validated clinical outcome scores (WOMAC, SF-12, Harris Hip scores) and yearly radiographs.

Results: Twenty-seven patients had died before the minimum 5-year follow-up period. The mean Harris Hip and WOMAC scores were 89 and 79 respectively at last follow-up. Three sockets (0.6%) had been revised: two for infection, one for component malpositioning. No cup was revised for aseptic loosening. Six liners were exchanged: three for residual instability, 3 for wear associated with aseptic loosening of the stem. Radiographic review of remaining cups in-situ identified no cases of loosening and only a small number of cups (< 3%) with any osteolysis. The KM survivorship analysis with revision for any reason, was 97.5% and 97.4% at 5 and 10 years, while survivorship of the acetabular component was 99.8% at 5 and 10 years.

Conclusions: This second-generation cementless solid tri-spiked titanium shell, with a polished inner surface and improved locking mechanism, demonstrated excellent fixation and survivorship at mid-term follow-up.

Introduction and Aims: We undertook this study to detemine the results of acetabular fixation using the Duraloc 300 uncemented acetabular component combined with impaction bone grafting in patients with acetabular protrusion.

Method: Thirty consecutive total hip replacements using a Duraloc 300 cup in patients with acetabular protrusion requiring impaction bone grafting were reviewed at an average of 5.2 years. Pre-operative x-rays were analysed for degree of protrusion. Post-operative x-rays were analysed for cup placement and interface gaps. Follow-up films were analysed for graft incorporation, lucent lines, osteolysis, wear and migration. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed.

Results: All components were found to be stable with no evidence of loosening or migration. All but two cases showed trabeculated bone with an average minimum thickness of 7mm of bone medial to the cup in zone 2. Mean rate of wear was 0.10mm per year. No cases of pelvic osteolysis were seen.

Conclusion: The Duraloc 300 cup provides excellent fixation in patients with acetabular protrusion and impaction bone grafting. The graft has been found to incorporate and remodel. We are therefore optimistic that the durability of fixation should equal that of primary hip surgery without protrusion.

Eighty-three patients (ninety hips) with well-fixed cementless socket retained during revision of a femoral component were reviewed. At revision, 33% of patients had acetabular osteolysis and 52% were grafted. At mean follow-up 9.6 years (5.5 – 15.9) after femoral revision and 14.8 years (7.1–20.2) after primary arthroplasty, survivorship was 96.5% (95% CI, 91.5% to 100%) at five years and 81%(95% CI, 61% to 99%) at ten years after femoral revision. Revision of a cementless acetabular component solely on the basis of the duration that it was in vivo or whether a previous revision had been done does not appear to be warranted. Removal a well fixed cementless acetabular component can result in an increased operative morbidity. Data that can be used to predict the long-term survival of retained well-fixed cementless acetabular components are therefore needed. Retention of the well-fixed cementless acetabular component during femoral revision is a predictable technique. Revision of a cementless acetabular component solely on the basis of the duration that it was in vivo or whether a previous revision had been done does not appear to be warranted. Eighty-three consecutive patients (ninety hips) in whom a well-fixed cementless socket had been retained during revision of a femoral component were reviewed. Mean patient age was fifty-four. At the time of revision, 33% of the patients had acetabular osteolysis of which 52% were grafted. At a mean follow-up 9.6 years (5.5 – 15.9) after femoral revision and 14.8 years (7.1–20.2) after primary arthroplasty, 94.5% of the sockets remained in place. With any revision as end point, survivorship was 96.5%(95% CI, 91.5% to 100%) at five years and 81%(95% CI, 61% to 99%) at ten years after femoral revision. With failure of cementless socket as end point (i.e. loosening, deficient locking mechanism), survivorship was 100% (95% CI, 100%) and 94% (95% CI, 82%–100%) at five and ten years after femoral revision and 100% (95% CI, 100%) and 94% (95% CI, 82%–100%) at ten and fifteen years after primary arthroplasty. No cases showed recurrence or expansion of pelvic osteolysis. The overall incidence of dislocation was 15%

