To the best of our knowledge, this prospective study is the first to investigate the prevalence of acetabular labrum tears in athletes presenting with groin pain. Eighteen consecutive athletes who presented to our sports clinic with groin pain, underwent Magnetic Resonance Arthrography (MRA). Presence or absence of acetabular labrum tears, were reported on by a Consultant Radiologist, who has an interest in musculoskeletal radiology. In 4 out of 18 athletes with groin pain (22.2%), the Magnetic Resonance Arthrography demonstrated the presence of acetabular labrum tear. Two underwent hip arthroscopy and treatment. Acetabular labrum tears can be a common cause of groin pain in athletes. Sports clinicians have to be well aware of the condition. Magnetic resonance arthrography of the hip can be a valuable tool in diagnosing this pathology

Objectives: During the past decade, acetabular labrum injury has been increasingly recognized as a cause of hip joint pain. Currently, T1-weited MR arthrography (MRa) with gadolinium is the most popular diagnostic imaging technique used for direct detection of acetabular labrum injury. However, the intra-articular injection of gadolinium is not a procedure approved in Japan. We have conducted radial MRa using T2*-weighted images with saline instead. The purpose of this report was to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of T2*-weighted MRa with saline for the diagnosis of acetabular labrum injury. Methods: Between November 2005 and March 2007, thirty-two hip joints of 30 patients (8 joints of 7 males and 24 joints of 23 females) aged between 13 and 81 (mean; 58) years at the time of study, who underwent MR arthrogram and hip arthroscopy were studied. Prior to performing T2*-weighted MRa, a mixture of 5ml of 2% lidocaine chloride, 5ml of 64% iotrolan, and 15ml of saline was injected under fluoroscopy guidance injected into the hip joint. T2*-weighted MRa was conducted using a 1.5-tesla magnet and local surface coil in radial slices perpendicular to the labral rim, at 15-degree intervals. Radial sequences were operated at T2*-weighted images, Gradient echo method, TR of500ms, TE of 20ms, flip angle of 30 degrees, slice thickness of 5 mm, and FOV of 180 mm. On the MRa, acetabular labrum tear was diagnosed when inflow of contrast medium (high intensity) was observed continuous with the joint space at the base of acetabular labrum. Hip arthroscopy was conducted in the supine position by the standard three portal methods. The results of T2*-weighted MRa were compared with arthroscopic findings to calculate the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of T2*-weighted MRa. Results: On T2*-weighted MRa, acetabular labrum tear was observed in 17 joints, and no abnormalities in 15 joints. From arthroscopic findings, acetabular labrum tear was observed in 20 joints, and no acetabular labrum abnormalities in 12 joints. Comparing the two methods, the T2*-weighted MRa results were true positive in 17 joints, true negative in 12 joints, and false negative in 3 joints. Therefore, MRa had a sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 90.6%. Discussion: MRa has become the standard imaging technique for the diagnosis of acetabular labrum tear. The sensitivity was reported to range from 63 to 100%, specificity from 44 to 75%, and precision from 63 to 94%. Our results showed that this method provides sensitivity, specificity and accuracy that approach conventional MRa, demonstrating that radial T2* weighted MRa is a useful imaging technique for the diagnosis of acetabular labrum pathology. Conclusions: We recommend T2*-weighted MRa with saline for the diagnosis of acetabular labrum injury

Background: The positioning of the acetabular component is of critical importance in total hip arthroplasty. Due to the orientation of the acetabulum and limitations of observation imposed at the operative site mal-positioning is common. We believe that by utilising the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) and acetabular labrum, we are able to anatomically position our cup. In this study, we evaluate the correlation between placement of the acetabular component by reference to the TAL and the acetabular labrum with the taught safe zones for cup placement. Method: 7 embalmed hips were studied. Following disarticulation the labrum and TAL were digitised and their plane was calculated. Orientation of cup placement in this plane was calculated from a pre-dissection pelvic CT. Results: The plane of the labrum/TAL varied between 5–26° of anteversion and 32–59° of inclination. Interob-server differences in acetabular cup placement based on the TAL/labral plane indicate reasonable coherence. Almost all components were inside the documented “safe zone” 0–40° of anteversion and 30–55° of inclination of placement. Conclusion: The acetabular labrum and TAL form a plane that reflects the documented “safe zones” for acetabular component placement. We feel that this plane allows a surgeon to determine optimal patient specific acetabular component placement, irrespective of patient position

