The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and outcome of bilateral simultaneous ACL reconstruction. In patients presenting with an ACL-deficient knee, 2 – 4% have bilateral ACL deficiency. A staged or simultaneous approach can be adopted when the patient requires reconstructive surgery for both knees. We report a case series of 8 patients (6 male, 2 female, average age 30.4 years) who underwent bilateral simultaneous ACL reconstruction. Simultaneous or bilateral ACL reconstruction using ipsilateral patella tendon graft has been reported as a safe procedure with outcome and complication rate no different to unilateral procedures. Considerable cost savings of simultaneous over staged procedures have also been described. There are no case series in the published literature that describe the use of hamstring tendon autograft for bilateral simultaneous ACL reconstruction. We used two camera stack systems and instrument sets to allow for simultaneous bilateral surgery by two surgical teams. Quadrupled hamstring tendon graft was used in 4 patients although in one patient patella tendon graft was used on the second side due to poor quality of hamstring tendons. Patella tendon graft was also used in a further 4 patients. At two weeks all patients were able to discard crutches and were independent in mobility. There was no difference in outcome at one year between those patients undergoing bilateral simultaneous ACL reconstruction in comparison to the outcomes of unilateral ACL reconstruction with respect to Lysholm, Tegner and IKDC scores. The mean follow up period was 2.3 years. Our results demonstrate that bilateral simultaneous ACL reconstruction is safe and cost effective. A simultaneous approach also has the benefit of reducing the overall period of rehabilitation required by the patient. We report good short-term functional outcome but no long-term data is yet available.
The results of the first 20 consecutive patients have been compared with 20 standard TKR procedures. The mean age of 73.5 and BMI of 29 was not significantly different to the standard Group. Mean hospital stay was approximately halved (5 days versus 9 days). 75% of patients were discharged on day 4 without needing extra home support. Mean incision length was 13.5cm and only one of 20 required blood transfusion. Mean operative time was 12 minutes longer and post-operative CT alignment showed no mal-position of the implants.
100 patients were studied. 3 records were excluded, as there was no follow-up recorded. The demographics on 97 were: mean age 67 (range 37–91), male 56%, mean duration of symptoms 8.8yrs and primary OA in 65%. Overall 43% were improved at 3 months, 31% at 6 months and 29% at 12 months. When the results were analysed according to indication, patients with ‘moderate non-mechanical osteoarthritic symptoms after failed medical management and not severe enough for arthroplasty’ did best (49% at 3 months and 38% at 6 months). Patients with ‘persisting arthritic symptoms after attempted arthroscopic debridement for mechanical type knee symptoms’ had less predictable results (42% improved at 3 months and 23% at 6 months). Patients with ‘severe or deteriorating symptoms while awaiting knee replacement’ or who were ‘too medically ill for TKR’ had a low rate of improvement (18% at 3 months).
Questionnaire of surgeons views on photographic records: This showed that less than 50% of surgeons felt they could interpret their own photographs and only 25% felt other surgeons records were useful. 80% felt that single image photographs gave clearer information than 4 small images per sheet. Retrospective audit of 70 arthroscopic records. This showed that the diagnosis was demonstrated in only 60% of records when taken. Small images had been recorded in 75% of cases. Production of guidelines for improving photographic records. Re-audit of 50 subsequent records. This showed a significant improvement such that the diagnosis was clearly demonstrated in 84% of records.
This may lead to a reduction in the need for repeat arthroscopy when patients are referred for second opinions to specialist knee surgeons, thereby reducing costs and morbidity.