Posterior column plating through the single anterior approach reduces the morbidity in acetabular fractures that require stabilization of both the columns. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of posterior column plating through the anterior intrapelvic approach (AIP) in the management of acetabular fractures. We retrospectively reviewed the data from R G Kar Medical College, Kolkata, India, from June 2018 to April 2023. Overall, there were 34 acetabulum fractures involving both columns managed by medial buttress plating of posterior column. The posterior column of the acetabular fracture was fixed through the AIP approach with buttress plate on medial surface of posterior column. Mean follow-up was 25 months (13 to 58). Accuracy of reduction and effectiveness of this technique were measured by assessing the Merle d’Aubigné score and Matta’s radiological grading at one year and at latest follow-up.Aims
Methods
This study assesses the incidence of noise in ceramic on ceramic (COC) bearings compared to metal on polyethylene (MOP) bearings. Noise after MOP implants has rarely been studied and they never been linked to squeaking. We have developed a noise characterising hip questionnaire and sent it along with the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) to 1000 patients; 509 respondents, 282 COC and 227 MOP; median age 63.7 (range 45–92), median follow up 2.9 years (range 6–156 months). 47 (17%) of the COC patients reported noise compared to 19 (8%) of the MOP patients (P=0.048). 9 COC and 4 MOP patients reported their hip noise as squeaking. We found the incidence of squeaking in the COC hips to be 3.2% compared to 1.8% in the MOP hips. Overall, 27% patients with noise reported avoiding recreational activities because of it and patient's with noisy hips scored on average 4 points less in the OHS (COC: P=0.04 and MOP: P =0.007). This is the first study to report squeaking from MOP hip replacements. We therefore believe the squeaking hip phenomenon is not exclusive to hard bearings. Surprisingly, only a small proportion of patients described nose from their as a ‘squeak’. Noisy hip implants may have social implications, and patients should be aware of this. We have shown a relationship between noise and a lower OHS. However, longer follow-up and further study is needed to link noise to a poorly functioning implant.
In fractures electrical currents generated by piezoelectric and junctional diode effects initiate and augment healing. Conductive fixators may interfere with these currents causing delayed/nonunion which can be avoided by non conductive fixators, facilitating osteosynthesis. Null hypothesis of no difference and two tailed alternate hypothesis of any could be better was used. Impugn change in Electrical properties for demarcating union rate. Patients of Gustillo's grade I and II tibia fractures were randomised in conductive and non conductive fixator groups in a blinded manner. Electrical and clinico-radiological properties were compared every two weeks for 20 weeks, recoding magnitude and significant difference. Capacitance(p=0.03), Impedance(p=0.002), Inductance(p=0.01) and Reactance(p=0.02) are the electrical parameters which not only demarcated union rate but orchestrated diagnosis of fracture healing. In Non-conducting group, after removal of fixator at week 10, Local Tenderness was consistently absent, Rust Score was higher at week 18 and 20(p=0.01), absence of abnormal mobility was 58% higher and 100% at week 12(p < 0.05), Presence of weight bearing was higher from week 16(OR=15, p=0.03), presence of transmitted movement was 2.4 times higher at week 10(95% CI=0.17–34.93, p=0.52) and was 100% at week 14. Fractures heal at a faster rate if fixed by insulated non-conducting external fixators. Electrical parameters can be used to demarcate and monitor fracture healing.
