Total knee arthroplasty is effective for the management of osteoarthritis of the knee. Conventional techniques utilizing manual instrumentation (MI) make use of intramedullary femoral guides and either extramedullary or intramedullary tibial guides. While MI techniques can achieve excellent results in the majority of patients, those with ipsilateral hardware, post-traumatic deformity or abnormal anatomy may be technically more challenging, resulting in poorer outcomes. Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) is an alternative that utilizes fixed trackers and anatomic registration points, foregoing the need for intramedullary guides. This technique has been shown to yield excellent results including superior alignment outcomes compared to MI with fewer outliers. However, studies report a high learning curve, increased expenses and increased operative times. As a result, few surgeons are trained and comfortable utilizing CAN. Patient-specific instrumentation is an alternative innovation for total knee arthroplasty. Custom guide blocks are fabricated based on a patient's unique anatomy, allowing for the benefits of CAN but without the increased operative times or the high learning curve. In this study we sought to evaluate the accuracy of PSI techniques in patients with previous ipsilateral hardware of the femur. After reviewing our database of 300 PSI total knee arthroplasty patients, 16 were identified (10 male, 6 female) using the Zimmer NexGen Patient Specific Instrumentation System. Fourteen patients included in the study had a preexisting total hip arthroplasty on the ipsilateral side [Figure 1], 1 had a sliding hip screw, and 1 patient had a cephalomedullary nail. Postoperative mechanical axis alignment measurements were performed using plain long-standing radiographs [Figure 2]. The American Knee Society Score was used to evaluate clinical outcomes postoperatively.Introduction
Methods
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective operation for the management of osteoarthritis of the knee. Conventional technique utilizing manual instrumentation (MI) allows for reproducible and accurate execution of the procedure. The most common techniques make use of intramedullary femoral guides and either extrameduallary or intrameduallary tibial guides. While these methods can achieve excellent results in the majority of patients, those with ipsilateral hardware, post-traumatic deformity or abnormal anatomy may preclude the accurate use of these techniques. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) is an alternative innovation for total knee arthroplasty. Utilizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT), custom guide blocks are fabricated based on a patient's unique anatomy. This allows for the benefits of computer assisted navigation (CAN) but without the increased operative times or the high learning curve associated with it. Furthermore it allows the use of familiar cutting blocks and guides to check the accuracy of the PSI guide blocks. In this study we sought to evaluate the accuracy of PSI techniques in patients with previous ipsilateral hardware, which would make the use of MI technically challenging and possibly subject to inaccuracy. After reviewing our database of 300 PSI total knee arthroplasty patients, 16 patients were identified (10 male, 6 female) using the Zimmer NexGen Patient Specific Instrumentation System. Fourteen patients included in the study had a preexisting total hip arthroplasty on the ipsilateral side, 1 had a preexisting sliding hip screw, and 1 patient had a preexisting cephalomedullary nail. Postoperative mechanical axis alignment measurements were performed using plain long-standing radiographs. The American Knee Society Score was used to evaluate clinical outcomes postoperatively.Introduction:
Methods:
