The aim of the paper is to provide an independent single surgeon experience with BHR after a seven-year follow-up. A cohort of 117 hips in 101 consecutive patients operated by the senior author between Jan 1998 and Dec 2002 were assessed to note their clinical, radiological and functional outcome after a mean follow-up of 7 years (5–9.4 years). Primary osteoarthritis was seen in 73 hips and secondary in 44 hips. Their mean age at surgery was 54 years (range 20–74years). At latest follow-up their mean flexion was 100°and their mean functional outcome scores were respectively: Oxford hip score of 21.5 (12–52, mode 12); Harris hip score of 84.8 (25–100, mode 97), Charnley modification of Merle d’ Aubigné and Postel scores were 4.8 for pain, 4.3 for walking and 5.4 for movement; and SF-36 (physical component 43.9 and mental component 51.45). Failure in the study was defined as revision for any reason. Revision was undertaken in 8 hips (6.8%), five within the first year for periprosthetic fracture neck of femur and 3 hips after the end of 5-year follow-up (2 for advance collapse of the femoral component in patients’ with avascular necrosis of the femoral head and 1 hip for sepsis). The Kaplan-Meier survival with revision as end point at minimum 5-years of follow-up was 95.7% (95% CI 92–99%) and overall survival at an average 7-years was 91.7% (95% CI 86–97.6%). All the failures were due to the femoral component. However, the reported survival with the use of traditional uncemented and cemented femoral stems is beyond 99% at similar period of follow-up. Patient selection particularly in patients with secondary osteoarthritis is therefore a critical factor when choosing BHR components.
Of the 30585 births (from 1997–2002) in the population served by our NHS trust, 2742 babies (8.96%) were referred to the hip screening clinic by the neonatologists and general practitioners. They were examined clinically and by US scans by the specialist consultants. The findings were documented prospectively. 233 hips were identified as abnormal by ultrasound scans (Graf). 45% (106) of these were normal on clinical examination. None of the hips identified as abnormal on clinical examination were normal on US scans. In 38% (88) clinical examination could not be reliably performed as the babies were tense. Of the 1862 hips which were clinically normal, 106 (5.69%) had abnormal ultrasound findings. Furthermore, of the 841 babies who were tense on clinical examination, 88 (10.46%) babies had abnormal ultra-sonographic findings. Ultrasound scanning of hips in at-risk babies by an experienced paediatric radiologist will identify all the abnormal hips. This will release the paediatric orthopaedic surgeon from routine clinical examination of all these babies. This time can be utilised for running other clinics. Babies found to have abnormal hips on US scanning may be seen by the orthopaedic surgeon for treatment and follow-up. Parents of babies with normal hip US scans may be reassured by a nurse practitioner or a paediatric physiotherapist.
Back pain is a complex problem affecting the majority of the population at some point in their life. This cross-sectional study evaluated patients presenting to a tertiary spine clinic with a primary complaint of back pain for modifiable lifestyle factors which may be associated with their back pain. Patients were also asked if any of these lifestyle factors had been addressed by primary care practitioners prior to referral to the spine surgeon’s office. The purpose of this cross-sectional study is to evaluate the modifiable lifestyle factors which may be associated with back pain in patients presenting to a tertiary spine clinic with a primary complaint of back pain and to compare these lifestyle factors with the general population. A secondary objective is to determine whether patients with back pain were given any instructions with regard to modifiable lifestyle factors by their primary care practitioner. Consecutive patients presenting to the orthopaedic spine surgery clinic at the Ottawa Hospital – Civic Campus are asked to complete a questionnaire upon presentation to the surgeon’s clinic and prior to their visit with the surgeon. Data being collected includes Body Mass Index, smoking history, physical activity history, perceived stress, and disability. Information is also being collected on sources of information about back pain including instructions given by primary care practitioners (physician, chiropractor, physiotherapist, massage therapist, acupuncturist, naturopath, and other). Data will be analyzed to determine the difference in modifiable risk factors between patients presenting to the spine surgery clinic and the general population. Data will also be tabulated for numbers of patients being given information on modifiable lifestyle factors by primary care practitioners. To date fifty-two patients have completed the questionnaire. A significant difference has been noted between the number of morbidly obese (BMI >
30) patients presenting to the clinic and the general population. It has been noted that less than 20% of primary care physicians have talked about lifestyle modification with their patients prior to referring them to a spine surgeon. It will be important to know what modifiable lifestyle risk factors this group of patients possesses and which of these modifiable lifestyle risk factors are actually being addressed by primary care practitioners prior to referral to spine surgeons. The current waiting list for an appointment with a spine surgeon at the Ottawa Hospital is six to eighteen months. If surgeons can help primary care practitioners address some modifiable lifestyle factors with their patients prior to their referral, waiting times may be reduced or at the very least made more comfortable for patients.