The last two decades have seen remarkable technological advances in total hip arthroplasty (THA) implant design. Porous ingrowth surfaces and highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) have been expected to dramatically improve implant survivorship. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate survival of contemporary cementless acetabular components following primary THA. 16,421 primary THAs performed for osteoarthritis between 2000 and 2019 were identified from our institutional total joint registry. Patients received one of 12 contemporary cementless acetabular designs with HXLPE liners. Components were grouped based on ingrowth surface into 4 categories: porous titanium (n=10,952, mean follow-up 5 years), porous tantalum (n=1223, mean follow-up 5 years), metal mesh (n=2680, mean follow-up 6.5 years), and hydroxyapatite (HA) coated (n=1566, mean follow-up 2.4 years). Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to assess the survivorship free of acetabular revision. A historical series of 182 Harris-Galante-1 (HG-1) acetabular components was used as reference. The 15-year survivorship free of acetabular revision was >97% for all 4 contemporary cohorts. Compared to historical control, porous titanium (HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02–0.17, p<0.001), porous tantalum (HR 0.09, 95%CI 0.03–0.29, p<0.001), metal mesh (HR 0.11, 95%CI 0.04–0.31, p<0.001), and HA-coated (HR 0.14, 95%CI 0.04–0.48, p=0.002) ingrowth surfaces had significantly lower risk of any acetabular revision. There were 16 cases (0.1%) of acetabular aseptic loosening that occurred in 8 (0.07%) porous titanium, 5 (0.2%) metal mesh, and 3 (0.2%) HA-coated acetabular components. 7 of the 8 porous titanium aseptic loosening cases occurred in one known problematic design. There were no cases of aseptic loosening in the porous tantalum group. Modern acetabular ingrowth surfaces and HXLPE liners have improved on historical results at the mid-term. Contemporary designs have extraordinarily high revision-free survivorship, and aseptic loosening is now a rare complication. At mid-term follow-up, survivorship of contemporary uncemented acetabular components is excellent and aseptic loosening occurs in a very small minority of patients

Background. We have often experienced a change of the tone of the hammering sound during the press-fit implantation of cementless acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The tone of the impact sound before the press-fit of acetabular components seems to differ from the tone after the press-fit. This change of tone may depend on the accuracy of the fit of the acetabular component, or it may simply be a subjective perception. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact sounds in the press-fit implantation of cementless acetabular components. Methods. The hammering sounds in press-fit implantation of acetabular components were studied intraoperatively in 22 patients (28 hips) who underwent primary THA for treatment of advanced osteoarthritis. All operations were performed via the direct anterior approach in a supine position. The hemispherical titanium-alloy acetabular component (TriAD; stryker) was implanted in all patients. A sound level meter (NA-28; RION) was used to record and analyze the sounds. The hammering sounds of the first three hits and last three hits were recorded as the “before press-fit” and “after press-fit” sound samples, respectively. A frequency analysis was then performed at the point of peak sound pressure in each sample. Results. The dominant frequency of the impact sounds was equal to or lower than 1 kHz in 20% of the before press-fit samples and 76% of the after press-fit samples, and equal to or higher than 4 kHz in 69% of the before press-fit samples and 21% of the after press-fit samples. The frequency of the impact sounds changed significantly (p<0.01) during the press-fit implantation. Conclusion. The frequency of the impact sound changed significantly during the press-fit implantation of cementless acetabular components. We conclude that an intraoperative evaluation of the impact sound might help to improve accuracy when implanting the acetabular component

The cemented acetabular component has been essentially abandoned, due to the reliable and durable fixation provided by bone ingrowth into cementless acetabular components of many different designs. A variety of porous surfaces including sintered beads, titanium fibermetal, plasma sprayed titanium, and ultraporous tantalum have been shown to result in significant osteointegration, and provide long term fixation of cementless acetabular components. New ultraporous metals will also likely prove to perform similarly, however, their advantages in the primary THA are unclear. Most currently available cementless acetabular components rely on obtaining initial “interference” or “frictional” fit provided by relative underreaming. Many designs incorporate additional features such as screws, pegs, and fins to limit implant micromotion and augment initial fixation until early tissue ingrowth occurs. “Underreaming” by more than 1 mm has been associated with incomplete component seating and increased incidence of acetabular fracture. Knowledge of the geometry of the component by the surgeon is recommended, since some designs are elliptical and have a built-in degree of interference fit. Screws used to augment acetabular fixation in the primary THA can typically be restricted to the area of the acetabular dome (cluster configuration) and cups with multiple holes are usually unnecessary and may be undesirable as they allow access of wear debris to the acetabular implant-bone interface. In order to minimize backside wear and dissociation of the acetabular liner, modular components need to have a well-designed locking mechanism. Retrieval studies have shown that the peripheral rim of the acetabular liner is most susceptible to oxidative degradation and the integrity of the locking mechanism in this area can be compromised with time. Non-modular, “one piece” components eliminate these concerns, but most of these designs rely on initial frictional fit alone for stability. In the event that the position of a nonmodular component needs to be changed intra-operatively, the quality of frictional fit after repositioning can be diminished and may not be sufficient for implant stability. Modular components that incorporate screws, allow for acetabular component repositioning and adjunctive fixation with screws. Many newer acetabular component designs can accommodate a modular liner for either a metal on polyethylene, ceramic on ceramic or metal on metal bearing

