Abstract
Background
Microfracture (MF) and Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) are used to repair symptomatic condylar cartilage defects (grade II-IV Outerbridge). Superiority of ACI to MF is still debated. The aim of the study was to conduct a systematic literature review, compare superiority of ACI versus MF in a meta-analysis and investigate the correlation between patient age and outcome of both treatments.
Methods
Extended literature search was conducted (papers from January 2001 to present), looking at patient characteristics, pre- and post-operative scores and cartilage repair assessment evaluation. Methodological quality was verified through modified Coleman score and assessment bias. A fixed-effect meta-analysis was conducted, comparing post-operative standardised mean differences between ACI and MF. Pearson correlation coefficient between post-operative score and age was calculated against ACI and MF.
Results
of 490 studies systematically analysed, 8 met the inclusion criteria, accounting for 255 patients treated with ACI and 259 with MF. Overall mean postoperative scores were 81.38±8.31 for ACI and 74.9±7.0 for MF, with no significant difference (p=0.13). The average modified Coleman score of the studies was 82.6, with low bias among them. The meta-analysis displayed an overall effect estimate of 0.3 favouring ACI treatment versus MF (95%CI=0.12–0.48, P=0.001). Significant heterogeneity was although observed (I2>70%). Pearson correlation coefficient calculated between mean post-operative score and mean age, surprisingly failed to indicate clear correlation for ACI (r=0.11) and MF (r=0.18) respectively.
Conclusions
Minor statistically significant superiority of ACI intervention versus MF in knee cartilage repair was found, together with high levels of heterogeneity, halting the possibility to make full recommendation of ACI versus MF.
Level of Evidence
Ia (systematic review and meta-analysis).
