Abstract
Most glenoid implants rely on centrally located large fixation features to avoid perforation of the glenoid vault in its peripheral regions [1]. Upon revision of such components there may not be enough bone left for the reinsertion of an anatomical prosthesis, resulting in a large cavity that resembles a sink hole. Multiple press-fit small pegs would allow for less bone resection and strong anchoring in the stiffer and denser peripheral subchondral bone [2], whilst producing a more uniform stress distribution and increased shear resistance per unit volume [3] and avoiding the complications from the use of bone cement. This study assessed the best combination of anchoring strength, assessed as the ratio between push in and pull out forces (Pin/Pout), and spring-back, measured as the elastic displacement immediately after insertion, for five different small press-fitted peg configurations (Figure 1, left) manufactured out of UHMWPE cylinders (5 mm diameter and length).
16 specimens for each configuration were tested in two types of Sawbones solid bone substitute: hard (40 PCF, 0.64 g/cm3, worst-case scenario of Pin) and soft (15 PCF, 0.24 g/cm3, worst-case scenario of spring-back and Pout). Two different interference-fits, Ø, were studied by drilling holes with 4.7 mm and 4.5 mm diameter (Ø 0.3 and Ø 0.5, respectively). A maximum Pin per peg of 50 N was defined, in order to avoid fracture of the glenoid bone during insertion of multiple pegs. The peg specimens were mounted into the single-axis screw-driven Instron through a threaded fixture. A schematic of the experimental set up is made available (Figure 1, centre). The peg was pushed in vertically for a maximum of 5 mm at a 1 mm/s rate, under displacement control, recording Pin. The spring-back effect was assessed by switching to load control and reducing the load to zero. The peg was then pulled out at a rate of 1 mm/s, recording Pout. The test profile is depicted in Figure 1 (right).
Average Pout/Pin, spring back (in mm) and force-displacement curves for all 80 specimens tested are shown in Figure 2. These were split into groups according to the type of bone substitute and interference-fit, with the right column showing the average values for the Pin. High repeatability among samples of the same configuration tested is noted. Configurations #1, #3 and #5 all exceed the maximum Pin per peg for at least one type of bone. Configuration #2 has the lowest Pin of all (best thread aspect ratio), followed by configuration #4 (thinner threads). The peg configurations #4 and #2 had the highest Pin/Pout. The peg configurations with lowest spring-back after insertion were configuration #2 and #4. Interference fit of Ø 0.3 mm was shown to reduce Pin below maximum limit of 50 N without great influence in spring-back.
