It is not clear which type of casting provides the best initial treatment in adults with a distal radial fracture. Given that between 32% and 64% of adequately reduced fractures redisplace during immobilization in a cast, preventing redisplacement and a disabling malunion or secondary surgery is an aim of treatment. In this study, we investigated whether circumferential casting leads to fewer the redisplacement of fewer fractures and better one-year outcomes compared with plaster splinting. In a pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, two-period cluster-randomized superiority trial, we compared these two types of casting. Recruitment took place in ten hospitals. Eligible patients aged ≥ 18 years with a displaced distal radial fracture, which was acceptably aligned after closed reduction, were included. The primary outcome measure was the rate of redisplacement within five weeks of immobilization. Secondary outcomes were the rate of complaints relating to the cast, clinical outcomes at three months, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (using the numerical rating scale (NRS), the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) scores), and adverse events such as the development of compartment syndrome during one year of follow-up. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression for the analysis of the primary outcome measure.Aims
Methods
Electromagnetic fields (EMF) are widely used in musculoskeletal
disorders. There are indications that EMF might also be effective
in the treatment of osteoporosis. To justify clinical follow-up
experiments, we examined the effects of EMF on bone micro-architectural
changes in osteoporotic and healthy rats. Moreover, we tested the
effects of EMF on fracture healing. EMF (20 Gauss) was examined in rats (aged 20 weeks), which underwent
an ovariectomy (OVX; n = 8) or sham-ovariectomy (sham-OVX; n = 8).
As a putative positive control, all rats received bilateral fibular
osteotomies to examine the effects on fracture healing. Treatment
was applied to one proximal lower leg (three hours a day, five days
a week); the lower leg was not treated and served as a control.
Bone architectural changes of the proximal tibia and bone formation
around the osteotomy were evaluated using Objectives
Methods