The aim of this study was to ascertain the results and effectiveness of targeted screening of babies. All the newborn babies (30585 births from 1997 to 2002) in the geographical area served by our trust were assessed by the paediatricians (neonatologists) and general practitioners (GP). They were assessed for abnormal hip examination finding including clinical instability and risk factors for DDH. The risk factors were positive family history, abnormal lie or presentation other than vertex during pregnancy or at birth, oligohydramnios or other congenital abnormalities. On referral, they were assessed clinically and by ultrasound (US) scan in a special Hip screening clinic. The data were obtained prospectively. Over the period of these six years, 2742 babies were examined in the clinic. Many had more than one risk factor or abnormal hip examination finding (15.9% of babies with abnormal hips and 7.4% of babies with normal hips). Only five babies presented at or after 4 months of age (delayed presentation). They had been treated by the GP (1 patient), at a private hospital (1 patient) or were from outside our area (3 patients). All had abnormal hips on clinical examination. Of these, 3 were 3A or 3B Graf grade (US scan), 1 was 2B and another 2A+. Screening of babies with above risk factors has identified all patients with abnormal hips in our area, thus avoiding late presentation of DDH. Raising awareness of GPs and paediatricians about these factors should also reduce the number babies to be seen in the hip screening clinic to minimum yet safe levels.
To establish whether Patients or Medical Professionals are the main source of delay for patients referred to a Specialist Centre for Soft Tissue Sarcoma.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of ligamentous restraints on first metatarsal (MT1) movements in the context of hallux valgus (HV), the surgical correction of which relies on a sound understanding of factors leading to MT1 deformity. Hypermobility or instability of the first metatarsal at its tarsometatarsal joint (TMJ1) is associated with greater degrees of deformity and also greater risk of recurrence after surgery. Recent anatomical work has shown the importance of the plantar aponeurosis (PA), and the transverse ‘tie-bar’ system (TTB) of the metatarsophalangeal (MPJ) plantar plates and intervening deep transverse inter-metatarsal ligaments in the structure and function of the foot. These ligamentous systems are important in MPJ stability, but may also be important at TMJ1. Ten normal cadaveric feet were dissected to expose the capsules and ligaments of the MPJs and TMTJs and the PA. They were then mounted in plaster of Paris leaving the MT1, MT2, and their articulations free. A loading fixture was constructed so that loads could be applied to MT1 in the transverse plane to produce moments in flexion, abduction or extension. The movements resulting from a load of 40N were measured relative to MT2 using an Isotrak II (Polhemus, US) magnetic measurement system. The tests were performed with the hallux mobile, fixed neutral and fixed dorsiflexed at the MPJ. After an initial test with all structures intact, the PA and the TTB were severed in random order and the test repeated. “Movement maps” were produced showing the range of motion available in different directions and with different ligamentous restraints. Movement maps suggest that the TMJ1 behaves as a ball and socket joint with no preferred axis of motion. The contributions of the PA and TTB to stiffness in the sagittal plane are small (about 1° movement). However, the TTB provides significant control of the abduction of MT1. The control afforded by the TTB is particularly important since it can ensure that the PA acts to provide an adduction moment about the TMJ1. The integrity of these ligamentous structures is likely to be important in the success of corrective surgical procedures for HV, where disruption can allow up to 10° increase in MT1-2 angles.