The definition of a ‘safe’ tumour margin remains controversial. Enneking’s original definition of intralesional, marginal, wide and radical margins was based on a study of just 40 patients of whom only 12 had limb salvage surgery. Since that time thre have been numerous attempts to try and define tumour margins more clearly based on anatomical structures and distances of the tumour from the cut edge. Whilst all can agree on what is a radical margin (usually an amputation) and what is an intralesional margin (tumour exposed) there remains a lack of clear definition of what comprises a wide margin and what is a marginal margin. As an example three large tumour units were asked to assess their margins for adequacy. While the rated of adequate excision varied from 49% to 70%, all 3 units had near identical local recurrence rates of 17–20%. The rate of local recurrence is also modified by adjuvant therapy. A suggestion for an International study assessing tumour margins is made, investigating both anatomical and biological factors.

Aim: To identify prognostic factors for patients with sarcomas.

Method: A retrospective analysis of all patients with newly diagnosed referred to a specialist musculoskeletal tumour centre, with a minimum 5 year follow up. Factors affecting survival and recurrence were identified.

Results: There were 1175 patients with soft tissue sarcomas and the most common diagnoses were liposarcoma (22%) followed by mfh (12%) and leiomyosarcoma (11%). 55% were high grade, 25% intermediate and 20% low grade. The most common site was the thigh (44%). 9% had metastases at diagnosis and of these only 10% survived 5 years. Prognostic factors were analyzed in the remaining 1075 patients. The 5 year disease specific survival was 87% for low grade, 66% for intermediate grade and 48% for high grade sarcomas. Prognostic factors (p< 0.05) on univariate analysis were grade, depth, size, age, sex, wide margins of excision, limb salvage (vs amputation), having had a previous excision (whoops). Many of these factors however were inter-related and on multivariate analysis it was found that the following were still significant: Grade, size, depth, age and buttock location (all p< 0.0005). There were 2320 bone tumours (954 with osteosarcoma, 454 with chondrosarcoma and 463 with Ewings). Prognostic factors for all tumours were size, good response to chemotherapy and limb salvage (as opposed to amputation)

Conclusion: This study has confirmed the generally held factors for prognosis of sarcomas. It is largely tumour factors, not treatment factors which dictate outcome. Of all the factors leading to a poor prognosis, size is the only one which can appreciably be altered – by earlier diagnosis.

Introduction: Chondrosarcoma has always been treated with respect by oncology surgeons, given that it is relatively resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The importance of the adequacy of surgical resection margins has been previously reported, however, the aim of the study was to study the outcomes of surgery for Chondrosarcoma and determine the role of initial surgical margins and local recurrence on final outcome.

Methods: Electronic patient records were retrieved on all patients seen at a tertiary referral musculoskeletal oncology centre with Chondrosarcoma of bone with a minimum of 2 years follow up. A total of 532 patients were seen with Chondrosarcoma between 1970 and 1/1/2006. Patients were excluded if they had initial treatment in another unit (20 patients), a subdiagnosis of dedifferentiated Chondrosarcoma (due to very poor prognosis, 43 patients), metastases at presentation (6 patients) and if they presented with disseminated metastases prior to local recurrence (12 patients). This left 451 patients in the study group and the clinicopathological records were reviewed on these patients.

Results: Of the 451 patients, the mean age was 48 years old at diagnosis (range 6–89 years) with the most commonly sites of presentation being in the pelvis in 132 patients (29%), proximal femur in 81 patients (18%), distal femur in 40 patients (9%) and proximal humerus in 40 patients (9%). Grade at presentation was grade 1 in 44%, grade 2 in 44% and grade 3 in 12%. Surgical margins were wide in 45%, marginal in 28% and incisional (including curettage procedures) in 27%. Local recurrence occurred in 88 patients (19.5%). Local recurrence rates were significantly different for surgical margins on Fisher exact testing (p=0.003), which held true even when stratified by presenting grade of tumour. Local recurrence occurred at a mean of 2.8 years, however, 12.5% occurred more than 5 years from diagnosis. There was a significant difference in survival compared between those patients with local recurrent disease and those without on Kaplan Meier analysis; 10 year survival for those without recurrence was 73.1% compared to 41% for those with local recurrence(p< 0.0001, Logrank). On cox regression analysis significant factors affecting survival were pelvic location (p=0.004), local recurrence (p=0.007), age at presentation (p=0.01), marginal margins (p=0.04) and initial tumour grade (p=0.043). There was no significant difference between survival and initial surgical margin when stratified by grade of tumour, possibly as further surgery to improve adequacy of margins. Further sub-analysis is being performed.

