The syndesmosis joint, located between the tibia and fibula, is critical to maintaining the stability and function of the ankle joint. Damage to the ligaments that support this joint can lead to ankle instability, chronic pain, and a range of other debilitating conditions. Understanding the kinematics of a healthy joint is critical to better quantify the effects of instability and pathology. However, measuring this movement is challenging due to the anatomical structure of the syndesmosis joint. Biplane Video Xray (BVX) combined with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) allows direct measurement of the bones but the accuracy of this technique is unknown. The primary objective is to quantify this accuracy for measuring tibia and fibula bone poses by comparing with a gold standard implanted bead method. Written informed consent was given by one participant who had five tantalum beads implanted into their distal tibia and three into their distal fibula from a previous study. Three-dimensional (3D) models of the tibia and fibula were segmented (Simpleware Scan IP, Synopsis) from an MRI scan (Magnetom 3T Prisma, Siemens). The beads were segmented from a previous CT and co-registered with the MRI bone models to calculate their positions. BVX (125 FPS, 1.25ms pulse width) was recorded whilst the participant performed level gait across a raised platform. The beads were tracked, and the bone position of the tibia and fibula were calculated at each frame (DSX Suite, C-Motion Inc.). The beads were digitally removed from the X-rays (MATLAB, MathWorks) allowing for blinded image-registration of the MRI models to the radiographs. The mean difference and standard deviation (STD) between bead-generated and image-registered bone poses were calculated for all degrees of freedom (DOF) for both bones.Abstract
Objectives
Methods
Investigate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as an alternative to Computerised Tomography (CT) when calculating kinematics using Biplane Video X-ray (BVX) by quantifying the accuracy of a combined MRI-BVX methodology by comparing with results from a gold-standard bead-based method. Written informed consent was given by one participant who had four tantalum beads implanted into their distal femur and proximal tibia from a previous study. Three-dimensional (3D) models of the femur and tibia were segmented (Simpleware Scan IP, Synopsis) from an MRI scan (Magnetom 3T Prisma, Siemens). Anatomical Coordinate Systems (ACS) were applied to the bone models using automated algorithms1. The beads were segmented from a previous CT and co-registered with the MRI bone models to calculate their positions. BVX (60 FPS, 1.25 ms pulse width) was recorded whilst the participant performed a lunge. The beads were tracked, and the ACS position of the femur and tibia were calculated at each frame (DSX Suite, C-Motion Inc.). The beads were digitally removed from the X-rays (MATLAB, MathWorks) allowing for blinded image-registration of the MRI models to the radiographs. The mean difference and standard deviation (STD) between bead-generated and image-registered bone poses were calculated for all degrees of freedom (DOF) for both bones. Using the principles defined by Grood and Suntay2, 6 DOF kinematics of the tibiofemoral joint were calculated (MATLAB, MathWorks). The mean difference and STD between these two sets of kinematics were calculated.Abstract
Objectives
Methods
Biplane video X-ray (BVX) – with models segmented from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) – is used to directly track bones during dynamic activities. Investigating tibiofemoral kinematics helps to understand effects of disease, injury, and possible interventions. Develop a protocol and compare in-vivo kinematics during loaded dynamic activities using BVX and MRI. BVX (60 FPS) was captured whilst three healthy volunteers performed three repeats of lunge, stair ascent and gait. MRI scans were performed (Magnetom 3T Prisma, Siemens). 3D bone models of the tibia and femur were segmented (Simpleware Scan IP, Synopsis). Bone poses were obtained by manually matching bone models to X-rays (DSX Suite, C-Motion Inc.). Mean range of motion (ROM) of the contact points on the medial and lateral tibial plateau were calculated using custom MATLAB code (MathWorks). Results were filtered using an adaptive low pass Butterworth filter (Frequency range: 5-29Hz). Gait and Stair ascent activities from one participant's data showed increased ROM for medial-lateral (ML) translation in the medial compartment but decreased ROM in anterior-posterior (AP) translation when comparing against the same translations on the lateral compartment of the tibial plateau. Lunge activity showed increased ROM for both ML and AP translation in the medial compartment when compared with the lateral compartment. These results highlight the variability in condylar translations between different activities. Understanding healthy in-vivo kinematics across different activities allows the determination of suitable activities to best investigate the kinematic changes due to disease or injury and assess the efficacy of different interventions. Acknowledgements: This research was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) doctoral training grant (EP/T517951/1).
