We aimed to retrospectively identify risk factors for delayed / non-union for first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion. Case notes and radiograph analysis was performed for operations between April 2014 and April 2016 with at least 3 months post-operative follow up. Union was defined as bridging bone across the fusion site on AP and lateral radiographic views with no movement or pain at the MTPJ on examination. If union was not certain, CT scans were performed. All patients operations were performed/supervised by one of three consultant foot surgeons. Surgery was performed through a dorsal approach using the Anchorage compression plate. Blinded pre-operative AP radiographs were analysed for the presence of a severe hallux valgus angle equal or above 40 degrees. Measurement intra-observer reliability was acceptable (95%CI:1.6–2.3 degrees). Smoking and medical conditions associated with non-union underwent univariate analysis for significance.Introduction
Methods
1737 elective foot and ankle cases were prospectively audited from Dec 2005 to end June 2010. All cases were brought back to a specialist nurse dressing clinic between 10 and 17 days post op. Data was collected at the dressing clinic with a standardised proforma on the type of surgery, the state of the wound and any additional management required. Those patients with a pre-existing infection were excluded. Of the 1737 cases 201 (11.6%) had a minor wound problems such as excessive post op bleeding into the dressings, suture problems, early removal of K wires, delayed wound healing and minor infection. 42 patients required antibiotics (2.4%) 8 patients had a deep wound infection (0.5%) requiring intravenous antibiotics and or further surgery. There were 1185 forefoot procedures 36 of which developed an infection (3%), overall infections of the mid/hindfoot was 6 (1%). Practice has changed as a result of the audit (reviewed annually). We have changed our closure techniques (reducing suture problems). For the past 2 years all of our elective foot and ankle patients now go to an ultra clean ward (Joint Replacement Unit) and we have shown a reduction in infection rates by over 50% since. Our infection rate before the JRU was 3.3% with 0.7% deep infection rate (818 procedures) and after the introduction of the JRU our infection rate has ped to 1.6% superficial and 0.3% deep infection p<.001. This large series prospective study sets a benchmark for infection rates in elective foot and ankle surgery. It also highlights the benefit of a dedicated orthopaedic elective unit with rigorous infection control policy and the need to regularly review our results.