Conclusions: There is a complex relationship between surgical margins, local recurrence and margins. It appears that long term survival is possible in approximately 1/3 patients who have local recurrence in intermediate and high grade chondrosarcomas and therefore ever effort should be made to regain local control following local recurrence.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the results of a series of cases from a single institution with respect to local disease control and patient survival to determine prognostic factors.

Methods: Electronic patient records were reviewed on all patients with STS between February 1963 and January 2007. 2445 patients had over 30 types of STS. 1639 (67%) had not received any treatment prior to presentation, however, 770 patients (32%) had undergone a previous attempted excision. Survival analyses were done using Kaplan Meier and Cox regression analyses, however, for prognostic factor analysis, only patients presenting without prior treatment were included.

Results: Common diagnoses were liposarcoma (292 patients, 12%), synovial sarcoma (242 patients, 10%) and leiomyosarcoma (239 patients, 10%). Most presented in the thigh (950 patients, 39%), arm (325 patients, 13%) or lower leg (275 patients, 11%) and most were deep to fascia (1581 patients, 74%). The mean size was 10.2cm.

Overall cumulative patient survival was 58% at 5 years and 44% at 10 years. Locally recurrent disease occurred in 350 patients (14%), 204 patients (8%) presented with and 720 patients (30%) subsequently developed metastatic disease.

Prognostic factors for locally recurrent disease were arm tumours (p=0.003, HR=0.3), hip tumours (p=0.01, HR=0.31), thigh tumours (p=0.002, HR=0.52), intralesional margins (p< 0.0001, HR=3.7), high grade tumours (p=0.03, HR=1.8), tumour size 3–6cm (p=0.04, HR=0.54) and tumour size 6–10cm (p=0.03, HR=0.63).

Prognostic factors for patient survival were deep location (p=0.02, HR=1.6), high grade tumours (p< 0.0001, HR=4.7), intermediate grade tumours (p< 0.0001, HR=3.4), surgical margins (p=0.04), age at diagnosis (p< 0.0001, HR=1.02), size of tumour < 3cms (p=0.04, HR=0.29), 3–6cms (p< 0.0001, HR=0.41), 6–10cms (p=0.007, HR=0.63), no locally recurrent disease (p=0.0001, HR=0.59).

Conclusions: Significant prognostic factors have been proven for STS, and marginal margins have not been proven to alter the risk of locally recurrent disease or patient survival.

Introduction: Current practice in the UK is to perform clinical follow up on patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and only to request cross sectional imaging if there is clinical suspicion. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of this policy by investigating the patients who developed a local recurrence (LR) after previous treatment for STS and whether the size and extent at diagnosis of LR affected their subsequent management

Method: We reviewed the clinical records and imaging of all patients with diagnosed LR of STS to investigate the site and size of the LR and its management.

Results: 35 patients were diagnosed with LR over a 3 year time period. The average time from previous definitive treatment was almost 19 months. The suspicion was made by the patient in 18 patients, by a doctor in 16 and a district nurse in 1. The patients had MRI to confirm the diagnosis followed by biopsy or excision biopsy. 31 of the tumours were high grade, 2 low and 2 were not excised. The size at time of LR was 5.6 cm (range 0.5–15). 12 of the patients had concomitant metastases. 16 were treated by local excision and 5 by amputation whilst 14 patients had palliation. It was felt that with earlier diagnosis the clinical management would have been different in:

those 7 whose LR was inoperable due to size,

Discussion: Earlier diagnosis could have led to simpler surgery in a third of the affected patients. This study raises the question as to whether a more aggressive policy of follow up with regular imaging (either MRI or ultrasound) could detect LR earlier and lead to improved outcomes.

