header advert
Results 21 - 22 of 22
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 578 - 578
1 Dec 2013
Ward J Hallstrom B Pour AE
Full Access

Purpose:

Two-stage revision is the gold standard treatment for chronic periprosthetic infection of the hip or knee. Implantation of a functional antibiotic spacer allows patients the option of two stage revision or living with the spacer in place. Some patients may be satisfied with the activity level that they attain with the functional antibiotic spacer and may avoid the morbidity of a second surgery.

Methods:

We retrospectively examined the outcomes of 30 joints in 27 patients treated for chronic periprosthetic infection of the hip or knee at a mean follow-up of 27 months (range 11–46 months). Comparing the patients treated with two-stage revision to those patients living with a functional antibiotic spacer, we used University of California Los Angeles activity scores, modified Harris hip scores, and patient satisfaction measures to answer two main questions: (1) Is there a significant difference in activity level? (2) Is there a significant difference in patient satisfaction? Patient satisfaction was measured on a 1–100 scale with 100 being completely satisfied.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 262 - 262
1 Jul 2011
Resterpo C Parvizi J Sharkey PF Pour AE Haytmanek CT Roberts N Rothman RH
Full Access

Purpose: Recently an orthopedic manufacturer has introduced a gender specific knee design implying that there is a substantial anatomical difference between the genders. If such concept is true then TKA prosthesis implanted in the female population over the last decades, by definition, must have suboptimal outcome when compared to the male patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the functional outcome, the incidence of complications, and the need for revision between the two genders receiving the same knee design.

Method: The study selected a matched group of 150 men and 250 women undergoing TKA at our instituion. The patients were matched for age, BMI, pre-op diagnosis, comorbidities, race, mode of fixation, and the type of implant. Other demographic, surgical, and medical factors between the two genders were similar. Both pre-op and post-op functional scores were compared between the two groups. Pre-op and post-op radiographic images were assessed for implant fit.

Results: There was a significant improvement in functional outcome as measured by Knee Society score, WOMAC, and SF-36 for all patients. The improvement in functional outcome was not different between the two groups. The incidence of complications, reoperations, and need for revision between the two genders was also not significantly different.

Conclusion: Total knee arthroplasty continues to be an effective surgical procedure. Both genders appear to enjoy relief of pain and improvement of function equally. Based on this retrospective study the use of non-gender specific knee prosthesis did not seem to result in suboptimal outcome in female patients. There appears to be little merit in introduction of gender specific knee designs when previous non-gender specific prosthesis appeared to function well in both genders.