Abstract
Purpose: Recently an orthopedic manufacturer has introduced a gender specific knee design implying that there is a substantial anatomical difference between the genders. If such concept is true then TKA prosthesis implanted in the female population over the last decades, by definition, must have suboptimal outcome when compared to the male patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the functional outcome, the incidence of complications, and the need for revision between the two genders receiving the same knee design.
Method: The study selected a matched group of 150 men and 250 women undergoing TKA at our instituion. The patients were matched for age, BMI, pre-op diagnosis, comorbidities, race, mode of fixation, and the type of implant. Other demographic, surgical, and medical factors between the two genders were similar. Both pre-op and post-op functional scores were compared between the two groups. Pre-op and post-op radiographic images were assessed for implant fit.
Results: There was a significant improvement in functional outcome as measured by Knee Society score, WOMAC, and SF-36 for all patients. The improvement in functional outcome was not different between the two groups. The incidence of complications, reoperations, and need for revision between the two genders was also not significantly different.
Conclusion: Total knee arthroplasty continues to be an effective surgical procedure. Both genders appear to enjoy relief of pain and improvement of function equally. Based on this retrospective study the use of non-gender specific knee prosthesis did not seem to result in suboptimal outcome in female patients. There appears to be little merit in introduction of gender specific knee designs when previous non-gender specific prosthesis appeared to function well in both genders.
Correspondence should be addressed to CEO Doug C. Thomson. Email: doug@canorth.org
