Floating shoulder (FS) is, according to Goss et al, a double disruption of the superior shoulder suspensory complex which usually results from a glenoid neck fracture and a ipsilateral midclavicular fracture. However, the interruption can interest the whole scapular belt from acromion to sterno-clavicular joint. It occurs mostly after a violent traumatism with direct lateral impact on the shoulder. That leads to complex therapeutic issues with sometimes uncertain results. Between 1984 and 2009, 35 patients (30 men, 5 women), mean age 35 years [16–72] with FS, were treated in our department. Most of them sustained road accident (31cases) with polytraumatism context in 12 cases. A CT scan was realized in the majority of cases to specify the scapular fracture and look for intra-thoracic immediate complications. Mostly, glenoid neck fracture associated with a clavicular fracture has been found out (15cases). Orthopaedic treatment has been realized in 18 cases. Surgical management has been decided for open reduction of sterno-clavicular joint in 2 cases, isolated fixation of the clavicle in 9 cases, of the scapula in 3 cases, and of both scapula and clavicle in 3 cases. Criteria for clinical evaluation were an algo-functional scale (Oxford Shoulder Score, OSS), a subjective Constant Shoulder Score, a functional incapacity scale (Shoulder Simple Test, SST), scales of life quality (DASH and SF12) and global indications (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, SANE).Background
Material
The same cup orientation is classically applied to all cases of hip replacement (45° abduction, 20° anteversion). We hypothesize that this orientation must be adapted to the patient's hip range of motion. We tested this hypothesis by means of an experimental study with respect to hip range of motion, comparing the classical orientation (45° and 20°), and the orientation obtained with computer-assisted navigation. The experimental model included a hemipelvis equipped with a femur whose mobility was controlled for three configurations: stiff (60°/0°, 15°/10°, 10°/10°), average (80°/10°, 35°/30°,35°/25°), mobile (130°/30°, 50°/50°, 45°/35°). The hemipelvis and the cup holder were equipped with an electromagnetic system (Fastrack ™) to measure cup orientation. The Pleos™ navigation system (equipping the hemipelvis, the femur, and the cup holder) guided the cup orientation by detecting the positions risking impingement through a kinematic study of the hip. Nine operators each performed 18 navigation-guided implantations (162 hip abduction, anteversion, and range of movement measurements) in two series scheduled 2 months apart.Introduction
Material and Methods
