Many of the dangers to healthcare workers from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been highlighted,1 but to reduce hazards further, as COVID-19 and other viral diseases can be spread by aerosol transmission, there is a need to minimize aerosol formation during surgical procedures. A six-fold increased risk of transmission of viral diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) has been reported during anaesthetic procedures such as endotracheal intubation.2 No definite transmission has been reported due to surgical procedures, however unlike other viral diseases such as SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), COVID-19 appears to be both severe and highly transmissible and therefore could pose a far higher risk to surgeons and operating room staff.3 Transmissibility is measured using R0, the basic reproduction number, which is defined as the number of additional persons one case infects over the course of their illness. If R0 is > 1, there is the potential for sustained transmission. For both SARS and MERS, R0 is < 1,4,5 whereas for COVID-19 the current estimate is much higher between 2.2 and 3.4.6 Therefore, it is possible that there is a greater risk from peroperative aerosols than with other diseases.
A number of surgical procedures generate aerosols; power tools such as bone saws, drills, and burrs are well known to do this as well as pulse lavage irrigation systems.7 A less reported but potentially larger source of aerosols are cutting diathermies.8 Recent reports from China suggest that up to 30% to 40% of COVID-19 patients have virus detectable in the blood.9,10 Viral load was found to be higher and longer-persisting in saliva, stool, and blood of severe COVID-19 cases.9,11 In comparison to SARS, in which only very low plasma levels of virus have been reported,12 the blood of COVID-19 patients is likely to have a higher potential for aerosols produced during surgical procedures to carry the virus. Best practice should thus be to minimize the amount of aerosol production wherever possible. As those closest to aerosol generation procedures are most at risk, when generation of aerosols is unavoidable, the sucker should be kept near to the interface of the tool and tissue to remove as much of the aerosol as possible to minimize this risk.
Although most non-essential surgery has been cancelled during the pandemic, there are still patients with life- and limb-threatening conditions or in severe pain who need to undergo emergency and urgent procedures. There is increasing evidence that a significant number of potentially up to 50% or more of individuals infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) are asymptomatic.13 Moreover, a recent report suggested that a considerable number of patients highly likely to have COVID-19 are not diagnosed with the currently available molecular polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests in respiratory samples.14 Thus, although current guidelines recommend that patients are tested prior to having surgery, it would seem prudent to minimize aerosol production wherever possible - certainly in all patients who have respiratory symptoms, but potentially in all surgical cases during the current crisis.
The British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) has recommended that during the coronavirus pandemic, there should be an increased emphasis on managing patients with nonoperative strategies.15 In addition, in conjunction with Public Health England, they have recommended that ventilation in both laminar flow and conventionally ventilated theatres should remain fully on during surgical procedures where patients may have COVID-19 infection, as the rapid dilution of these aerosols by operating theatre ventilation will help to protect operating room staff. Air passing from operating theatres to adjacent areas will be highly diluted and is not considered to be a risk. An alternative approach has been reported from Singapore, which describes the reversal of the air flow to create a negative pressure within the operating room.16 However, it is not known if this is accompanied by an increase in the rate of implant infection, which is known to pose major diagnostic17-20 and treatment21-24 challenges. Wong et al25 concur with the view that a high frequency (> 25 per hour) of air changes will rapidly reduce the viral load in the operating theatre, suggesting that in terms of minimizing risk to the patient of implant infection and to the staff of COVID-19 infection, this is a pragmatic way to reduce the risk of aerosol transmission.
Finally, it should also be taken into account that SARS-CoV2 can potentially be transmitted via blood transfusions and blood products. Although there is some evidence that the viral load is higher in severe COVID-19 cases, SARS-CoV2 has also been detected in the blood of mild cases.9,11 There are currently no reports about positive COVID-19 PCR results in asymptomatic cases, but given the huge and increasing number of COVID-19 cases worldwide, such cases are likely to exist, and blood products from such donors will be able to transmit the disease.
