Introduction: The CPS-Plus stem (Endoplus UK) is a polished double-taper with a rectangular cross section maintained throughout for rotational stability. There are 5 stem sizes with proportionate offset, together with 5 neck length options, and a unique proximal stem centraliser which has been shown to increase proximal cement pressurisation during insertion in-vitro, assists with alignment of the stem and helps create an even cement mantle. RSA analysis has demonstrated linear subsidence in a vertical plane, without the posterior head migration and valgus tilt associated with other designs.

Data on the CPS-Plus stem has been obtained from a multi-centre prospective clinical trial. 231 hips in 223 patients have been entered into the study. 151 of these have reached 3 years follow-up.

Method: Patients were recruited by surgeons working at three centres in the UK and two in Norway. Merle d Aubigne and Postel, Harris, and Oxford hip scores were recorded pre-operatively and at follow-up (3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months). Radiographic assessment included evaluation of subsidence and the presence of any radiolucencies.

Results: Objective and subjective scoring have indicated very satisfactory results. Radiological subsidence is less than 1.5mm in over 95% of cases and only one stem has subsided more than 3mm. There has been one revision for deep sepsis, 7 dislocations and one femoral fracture, but none of these complications were related to the choice of femoral component. There have been no revisions for aseptic loosening. Kaplan Meier survivorship analysis at 36 months for aseptic stem loosening is 0.997 (95% CI 0.977 – 1) and for all-cause revision is 0.981 (95% CI 0.958 – 1).

Discussion: The tradition of polished tapered stems arose from serendipity and most results have been excellent. The CPS-Plus stem represents an attempt to re-examine the issues relating to rotational stability, subsidence, cement pressurisation and offset. Earlier laboratory studies have now been supplemented by this clinical evaluation, performed in a number of different centres by several surgeons, and the evidence is encouraging.

In particular, the RSA subsidence characteristics, cement pressurisation and rotational stability already associated with this implant in-vitro have been supported by excellent survivorship analysis, and the authors believe that increasing familiarity with the concepts raised by this implant will result in clinical benefits in relation to polished taper cemented stem longevity.

The static properties of bone cements have been widely reported in the literature (Lewis, 1997, Khun, 2000, Armstrong 2002). Commercial bone cements are expected to perform above the minimum values in static tests specified by ISO 5833: 2002. It has been suggested that the viscoelastic properties of bone cement, such as creep and stress relaxation, might bear more relevance to the in-vivo behaviour of the cement-implant construct (Lee 2002). This study aimed to compare numerous properties of Simplex P, Simplex Antibiotic and Simplex Tobramycin and identify those properties most sensitive to subtle changes in cement composition. The three cements were chosen on the basis that they are characterised by the same liquid and powder compositions, the only difference being represented by the type and amount of added antibiotics. In Simplex Antibiotic the additives are 0.5g Erythromycin and 3 million I.U. Colistin, while in Antibiotic Simplex with Tobramycin the only additive is 0.5g of Tobramycin. The static properties of the cements were assessed following protocols described in ISO 5833: 2002, while the viscoelastic properties of the cement were measured with in-house developed apparatus in quasi-static conditions. Creep and stress relaxation tests were performed in four point bending configuration. Porosity was measured on the mid cross section of the creep samples using a digital image technique. All cements exhibited properties compatible with the ISO standard, but in plain Simplex the ISO minimum for bending and compressive strength was within the variation of the batches tested. Bending strength measurements were the least sensitive to differences in the cements. Plain Simplex displayed lower bending and compressive strength but higher bending modulus than the antibiotic laden options. The bending modulus could only discriminate between Simplex P and Simplex Antibiotic (p=0.02). Differences in the compressive strength of the three cements were significant, with the plain option being the weakest. Stress relaxation only discriminated between plain and Tobramycin loaded cement (p=0.028), while creep was more sensitive to differences and allowed distinction between plain and antibiotic loaded bone cements. The creep behaviour correlated with the cross sectional porosity measurements. This study demonstrated that the static tests specified by the current international standard are not as sensitive to subtle changes in the composition of the material as the time temperature dependent parameters characteristic of creep and stress relaxation. The authors advocate the evaluation of time and temperature dependent characteristics as a complement to the current standard.

Introduction: In-vivo elution studies on Antibiotic-loaded Bone Cement (ABC) have concentrated on the short to medium term. This unit has previously described gentamicin release from cement during revision surgery and its presence in the joint aspirates of THAs at up to 12 years. We elected to study the late elutional behaviour of gentamicin-loaded cement in THA.

Methods: 51 patients undergoing revision THA surgery, for aseptic failure, at our centre were studied. Details of the original operation and the subsequent clinical and radiographic course were noted. Pre-operative urine samples and intra-operative joint fluid aspirates (prior to cement disruption) were assayed for their gentamicin concentrations using a fluorescence polarisation immunoassay (Abbott TDX). Cement samples underwent a Bacillus subtilis agar plate inhibition bioassay to assess for antimicrobial activity.

Results: Urine samples were obtained in 43 (84%) of the cases. All were negative for gentamicin (sensitivity level of 0.06 mg/L). Cement samples were retrieved in 36 cases (71%) and all of these (100%) demonstrated significant antimicrobial activity when compared to a standard 10 mg gentamicin disc. In 25 cases (49%) the joints were aspirated and 8 (32%) of these had a gentamicin concentration > 0.1 mg/L. The concentrations however were all below the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) for intermediate sensitivity organisms. The longest interval between the primary and revision operations, in these positive cases was 25 years!