We reviewed the treatment and clinical outcome of 32 consecutive patients with Ewing’s sarcoma who presented with or developed pathological fracture after biopsy between 1984 and 2004. The minimum follow-up was 18 months. The mean age at diagnosis was 20 years (5 – 51). There were 18 males and 14 females. All patients were newly diagnosed and had localized disease at the time of diagnosis. 21 patients presented with pathological fracture while 11 patients developed fracture during the course of chemotherapy. The femur was the most common location in 15 patients.

All the patients had chemotherapy according to the protocol current at the time of treatment. 6 patients had radiotherapy alone while 26 patients underwent surgical excision and reconstruction. Of the patients who had surgery, 7 patients had adjuvant radiotherapy. Fracture healing was the norm after pre-operative chemotherapy. Surgical margins were wide in 17 patients, marginal in 4 and intralesional in 3 patients.

Local recurrence developed in one patient (3%). Metastases occurred in 12 patients (37%). At the time of review 16 patients were free of disease, 3 were alive with disease and 13 patients had died of disease. The cumulative 5 year metastases free and overall survival in all the patients was 58% and 61 % respectively and similar to patients with Ewing’s sarcoma without fracture treated at our centre. The prognosis of patients who presented with fracture was exactly similar to those who developed fracture in the course of treatment.

We conclude that limb preserving surgery is perfectly safe in patients with Ewing’s sarcoma who have associated pathological fracture and survival is not in any way compromised. Survival of patients who present with fracture is similar to those who develop fracture in the course of treatment. The exact role of adjuvant radiotherapy in these patients needs to be clarified.

We have investigated whether improvements in design have altered outcome for patients undergoing endoprosthetic replacement of the distal femur following tumour resection.

Survival of the implant and ‘servicing’ procedures has been documented using a prospective database and review of the implant design records and case records.

A total of 335 patients underwent a distal femoral replacement with 162 having a fixed hinge design and 173 a rotating hinge. The median age of the patients was 24 years (range 13–82yrs). With a minimum follow up of 5 years and a maximum of 30 years, 192 patients remain alive with a median follow up of 11 years. The risk of revision for any reason was 17% at 5 years, 33% at 10 years and 58% at 20 years. Aseptic loosening was the most common reason for revision in the fixed hinge knees whilst infection and stem fracture were the most common reason in the rotating hinges. The risk of revision for aseptic loosening in the fixed hinges was 35% at ten years but appears to have been abolished by the use of a the rotating hinge knee with a hydroxyapatite collar. The overall risk of revision for any reason was halved by use of the rotating hinge.

Improvements in design of distal femoral replacements have significantly decreased the risk of revision surgery but infection remains a serious problem for all patients. We believe that a cemented, rotating hinge prosthesis with a hydroxyapatite collar offers the best chance of long term prosthesis survival.

Aim: To identify tumour and treatment factors significant for both local control and survival for patients with chondrosarcoma of the pelvis.

Method: The features of all patients with non metastatic chondrosarcoma of the pelvis treated at a tertiary treatment centre between 1971 and 2001 with more than 2 years of follow-up were analyzed.

Results: There were 106 patients with a median age of 44. There were equal numbers of male and female patients in the group. The median size of the tumours was 12cm. 47 tumours were grade 1, 37 were grade 2 and 22 were grade 3. Treatment involved hindquarter amputation in 33 and excision with or without reconstruction in 73. Clear margins (wide or better) were achieved in 34 cases. The excision was marginal in 30 cases and intralesional or contaminated in 37. Local recurrence arose in 39 patients and was related to adequate margins of excision (p=0.03) and grade (p=0.01). Overall survival was 72% at 5 years, 56% at 10 years and 46% at 15 years. Survival was strongly related to grade (p=0.08) but survival beyond 5 years was most strongly related to the adequacy of the excision margins.

Conclusion: Tumour grade is the most important prognostic factor for chondrosarcoma of the pelvis but the ability to obtain clear margins of excision influences both local control and the prospects for long term survival.