In this in vitro study of the hip joint we examined which soft tissues act as primary and secondary passive rotational restraints when the hip joint is functionally loaded. A total of nine cadaveric left hips were mounted in a testing rig that allowed the application of forces, torques and rotations in all six degrees of freedom. The hip was rotated throughout a complete range of movement (ROM) and the contributions of the iliofemoral (medial and lateral arms), pubofemoral and ischiofemoral ligaments and the ligamentum teres to rotational restraint was determined by resecting a ligament and measuring the reduced torque required to achieve the same angular position as before resection. The contribution from the acetabular labrum was also measured. Each of the capsular ligaments acted as the primary hip rotation restraint somewhere within the complete ROM, and the ligamentum teres acted as a secondary restraint in high flexion, adduction and external rotation. The iliofemoral lateral arm and the ischiofemoral ligaments were primary restraints in two-thirds of the positions tested. Appreciation of the importance of these structures in preventing excessive hip rotation and subsequent impingement/instability may be relevant for surgeons undertaking both hip joint preserving surgery and hip arthroplasty. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:484–91

Background. The acetabular labrum provides sealing function and a degree of hip joint stability. Previous early(16 month) and mid-term(mean 3.5 years) follow-up of this cohort reported better patient related outcome measures in the refixation group. Methods. We reported patients who underwent labral debridement/focal labral excision during a period before the development of labral repair techniques. Patients with labral tears thought to be repairable with our current arthroscopic technique were compared with patients who underwent labral refixation. In 46 hips, the labrum was focally excised/debrided (group 1); in 54 hips, the labrum was refixed (group 2). Outcomes were measured with modified-Harris-Hip-Score (mHHS), Short Form-12 (SF-12), and a visual-analog-scale(VAS) for pain preoperatively and postoperatively. Results. Mean age was 33 years in group 1 and 28 years in group 2 with mean follow-up of 7 years (range, 2–13.6 years). At mean follow-up, subjective outcomes were significantly improved (P<.01) for both groups compared with preoperative scores. The mHHS (P=.005), SF-12 (P=.025), and VAS pain scores (P<.001) were all significantly better for refixation group compared with debridement group. Although most recent outcomes for both groups fell at mean 7 years' follow-up in comparison to 16 month and 3.5 year follow-up, the disparity between groups was greater in favor of labral refixation. Good-to-excellent results were 47.7% in debridement and 86.3% in refixation (p<.001), and failure rates were 29.6% (debridement) and 13.7% (refixation group) (p =.059). There were 4 revisions in the debridement group and 2 revisions in the refixation group. Conclusion. Longer term follow-up comparing focal labral debridement/excision to refixation revealed a decrease in patient related outcome scoring and good/excellent results in both groups. Ultimately, there was a greater drop in outcome measures and good/excellent results in the debridement group and better maintenance of results in the refixation group at mean 7 years follow-up. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Introduction and Objective

To estimate the prevalence of acetabular ossifications in the adult population with asymptomatic, morphologically normal hips at CT and to determine whether the presence of labral ossifications is associated with patient-related (sex, age, BMI), or hip-related parameters (joint space width, and cam- and pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement morphotype).

Purpose: A prospective investigation to define the syndrome associated with symptomatic labral tears definitively diagnosed at hip arthroscopy.

Methods: 66 consecutive patients that had an arthroscopically documented labral tear were evaluated. Demographics, symptomatology, examination, previous treatments, functional limitations, were assessed prospectively. Onset/duration of symptoms to diagnosis of tears, other diagnoses offered by healthcare providers, and non-labral procedures that patients had undergone for the symptoms were analyzed. Radiographic abnormalities and MR arthrography findings were recorded.

Results: There were 47 female and 19 male patients with a mean age of 38 years. Initial presentation: insidious in 61%, acute injury in 30%, and trauma in 9% hips. Moderate to severe pain occurred in 86% of patients, with groin pain predominating (92%). Fifty three percent had true mechanical symptoms - catching/locking. Walking, pivoting, impact activity aggravated patient symptoms (p< 0.05). Pain was characterized as a combination of dull aching pain with intermittent episodes of sharp pain in 70%(p=0.001). Pain was frequently activity related (p< 0.05) and night pain occurred in 71% of patients (p=0.0006). The majority of patients (98%) with a labral tear reported being active/athletic. On examination 39% patients had a limp, 38% a positive Trendelenburg sign, and 95% a positive impingement sign. The mean time to diagnosis of labral tear from the onset of symptoms was 21 months. A mean of 3.3 healthcare providers were seen prior to a definitive diagnosis. Surgery on another anatomic site was recommended in 11 patients and 4 of these underwent an unsuccessful surgery prior to diagnosis of the labral tear. Radiographic data indicated that 38% of hips had an underlying structural abnormality consistent with mild development dysplasia or anterior femoroacetabular impingement. Preoperative MRA detected 73% of the labral tears.

