Abstract
Introduction
Total knee replacement (TKR) implant designs and materials have been shown to have a significant impact on tibial insert wear. A medial-pivot (MP) design theoretically should generate less wear due to a large contact area in the medial compartment and lower contact stresses. Synovial fluid aspiration studies have confirmed that a first generation MP TKR system (ADVANCE®, MicroPort Orthopedics Inc., Arlington, TN, USA) generates less wear debris than is seen with other implant designs articulating against conventional polyethylene (CP).
Objectives
The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro wear rate of a second generation MP TKR system (EVOLUTION® Cruciate-Sacrificing, MicroPort Orthopedics Inc., Arlington, TN, USA) using CP tibial inserts and compare to previously published values for other TKR designs with CP and first or second generation crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) tibial inserts.
Methods
In vitro wear was assessed for five MP CP tibial inserts, each loaded for 5 megacycles (Mc) of simulated gait in accordance with ISO 14243–3. Insert cleaning and wear measurements were performed every 0.5 Mc in accordance with ISO 14243–2. Manufacturer websites and the MEDLINE database were searched for previously published in vitro wear rates for other TKR designs used in combination with CP and first or second generation XLPE inserts. Second generation XLPE inserts are those with additives or additional manufacturing, such as sequentially annealed and irradiated XLPE (X3®, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA) and vitamin E infused polyethylene (E1®, Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA). All TKR designs utilized cobalt-chrome (CoCr) femoral components, except Legion-Verilast that included Oxinium™ femoral components (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA).
Results
The mean wear rate for the MP system (2.0+0.2 mg/Mc) was less than half the wear rates reported for other TKR designs using CP inserts (Figure 1). The wear was also reduced or similar to those reported for all but three designs used in combination with XLPE inserts (Figure 2). Interestingly, wear rates for the MP system were approximately one-third of those reported for E1 and X3 used in combination with the Scorpio and Triathlon CR TKR systems (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA). The main limitation to the current study is the use of literature comparators. While the comparison studies were all conducted using similar methods on knee wear simulator machines, there were some experimental differences that could potentially impact wear rates (e.g. diluted vs. non-diluted serum, gait patterns, types of testing machines).
Conclusions
In vitro wear for a second generation MP TKR system was similar or lower than what has been previously reported for other TKR systems used with CP or XLPE tibial inserts. These results suggest that implant design may play a larger role in TKR wear debris generation than the material used for the tibial insert.