We reviewed the treatment and clinical outcome of 32 consecutive patients with Ewing’s sarcoma who presented with or developed pathological fracture after biopsy between 1984 and 2004. The minimum follow-up was 18 months. The mean age at diagnosis was 20 years (5 – 51). There were 18 males and 14 females. All patients were newly diagnosed and had localized disease at the time of diagnosis. 21 patients presented with pathological fracture while 11 patients developed fracture during the course of chemotherapy. The femur was the most common location in 15 patients.

All the patients had chemotherapy according to the protocol current at the time of treatment. 7 patients had radiotherapy alone while 25 patients underwent surgical excision and reconstruction. Of the patients who had surgery, 7 patients had adjuvant radiotherapy. Fracture healing was the norm after pre-operative chemotherapy. Surgical margins were wide in 17 patients, marginal in 4 and intralesional in 3 patients.

Local recurrence developed in one patient (3%). Metastases occurred in 12 patients (37%). At the time of review 16 patients were free of disease, 3 were alive with disease and 13 patients had died of disease. The cumulative 5 year metastases free and overall survival in all the patients was 58% and 61 % respectively and similar to patients with Ewing’s sarcoma without fracture treated at our centre. The prognosis of patients who presented with fracture was exactly similar to those who developed fracture in the course of treatment.

We conclude that limb preserving surgery is perfectly safe in patients with Ewing’s sarcoma who have associated pathological fracture and survival is not in any way compromised. Survival of patients who present with fracture is similar to those who develop fracture in the course of treatment. The exact role of adjuvant radiotherapy in these patients needs to be clarified.

Synovial sarcoma is a morphologically well-defined neoplasm that most commonly occurs in soft tissue accounting for 5% to 10 % of all soft tissue sarcomas. We reviewed 156 patients with synovial sarcoma of soft tissues treated at a supra-regional centre to determine survival and prognostic factors.

There were 77men and 79 women with mean age at presentation of 38 years (3 to 84). Follow-up periods ranged from 3 to 494 months (median 43 months). Tumor was located in lower extremities in 111patients, upper extremities in 34 patients, and trunk and pelvis in 11 patients. Overall survival was 66% at 5 years and 48% at 10 years. The 5 and 10 year survival for the 23 patients who had metastases at the time of diagnosis was 13% and 0% respectively compared to 75% and 54% for those without metastases at diagnosis. Local recurrence occurred in 18 patients (13%). The significant prognostic factors for survival included presence of metastases at diagnosis and development of local recurrence. Tumour size and depth, age of patients and use of chemotherapy did not significantly influence survival.

We conclude that the clinical factors which influence survival of patients with synovial sarcoma are different from those of soft tissue sarcomas in general. Biological factors may better predict prognostic survival than the usual clinical factors.

Aim: To identify patient, tumour or treatment factors that influence outcome in patients with radiation induced sarcoma of bone.

Method: A retrospective review of an oncology database supplemented by referral back to original records.

Results: We identified 42 patients who presented to our Unit over a 25 year period with a new sarcoma of bone following previous radiotherapy. The age of the patients at presentation ranged from 10 to 84 years of age (mean: 17 years) and the time interval from previous radiotherapy ranged from 4 to 50 years (median: 14 yrs; mean: 17 years). The median dose of radiotherapy given had been 50 Gy but there was no correlation of radiation dose with time to development of sarcoma. The pelvis was the most common site for development of sarcoma (14 cases) but breast cancer was the most common primary tumour (8 cases). 9 of the patients had metastases at the time of diagnosis of the sarcoma. Osteosacoma was the most common diagnosis (30). Treatment was by surgery and chemotherapy when indicated and 30 of the patients had treatment with curative intent. The survival rate was 41% at 5 years for those treated with curative intent but in those treated palliatively median survival was only 6 months and all had died by one year. The only factor found to be significant for survival was the ability to completely resect the tumour, thus limb sarcomas had a better prognosis (66% survival at 5 years) than central ones (12%)(p=0.009).

Conclusion: Radiation induced sarcoma is a rare complication of radiotherapy. Both surgical and oncological treatment is likely to be compromised by previous treatment the patient has received. Despite this 40% of patients will survive more than 5 years with aggressive modern treatment.