Conclusions: The clinical presentation of a labral tear may vary, with duration of symptoms often greater than 12 months prior to diagnosis. In young, active patients with a predominant complaint of groin pain with or without a history of trauma, the diagnosis of a labral tear should be suspected, and investigated, as radiographs and history may be nonspecific for this diagnosis.

This in-vitro study finds which hip joint soft tissues act as primary and secondary passive internal and external rotation restraints so that informed decisions can be made about which soft tissues should be preserved or repaired during hip surgery. The capsular ligaments provide primary hip rotation restraint through a complete hip range of motion protecting the labrum from impingement. The labrum and ligamentum teres only provided secondary stability in a limited number of positions. Within the capsule, the iliofemoral lateral arm and ischiofemoral ligaments were primary restraints in two-thirds of the positions tested and so preservation/repair of these tissues should be a priority to prevent excessive hip rotation and subsequent impingement/instability for both the native hip and after hip arthroplasty.

Aims. This study uses prospective registry data to compare early patient outcomes following arthroscopic repair or debridement of the acetabular labrum. Methods. Data on adult patients who underwent arthroscopic labral debridement or repair between 1 January 2012 and 31 July 2019 were extracted from the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry. Patients who underwent microfracture, osteophyte excision, or a concurrent extra-articular procedure were excluded. The EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D) and International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT-12) questionnaires were collected preoperatively and at six and 12 months post-operatively. Due to concerns over differential questionnaire non-response between the two groups, a combination of random sampling, propensity score matching, and pooled multivariable linear regression models were employed to compare iHOT-12 improvement. Results. A total of 2,025 labral debridements (55%) and 1,659 labral repairs (45%) were identified. Both groups saw significant (p < 0.001) EQ-5D and iHOT-12 gain compared to preoperative scores at 12 months (iHOT-12 improvement: labral repair = +28.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 26.4 to 30.9), labral debridement = +24.7 (95% CI 22.5 to 27.0)), however there was no significant difference between procedures after multivariable modelling. Overall, 66% of cases achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and 48% achieved substantial clinical benefit at 12 months. Conclusion. Both labral procedures were successful in significantly improving early functional outcome following hip arthroscopy, regardless of age or sex. Labral repair was associated with superior outcomes in univariable analysis, however there was no significant superiority demonstrated in the multivariable model. Level of evidence: III. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(4):291–301

Objectives. The aim of this study was to investigate the structural integrity of torn and non-torn human acetabular labral tissue. Methods. A total of 47 human labral specimens were obtained from a biobank. These included 22 torn specimens and 25 control specimens from patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with macroscopically normal labra. The specimens underwent dynamic shear analysis using a rheometer to measure storage modulus, as an indicator of structural integrity. Results. There was a significant difference in the storage modulus between torn (mean modulus = 2144.08 Pa) and non-torn (3178.1 Pa) labra (p = 0.0001). Conclusion. The acetabular labrum of young patients with a tear has significantly reduced structural integrity compared with a non-torn labrum in older patients with end-stage osteoarthritis. This study contributes to the understanding of the biomechanics of labral tears, and the observation of reduced structural integrity in torn labra may explain why some repairs fail. Our data demonstrate that labral tears probably have a relatively narrow phenotype, presenting a basis for further investigations that will provide quantifiable data to support their classification and a means to develop a standardized surgical technique for their repair. This study also demonstrates the value of novel biomechanical testing methods in investigating pathological tissues of orthopaedic interest. Cite this article: A. K. Woods, J. Broomfield, P. Monk, F. Vollrath, S. Glyn-Jones. Dynamic shear analysis: a novel method to determine mechanical integrity of normal and torn human acetabular labra: Implications for prediction of outcome of repair. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:440–446. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.77.BJR-2017-0282.R2

