Abstract
Introduction
Proper alignment (tibial alignment, femoral alignment, and overall anatomic alignment) of the prosthesis during total knee replacement is critical in maximizing implant survival[7] and to reduce polyethylene wear[1]. Poor overall anatomic alignment of a total knee replacement was associated with a 6.9 times greater risk of failure due to tibial collapse, that varus tibial alignment is associated with a 3.2 times greater risk[2] and valgus femoral alignment is associated with a 5.1 times greater risk of failure[7]. To reduce this variability intramedullary (IM) instruments have been widely used, with increased risk of the fat emboli rate to the lungs and brain during TKA[6] and possible increase of blood loss[4, 5]. Or, alternatively, navigation has been used to achieve proper alignment and to reduce morbidity[3]. Recently, for distal femoral resection, inertial sensors have been coupled to extramedullary (EM) instruments to improve TKA surgery in terms of femoral implant alignment, with respect to femoral mechanical axis, and reduced morbidity by avoidance of IM canal violation. The purpose if this study is to compare blood loss and alignment of distal femoral cut in three cohorts of patients: 1 Operated with inertial based cutting guide; 2 Operated with navigation instruments; 3 operated with conventional IM instruments.
Material and methods
From September to November 2014 30 consecutive patients, eligible for TKA, were randomly divided into three cohorts with 10 patients each:x 1 “EM Perseus”, patient operated with EM inertial based instruments (Perseus, Orthokey Italia srl, Florence, Italy); 2 “EM Nav”, operated with standard navigated technique, where bone resections were planned and verified by mean of navigation system (BLUIGS, Orthokey Italia srl, Florence, Italy); 3 “IM Conv”, operated with standard IM instrumentation. All patients were operated by the same surgical technique, implanted TKA were mobile bearing PS models, Gemini (Waldemar Link, Hamburg, Germany) and Attune (Depuy, Warsaw, Indiana). Anteroposterior, lateral, and full-limb weightbearing views preoperatively and postoperatively at discharge were obtained, taking care of neutral limb rotational positioning in all patients enrolled in the study. Angles between femoral mechanical axis and implant orientation on frontal and lateral planes were measured with a CAD software (Rhinoceros 3, McNeel Europe, Rome, Italy) by two independent persons, average value was used for statistical analysis. Haemoglobin values were recorded at three time intervals: the day before surgery, at 24h follow-up and at patients discharge.
Statistical analysis
Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare differences between the three cohorts in blood loss and femoral implant alignment.
Results
All the three cohorts were comparable in terms of age, sex, preoperative limb alignment and preoperative haemoglobin values (Tab. 1). Haemoglobin ad discharge was reduced for all three cohorts (Tab. 2), no significant differences was found even if IM Conv group showed higher loss compared to EM Perseus and EM Nav groups. Femoral implant alignment deviation, considering perpendicularity with femoral mechanical axis as goal, was comparable in frontal and lateral plane for all three cohorts (Tab. 2).
Discussion
The aim of the study was to compare the accuracy in femoral component positioning, on the coronal and sagittal plane obtained with a new inertial based EM instrument, with a standard IM distal femoral cutting jig and with navigation. We confirm our hypothesis that the use of inertial based EM instruments to perform the distal femoral bone cut in TKA is reliable and at least as accurate as the standard IM technique and navigation. Our study did not show a statistical decrease in blood loss when the femoral canal was not reamed (in inertial based EM, and navigated groups), even if patient operated with IM instruments had sensibly higher blood loss compared to the other two groups. This study was not exactly powered for that purpose, a study with a larger cohort and strict patient selection criteria would be required. This study demonstrates that inertial based EM instruments is accurate for femoral component alignment in TKA and compares favorably to navigation systems and standard IM techniques. Other indications for the use of inertial based EM instruments include all major femoral extraarticular deformities, the presence of ipsilateral long-stemmed hip arthroplasty, and the presence of hardware such as distal femoral plates and screws or IM nails.