Purpose: To study the results of treatment of symptomatic non-union with endoprosthesis at the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital

Methods: Between 1987 & 2005, 17patients were treated with massive endoprosthesis for non-union. We performed a retrospective review of these case notes

Results: Mean age at diagnosis was 63years (range 36–86). Location of non-union was distal femur in 9, proximal femur in 4, proximal humerus in 2, proximal tibia in 1, distal humerus in 1. The majority of the patients had received prior multiple operations before endoprosthetic surgery.

Four patients had obvious infection confirmed by histology and/or microbiology prior to surgery. Endoprosthetic Reconstruction was performed as a 1 stage procedure in 13 and as a 2 stage in 4.

Complications occurred in 5 patients. These included recurrence of infection in 1, persistent pain in 1, aseptic loosening in 1, periprosthetic fracture in 1 and a non ST myocardial infarction in 1. At the last follow-up, (mean 5years, range 1–18years) majority of patients achieved good range of motion and good mobility.

Conclusion: We conclude that endoprosthetic replacement is a reasonable option for treatment of end-stage non-union in carefully selected patients. Adequate mobility and function can be achieved in majority of patients following such treatment

Purpose of the study: To analyze survival and prognostic factors in a series of patients treated for chondrosarcoma of the pelvis.

Material and methods: The series included 106 patients (53 women and 53 men) treated for non-metastatic chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. Minimum follow-up was two years. Mean age at diagnosis was 44 years. Tumors were grade 1 (n=47), grade 2 (n=37), grade 3 (n=22). Conservative surgery was performed in 73 patients (resection with or without reconstruction) and interilio-abdominal disarticulation for 33.

Results: Resection margins were sufficient for 34 patients (wide or radical resection), marginal for 35, and intratumoral or malignant for 37. Local recurrence was noted in 39 patients (37%). Prognostic factors affecting local recurrence were: quality of resection (p=0.03), grade (p=0.01). Overall survival at 5, 10 and 15 years were 72, 56, and 46% respectively. Survival was strongly correlated with grade (p=0.08) and survival after five years was also correlated with resection margins.

Conclusions: In this series, tumor grade was the most important prognostic factor for patients with chondrosarcoma of the pelvis but achieving satisfactory resection with wide margins also has a significant effect on prognosis for local recurrence and long-term survival.

Background: Limb preserving surgery in patients with tumours involving the whole femur present a formidable challenge.

Results: We present our experience of treating such patients with total femur endoprostheses over the last 30 years (1975 to 2005). There were twenty six consecutive patients including 14 males and 12 females. Average age was 40 years (14 – 82 years) at the time of surgery. Eleven patients were still alive of which nine were free of disease at the time of review. The mean follow-up was 57 months (3 to 348). Using Kaplan Meier estimates, the long-term patient survival at 10 years was 37%. The survival of patients with primary localised tumour was 50% at 10 years.

Revision of the prostheses was necessary in two patients at 110 and 274 months after surgery because of recurrent dislocation in one and aseptic loosening of the acetabular cup and tibial stem in the other. Amputation was necessary in two patients, one due to deep infection and the other due to local recurrence. The long-term limb survival being 92% at 10 years. Nine patients who were alive with no evidence of disease were assessed for function of the salvaged limbs using the musculoskeletal tumour society (MSTS) rating system. The mean functional score was 72%.

Conclusion: We conclude that total femur endoprosthetic replacement offers an excellent method of limb reconstruction following excision of the whole femur either for primary or metastatic tumours. However, patients survival after such operation is poor due to disease related factors.

We have investigated whether improvements in design have altered outcome for patients undergoing endoprosthetic replacement of the distal femur following tumour resection.

Survival of the implant and ‘servicing’ procedures has been documented using a prospective database and review of the implant design records and case records.