Recent advancements in biomaterial technology have created novel options for acetabular fixation in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). For example, cementless acetabular fixation has become the preferred option, however, there is continued debate concerning whether long-term survivorship is comparable to that of cemented component fixation. Many doubts previously associated with early cementless designs have been addressed with newer features such as improved locking mechanisms, enhanced congruity between the acetabular liner and the shell, and the inclusion of highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). Additionally, there has been increased utilization of new porous metals, titanium mesh, and hydroxyapatite (HA) coated implants. However, several retrieval studies have indicated that porous-coated cementless acetabular components can exhibit poor bony ingrowth. Many surgeons in Europe favor cemented fixation, where registry data is favorable for this interface. A surgeon's decision to use a cemented or cementless acetabular component is typically dependent on factors such as patient bone stock, surgical training, and experience. With the frequency of THAs expected to increase, it is particularly important for orthopaedic surgeons to be familiar with appropriate preoperative planning and component selection in an effort to achieve optimal outcomes. Therefore, this talk will outline and describe the options currently available for cementless and cemented acetabular fixation in primary total hip arthroplasty

Although there are several reports of excellent long-term survival after cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA), cemented acetabular components are prone to become loose when compared with femoral components. On the other hand, the survival of cementless acetabular components has been reported to be equal or better than cemented ones and the use of cementless acetabular components is increasing. However, most of the reports on survival after THA are for patients with primary hip osteoarthritis (OA) and there is no report of 20-year survival of cementless THA for patients with hip dysplasia. It is supposed to be more difficult to fix cementless acetabular components for OA secondary to hip dysplasia than primary OA. The purposes of this study were to review retrospectively the 20-year survival of cemented and cementless THA for hip dysplasia and to compare the effect of fixation methods on the long-term survival for patients with hip dysplasia. We retrospectively reviewed all patients with OA secondary to hip dysplasia treated with a cemented Bioceram hip system between 1981 and 1987, and a cementless cancellous metal Lübeck hip system between 1987 and 1991. We excluded patients aged more than 60 years, males, and Crowe 4 hips. The studied subjects were 70 hips of cemented THA (Group-C) and 57 hips of cementless THA (Group-UC). Both hip implants had a 28-mm alumina head on polyethylene articulation. The mean age at operation was 50.5 years (range, 36–60 years) in Group-C and 50.0 years (range, 29–60 years) in Group-UC. The mean BMI was 23.2 kg/m. 2. in Group-C (range, 17.3–29.3 kg/m. 2. ) and 22.9 kg/m. 2. in Group-UC (range, 18.8–28.0 kg/m. 2. ). There were no significant differences in age and BMI between the two groups. The average follow-up period was 18.0 years in Group-C and 18.4 years in Group-UC. In Group-C, revision was performed in 33 hips due to aseptic cup loosening (30 hips), stem loosening (one hip), and loosening of both components (two hips). In Group-UC, revision was performed in 10 hips due to stem fracture secondary to distal fixation (4 hips), cup loosening (three hips), polyethylene breakage (two hips), and extensive osteolysis around the stem (one hip). The survival at 20 years regarding any revision as the endpoint was 51% in Group-C and 84% in Group-UC. This difference was significant using Log-rank test (P=0.006). The cup survival at 20 years was 54% in Group-C and 92% in Group-UC. This difference was also significant (P = 0.0003). The stem survival at 20 years was 95% in Group-C and 92% in Group-UC. This difference was not significant (P = 0.4826). Cementless THA showed a higher survival rate at 20 years for hip dysplasia than cemented THA because of the excellent survival of the acetabular component without cement. We conclude that cementless THA with the cancellous metal Lübeck hip system led to better longevity at 20 years than cemented THA with the Bioceram for patients with OA secondary to hip dysplasia

