Aims

The aims of this study were to identify and evaluate the current literature examining the prognostic factors which are associated with failure of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA).

Aims

Olecranon fractures are usually caused by falling directly on to the olecranon or following a fall on to an outstretched arm. Displaced fractures of the olecranon with a stable ulnohumeral joint are commonly managed by open reduction and internal fixation. The current predominant method of management of simple displaced fractures with ulnohumeral stability (Mayo grade IIA) in the UK and internationally is a low-cost technique using tension band wiring. Suture or suture anchor techniques have been described with the aim of reducing the hardware related complications and reoperation. An all-suture technique has been developed to fix the fracture using strong synthetic sutures alone. The aim of this trial is to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of tension suture repair versus traditional tension band wiring for the surgical fixation of Mayo grade IIA fractures of the olecranon.

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) usage is increasing owing to expanded surgical indications, better implant designs, and improved long-term survival. Correct humeral implant positioning has been shown to diminish stem loading in vitro, and radiographic loosening in in the long-term. Replication of the native elbow centre of rotation is thought to restore normal muscle moment arms and has been suggested to improve elbow strength and function. While much of the focus has been on humeral component positioning, little is known about the effect of positioning of the ulnar stem on post-operative range of motion and clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the sagittal alignment and positioning of the humeral and ulnar components on the functional outcomes after TEA.

Between 2003 and 2016, 173 semi-constrained TEAs (Wright-Tornier Latitude/Latitude EV, Memphis, TN, USA) were performed at our institution, and our preliminary analysis includes 46 elbows in 41 patients (39 female, 7 male). Patients were excluded if they had severe elbow deformity precluding reliable measurement, experienced a major complication related to an ipsilateral upper limb procedure, or underwent revision TEA. For each elbow, saggital alignment was compared pre- and post-operatively. A best fit circle of the trochlea and capitellum was drawn, with its centre representing the rotation axis. Ninety degree tangent lines from the intramedullary axes of the ulna and humerus, and from the olecranon tip to the centre of rotation were drawn and measured relative to the rotation axis, representing the ulna posterior offset, humerus offset, and ulna proximal offset, respectively. In addition, we measured the ulna stem angle (angle subtended by the implant and the intramedullary axis of the ulna), as well as radial neck offset (the length of a 90o tangent line from the intramedullary axis of the radial neck and the centre of rotation) in patients with retained or replaced radial heads. Our primary outcome measure was the quickDASH score recorded at the latest follow-up for each patient. Our secondary outcome measures were postoperative flexion, extension, pronation and supination measured at the same timepoints. Each variable was tested for linear correlation with the primary and secondary outcome measures using the Pearson two-tailed test.

At an average follow-up of 6.8 years (range 2–14 years), there was a strong positive correlation between anterior radial neck offset and the quickDASH (r=0.60, p=0.001). There was also a weak negative correlation between the posterior offset of the ulnar component and the qDASH (r=0.39, p=0.031), and a moderate positive correlation between the change in humeral offset and elbow supination (r=0.41, p=0.044). The ulna proximal offset and ulna stem angle were not correlated with either the primary, or secondary outcome measures.

When performing primary TEA with radial head retention, or replacement, care should be taken to ensure that the ulnar component is correctly positioned such that intramedullary axis of the radial neck lines up with the centre of elbow rotation, as this strongly correlates with better function and less pain after surgery.

Aim: To review the epidemiology, prognostic factors and outcome of treatment for extra-osseous Ewing’s sarcoma.

Method: Thirty-four patients with a diagnosis of extra-osseous Ewing’s sarcoma were identified from a prospectively gathered national tumour database between 1961 and 2005. Patient demographics, clinical features, tumour stage, location and size, treatment received, local recurrence, metastasis and survival were all recorded. Survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier methods. The average follow up was 45 months.

Results: The annual incidence of extra-osseous Ewing’s was 0.2 per million of population between 1970 and 2004. The five-year survival rate for extra-osseous Ewing’s was 62%, which is significantly better than previously reported in the literature. Indicators of a poor prognosis were extra-compartment spread of tumour, local recurrence and metastasis. The recorded annual incidence of extra-osseous Ewing’s sarcoma increased during the period of this study.

Conclusions: Extra-osseous Ewing’s sarcoma appears to have similar demographics and the outcome following modern treatment is better than previously reported and no worse than that reported for osseous Ewing’s.

Aim: To investigate the incidence and type of venous thromboembolic event (VTE) diagnosed in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the trends over time following the introduction of a rigorously enforced thromboprophylaxis protocol.

Methods: Data from all 3260 TKAs performed in our unit between April 1996 and March 2003 were prospectively collected by the Scottish Arthroplasty Project (SAP). The SAP data identified 84 of these patients as having being admitted with or died from a VTE episode. A unified thromboprophylaxis protocol was introduced in 1999, from 2001 it was included as part of the integrated care pathway. We retrospectively reviewed all available casenotes of these patients to identify the assessment and thromboprophylaxis given, the precise diagnosis of VTE, the treatment and adverse outcomes.

Results: Of the 84 VTEs identified, 29 had pulmonary emboli (PE), 12 had above knee deep vein thrombosis (DVT), 24 had calf DVT and 10 had no evidence of VTE though were coded as such (but not treated) by physicians elsewhere. Data were unavailable for the remaining 9 but these were assumed to have had VTE for the purposes of this study. Of the 24 patients with calf only DVT, 16 were given therapeutic anticoagulation of whom five developed haemorrhagic complications. From 2001 the thromboprophylaxis protocol was followed in 100% of patients. The rate of VTE in our unit has fallen steadily from 2.26% in 1996–7 to 1.05% in 2002–3.

Conclusions: There has been a steady decline in the rate of venous thromboembolism in our unit over the seven years of the study. A thromboprophylaxis protocol has been successfully introduced in our unit and consistently applied since 2001. There is considerable overdiagnosis and treatment of calf DVT with significant resultant morbidity.