A total of 335 patients underwent a distal femoral replacement with 162 having a fixed hinge design and 173 a rotating hinge. The median age of the patients was 24 years (range 13–82yrs). With a minimum follow up of 5 years and a maximum of 30 years, 192 patients remain alive with a median follow up of 11 years. The risk of revision for any reason was 17% at 5 years, 34% at 10 years and 58% at 20 years. Aseptic loosening was the most common reason for revision in the fixed hinge knees whilst infection and stem fracture were the most common reason in the rotating hinges. The risk of revision for aseptic loosening in the fixed hinges was 32% at ten years compared with 4% for rotating hinge knees with a hydroxyapatite collar. The overall risk of revision for any reason was halved by use of the rotating hinge.

Conclusion: Improvements in design of distal femoral replacements have significantly decreased the risk of revision surgery. Infection remains a serious problem for these patients.

Aim: To investigate the outcome of prosthetic pelvic replacements., analyzing complications and suggesting ways of avoiding these

Method: We reviewed the records of all 52 patients undergoing custom made hemipelvic replacement of the pelvis at our centre over the past 30 years.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 40 (range 13 to 75) and the most common diagnosis was chondrosarcoma followed by Ewing’s sarcoma. 4 patients had metastases at the time if diagnosis. All tumours involved the acetabulum (P2) and 9 had a significant extension up into the ilium with 28 involving the pubis. There was a very high incidence of complications – local recurrence arose in 40% and infection in 32% at 5rs, there was a 10% risk of amputation (all for local recurrence). The overall survival of the patients was 69% at 5yrs and 59% at 10 yrs and the survival of the prosthesis without a major complication (infection or local recurrence) was only 40% at 5 and 10 yrs. Local recurrence was related to effectiveness of chemotherapy and margins whilst infection was increased by tumours involving the pubic area.

Discussion: Although a successful hemipelvic replacement can produce a good functional outcome, the incidence of complications is very high. Steps to reduce these risks should be carefully considered including the use of wider margins and the use of silver coated prostheses as well as greater use of local or free flaps in selected cases.

Objective: Diagnostic delay is well recognised in soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The aim of this paper is to assess whether symptom duration/time to diagnosis, has any impact on patient survival and also if patient and tumour-related factors are related to the duration of symptoms prior to presentation.

Method: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for all patients diagnosed or treated with STS at our centre over a 20-year period. Information regard¬ing when the patients first experienced symptoms was entered into a local oncology database at their first consultant-outpatient appointment. Symptom duration was defined as time in weeks from first symptoms experienced by the patient to the time of diagnosis. Data analysis was performed using StatView and R. Risk factors were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model. Stat¬istical significance was determined using 95% confidence intervals where appropriate. Students t-test was used to compare categorical data.

Results: The study population comprised 1508 patients. 159 had metastatic disease at diagnosis and overall 5-year survival in this group was 14%. In view of this poor prognosis these patients were excluded from further analyses. In the remaining 1349 patients overall 5-year survival was 60%. Mean symptom duration within our study was 70.2 weeks. A Cox Proportional hazards model showed that duration of symptoms had a significant impact on survival (p=0.0037) with each additional week of symptoms reducing the monthly hazard rate by 0.2%. Patient and tumour-related factors that were significantly associated with longer symptom durations were low grade, subcutaneous tumours, and those patients with either epitheliod or synovial sarcomas. Symptom duration was not associated with tumour size or patient age/gender.

Conclusion: Patients presenting with long symptom durations/diagnostic delay, tend to have low grade disease and a more favourable outcome than patients who experience short symp¬tom durations.

99 patients with new diagnosed soft tissue sarcomas involving the pelvic region were studied to determine the outcome and prognostic factors for survival and local recurrence.

The mean age at diagnosis was 57 years. There were 55 males and 44 females. The mean tumor size was 12cm. The tumor was deep in 79 patients and superficial in 20. Surgical treatment was excision in 93 patients and hindquarter amputation in 6 patients. Histological grade was low grade in 23 and high grade in 75 patients. 7% of the patients had metastases at presentation.