In summary the following general advice should be followed:
-
Avoid using diathermy especially cutting diathermy
-
Avoid pulse lavage
-
Avoid ultrasonic tools
-
Place sucker near to power tool/tissue interface
-
Use a tourniquet when possible
-
Consider using a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) or a surgical body suit/space suit
During bone and joint procedures:
-
Limit use of power tools when possible
-
Avoid use of ultradrive and high speed burr if revising hips
References
1. The Lancet . COVID-19: protecting health-care workers . The Lancet . 2020 ; 395 ( 10228 ): 922 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
2. Tran K , Cimon K , Severn M , Pessoa-Silva CL , Conly J . Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: a systematic review . PLoS One . 2012 ; 7 ( 4 ): e35797 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
3. Swerdlow DL , Finelli L . Preparation for possible sustained transmission of 2019 novel coronavirus: lessons from previous epidemics . JAMA . 2020 ; 323 ( 12 ): 1129 – 1130 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
4. Dawood FS , Iuliano AD , Reed C , et al. Estimated global mortality associated with the first 12 months of 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 virus circulation: a modelling study . Lancet Infect Dis . 2012 ; 12 ( 9 ): 687 – 695 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
5. Chowell G , Castillo-Chavez C , Fenimore PW , et al. Model parameters and outbreak control for SARS . Emerg Infect Dis . 2004 ; 10 ( 7 ): 1258 – 1263 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
6. Zhao S , Lin Q , Ran J , et al. Preliminary estimation of the basic reproduction number of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China, from 2019 to 2020: A data-driven analysis in the early phase of the outbreak . Int J Infect Dis . 2020 ; 92 : 214 – 217 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
7. Nogler M , Lass-Flörl C , Wimmer C , et al. Contamination during removal of cement in revision hip arthroplasty. A cadaver study using ultrasound and high-speed cutters . J Bone Joint Surg Br . 2003 ; 85-B ( 3 ): 436 – 439 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
8. Yeh HC , Turner RS , Jones RK , et al. Characterization of aerosols produced during surgical procedures in hospitals . Aerosol Science and Technology . 1995 ; 22 ( 2 ): 151 – 161 . Google Scholar
9. Chen W , Lan Y , Yuan X , et al. Detectable 2019-nCoV viral RNA in blood is a strong indicator for the further clinical severity . Emerg Microbes Infect . 2020 ; 9 ( 1 ): 469 – 473 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
10. Liang T . Handbook of COVID-19 Prevention and Treatment. The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine . 2020 . https://covid-19.alibabacloud.com/ (date last accessed 8 April 2020 ). Google Scholar
11. To KK , Tsang OT , Leung WS , et al. Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study . Lancet Infect Dis . 2020 ; S1473-3099 ( 20 ): 30196 – 1 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
12. Drosten C , Günther S , Preiser W , et al. Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome . N Engl J Med . 2003 ; 348 ( 20 ): 1967 – 1976 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
13. Nishiura H , Kobayashi T , Suzuki A , et al. Estimation of the asymptomatic ratio of novel coronavirus infections (COVID-19) . Int J Infect Dis . 2020 ; S1201-9712 ( 20 ): 30139 – 9 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
14. Ai T , Yang Z , Hou H , et al. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a report of 1014 cases . Radiology . 2020 ; 200642 : 200642 . Google Scholar
15. No authors listed . Information for BOA members on trauma and orthopaedic care in the UK during coronavirus pandemic. British Orthopaedic Association . https://www.boa.ac.uk/resources/statement-for-boa-members-on-trauma-and-orthopaedic-care-in-the-uk-during-coronavirus-pandemic.html (date last accessed 8 April 2020 ). Google Scholar
16. Ti LK , Ang LS , Foong TW , Ng BSW . What we do when a COVID-19 patient needs an operation: operating room preparation and guidance . Can J Anaesth . 2020 . (Epub ahead of print) PMID: 32144591 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
17. Chen MF , Chang CH , Chiang-Ni C , et al. Rapid analysis of bacterial composition in prosthetic joint infection by 16S rRNA metagenomic sequencing . Bone Joint Res . 2019 ; 8 ( 8 ): 367 – 377 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
18. Chen MF , Chang CH , Yang LY , et al. Synovial fluid interleukin-16, interleukin-18, and CRELD2 as novel biomarkers of prosthetic joint infections . Bone Joint Res . 2019 ; 8 ( 4 ): 179 – 188 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
19. Janz V , Schoon J , Morgenstern C , et al. Rapid detection of periprosthetic joint infection using a combination of 16S rDNA polymerase chain reaction and lateral flow immunoassay: a pilot study . Bone Joint Res . 2018 ; 7 ( 1 ): 12 – 19 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
20. Saleh A , George J , Faour M , Klika AK , Higuera CA . Serum biomarkers in periprosthetic joint infections . Bone Joint Res . 2018 ; 7 ( 1 ): 85 – 93 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
21. Ahmed S , Haddad FS . Prosthetic joint infection . Bone Joint Res . 2019 ; 8 ( 11 ): 570 – 572 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
22. Pijls BG , Sanders IMJG , Kuijper EJ , Nelissen RGHH . Segmental induction heating of orthopaedic metal implants . Bone Joint Res . 2018 ; 7 ( 11 ): 609 – 619 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
23. Tsang STJ , Gwynne PJ , Gallagher MP , Simpson AHRW . The biofilm eradication activity of acetic acid in the management of periprosthetic joint infection . Bone Joint Res . 2018 ; 7 ( 8 ): 517 – 523 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
24. Romanò CL , Tsuchiya H , Morelli I , Battaglia AG , Drago L . Antibacterial coating of implants: are we missing something? Bone Joint Res . 2019 ; 8 ( 5 ): 199 – 206 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
25. Wong J , Goh QY , Tan Z , et al. Preparing for a COVID-19 pandemic: a review of operating room outbreak response measures in a large tertiary hospital in Singapore . Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth . 2020 ; 395 . (Epub ahead of print) PMID: 32162212 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
Author contributions
A. H. R. W. Simpson: Wrote the manuscript, Read and approved the final version.
G. Dall: Wrote the manuscript, Read and approved the final version.
J. G. Haas: Wrote the manuscript, Read and approved the final version.
Funding statement
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
ICMJE COI statement
None declared
Acknowledgements
None declared
Ethical review statement
This study did not require ethical approval.
