header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

MICROSTRUCTURAL EFFECTS OF BIOCERAMICS ON OSTEOCLAST DIFFERENTIATION AND ACTIVITY

European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS) 2016, 24th Annual Meeting, 14–16 September 2016. Part 1.



Abstract

The success of biomaterials lies in the direct interaction with the host tissue. Calcium phosphates (CaP) stand as an alternative graft material for bone regeneration due to their similar composition to natural bone. Few studies have focused on the early stages of bone-like material remodeling by osteoclasts (OC), though the CaP fate is to be resorbed and then replaced by new bone. Instead, to understand how osteoclasts modify the CaP surface and initiate resorption, so as to influence subsequent osteoblast activities and bone formation, is mandatory.

Sintered hydroxyapatite (s-HA) and biomimetic hydroxyapatite with two different microstructures (b-HA-C, coarse and b-HA-F, fine) discs (1500×250 µm2) were produced from the same reagents [1]. Tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) was used as control. Precursor human OC from buffy coats were seeded on ceramic substrates [6·106cells/cm2] and supplemented with RANKL-containing osteoblast supernatant as differentiation medium over 21 days. Cell interaction with the biomaterials was investigated in terms of OC adhesion and differentiation, with gene expression, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and Hoechst staining for OC maturation. Cell culture supernatants were analyzed for ionic exchange, namely Ca and P, due to biomaterials or cells. Osteoclasts morphology was evaluated using SEM at 21 days. Innovatively, focused ion beam (FIB) was used to evaluate biomaterial structure beneath the OC to further investigate the resorption effects. To this aim, selected OC were cut cross-sectioned using a Gallium ion beam at an acceleration of 30KV, followed by a coarse milling at 10nA and a deposition of platinum to achieve a fine milling at 500pA.

Clear differences in cellular behavior were noted relative to the different substrate microstructures. Control TCPS and s-HA showed similar TRAP-positive staining and gene expression for mature OC. Several resorption pits with partial dissolution of the equiaxial grains of s-HA were noticed. b-HA substrates also showed attached and differentiated TRAP-positive OC, but gene expression resulted lower than control and s-HA. However, morphological evaluation with SEM-FIB interestingly showed early stages of osteoclast-mediated degradation on b-HA-F, i.e.an increased surface roughness in the substrate underlying cells. B-HA-C also showed attached and mature OC with a scarce degradation activity

FIB technique has been applied to cell-seeded CaP and shown as a viable method to investigate OC morphology and resorption. Though gene expression showed similarities for both biomimetic substrates, substrate morphology observed underneath OC was significantly different. b-HA-F showed early stages of OC mediated degradation underneath well spread cells similar to those seen on s-HA. No resorptive activity was found on b-HA-C even though gene expression values were similar to b-HA-F: both the acute ion exchange and the surface tortuosity on b-HA-C could explain the difficulty with the resorptive process by OC. In conclusion focused ion beam technique complements SEM imaging and may disclose changes in the inner structure of materials due to cell/material interactions.