Distal tibial fractures may be satisfactorily held in reduction by fine-wire external fixation techniques, avoiding the need for open reduction and internal fixation. However, as the use of external fixation is associated with pin-site infection, extra-articular placement of the wires is recommended. This study assesses the proximal extension of the capsule of the ankle joint in order to provide information on the safety of wire placement for distal tibia fractures. We recruited 7 patients who were electively scheduled for an MRI ankle investigation with the suspicion of osteochondral defect and/or meniscoid lesion. Patients with a history of ankle fracture or ankle surgery were excluded from the study. Just prior to MRI, the ankle joint was injected with 5 to 15 ml of contrast solution (1 mM dimeglumine gadopentetate). Selected fat-saturated T1-weighted MRI scans with sagittal, coronal and axial views were obtained. The site and proximal extent of the capsular reflection with reference to the anterior joint line were measured. All contrast-enhanced MRIs of the ankle joint space were well defined and unambiguous. Proximal capsular extensions above the plane of the anterior joint line were noted at the antero-medial and antero-lateral aspect of the joint (mean 8.9 mm, range 4.9 to 13.4 mm) and at the tibia-fibular recess (mean 18.7 mm, range 13.3 to 23.6 mm), areas that are frequently traversed by wire insertion. Conclusion: This in vivo contrast-enhanced MRI ankle study demonstrates an appreciable capsular extension above the joint line of the ankle. The proximal capsular extensions at the antero-medial and antero-lateral aspect of the joint and at the tibio-fibular recess run the risk of being traversed during fine-wire placement for distal tibia fractures. Surgeons using these techniques should be aware of this anatomy.
This study examines the effect of injecting an inert synthetic lubricant, perfluoroalkylether (PFAE16350), as a mechanical joint lubricant to prevent the development of osteoarthritis in a surgically induced model of osteoarthritis in the adult guinea pig.
After wound closure, the animals were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: (1) Single intra-articular injection of 1ml synthetic, sterile lubricant (PFAE16350) or (2) Control group with single intra-articular injection of 1ml 0.9% sterile saline. At 9 weeks after surgery, after sacrifice, knee arthrotomy was performed, the presence of synthetic lubricant noted and the articular cartilages examined for macroscopic evidence of osteoarthritis. These cartilages were then fixed, embedded, sectioned, stained and graded histologically for osteoarthritis according to a modified Mankin scoring system. Immunohistochemical studies were performed to assess for any inflammatory or cytotoxic effect by the lubricant.
Subjective macroscopic assessment of the medial tibial plateau osteophyte was noted to be larger and the articular surface more roughened in the control cases compared to the lubricated cases. Synthetic lubricant was noted at arthrotomy in all cases where it was injected. Guinea-pig joints treated with the synthetic lubricant showed a mean modified Mankin score of 3.0 points compared with the guinea-pig joints treated with saline where the median modified Mankin score was 8.5 points (p<
0.001). There was no evidence of an inflammatory or cytotoxic response by immunohistochemical studies.
Using PCR, bacterial DNA was identified on 12 of 40 specimens (30%) from STOTs. Of these 12, three were taken at the start of surgery and nine at the end of the surgery, equivalent to a 45% wound contamination rate (9 of 20). Only two specimens (5%), both taken at the end of surgery, were positive on enriched culture. In LFOTs, bacterial DNA was identified by PCR on eight of 40 specimens (20%). Of these eight, two were taken at the start of surgery and six at the end of surgery, equivalent to a 30% wound contamination rate (6 of 20). None of the specimens were positive on enriched culture.
Statistical analysis used the Mann-Whitney U test.
Lubricated metal-on-metal (MOM) bearing surfaces are not easily separated, unlike ceramic- or metal-on-UHMWPE (COP, MOP), due to interfacial forces and low diametric clearance that provides a ‘suction-fit’. In vivo videofluoroscopic studies have shown that patients with MOP/COP THRs exhibit separation of bearing surfaces by up to 3.1 mm during normal gait and 5.4 mm during active abduction while patients with MOM bearings do not. In this regard, MOM bearings may have similarities to constrained bearings with the potential to lower dislocation rates. All patients under 70 years old undergoing primary THRs for primary osteoarthritis were prospectively registered on a computer database. From 1993–8, patients were offered a 28 mm COP bearing. After 1998, as part of a clinical trial, a 28 mm MOM bearing was inserted instead. For all cases, we used a metal-backed, uncemented acetabulum allowing a modular 10-degrees posteriorly augmented insert (Duraloc/PFC/Ultima, J&
J) and the same cemented femoral stem (Ultima, J&
J). The same experienced surgeon performed all operations using the posterior approach. Interfacial forces between bearing surfaces were assessed in vitro with a variable-speed-motor winch (APT) and a load-cell (E375/RDP) by recording peak-retaining-forces of bearing couples during separation with variable impact-distraction velocities. Statistical analysis used the Chi-square and student’s t-test. We identified 140 COP THRs in 129 patients and 109 MOM THRs in 100 patients. Nine of 140 (6.4%) COP bearings dislocated within 3 months of surgery compared to 1 of 109 (0.9%) in the MOM group (p=0.024). No significant differences were identified between groups when comparing patient and prosthesis factors. In vitro assessment demonstrated that MOM bearing possessed interfacial retaining forces up to 30N more than COP bearing (p<
0.001). This study demonstrates a significantly lower dislocation rate in THR with MOM bearing compared with COP. A potential explanation is the differential ease of separation that the two lubricated bearing couples possess due to interfacial retaining forces (viscous tension and ionic adhesive forces) exerted by the lubricating fluid.