Abstract
Aim: To identify prognostic factors for patients with sarcomas.
Method: A retrospective analysis of all patients with newly diagnosed referred to a specialist musculoskeletal tumour centre, with a minimum 5 year follow up. Factors affecting survival and recurrence were identified.
Results: There were 1175 patients with soft tissue sarcomas and the most common diagnoses were liposarcoma (22%) followed by mfh (12%) and leiomyosarcoma (11%). 55% were high grade, 25% intermediate and 20% low grade. The most common site was the thigh (44%). 9% had metastases at diagnosis and of these only 10% survived 5 years. Prognostic factors were analyzed in the remaining 1075 patients. The 5 year disease specific survival was 87% for low grade, 66% for intermediate grade and 48% for high grade sarcomas. Prognostic factors (p< 0.05) on univariate analysis were grade, depth, size, age, sex, wide margins of excision, limb salvage (vs amputation), having had a previous excision (whoops). Many of these factors however were inter-related and on multivariate analysis it was found that the following were still significant: Grade, size, depth, age and buttock location (all p< 0.0005). There were 2320 bone tumours (954 with osteosarcoma, 454 with chondrosarcoma and 463 with Ewings). Prognostic factors for all tumours were size, good response to chemotherapy and limb salvage (as opposed to amputation)
Conclusion: This study has confirmed the generally held factors for prognosis of sarcomas. It is largely tumour factors, not treatment factors which dictate outcome. Of all the factors leading to a poor prognosis, size is the only one which can appreciably be altered – by earlier diagnosis.
The abstracts were prepared by David AF Morgan. Correspondence should be addressed to him at davidafmorgan@aoa.org.au