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful surgical procedures of modern times, however debate continues as to the optimal orientation of the acetabular component and how to reliably achieve this. We hypothesised that functional CT-based planning with patient specific instruments using the Corin Optimised Positioning System (OPS) would provide more accurate component alignment than the conventional freehand technique using 2D templating. A pragmatic single-centre, patient-assessor blinded, randomised control trial of patients undergoing THA was performed. 54 patients (age 18–70) were recruited to either OPS THA or conventional THA. All patients received a cementless acetabular component. Patients in both arms underwent pre- and post-operative CT scans, and four functional x-rays (standing and seated). Patients in the OPS group had a 3D surgical plan and bespoke guides made. Patients in the conventional group had a surgical plan based on 2D templating x-rays, and the pre-operative target acetabular orientation was recorded by the surgeon. The primary outcome measure was the difference between planned and achieved acetabular anteversion and was determined by post-operative CT scan performed at 6 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), EQ-5D and adverse events. In the OPS group, the achieved acetabular anteversion was within 10° of the plan in 96% of cases, compared with only 76% of cases in the conventional group. For acetabular inclination, the achieved position in the OPS group was within 10° of the plan in 96% of cases, compared with in only 84% of cases in the conventional group. These differences were not statistically significant. The clinical outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Large errors in acetabular orientation appear to be reduced when functional CT-based planning and patient-specific instruments are used compared to the freehand technique, but no statistically significant differences were seen in the difference between planned and achieved angles. Larger studies are needed to analyse this in more detail and to determine whether the reduced numbers of outliers lead to improved clinical outcomes

Computer aided Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) surgery is known to improve implantation precision, but clinical trials have failed to demonstrate an improvement in survivorship or patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Our aim was to compare the risk of revision, PROMs and satisfaction rates between computer guided and THA implanted without computer guidance. We used the National Joint Registry dataset and linked PROMs data. Our sample included THAs implanted for osteoarthritis using cementless acetabular components from a single manufacturer (cementless and hybrid). An additional analysis was performed limiting the sample size to THAs using cementless stems (fully cementless). The primary endpoint was revision (of any component) for any reason. Kaplan Meier survivorship analysis and an adjusted Cox Proportional Hazards model were used. 41683 non computer guided, and 871 (2%) computer guided cases were included in our cementless and hybrid analysis. 943 revisions were recorded in the non-guided and 7 in the computer guided group (adjusted Log-rank test, p= 0.028). Cumulative revision rate at 10 years was 3.88% (95%CI: 3.59 – 4.18) and 1.06% (95%CI: 0.45 – 2.76) respectively. Cox Proportional Hazards adjusted HR: 0.45 (95%CI: 0.21 – 0.96, p=0.038). In the fully cementless group, cumulative revision rate at 10 years was 3.99% (95%CI: 3.62 – 4.38) and 1.20% (95%CI: 0.52 – 3.12) respectively. Cox Proportional Hazards adjusted HR: 0.47 (95%CI: 0.22 – 1.01, p=0.053). There was no statistically significant difference in the 6-month Oxford Hip Score, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS and success rates. Patient Satisfaction (single-item satisfaction outcome measure) was improved in the computer guided group but this finding was limited by a reduced number of responses. In this single manufacturer acetabular component analysis, the use of computer guided surgery was associated with a significant reduction in the early risk of revision. Causality cannot be inferred in view of the observational nature of the study, and further database and prospective studies are recommended to validate these findings

