Abstract
Our aim was to compare the biomechanical strength modified side-to-side repair with modified pulvertaft technique keeping overlap length, anchor points, type of suture, suture throw and amount of suture similar.
In our study, we have used turkey tendons. Two investigators performed 34 repairs during one summer month. All mechanical testing was carried out using the tensile load testing machine. Variables measured were maximum load, load to first failure, modulus, load at break, mode of failure, site of failure, tensile strain, and tensile stress. The statistical comparison was carried by Levene's test and T test for means.
The mean maximum load tolerated by modified side-to-side repair was 50.3N(S.D13.7) and that by modified pulvertaft 46.96N(S.D: 16.4), overall it was 48.29 N (S.D: 14.57). The tensile stress at maximum load for modified pulvertaft and modified side-to-side repair was 4.2MPa(S.D: 3.1) and 4.7 MPa (S.D: 3.8) respectively {Overall 4.3MPa(S.D: 3.5)}. The tensile stress at yield was 4.01 MPa (S.D: 3.1) and 5.5 MPa (S.D: 3.7) respectively for modified pulvertaft and modified side-to-side repair {overall 4.44 MPa (S.D: 3.45)}. The tensile strain at maximum load respectively for side-to-side and modified pulvertaft repair was 7.87%(S.D: 33.3) and 7.84%(S.D: 34.02) respectively.
We found no statistical difference between 2 repairs in terms of strength, load to first failure, and maximum load to failure. The suture cut through was the commonest mode of failure.
Our study uniquely compares two techniques under standard conditions, and contrary to existing evidence found no difference.
