We report the outcome at a minimum of 10 years follow-up for 80 polished tapered stems performed in 53 patients less than 35-years-old with a high risk profile for aseptic loosening. Forty-six prosthesis were inserted for inflammatory hip arthritis and 34 for avascular necrosis. The mean age at surgery was 28 years in the inflammatory arthritis (17–35) and 27 years in the avascular necrosis (15–35) patients. At a mean follow-up of 14.5 years in the inflammatory arthritis group and 14 years in the avascular necrosis group respectively, survivorship of the 80 stems with revision of the femoral component for any reason as an endpoint was 100 % (95 % CI). Re-operation was because of failure of four metal-backed cups, 3 all polyethylene cups and one cementless cup. None of the stems were radiographically loose. All but two femoral components subsided within the cement mantle to a mean of 1.2 mm (0 tot 2.5) at final follow-up. Periarticular osteolysis was noted in 4 femurs in zone 7. This finding was associated with polyethylene wear and was only seen in those hips that needed revision for a metal backed cup loosening. Our findings show that the polished tapered stem has excellent medium-term results when implanted in young patients with high risk factors for aseptic loosening.
In general TKA can be divided into two distinct groups: cruciate retaining and cruciate substituting. The cam and post of the latter system is in fact a mechanical substitution of the intricate posterior cruciate ligament. In our previous work we and many other investigators have focused on the movement of the femoral component relative to the tibial tray. Little information is available about the relative movement between the cam part of the femoral component and the post of the tibial insert. In this study we determine the distance and the changes in distance between the cam of the femoral component and the tibial post during extension, flexion at 90° and full flexion. The secondary purpose is to analyse possible differences between FBPS and MBPS TKA. 12 subjects' knees were imaged using fluoroscopy from extension over 90° to maximum kneeling flexion. The images were digitized. The 3-dimensional (3D) position and orientation of the implant components were determined using model-based shape-matching techniques, manual matching, and image-space optimization routines. The implant surface model was projected onto the geometry-corrected image, and its 3D pose was iteratively adjusted to match its silhouette with the silhouette of the subject's TKA components. The results of this shapematching process have standard errors of approximately 0.5° to 1.0° for rotations and 0.5 mm to 1.0 mm for translations in the sagittal plane. Joint kinematics were determined from the 3D pose of each TKA component using the 3-1-2 Cardan angle convention. This process resulted in a distance map of the femoral and tibial surfaces, from which the minimum separations were determined for the purpose of this study between cam and post (fig1.). Separation distances between the tibial polyethylene (PE) insert's post and the femoral prosthesis component have been calculated in three steps. First, the surface models of all three components as well as their position and orientation were extracted from the data files produced by the fluoroscopic kinematic analysis. Next, a set of 12 points were located on the post of each tibial insert (fig2.). Finally, for each point, the distance to the femoral component was quantified. For each step in this process, custom MATLAB(r) (The MathWorks(tm) Inc., Natick, MA, USA) programs were used. For each of the 12 points on the post, a line was constructed through the point and parallel to the outward-facing local surface normal of the post. The resulting set of lines was then intersected with the femoral component model. Intersection points where lines ran “out of” the femoral component, detected by a positive dot product of the femoral component surface normal with the post surface normal (used to define the line), were discarded. Finally, the distances between the 12 points on the post and the intersection points on each line were calculated. For each line, the smallest distance was retained as a measure of the separation between insert and femoral component. Where a line did not intersect the femoral component, the corresponding separation distance was set to infinity. In each position, distances are measured at 6 pairs of points. Two indices of asymmetry are analysed:
The absolute difference between both measurements within a pair. Perfect symmetry is present when this absolute difference equals zero. The proportion of pairs where one of both measurements equals infinity. Indeed, this situation refers to the presence of ‘extreme’ asymmetry. A linear model for repeated measures is used to analyse the absolute differences as a function of the between-subjects factor condition (mobile bearing or fixed bearing) and the within-subject factors position (4 levels) and pair (6 levels). More specifically, a direct likelihood approach is adopted using a compound symmetric covariance matrix. There is a significant difference in absolute difference between the fixed and mobile bearing condition (p=0.046). On average, the absolute difference is higher in the fixed bearing condition, 1.75 (95%CI: 1.39;2.11) vs 1.20 (95%CI:0.78;1.62). (fig2.).Methods
Results
Autologous chondrocyte implantation presents a viable alternative to microfracture in the repair of damaged articular cartilage of the knee; however, outcomes for patellar lesions have been less encouraging. ChondroCelect (CC) is an innovative, advanced cell therapy product consisting of autologous cartilage cells expanded To assess the effect of CC in the treatment of patellofemoral lesions, for which standard treatment options had failed and/or no other treatment options were considered feasible.Introduction
Purpose
A comparative kinematic study was carried out on six cadaver limbs, comparing tibiofemoral kinematics in five different conditions: unloaded, under a constant 130 N ankle load with a variable quadriceps load, with and without a constant 50 N medial and lateral hamstrings load. Kinematics were described as translation of the projected centers of the medial (MFT) and lateral femoral condyles (LFT) in the horizontal plane of the tibia, and tibial axial rotation (TR) as a function of flexion angle. In passive conditions, the tibia rotated internally with increasing flexion, to an average of −16° (range −12/−20°, SD 3.0°). Between 0 – 40° flexion, the medial condyle translated forwards 4 mm (range 0.8/5.5 mm, SD 2.5 mm), followed by a gradual posterior translation, totaling −9 mm (range −5.8/−18.5 mm, SD 4.9 mm) between 40° – 140° flexion. The lateral femoral condyle translated posteriorly with increasing flexion completing −25 mm (range −22.6 – −28.2 mm, SD 2.5 mm). Dynamic, loaded measurements were carried out in a knee rig. Under a fixed ankle load of 130 N and variable quadriceps loading, tibial rotation was inverted, mean TR 4.7° (range −3.3°/11.8° SD 5.4°), MFT −0.5 mm (range = −4.3/2.4 mm, SD = 2.4 mm), LFT 3.3 mm (range = −3.6/10.6 mm, SD = 5.1 mm). As compared to the passive condition, all these excursions were significantly different: p=0.015, p=0.013, and p=0.011 for TR, MFT and LFT respectively. Adding medial and lateral hamstrings force of 50N each, reduced TR, MFT and LFT significantly as compared to the passive condition. In general, loading the knee with hamstrings and quadriceps reduces rotation and translation as compared to the passive condition. Lateral hamstring action is more influential on knee kinematics than medial hamstrings action.
