Abstract
The Total Knee Replacement (TKR) has been used as the effective treatment for osteoarthritis of the knee. The load of the knee joint is generally applied at the heel strike as the impact loading. In the elderly who had muscle weakness or weakening eyesight, it can be anticipated that more excessive loads are often added to the knees when they stumble or trip over. And the varus / valgus alignments of the femur and tibia differs among patients. However, most finite element analyses considering the effect of the alignments have rarely been performed.
In this study, the mounting angle of the tibia component in the TKR knee was changed, and the effect of the change on the load transfer was assess using finite element analyses. Based on the CT images, the three-dimensional finite element models of the natural knee joint and TKR knee joint were created [Fig. 1]. Each model was constructed from hexahedoral elements with the isotropic material. The numbers of nodes and elements were 10,666 and 8,677 respectively. Under normal alignment, 5 degrees of varus, and 5 degrees of valgus knee, the static analyses at an applied load of 1000N and impact analyses at an applied load of 50 kg were performed. LS-DYNA ver760 software was used for the analyses.
The finite element analyses results showed that under the static loading, no stress shielding was observed in the tibial cancellous bone of the intact knee or TKR knee, and the maximum compressive stress was 1.5 MPa. While under the impact loading, the compressive stress generated inside of the cancellous bone was three times higher in the TKR knee joint than that in the intact knee, and the load transfer time was reduced. This result reveals that the cancellous bone have load bearing function especially in the impact condition.
When the impact load was applied to the varus and valgus TKR knee, the stress shielding was observed in the tibial cancellous bone, especially in the varus condition. In a case where the tibia component was mounted by tilting it at −5 to 5 degrees depending on the varus/valgus of the knee, the stress shielding was alleviated; the distribution of load was almost the same as that of the TKR knee joint model under the normal alignment [Fig.2]. The effect of a slight difference in the alignment on the stress distribution is expected to be a contributor to determine artificial knee joint shape, loading condition, and other design factors in developing revision arthroplasty or custom-made implant.