Aims. Cementless acetabular components rely on press-fit fixation for initial stability. In certain cases, initial stability is more difficult to obtain (such as during revision). No current study evaluates how a surgeon’s impaction technique (mallet mass, mallet velocity, and number of strikes) may affect component fixation. This study seeks to answer the following research questions: 1) how does impaction technique affect a) bone strain generation and deterioration (and hence implant stability) and b) seating in different density bones?; and 2) can an impaction technique be recommended to minimize risk of implant loosening while ensuring seating of the acetabular component?. Methods. A custom drop tower was used to simulate surgical strikes seating acetabular components into synthetic bone. Strike velocity and drop mass were varied. Synthetic bone strain was measured using strain gauges and stability was assessed via push-out tests. Polar gap was measured using optical trackers. Results. A phenomenon of strain deterioration was identified if an excessive number of strikes was used to seat a component. This effect was most pronounced in low-density bone at high strike velocities. Polar gap was reduced with increasing strike mass and velocity. Conclusion. A high mallet mass with low strike velocity resulted in satisfactory implant stability and polar gap, while minimizing the risk of losing stability due to over-striking. Extreme caution not to over-strike must be exercised when using high velocity strikes in low-density bone for any mallet mass. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(7):386–393

Introduction: The removal of well-fixed cementless acetabular components can be challenging and may lead to tremendous bone loss. The options for a well-fixed, mal-positioned cup include cup revision, face-changing liners, or eccentrically cementing a liner in a more appropriate position. This study reviews our experience with a technique of eccentrically cemented acetabular liners in wellfixed, malpositioned cementless acetabular components. Methods: From 2002 to 2004, 30 patients underwent acetabular revisions with eccentrically cemented liners into well-fixed, malpositioned acetabular components. The range of malpositioning included excessive abduction, extreme anteversion, retroversion, and neutral cup position. The cemented liners were downsized by 2–4 mm to provide an acceptable cement mantle and were positioned more appropriately in terms of both abduction angle and anteversion. Results: Mean follow-up was 4 years (3–5). Liners were reoriented for the following reasons 7 excessive abduction, 8 extreme anteversion, 10 neutral and retroversion, and 5 combined inappropriate version and abduction. One liner loosened at 18 months and required cup revision. The other 29 functioned well with no dislocations. Radiographic analysis demonstrated no loosening in 29 cups at a mean of 4 years (3–5). Conclusion: Eccentrically cemented liners into well fixed, malpositioned acetabular components in a reasonable option that has promising short-term results

Introduction. Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty THA is a major short term complication not infrequently resulting in revision arthroplasty. Malposition of the acetabular component in THA results in a higher rate of dislocation as well as increased wear and osteolysis. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of mode of fixation on positioning of the acetabular component. Patients, materials and methods. For all THAs performed at our hospital in 2008, angle of acetabular inclination was measured using PACS by two independent observers. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were assessed (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r). We determined whether the number of acetabular components outside the target angle range (eg:45±5°) was significantly different between cemented and cementless THA (chi squared test). An enquiry was made to the National Joint Registry (NJR) in respect to incidence of revision for dislocation of THA using cemented and cementless acetabular components, 2004–2009. Results. During 2008 126 THA were performed, 80 cemented and 46 cementless. There was good reliability of angle measurement (interobserver: r=0.89; intraobserver: r=0.87 and 0.97). More cemented acetabular components were within target angle range compared to cementless (cemented 32/80, cementless 29/46; chi squared=6.39, p<0.05). Using data from NJR comparing the number of primary hip replacement operations with number of revisions due to dislocation found a higher rate for cementless THA, 0.381% (266/69,822) than for cemented, 0.282% (262/92,928) (Odds ratio: 1.35 (95% CI 1.14–1.60; P<0.05). Conclusion. Positioning of the acetabular component is more difficult when using cementless systems as implant position is determined by orientation of reaming whereas with cement there is potential for fine implant position adjustment on insertion. The choice of a cementless acetabular component significantly increases the incidence of dislocation post THA. Acetabular component malposition is likely to be a factor in this increased incidence

