Abstract
Alternative bearing surfaces has been introduced to reduce wear debris-induced osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and offered favorable results. Large population-based data for total joint surgery permit timely recognition of adverse results and prediction of events in the future. The purpose of this study was to present the epidemiology and national trends of bearing surface usage in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in Korea using nationwide database.
A total of 30,881 THAs were analyzed using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database for 2007 through 2011. Bearing surfaces were sub-grouped according to device code for national health insurance claims and consisted of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC), metal-on-polyethylene (MoP), ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP), and metal-on-metal (MoM). The prevalence of each type of bearing surface was calculated and stratified by age, gender, hospital type, primary payer, and procedure volume of each hospital.
The number of primary THAs increased by 25.2% from 5,484 in 2007 to 6,866 in 2011. The average age of the entire study population was 58.1 years, and 53.5% were male [Table 1]. CoC was the most commonly used bearing surface (76.7%), followed by MoP (11.9%), CoP (7.3%), and MoM (4.1%). The distribution of bearing surfaces was identical to that in the general population regardless of age, gender, hospital type, and primary payer [Table 2]. The mean age of patients that received hard-on-hard bearing surfaces (CoC and MoM) was significantly younger than that of patients receiving hard-on-soft bearing surfaces (CoP and MoP) (56.9 years vs. 62.6 years). During the study period, 55.1% of THAs that used a hard-on-hard bearing surface were performed in males, while 53.0% of THAs that used a hard-on-soft bearing surface were performed in females. The order of prevalence of bearing surfaces was identical in low- and medium-volume hospitals (CoC was first, MoP was second, CoP was third, and MoM was fourth). The mean hospital charges did not differ according to the bearing surface used, with the exception of CoP, which was associated with a lower mean hospital charge. There were no changes in the distribution of bearing surfaces in each year between 2007 and 2011. Overall, the percentage of THAs that used CoC bearing surfaces increased substantially from 71.6% in 2007 to 81.4% in 2011, while the percentage that used CoP, MoP, and MoM decreased significantly [Fig. 1].
One of the reasons for the dominant usage of hard-on-hard bearing surfaces may be that the principal diagnosis of primary THAs and the patient age group distribution in Korea differ from those in other countries. The most common indication for primary THA is osteonecrosis of the femoral head in Korea. In contrast, the majority of primary THAs are performed for osteoarthritis in Western countries. The choice of bearing surface may be affected by many factors, including the nation's medical delivery system, payment type, disease pattern, and age distribution of patients that undergo THA. In future, the results of a large-scale nationwide study on primary THAs using CoC bearing surfaces in Korea will be reported.
For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).
