Abstract
A comparative kinematic study was carried out on six cadaver limbs, comparing tibiofemoral kinematics in five different conditions: unloaded, under a constant 130 N ankle load with a variable quadriceps load, with and without a constant 50 N medial and lateral hamstrings load. Kinematics were described as translation of the projected centers of the medial (MFT) and lateral femoral condyles (LFT) in the horizontal plane of the tibia, and tibial axial rotation (TR) as a function of flexion angle. In passive conditions, the tibia rotated internally with increasing flexion, to an average of −16° (range −12/−20°, SD 3.0°). Between 0 – 40° flexion, the medial condyle translated forwards 4 mm (range 0.8/5.5 mm, SD 2.5 mm), followed by a gradual posterior translation, totaling −9 mm (range −5.8/−18.5 mm, SD 4.9 mm) between 40° – 140° flexion. The lateral femoral condyle translated posteriorly with increasing flexion completing −25 mm (range −22.6 – −28.2 mm, SD 2.5 mm). Dynamic, loaded measurements were carried out in a knee rig. Under a fixed ankle load of 130 N and variable quadriceps loading, tibial rotation was inverted, mean TR 4.7° (range −3.3°/11.8° SD 5.4°), MFT −0.5 mm (range = −4.3/2.4 mm, SD = 2.4 mm), LFT 3.3 mm (range = −3.6/10.6 mm, SD = 5.1 mm). As compared to the passive condition, all these excursions were significantly different: p=0.015, p=0.013, and p=0.011 for TR, MFT and LFT respectively. Adding medial and lateral hamstrings force of 50N each, reduced TR, MFT and LFT significantly as compared to the passive condition. In general, loading the knee with hamstrings and quadriceps reduces rotation and translation as compared to the passive condition. Lateral hamstring action is more influential on knee kinematics than medial hamstrings action.
Correspondence should be addressed to Diane Przepiorski at ISTA, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Phone: +1 916-454-9884; Fax: +1 916-454-9882; E-mail: ista@pacbell.net