The use of cementless acetabular components is currently the gold standard for treatment in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Porous coated cups have a low modulus of elasticity that enhances press-fit and a surface that promotes osseointegration. Monoblock acetabular cups represent a subtype of uncemented cup with the liner moulded into the metal shell, minimizing potential backside wear and eliminating the chance of mal-seating. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term clinical and radiographic performances of a modular cup with that of a monoblock cup, with particular interest in the advent of lucent lines and their correlation with clinical outcomes. In this multi-surgeon, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 86 patients undergoing unilateral THA were recruited. Participants were randomized to either a porous-coated, modular metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) acetabular component (n=46) or a hydroxyapatite (HA)- and titanium-coated monoblock shell with ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing (n=42). The porous-coated cup had an average pore size of 250 microns with an average volume porosity of 45%, whereas the monoblock shell had an average pore size of 300 microns with an average volume porosity of 48% and a HA coating thickness of 80 nm. There were no baseline demographic differences between both groups regarding sex, age, body mass index (BMI), or American Society of Anaesthesia (ASA) class (p>0.05). All of the sockets were under-reamed by 1 mm. Radiographs and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Hip Score, were available for evaluation at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. A radiolucent distance between the cup and acetabulum of ≥0.5 mm was defined as gap if it was diagnosed from outset or as radiolucency if it had sclerotic edges and was found on progressive x-ray analyses. Thirty-two gaps (69%) were found in the modular cup group and 28 (6%) in the monoblock one (p=0.001). Of the former, 17 filled the gaps whereas 15 turned into a radiolucency at final assessment. Of the latter, only 1 of the gaps turned into a radiolucency at final follow-up (p 0.05) in both groups. Only the porous-coated cup was an independent predictor of lucent lines (OR:0.052, p=0.007). No case underwent revision surgery due to acetabular loosening during the study period. Only 2 cases of squeaking were reported in the CoC monoblock shell. Both porous-coated modular and hydroxyapatite-coated monoblock cups showed successful clinical results at short-term follow-up, however, the former evidenced a significantly higher rate of radiolucent line occurrence, without any association with PROMs. Since these lines indicate the possibility of future cup loosening, longer follow-up and assessment are necessary

Purpose. To review prospectively collected data on patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty utilizing two different cementless acetabular components. Method. All patients undergoing primary total hip replacement surgery at our institution are entered prospectively into a database which includes history and physical examination, radiology, WOMAC and SF-36 scores. The patients are re-examined, re-x-rayed and re-scored at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after surgery and yearly thereafter. Using this database we are able to identify patients who have undergone total hip replacement using one of two geometric variants of the acetabular component. The first design is hemispherical and the second design has a peripheral rim expansion designed to increase initial press-fit stability. Results. Five hundred and twenty-seven consecutive primary total hip replacements were identified using either of the geometric variants of the acetabular component. Results at a mean of 7 years revealed a 95.6% survivorship with no significant difference between the two component designs with revision for aseptic loosening as the end point. Functional scores between the two groups of patients also demonstrated no statistically significant difference. Radiologic assessment, however, showed a difference between the two designs. The hemispherical design which matches the reamer line-to-line had 80% complete osseointegration on final radiologic review while the second design with a peripheral rim expansion had only 57% complete osseointegration. This was statistically significant. The peripherally expanded components also had a greater number of screws inserted at the time of surgery, felt by us to be a reflection of initial surgeon dissatisfaction with component stability at the time of insertion of the component. The difference in screw numbers was also statistically significant. Conclusion. Cementless acetabular components in total hip replacement have become increasingly popular because of ease of insertion, use of differing bearing surfaces and ease of revision. Longevity of implanted acetabular components appears related to some extent to the quality and extent of bone ingrowth. This study demonstrates that a hemispherical design with line-to-line contact between the acetabular component surface and the acetabular bone is statistically superior in terms of bone ingrowth and probably statistically superior in terms of initial press-fit stability when compared to a peripherally expanded component. Peripherally expanded components appear to offer little advantage over hemispherical components in terms of clinical outcome and are statistically inferior to hemispherical components in radiologic parameters at 7 years follow-up

