Abstract
After big loos of substances of peripheral nerves, in order to connect proximal with distal stump, it is possible to use, in alternative to autologous grafting, different kind of conduits. The chitosan conduit and the muscle in vein technique showed very good results in pre clinical and clinical settings. We compared in this study the efficacy of empty chitosan conduit versus chitosan conduit enriched with fresh muscle fibbers (MIT) to improve peripheral nerve regeneration.
The median nerve of rat was repaired by means of empty chitosan conduit or MIT (nerve gam 6mm, conduit length 10 mm). As control group we used auto grafting technique. We performed analysis at short term (7,14,28 days) and at long term (12 weeks) in order to register bimolecular modification (quantitative real time PCRand western blot), morphological modification (optic and electronic microscope) and functional changing (grasping test).
Bimolecular analysis showed that muscle fibbers produced and released Neuregulin1, needed for regeneration and activity of Schwann cells. Otherwise also the autograft product Neuregulin1, instead no production was observed in empty conduit. So muscle fibbers compensate this fact. Morphological analysis showed that the first myelinc fibbers appear in MIT after 14 days, but not in empty tube.
The results of our work are very interesting because can merge the easiness of the implantation of chitosan tube and the efficacy of fresh muscle fibbers, as previously demonstrated by muscle in vein technique.
From a clinical point of view this procedure could be an alternative to auto grafting that is nowadays the gold standard for nerve repair, but present soma disadvantages.
