header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

AN ADVANCED SYSTEM FOR PRE-OPERATIVE SURGICAL PLANNING BASED ON CT AND MUSCULOSKELETAL MODELLING: APPLICATION TO HIP DYSPLASIA PATIENTS

European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS) 2016, 24th Annual Meeting, 14–16 September 2016. Part 1.



Abstract

In the congenital hip dysplasia, patients treated with total hip replacement (THR) often report persistent disability and pain, with unsatisfactory function and quality of life. A major challenge is to restore the center of rotation of the hip and a satisfactory abduction function [1]. The position of the acetabular cup during THR might be crucial, as it affects abduction moment and motor function. Recently, several software systems have been developed for surgical planning of endoprostheses. Previously developed software called HipOp [2], which is routinely used in clinics, allows surgeons to properly position the prosthetic components into the 3D space of CT data. However, this software did not allow to simulate the articular range of motion and the condition of the abductor muscles. Our aim is to present HipOpCT, an advanced version of the software that includes 3D musculoskeletal planning, through the application to hip dysplasia patients to add knowledge in the diagnosis and treatment of such patients who need THR.

40 hip dysplasia patients received pre-operative CT scanning of pelvis and thighs and had their THR surgery planned using HipOpCT. The base planning includes import of CT data, positioning of prosthetic components interactively through multimodal display, as well as geometrical measurements of the implant and the host bone. The advanced planning additionally includes evaluation of femoro-acetabular impingement and calculation of leg lengths, abductor muscle lengths and lever arms through the automatic creation of a musculoskeletal model. The musculoskeletal parameters in all patients were calculated during the surgical planning, and the data were processed to evaluate pre- and post-operative differences in leg length discrepancy, length and lever arm of the abductor muscles, and how these parameters correlated.

The surgical planning led to an increase in the operated leg length of 7.6 ± 5.7 mm. The variation in abductors lever arm was −0.9% ± 4.8% and significantly correlated with the variation in the operated leg length (r = −0.49), pre-operative leg length discrepancy (r = 0.32) and variation in abductors length (r = −0.32). The variation in abductors length was 6.6% ± 5.5%, and significantly correlated with the variation in the operated leg length (r = 0.92), post-operative leg length discrepancy (r = 0.37), pre-operative abductors length (r = −0.37) and variation in abductors lever arm (r = −0.32).

The increase in the operated leg length was strongly correlated to the increase in abductor muscle length. Conversely, abductor lever arms slightly decreased on average, and were inversely correlated to leg length variation and abductors lengths. This interactive technology for surgical planning represent a powerful tool for orthopaedic surgeons to consider the best muscle reconstruction, and for rehabilitation specialists to achieve the best functional recovery based on biomechanical outcomes. In a parallel study, we are investigating how these advanced planning is reflected onto the function, pain and biomechanical outcome after a rehabilitation protocol is completed.