Introduction: Despite its common occurrence there is still controversy regarding the choice of treatment for the displaced intracapsular hip fracture in the elderly patient. Aim: To compare internal þxation and hemiar-throplasty in a prospective randomised controlled trial. Method: 455 patients aged over 70 years with a displaced intracapsular hip fracture were randomised to either hemiarthroplasty or internal þxation. Results: Internal þxation has shorter length of anaesthesia (p< 0.0001), lower operative blood loss (p< 0.0001) and lower transfusion requirements (p< 0.0001). Additional surgical procedures were required in 90 patients (39.8%) treated by internal þxation and 12 patients (5.2%) in the arthroplasty group. There was no statistical difference in mortality at one year (p=0.91), however there was a trend to improved survival for the older less mobile patients treated by internal þxation. There was no statistical difference in pain and mobility. Limb shortening was more common after internal þxation (p=0.004). Conclusion: We recommend that displaced intracapsular fractures in the elderly should generally be treated by hemiarthro-plasty, but internal þxation may be appropriate for the frail less mobile patient.

The displaced intracapsular fracture in the elderly has frequently been termed the ‘unsolved’ fracture because of the debate as whether the femoral head should be preserved or replaced. To answer this question 413 patients aged over 70 years with a displaced intracapsular fracture were entered into a prospective randomised trial, to treatment with either an uncemented Austin Moore hemiarthroplasty or reduction and fixation with three cancellous screws. Pathological fractures, Paget’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis patients were excluded. Analysis of pre-operative characteristics of patients showed there was no significant difference between the two groups. Mean follow-up of surviving patients was 827 days.

Internal fixation resulted in a reduced mean operative time (22 versus 47 minutes), operative blood loss (23ml versus 171mls) and transfusion requirements. There was no significant differences in the incidence of post-operative complications between treatment other than and increased risk of wound sepsis for arthroplasty (4/207 versus 0/206 deep wound infections). There was a consistent tendency to a marginally lower mortality following internal fixation (15.5% versus 12.7% at 90 days).

Six patients in the arthroplasty group required revision, four for loosening, one for sepsis and one for fracture around the implant. Non-union occurred in 64(31%) of those treated by internal fixation. Most of these patients had conversion to arthroplasty. Other complications of internal fixation requiring secondary operations were avascular necrosis (4 cases), fracture below implant (1 cases) and removal for painful screw heads (7 cases). Functional assessment of the survivors at one year from injury showed no significant difference between the two groups for pain or change in mobility.

These results indicate that arthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures in the elderly is associated with a reduced re-operation rate but at the expense of a marginally increased mortality.