Objectives. The aim of this study was to use registry data to report and compare early patient outcomes following arthroscopic repair or debridement of the acetabular labrum. Methods. Data on adult patients who underwent arthroscopic labral debridement or repair between January 2012 and March 2019 was extracted from the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry dataset. Patients who underwent microfracture, osteophyte excision or a concurrent extra-articular procedure were excluded. Outcomes comprised EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) index and the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT-12), preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months. Results. A total of 3,553 arthroscopies comprising 1,986 labral debridement (56%) and 1,567 labral repairs (44%) were identified. Both groups saw significant (p <0.0001) EQ-5D and iHOT-12 gain compared to pre-operative baseline scores at 6 months (iHOT-12: repair = +27.4 (95%CI 25.2 to 29.5), debridement = +24.8 (95%CI 22.7 to 26.9)) which was maintained at 12 months (repair = +28.3 (95%CI 26.0 to 30.6), debridement = +24.3 (95%CI 22.0 to 26.5)) with improvement being significantly greater in the repair group by 12 months (p = 0.016) including after modelling for patient and surgical factors. Overall, 64% of cases achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and 47% achieved substantial clinical benefit (SCB: repair = 51%, debridement = 43%, p = 0.005) at 12 months. Significant functional improvement was seen for both genders and in younger and older (>40 years) cohorts. Conclusion. Both labral repair and debridement techniques were successful in significantly improving 12-month outcomes following hip arthroscopy regardless of age or gender. Labral repair was associated with superior outcomes in comparison to debridement. Whilst patient selection is crucial, our findings support the repair of an injured labrum where possible. A multi-centre randomised controlled trial would be the most appropriate next step to overcome bias inherent in the existing literature

Background. The acetabular labrum is an essential stabilizer of the hip joint, imparting its greatest effect in extreme joint positions where the femoral head is disposed to subluxation and dislocation. However, its stabilizing value has proved difficult to quantify. The objective of the present study was to assess the contribution of the entire acetabular labrum to mechanical joint stability. We introduce a novel “dislocation potential test” that utilizes a dynamic, cadaveric, robotic model that functions in real-time under load-control parameters to map the joint space for low-displacement determination of stability, and quantify using the “stability index”. Methods. Five fresh-frozen human cadaveric hips without labral tears were mounted to a six-degree-of-freedom robotic manipulator and studied in 2 distinct joint positions provocative for either anterior or posterior dislocation. Dislocation potential tests were run in 15° intervals, or sweep planes, about the face of the acetabulum. For each interval, a 100 N force vector was applied medially and swept laterally until dislocation occurred. Three-dimensional kinematic data from conditions with and without labrum were quantified using the stability index, which is the percentage of all directions a constant force can be applied within a given sweep plane while maintaining a stable joint. Results. Global stability indices, considering all sweep planes, were significantly greater with labrum intact than after total labrectomy for both anterior (Figure 1A) (p = 0.02) and posterior (Figure 1B) (p<0.001) provocative positions. Regional stability indices, based upon the expected range of dislocation for each provocative position, were also significantly greater and of slightly larger magnitude for the intact condition than after total labrectomy (p<0.001). Conclusions. This is the first known application of a six-degree-of-freedom robot to recreate mechanical hip impingement and dislocation to elucidate the role of the labrum in hip stability. Our results suggest that at least in extreme positions, the labrum imparts significant overall mechanical resistance to hip dislocation compared to the condition without the labrum. Regional contributions of the labrum are greatest in the direction of dislocation as foretold by joint position as indicated by region-based stability indices. Future studies involving more clinically relevant injury patterns with greater soft tissue preservation in a younger cadaveric population would better reflect the in vivo effects of labral injury so that treatment strategies can be developed accordingly