The difference in the mean values regarding inclination was greater than would be expected by chance; there was a statistically significant difference (P = 0,010).
Navigation technique was discussed to equalize the drawback of MIS. However, tools like imageless navigation may further improve the cup position even in traditional approach.
computerized histomorphometry and an overall histology assessment. Clinical outcome was measured using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Safety was recorded throughout the study.
As total knee arthroplasties (TKA) have become the gold standard procedure for severe gonarthrosis, greater interest in postperative tibiofemoral instability has developed. Emphasizing the correlation between evaluation of symptoms and findings, offers an opportunity to elucidate the specifics of the instability. Mandatory is the joint gap measurement during surgery to assess the effect of specific cuts or releases of the anatomic portion of the joint gap. By performing navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasties, we are capable of measuring the joint gap in a highly reliable way. During the ligament balancing in navigation-assisted TKA, we performed a data collection of the joint gap in 0–30 and 90 of flexion in 100 patients. The measurements were repeated after 10 and 20 minutes in extension. The result offers us an opportunity to assess the interesting effect of ligament-stress relaxation in TKA and to gain more insights in the further release-necessity and choice of insert during the TKA procedure.
In relation to the conduct of this study, one or more of the authors has received, or is likely to receive direct material benefits.
In relation to the conduct of this study, one or more of the authors has received, or is likely to receive direct material benefits.
In relation to the conduct of this study, one or more of the authors has received, or is likely to receive direct material benefits.
Performing a total knee arthroplasty in a patient with a flexion contracture or recurvatum deformity requires from the surgeon an adequate knowledge of the principles of flexion – extension space balancing. In the standard TKA procedure, adequate balancing between the flexion and extension space is usually easily achieved, leading to an equal and symmetrical space both in flexion and extension, which results in a stable knee and maximal range of motion after implantation of the prosthetic components. The situation is different in the knee with a flexion contracture or recurvatum, where the extension space is relatively smaller (flexion contracture) or greater (recurvatum) than the flexion space. In both of these situations, the flexion and extension space should be balanced by the surgeon in order to avoid an important deficit in range of motion or an instability problem. Several surgical techniques are available for this. In the knee with a flexion contracture, the extension space is relatively too small. Adequate removal of posterior osteophytes will increase the extension space, and this should be the first step in the flexion – extension space procedure (1). Next, the collateral structures should be balanced, with release of the tight structures that are effective in extension only (2). These are predominantly the iliotibial band in the valgus knee, and the posterior oblique ligament in the varus knee. If these 2 steps are not sufficient, proximalisation of the femoral component by 2 to 3mm may be required (step 3), or a formal release of the posterior capsule from the posterior femoral condyles (4). When an anterior reference system is used, the surgeon can also decide to use a slightly larger femoral component with a slightly increased tibial resection to equalise the gaps (5). In the knee with a recurvatum deformity, the extension space is relatively too large. In this situation, distalisation of the femoral component by removing 2 mm less distal femoral bone, will decrease only the extension space without altering the flexion space (1). In case of anterior referencing, the use of a slightly undersized femoral component will further equalise the gaps (2). Just using a thicker tibial insert to fill up the extension space, while increasing the flexion space by resecting the PCL or increasing the tibial slope, may be another option in the modest recurvatum knee (3).
Many surgeons consider revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) a difficult procedure, calling for flexibility and improvisation. However, revision TKA can be broken into a number of consecutive steps that need to be performed. Setting up a reproducible and stepwise approach is mandatory for the surgeon who performs this procedure more or less regularly. At our institution, we have followed a five-step protocol in performing 166 revision TKA procedures. Its relatively strict guidelines leave little room for intraoperative improvisation. Our protocol covers exposition, implant extraction, implant selection, bone preparation and dealing with bony defects. There has been acceptable ‘on the table’ reconstruction in all cases.
Although most surgeons agree that the functional results obtained with modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are acceptable, it is clear that even with the most recent designs it is still impossible to duplicate the behaviour and functional performance of a normal knee. Recent kinematic studies have shown that modern TKA designs consistently provoke aberrant kinematics, mainly owing to the absence of the anterior cruciate ligament and the inability to maintain a functional posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). With regard to roll-back, PS cam-post designs appear to perform better than PCL retaining knees, but only in deeper degrees of flexion, usually only beyond 90°. Whether it is strictly necessary to try to obtain normal kinematics remains an open debate. Clearly, aberrant kinematics are the direct cause of the flexion limitation we see in many of our patients. Further, they probably contribute to many of the discomforts associated with modern TKA, such as difficulties descending stairs, rising from chairs, pivoting and thrusting. Improvements in current TKA designs should aim at introducing the concept of guided-motion (intrinsic mechanism) and at maintaining or restoring (extrinsic) determinants of kinematics, i.e. the cruciate ligaments, the joint configuration and the extra-articular structures.