This comparative clinical and radiographic study evaluates the role of implant design and positioning on maximum postoperative flexion after TKR. Two groups of cemented posterostabilised mobile prosthesis were studied. In group A (23 cases) bearing mobility was possible in rotation and translation. In group B (36 cases) solely rotation was possible and the radius of the posterior femoral condyle was larger. In both groups the same medial transquadricipital approach was used and the postoperative rehabilitation was identical. There were no significant difference between the two groups for patient age, sex, weight and etiology. The average preoperative flexion was 120.8° in group A and 120.7° in group B. The average postoperative flexion at one year was 114.8° in group A and 130.4° in group B. Instability was noted twice in group A and none in group B. Radiographically there was no difference in mechanical axis or patellar height. There was a difference in joint line elevation and anteroposterior joint size. Higher flexion angle may be related to smaller antero-posterior joint size, better posterior osteophytes removal and larger posterior femoral condyle radius. Greater stability correlates with greater jumping distance over the tibial post. This study showed that deep flexion can be achieved in some patients after TKR, with implications on surgical technique and implant design.
The objective of the present study was to analyse kinematics of subjects having a UKA during stance phase of gait, where the ACL was intact at the time of the operative procedure. Femorotibial contact positions for nineteen subjects (15 medial UKA (MUA); 14 lateral UKA (LUA); HSS >
90, post-op >
3 yrs) were analysed using video fluoroscopy. During stance-phase of gait, on average, subjects having a medial UKA experienced 0.8 mm of anterior motion (7.7 to – 2.3 mm), while subjects having a lateral UKA experienced −0.4 mm (0.9 to – 2.1 mm) of posterior femoral rollback (PFR). Eight of 15 subjects having a medial UKA and two out of four lateral UKA experienced PFR. Eight of 15 subjects having a medial UKA experienced normal axial rotation (average = 0.9 degrees) and one out of four subjects having a lateral UKA experienced normal axial rotation (average = −6.0 degrees). High variability in the kinematic data for subjects experiencing an anterior slide and opposite axial rotation suggests that these subjects had an ACL that was not functioning properly and was unable to provide an anterior constraint force with the necessary magnitude to thrust the femur in the anterior direction at full extension. Progressive laxity of the ACL may occur over time, and at least in part, lead to premature polyethylene wear occasionally seen in UKA. Our results support the findings of other studies that the ACL plays a significant role in maintaining satisfactory knee kinematics, which may also, in part, contribute to UKA longevity.
The objective of this present study was to determine the in vivo kinematic patterns for subjects implanted with a patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA). Twenty subjects, all having a PFA, were studied (<
2 years post-op) under fluoroscopic surveillance to determine patellofemoral contact positions, sagittal plane, and medial/lateral translation using a skyline view. The patellofemoral contact patterns for each subject having a PFA was highly variable, 11.9 mm of translation. The average amount of patella rotation during the full flexion cycle was 26.3 degrees, while one subject experienced 48.6 degrees. The average amount of medial/lateral translation was 3.8 mm (5 >
5 mm). Five subjects experienced grater than 5 mm of motion. This was the first study to ever determine the in vivo kinematics for subjects having a PFA and the in vivo medial/lateral translation patterns of the patellofemoral joint. Subjects in this study experienced high variability and some abnormal rotational patterns. Most of the subjects who underwent PFA in this study had a previous history of subluxed or dislocated patella which affects the normal patella tracking, especially regarding tilting and translation. This tracking may also be directly affected by patellofemoral conformity, a consequence of femoral implant design. Finally, after PFA the patello-tibial tilt angle is influenced by the anteroposterior positioning of the femoral component. The results of this very first in vivo kinematic study may play an important role, not only for design consideration of patellofemoral replacement but also for surgical technique in order to obtain optimal implant positioning.