Conclusions: This study uniquely demonstrates sequestration of gentamicin within cement for up to 27 years. In addition, one third of joint aspirates had detectable though subtherapeutic gentamicin concentrations at up to 25 years. There was no evidence of late systemic release. These low concentrations of antibiotics, released after many years, are probably a potent stimulus to the emergence of resistant organisms. The use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in primary THA remains controversial and requires further scrutiny.

Revision hip surgery is becoming increasingly common, 300 procedures being performed in 2001 at our institution. In order to achieve a good outcome bone stock needs to be of good quantity frequently necessitating the use of impaction bone grafting using allograft bone.

Donor bone may frequently take three months before it becomes available for use due to the stringent screening procedure. Donor patients must have a clean bill of health, swabs taken at the time of surgery must obviously demonstrate no growth and blood samples taken at donation and an interval of three months, free from viral infectious diseases. It is thus easy to see the lag from the time of donation to availability and why, with increasing demand, need for allograft bone is rapidly exceeding supply.

We need to look for an alternative supply of human bone allograft.

We have compared the harvest of bone at the time of primary total knee replacement with that of the femoral head by both mass and volume. Sixty consecutive patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty were included in the study, and the masses and volume of the femoral heads compared with that of the total bone cuts in knee arthroplasty. The type of knee replacement used was documented as was whether the femoral head had had a bone block removed. It was found that the mass of femoral heads was 81g, that of knee cuts 95g this is a statistically significant difference; the volume of femoral heads 66ml and that of knee cuts 75ml.

The volumes of bone available from knee arthroplasty cuts are at least comparable femoral heads obtained using hip replacement and could, perhaps, provide a realistic source of bone allograft.

Aims: The aim of this study was to reassess whether the use of a Ôone knife techniqueñ can be considered as safe as the current practice of using separate skin and inside knives for elective orthopaedic surgery. Methods: A tatal of 609 knife blades from 203 elective orthopaedic operations consisting of equal numbers of skin, inside and control blades, were cultured using direct and enrichment media. Results: Thirty-one skin blades (15.3%), 22 inside blades (10.8%) and 13 control blades (6.4%) gave bacterial growth. In only 3 cases (1.4%) skin and inside knife cultures grew corresponding organisms. However, in the presence of skin knife contamination the same organism was found on 10% of inside blades. It remains to be seen whether in the remaining 90% contamination of deeper layers was prevented by changing the knife after the skin incision, since the incidence of late deep sepsis is not yet known in these cases. Conclusions: The organisms cultured in this study were predominantly coagulase-negative staphylococci, known to be major culprits in early and late peripros-thetic infection. Our study suggests that the rationale for separate skin and inside knives can be supported, since the cost of a single deep infection in human and þnancial terms can be considerable

Introduction: Impaction grafting has become a popular technique to revise implants. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Registry reports its use for a third of all revisions. Yet, the technique is seen as demanding. A particular challenge is to achieve sufficient mechanical stability of the construction. This work tests two hypotheses: (1) Graft compaction is an important determinant of mechanical stability, and (2) Graft compaction depends on compaction effort and graft properties. Methods: Impaction grafting surgery was simulated in laboratory experiments using artificial bones with realistic elastic properties (Sawbones, Malmö, Sweden). Bone stock was restored with compacted morsellised graft, and the joint reconstructed with a cemented implant. The implant was loaded cyclically and its migration relative to bone measured. In a second study, morsellised bone of various particle sizes and bone densities, with or without added ceramic bone substitutes, was compacted into a cylindrical mould by impaction of a plunger by a dropping weight. Plunger displacement was measured continuously. Results: Initial mechanical stability of the prostheses correlated most strongly with degree of graft compaction achieved. Graft compaction to similar strength was achieved with less energy for morsellised bone with larger particles, higher density, or bone mixed with ceramic substitutes. Conclusion: Initial mechanical stability of impaction-grafted joint reconstructions depends largely on degree of graft compaction achieved by the surgeon. Compaction depends partly on the vigour of impaction, and partly on graft quality. Higher bone density, larger particle size and mixing with ceramic particles all help to facilitate graft compaction, giving a stronger compacted mass with less effort.

Introduction: There are approximately 50000 hip and knee arthroplasties performed in the UK every year. With this increasing number the prevalence of periprosthetic fractures is also rising. These are often challenging problems with increased morbidity and mortality. The use of cortical strut allografts in periprosthetic fractures was first reported in the early 90’s with favourable results.The aim of this study was to assess the radiological outcome of cortical strut allografts used as the treatment for periprosthetic fractures of the femur in patients presenting to our institution.

Patients & Methods: 17 patients with who had received strut allografts as part of their treatment for a periprosthetic fracture of the femur were identified. 13 fractures were around a total hip replacement and 4 around other femoral implants (2 long stemmed TKR’s and 2 fracture fixation devices).

We undertook a radiological evaluation of this technique. We assessed fracture union and strut allograft incorporation using the radiological criteria of Emerson et al. The procedure was deemed a success if the fracture had united, with evidence of graft incorporation with a stable implant. We also undertook a notes review identifying any risk factors and any previous surgery.

Results: Two patients died in the early post-operative period. 15 patients were available for analysis. The average length of radiographic review was 16 months. 11/15 procedures (73%) were deemed a success. All these showed evidence of graft incorporation which was time dependent. There were four failures. In one patient the struts fractured at two months. There were three cases of deep sepsis, this required amputation in one and excision arthroplasty in two.

Conclusion: Cortical strut allografts are a good technique for the management of periprosthetic fractures of the femur. As well as providing initial support they also become incorporated which improves the host bone stock.