The 5 year overall survival was 57% and local recurrence occurred in 22% of the patients. The risk of inadequate surgical margins in patients with tumors within the pelvic brim was 50% compared to 18% for those with tumors located outside the pelvic brim. The significant predictors of local recurrence were inadequate margins and location of the tumor within the pelvic brim. Tumor size, grade and depth did not influence development of local recurrence. Significant predictors of survival included metastases at presentation, tumor grade and depth. The cumulative 5 year survival for patients with deep high grade tumors, deep low grade tumors, superficial high grade and superficial low grade tumors were 45%, 74%, 63% and 100% respectively (p=0.01). The 5-year overall survival was 66% in those patients without local recurrence compared to 37% in those who develop local recurrence (p=0.005). Multivariate analysis revealed that development of local recurrence was the most important determinant of overall and metastases free survival.

We conclude that patients with pelvic soft tissue sarcoma who develop local recurrence have an extremely poor prognosis. Patients with high grade and inadequate surgical margins represent a particular group with very high risk of metastases and death even with radiotherapy and perhaps should be considered for other adjuvant treatment.

130 consecutive patients with metastastic tumours of the extremity bones treated with resection with or without major endoprosthetic reconstruction were studied retrospectively to determine the indication for surgery, complications, clinical outcome and oncological results of treatment.

The mean age at diagnosis was 61 (22 – 84). The tumours originated from a variety of organs. Lower extremity was involved in 104 and upper extremity in 26. Metastatic disease was solitary in 55 patients and multiple in 75 at the time of surgery. The median follow-up possible from the time of operation to review was 48 months (0-103).

The indication for surgery was radical treatment of solitary metastases with curative intent in 33, pathological fracture in 46, impending fracture in 27, failure of prior fixation devices in 17, painful swelling or extremity in 37. Surgical treatment included excision of expendable bones without reconstruction in 20 patients and resection with endoprosthetic reconstruction in 110 patients. 7 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and the majority received adjuvant radiotherapy.

At the time of review, 58 patients had died at a mean time of 23 months (0–90) from surgery (53 from progressive metastatic disease and 5 from other causes). 72 were alive at mean follow-up of 22 months (1–103) from surgery. 36 patients (28%) were alive at 2 years post-surgery and 8 (6%) at 5 years. One patient died intra-operatively. Post-operative complications occurred in 32 patients (25%). 18 patients required further surgical procedures for dislocation, infection haematoma, stiff joint, plastic surgical procedures. All the patients had control of pain and 90% achieved desired mobility.

There was no difference in the survival of patients who presented with solitary and multiple metastases, renal and non-renal metastases, and upper or lower limb metastases.

Conclusion: Selected patients with bone metastases can benefit from resection and major bone reconstruction with acceptable morbidity. We have not identified predictable prognostic factors in these selected patients.

Only 1% of all primary bone tumours are situated in the distal humerus. Destruction of the distal humerus by tumour is rare and reconstruction of the distal humerus is challenging. Because of the amount of bone loss following tumour excision, excision arthroplasty or arthrodesis is impossible and hence some form of reconstruction is usually required. Allograft reconstruction and hemiarthroplasty are uncommon and lead to an unpredictable outcome.

Ten patients underwent endoprosthetic replacement of the distal humerus for bone tumours over a thirty one-year period. There were 8 primary and 2 secondary tumours and male to female ratio was 2:3. Average age of the patients was 47.5 years (15–76 years). Mean follow up was 8 years (9 months - 31 years). Four patients required further surgery, three having revision for asceptic loosening and two of these and one other later needing a rebushing. There were no permanent nerve palsies, infections, local recurrences or mechanical failures of the implant. Four patients died of their disease between 12 and 71 months after operation, all with their prosthesis working normally.

Average flexion deformity was 15 degrees (0–35) and average flexion of these patients was 115 degrees (110–135). The average TES Score for these patients was 73% (29% to 93%). The activities which the patients found to be no problem (TES score more than 4.5 out of 5) were: brushing hair, drinking from a glass, putting on make up or shaving, picking up small items, turning a key in a lock, doing light household chores and socialising with friends, whilst activities that proved difficult (TES score less than 3 out of 5) were: gardening and lifting a box to an overhead shelf. Pain was not a problem and only 1 of the surviving patients reported ever having to use regular analgesics.

Conclusions: Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal humerus and elbow joint is a satisfactory method of dealing with these unusual tumours in the long term.