Aims: To evaluate the outcomes of the primary total hip arthroplasties using nonmodular cementless acetabular component with titanium mesh coating þxed by press-þt technique. Methods: Eighty-two primary total hip arthroplasties in 75 patients were performed consecutively. Sixty-two hips were eligible for follow up of average 62 months (range, 48–84). The mean age was 59 years. The clinical evaluation was done by modiþed Harris hip score (HHS) and radiologic evaluation including stability of component, polyethylene wear rate (Dorr method) and remodeling pattern was done. Results: Mean HHS improved from 50.2 points preoperatively to 90.5 points at the last follow up. Excellent or good results were found in 52 hips (84%). All components were stable radiologically. The average thickness of polyethylene was 13.06mm. The linear polyethylene wear rate was 0.073mm/years (range, 0.01–0.23). Wear rate was correlated with the thickness of polyethylene signiþcantly (p=0.049). Any pelvic osteolysis was not found. The polar gap was found in 25 hips (40%) at initial radiographs and has disappeared during follow up in 22 hips (88%). One hip was revised due to chronic unreduced dislocation. There were 9 heterotrophic ossiþcations, 6 nonrecurrent dislocations, and 2 transient sciatic nerve palsies. Conclusion: Total hip arthroplasty using nonmodular cementless acetabular component seemed to enhance satisfactory early mid-term result in terms of stability and acetabular remodeling with minimal wear and pelvic osteolysis

Periprosthetic osteolysis is a serious medium to long-term complication of total hip arthroplasty. Interobserver reliability of detecting osteolysis around cementless ace-tabular components is reported to be poor using plain radiographs. Quantitative computed tomography (CT) provides sensitive and accurate measures of osteolytic lesion volume, however, there may remain a role for plain radiographs in monitoring progression of osteolysis. The aim of this study was to use quantitative CT to monitor the progression of osteolytic lesions around cementless acetabular components and to compare plain radiographs and CT in determining the progression of osteolysis. A high-resolution multi-slice quantitative CT scanner with metal artefact suppression was used to determine the volume of osteolysis around 18 cementless acetabular components. The mean time since arthroplasty was 14 years (range 10–15 years) at the initial CT. Repeat scans of the hip were undertaken over a five-year period to determine progression of osteolysis with time. A second blinded observer examined anteroposterior and lateral plain radiographs taken at the same time as the CT scans and measured the location and area of osteolytic lesions. CT measurements determined that in ten of 18 hips (56%), osteolytic lesions progressed by more than 1cm3/yr. Progression in size of osteolytic lesions was significantly associated with hips with larger osteolytic lesions at the initial CT (p=0.0005). The mean volume of osteolysis progression was 4.9cm3/year (range 2.8–7.5cm3/yr) for cases with osteolysis volumes greater than 10cm3 at the initial CT, and 0.7cm3/yr (range 0–2.3cm3/yr) for cases with osteolysis volumes smaller than or equal to 10cm3 at the initial CT (p=0.002). Importantly, the rate of osteolysis progression between CT scans varied greatly in some hips. In contrast, using plain radiograph assessment, progression in the area of osteolytic lesions was only detected in 10% of hips. In conclusion, quantitative CT provides new insights into the natural history of periacetabular osteolysis. Total osteolysis volume greater than 10cm3 is associated with a high risk of progression and progress, on average, at a greater rate than those less than 10cm3. Plain radiographs, including a lateral view, are an unreliable clinical diagnostic tool to predict substantial progression of periacetabular osteolytic lesions

Recently, new metallurgical techniques allowed the creation of 3D metal matrices for cementless acetabular components. Among several different products now available on the market, the Biofoam Dynasty cup (MicroPort Orthopedics® Inc., Arlington, TN, USA) uses an ultraporous Titanium technology but has never been assessed in literature. Coping with this lack of information, our study aims to assess its radiological osteointegration at two years in a primary total hip arthroplasty and compares it to a successful contemporary cementless acetabular cup. This monocentric retrospective study includes 96 Dynasty Biofoam acetabular components implanted between March 2010 and August 2014 with a minimum 2 years radiographic follow-up. Previous acetabular surgery, any septic issue or re-operation for component malposition were exclusion criteria. They were compared to 96 THA using the Trident PSL matched for age, gender, BMI and follow-up. Presence of radiolucencies and sclerotic lines were described on AP pelvis views using the classification of DeLee and Charnley. There was no statistical difference between the two groups concerning demographics and mean follow-up (p> 0.05). Shell's anteversion was similar but inclination was greater in the biofoam group (p=0.006). 27,17% of the Biofoam shells presented radiolucencies in 2 zones or more and 0% of the Trident shells. 11,96% of Biofoam cups showed radiolucencies in the 3 zones of DeLee comparing to 0% of the Trident cups. There was no statistical difference between the Biofoam group (n=54/96) and the Trident PSL group (n=57/96) in pre-operative functional scores for both WOMAC subscales and SF-12. When evaluating last follow-up PROM's, no significant differences were found comparing the entirety of both groups, 56 Biofoam and 51 Trident PSL. No difference was found either when comparing Biofoam patients with ³ 2 zones of radiolucencies (n=15) to the whole Trident group (n=51). This study raises concerns about radiologic evidence of osteointegration of the Biofoam acetabular cup. Nevertheless, these radiological findings do not find any clinical correlation considering clinical scores. Thus, it may question the real meaning of these high-rated radiolucencies, which at first sight reflect a poorer osteointegration. The first possible limitation with this study is an overinterpretation of the radiographs. Nevertheless, both observers were blinded regarding the patients groups and clinical outcomes and there was a strong inter-observer reliability. Although both cohorts were matched on their demographics and were similar on the cup anteversion, we noticed a slightly lower abduction angle in the Biofoam population. It could reduce the bone-implant coverage area and hence hinders the bony integration, but this difference was small and both groups remained in the Lewinneck security zone. Furthermore, even if patients were matched on age, gender, BMI and follow-up, other variables can influence early osteointegration (smoke status, osteoporosis) and have not been controlled even though we have no reasons to think their distribution could differ in the 2 groups. The real clinical meaning of these findings remains unknown but serious concerns are raised about the radiographic osteointegration of the Dynasty Biofoam acetabular components. Concerns are all the more lawful that this implants aim to enhance osteointegration

