The treatment of C2 fractures with collar, halo or surgery can all be justified depending on the patient. In our unit, primary treatment is with a halo: in a previous study presented at BASS we found an 85% fusion rate. In a follow on study, we wished to assess the outcome in those patients who underwent surgical treatment. The discharge logbook was examined retrospectively to identify patients who had posterior instrumentation for C2 fractures from 2008-2010 inclusive. Discharge summaries, clinic letters and radiology images/reports from PACS were analysed to obtain data regarding primary treatment, outcome, necessity for delayed treatment and radiological evidence of union.Purpose
Methods
To analyse if patients with pain improvement following a nerve root block had better outcomes following lumbar microdiscectomy. Fifty-six patients who had a lumbar microdiscectomy were retrospectively followed up to 1 year. All patients had a selective nerve root block (SNRB) as a primary treatment or diagnostic procedure. VAS pain scores were measured daily for 1 week following injection. Patients were grouped into responders and non-responders at 1 week. The 2 groups of patients were followed at 1 year following a lumbar microdiscetomy (LMD). A total of 118 patients had SNRB over a period of 3 years. Of the 56 patients studied retrospectively, 52% and 36% of patients had a VAS score improvement of more than 2 points at 4 days and 1 week respectively. At 1 year post op, 85% of patients had better outcomes in the responder group compared to 74% in the non responder group. Although there was a difference this was not statistically significant. Improvement with SNRB is not a positive predictor of good response with surgery. The ability to evaluate the effect of diagnostic or therapeutic blocks on surgical outcomes is limited by a lack of randomized studies and wide-ranging discrepancies with regard to injection techniques, surgical technique, and outcome measures. More research is needed to determine if diagnostic screening blocks can improve surgical outcomes.
Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK To retrospectively review outcomes in patients who underwent vertebroplasty in Liverpool in response to recent level 1 publications claiming vertebroplasty to be no better than sham procedure assessed using 2 criteria. We reviewed cases between 2006 and 2009 looking at 5 criteria for procedure. Visual Analogue Score (VAS) Oswestry disability index scores (ODI) 96 patients identified. 10 patients excluded (inadequate data recorded) (n=86). Operated levels n=134 (thoracic n=61, lumbar n=71, sacral n=2). Presenting symptoms included back pain (86/86) and point tenderness was present in 90% (77/86). Average length of symptoms was 11.50 months with 28% reporting greater than 12 months. 72% recalled definite onset of symptoms with 90% being associated with a low velocity injury. Radiological findings showed an average of 54% height collapse and 91% showing high signal on STIR MRI sequences. Number of levels operated – 3 or more (n=9 VAS 5.3 ODI 10.6); 1 to 2 levels (n= 77 VAS 3.7 ODI 13.9) Average improvement in VAS score was 3.8.and ODI 13.6 47% (40/86) of patients met all 5 current criteria recommended for operation (VAS 3.7, ODI 14). 53% (46/86) of patients met 2-5 criteria (VAS 3.8, ODI 13.4). There was improvement in pain scores in 91% of patients with an average pre-op VAS 7.8 and post-op VAS 4.0. There was no significant difference in patients meeting all 5 criteria compared to those meeting 2-5 criteria.
To review the accuracy of our systematic process in preventing wrong level lumbar microdiscectomy. X-ray is used to identify the correct level for the skin incision to be made, x-ray is again used if the surgeon is in doubt prior performing the flavotomy. Following a lumbar microdiscectomy a Watson Chane is inserted into the empty disc space and an intra-operative x-ray is taken to confirm the level the discectomy has occurred. Observers A and B independently reviewed intra-operative x-ray in patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomies and correlated the accuracy of the x-ray in determining correct level surgery against the pre-operative MRI scan and the preposed level of surgery. 123 patients, 66 males and 57 females underwent 127 lumbar microdiscectomy procedures between 2007 and 2009. The levels where surgery occurred are;- L2/3 -1 patient, L3/4–8 patients, L4/5–53 patients and L5/S1-65 patients. Kappa coefficient was used to determine inter-observer and Pearson Correlation coefficient was used to determine the X-ray and MRI relationship Percentage of patients who required a pre-flavotomy x-ray level check are:- L2/3–100%, L3/4-63%, L4/5–45%, and L5/S1–40%. Pearson's correlation in confirming the level lumbar microdiscectomy was performed using final x-ray and the pre-operative MRI scan was 1. Kappa coefficient between observer A and B was 1. This process of using intra-operative x-ray in determining the exact level where lumbar microdiscectomy was performed is 100% accurate. This is our standard process in preventing wrong level surgery for lumbar microdiscectomy.
To analyse if patients with pain improvement following a nerve root block had better outcomes following lumbar microdiscectomy. Fifty-six patients who had a lumbar microdiscectomy were retrospectively followed up to 1 year. All patients had a selective nerve root block (SNRB) as a primary treatment or diagnostic procedure. VAS pain scores were measured daily for 1 week following injection. Patients were grouped into responders and non-responders at 1 week. The 2 groups of patients were followed at 1 year following a lumbar microdiscetomy (LMD). A total of 118 patients had SNRB over a period of 3 years. Of the 56 patients studied retrospectively, 52% and 36% of patients had a VAS score improvement of more than 2 points at 4 days and 1 week respectively. At 1 year post op, 85% of patients had better outcomes in the responder group compared to 74% in the non responder group. Although there was a difference this was not statistically significant. Improvement with SNRB is not a positive predictor of good response with surgery. The ability to evaluate the effect of diagnostic or therapeutic blocks on surgical outcomes is limited by a lack of randomized studies and wide-ranging discrepancies with regard to injection techniques, surgical technique, and outcome measures. More research is needed to determine if diagnostic screening blocks can improve surgical outcomes.
Review the complications reporting in 4 prominent spinal journals over the last decade. Computerised search of the Medline database and hand search was undertaken to evaluate the complication reporting in 4 spinal journals (Spine, European Spine Journal, Journal of Neurosurgery Spine and Journal of Bone and joint surgery) from 2000 to 2009. The articles were divided based on the level of NICE evidence classification A to D. A total of 88 articles reported spinal complications. Of these 5.9% was level B, 8.8% was level C and 85.3% was level D. There were no RCT's reported relating to complications (Level A) and majority of complications were case reports or expert opinions (level D). For the proportion of level D the rank order of the journals was; Spine (4.8%), European spine journal (3.8%), Journal of neurosurgery spine (5.1%) and Journal of bone and joint surgery was (1.8%). There was no increase in the rate of reporting over the decade. A detailed discussion of the reporting will be presented. Papers focusing primarily on complications and its management are still not the focus in most surgical journals. This review over the last 10 years confirms that only rare and uncommon complications are reported in the form of case reports. Meta analysis or case series of complication is rarely reported. More focus must be emphasised on reporting mortality and morbidity for education.