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine if a correlation exists between the impingement test and the arthroscopic findings at the acetabular rim in non-dysplastic hips. Secondarily, we also wanted to establish if there was a correlation between the pain experienced on the impingement test and the pathology identified. Patients and Methods: Sixty-two consecutive patients who were due to have an arthroscopy of the hip in our unit were prospectively recruited into the study. All the dysplastic hips were excluded from the study. One observer was involved in examining all the patients and another one in performing all the arthroscopies. The impingement test was considered positive if at 90 degrees of flexion, adduction and internal rotation, the patient complained of discomfort or pain. If the patient experienced pain this was described as a strongly positive test and if there was discomfort experienced it was considered as a weakly positive test. The test was performed on the morning of the arthroscopy and all the intra-articular findings recorded at arthroscopy. A tear of the acetabular labrum and chondral damage in the antero-superior margin of the acetabulum were considered as positive pathology at the acetabular rim. Results : There were 40 males and 22 females in the study group. The impingement test was positive in 57 patients, strongly positive in 42 and weakly positive in 15. The arthroscopy revealed positive pathology in terms of an acetabular labrum tear and/or chondral damage at the acetabular rim in 55 patients. A negative test was recorded in 5 patients but there was positive rim pathology in two of these 5 patients. Conclusion: The impingement test correlates positively with the pathology at the acetabular rim; the sensitivity of the test for diagnosing acetabular rim pathology is 96.4 % and the specificity is only 60 % in non-dysplastic hips. However, we did not identify any correlation between the level of pain and the pathology observed

The majority of patients who develop hip arthritis have a mechanical abnormality of the joint. The structural abnormalities range from instability (DDH) to impingement. Impingement leads to osteoarthritis by chronic damage to the acetabular labrum and adjacent cartilage. In situations of end-stage secondary DJD, hip arthroplasty is the most reliable treatment choice. In young patients with viable articular cartilage, joint salvage is indicated. Treatment should be directed at resolving the structural abnormalities that create the impingement. Femoral abnormalities corrected by osteotomy or increased head-neck offset by chondro-osteoplasty creating a satisfactory head-neck offset. This can safely be done via anterior surgical dislocation. The acetabular-labral lesions can be debrided and/or repaired. Acetabular abnormalities should be corrected by “reverse” PAO in those with acetabular retroversion or anterior acetabular debridement in those with satisfactory posterior coverage and a damaged anterior rim. Often combinations of the above are indicated

Introduction. Femoroacetabular impingement(FAI) is a relatively common cause causes of hip pain and dysfunction in active young adults. The concept of FAI was popularized by Ganz et al in early 2000s. Surgical treatment for FAI has been widely employed over the last two decades. The long term outcome of femoroacetabular osteoplasty (FAO) and risk factors for long-term failure of FAO is less studied. The goal of this single surgeon series is to identify the long term outcome of FAO (minimum 10-year follow-up) and risk factors for surgical treatment failure in these patients. Methods. The prospective database on hip joint preservation identified 1,120 patients who have undergone FAO between January 2005-June 2019. Of these 164 patients (178 hips) have a minimum 10-year follow-up (range, 10–14). The database collects detailed information on patient demographics, clinical history, radiographic and cross sectional imaging findings, intraoperative findings (site and size of chondral lesion, labral tear, subchondral cyst, size of cam lesion, etc), and patient outcome using the modified HHS, SF-36, and UCLA activity score. Patients are contacted on an annual basis and the functional outcome instruments administered. Of 1,120 patients, 122 patients have been lost to follow-up. Results. The mean age of patients in the cohort is 34.3±10.4 years and 39.6% of patients are female. FAO resulted in an improvement in mean mHHS (58.2±3.9 to 86.4±3.2) and SF-36(60.4±4 to 85±4.1) in 89% of patients. At the latest follow up 8.1% of patients have undergone THA. The study found that older age, longer preoperative symptomatic period, higher preoperative alpha angle, presence of hip dysplasia and acetabular retroversion, inability to repair acetabular labrum, and full thickness acetabular chondral lesion were associated with higher risk of failure of treatment. Conclusion. Patients with symptomatic FAI who undergo surgery experience pain relief and functional improvement that appears to endure over a decade in the majority. This study on a large cohort with long term follow-up has also identified patients who are at higher risk of failure. The study has also shed light on some interesting findings such as labral tear being very common in patients without hip symptoms and others that will be presented. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Purpose of the study: The aim of this work was to report our experience with arthroscopy for the treatment of acetabular labral lesions and identify prognostic factors determining mid- and long-term outcome. Material and methods: Between August 1991 and December 1997, 12 patients (ten women, two men, mean age 39 years, age range 25–61 years) underwent arthroscopic treatment of an acetabular labrum lesion. All were reviewed at a mean 4 years follow-up (18 months-8 years). Half of the patients (n = 6) had a history of hip surgery: two femoral osteotomies and one acetabular bone block for congenital hip dislocation, two high-energy traumas and one traumatic dislocation. Clinical manifestations including pain (n = 12), a sensation of a snag (n = 10), or blockage (n = 8) had developed over a mean 15 months (2–24 months). Standard x-rays evidenced early signs of degenerative disease in four cases and acetabular dysplasia in four (5° < VCE < 18°), and were normal in four. Arthroscanography was performed in all cases and always evidenced a lesion of the anterior or anterosuperior part of the labrum, generally a fissuration (n = 7). The surgical procedure performed on an orthopedic table with traction on the limb lasted 45 to 75 min for regularization of the degenerated labrum in three patients, resection of the languette in six, the anse de seau in two or the labral notch in one. A short hospitalization (24 to 48 hours) was sufficient with immediate weight bearing with two canes. One patient developed sciatic paresia which regressed in 72 hours with vulvar edema due to excessive peroperative traction. Results: Besides the labral lesion, the exploration also identified an associated chondral lesion in seven cases (acetabulum in two, femoral head in three, both in two) which had been suspected in six cases from preoperative imaging (osteoarthrosis in four, dysplasia in two) and which affected the final outcome. Four of these patients (osteoarthritis in two and dysplasia in two) worsened clinically and radiographically to the point where a total hip arthroplasty was required in three. Among the three other patients, two had residual pain (osteoarthritis in one and initial x-ray normal in one) with no radiographic deterioration and only one (osteoarthrtis) was totally relieved without any radiographic deterioration at six years follow-up. Among the five patients with no chondral lesions, three (with normal x-rays initially) were pain free at four years follow-up while the two others (dysplasia) had residual pain at two years follow-up with no sign of osteoarthrtis on the latest x-rays. Discussion: Lesions of the acetabular labrum are uncommon but can be treated arthroscopically. Resection of the labral lesion is immediately effective but does not prevent long-term degradation of the joint if there is an associated chondral lesion

