Abstract
Background
Multiple randomised controlled trials have demonstrated that arthroscopy provides little benefit in patients with knee osteoarthritis. In 2008, NICE released guidelines to reflect this evidence. Implementation has been sporadic, and arthroscopy for knee osteoarthritis is commonly performed with an annual incidence of 9.9 per 10,000 in England. Our aim was to establish whether previous arthroscopy affects Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Total Knee Replacement (TKR) patients.
Methods
Data was retrospectively collected from 2010–2012 from a University hospital. Pre-operative and one-year post-operative PROMs were collected on patients who had undergone arthroscopy and then TKR, or only TKR. The change in PROMs score over TKR was then compared between groups.
Results
Complete data was available for 85 patients: 36 had arthroscopy prior to TKR, with 49 receiving only TKR. There was no difference between the groups with regard to age and gender. Oxford Knee Score (OKS) before TKR for both groups were similar (arthroscopy group 41.9, non-arthroscopy 40.8). At arthroscopy 81% of patients had grade IV arthritis, with 19% demonstrating grade III. Patients who had arthroscopy before TKR had a worse response to TKR compared to those who did not have an arthroscopy (respective mean change of 23.79%, 38.4%, p< 0.001).
Conclusions
Although this exploratory study is small and subject to selection bias, our data suggest that arthroscopy may have a detrimental effect on patient function after TKR. This may be due to psychological factors, as there is growing evidence to suggest stress and anxiety negatively affect PROMs4. Medicalisation of patients through arthroscopic procedures may contribute to poor PROMs. This study offers a potential pre-operative factor that may explain some of the variability in outcome seen with TKR. This relationship requires confirmation and exploration in larger studies with correction for confounding factors.
Level of evidence
III