The principles of acetabular reconstruction include the creation of a stable acetabular bed, secure prosthetic fixation with freedom of orientation, bony reconstitution, and the restoration of a normal hip centre of rotation with acceptable biomechanics. Acetabular impaction grafting, particularly with cemented implants, has been shown to be a reliable means of acetabular revision. Whilst our practice is heavily weighted towards cementless revision of the acetabulum with impaction grafting, there is a large body of evidence from Tom Slooff and his successors that cemented revision with impaction grafting undertaken with strict attention to technical detail is associated with excellent long terms results in all ages and across a number of underlying pathologies including dysplasia and rheumatoid arthritis. We use revision to a cementless hemispherical porous-coated acetabular cup for most isolated cavitary or segmental defects and for many combined deficiencies. Morsellised allograft is packed in using chips of varied size and a combination of impaction and reverse reaming is used in order to create a hemisphere. There is increasing evidence for the use of synthetic grafts, usually mixed with allograft, in this setting. The reconstruction relies on the ability to achieve biological fixation of the component to the underlying host bone. This requires intimate host bone contact, and rigid implant stability. It is important to achieve host bone contact in a least part of the dome and posterior column – when this is possible, and particularly when there is a good rim fit, we have not found it absolutely necessary to have contact with host bone over 50% of the surface. Once the decision to attempt a cementless reconstruction is made, hemispherical reamers are used to prepare the acetabular cavity. Sequentially larger reamers are used until there is three-point contact with the ilium, ischium and pubis. Acetabular reaming should be performed in the desired orientation of the final implant, with approximately 200 of anteversion and 400 of abduction (or lateral opening). Removing residual posterior column bone should be avoided. Reaming to bleeding bone is desirable. Morsellised allograft is inserted and packed and/or reverse reamed into any cavitary defects. This method can also be applied to medial wall uncontained defects by placing the graft onto the medial membrane or obturator internus muscle, and gently packing it down before inserting the cementless acetabular component. Either the reamer heads or trial cups can be used to trial prior to choosing and inserting the definitive implant. The fixation is augmented with screws in all cases. Incorporation of the graft may be helped by the use of autologous bone marrow. Cementless acetabular components with impaction grafting should not be used when the host biology does not allow for stability or for bone ingrowth. This includes the severely osteopenic pelvis, pelvic osteonecrosis after irradiation, tumours, and metabolic bone disorders. They should also not be used in the presence of pelvic discontinuity unless the structure of the pelvic ring has been restored with a plate, or specialised materials/porous metals are used. The challenge of reconstituting the acetabulum depends on the degree and type of bone loss. The principles of maximising host bone-implant contact and implant stability have borne fruit in our experience with cementless revision. The advantages of bone grafting in acetabular reconstruction include the ability to restore bone stock, to rebuild a normal hip center and hip biomechanics and to increase bone stock for future revisions