Classifying trochlear dysplasia (TD) is useful to determine the treatment options for patients suffering from patellofemoral instability (PFI). There is no consensus on which classification system is more reliable and reproducible for the purpose of guiding clinicians’ management of PFI. There are also concerns about the validity of the Dejour Classification (DJC), which is the most widely used classification for TD, having only a fair reliability score. The Oswestry-Bristol Classification (OBC) is a recently proposed system of classification of TD, and the authors report a fair-to-good interobserver agreement and good-to-excellent intraobserver agreement in the assessment of TD. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability and reproducibility of these two classifications. In all, six assessors (four consultants and two registrars) independently evaluated 100 axial MRIs of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) for TD and classified them according to OBC and DJC. These assessments were again repeated by all raters after four weeks. The inter- and intraobserver reliability scores were calculated using Cohen’s kappa and Cronbach’s α.Aims
Methods
A patient-centred approach, usually achieved through shared decision
making, has the potential to help improve decision making around
knee arthroplasty surgery. However, such an approach requires an
understanding of the factors involved in patient decision making.
This review’s objective is to systematically examine the qualitative literature
surrounding patients’ decision making in knee arthroplasty. A systematic literature review using Medline and Embase was conducted
to identify qualitative studies that examined patients’ decision
making around knee arthroplasty. An aggregated account of what is
known about patients’ decision making in knee arthroplasties is
provided.Objectives
Methods
Patients with knee osteoarthritis frequently complain that they develop pain in other joints due to over-loading during gait. However, there have been no previous studies examining the effect of knee arthritis on the other weight bearing joints. The aim of this study was to examine the loading of the hips and contra-lateral knee during gait in a cohort of patients pre- and post knee replacement. Twenty patients with single joint osteoarthritis awaiting knee replacement and 20 healthy volunteers were recruited. Gait analysis during level gait and at self selected speed was performed using a 12 camera Vicon motion analysis system. The ground reaction force was collected using EMG electrodes attached to the medial and lateral hamstrings and quadriceps bilaterally. Patients were invited to return 12 months post-operatively. Data was analysed using the Vicon plug-in-gait model and statistical testing was performed with SPSS v16.0 using ANCOVA to account for gait speed.Introduction
Methods