The acetabular labrum serves many integral functions within the hip joint. As a result, novel surgical techniques that aim to preserve or reconstruct the labrum have entered the spotlight. We have successfully performed a labral reconstruction using the quadriceps tendon as an autograft for a patient with a moderate labral defect. The purpose of this report is to propose this novel donor site as a viable alternative for labral reconstruction using an autograft; the potential benefits over currently popular methods will be discussed

The majority of patients who develop hip arthritis have a mechanical abnormality of the joint. The structural abnormalities range from instability (DDH) to impingement. Impingement leads to osteoarthritis by chronic damage to the acetabular labrum and adjacent cartilage. In situations of endstage secondary DJD, hip arthroplasty is the most reliable treatment choice. In young patients with viable articular cartilage, joint salvage is indicated. Treatment should be directed at resolving the structural abnormalities that create the impingement. Femoral abnormalities corrected by osteotomy or increased head-neck offset by chondro-osteoplasty creating a satisfactory head-neck offset. This can safely be done via anterior surgical dislocation. The acetabular-labral lesions can be debrided and/or repaired. Acetabular abnormalities should be corrected by “reverse” PAO in those with acetabular retroversion or anterior acetabular debridement in those with satisfactory posterior coverage and a damaged anterior rim. Often combinations of the above are indicated. This talk will also update issues related to hip impingement and joint salvage surgery that have arisen over the past year

The majority of patients who develop hip arthritis have a mechanical abnormality of the joint. The structural abnormalities range from instability (DDH) to impingement. Impingement leads to osteoarthritis by chronic damage to the acetabular labrum and adjacent cartilage. In situations of endstage secondary DJD, hip arthroplasty is the most reliable treatment choice. In young patients with viable articular cartilage, joint salvage is indicated. Treatment should be directed at resolving the structural abnormalities that create the impingement. Femoral abnormalities corrected by osteotomy or increased head-neck offset by chondro-osteoplasty creating a satisfactory head-neck offset. This can safely be done via anterior surgical dislocation or arthroscopically. The acetabular-labral lesions can be debrided and/or repaired. Acetabular abnormalities should be corrected by “reverse” PAO in those with acetabular retroversion or anterior acetabular debridement in those with satisfactory posterior coverage and a damaged anterior rim. Often combinations of the above are indicated

Aims

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients report exacerbation of hip pain in deep flexion. However, the exact impingement location in deep flexion is unknown. The aim was to investigate impingement-free maximal flexion, impingement location, and if cam deformity causes hip impingement in flexion in FAI patients.