Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Hip

GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING IN METAL ON METAL TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

British Hip Society meeting (BHS) March 2016



Abstract

Introduction

The biological pathways responsible for adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) are unknown. Necrotic and inflammatory changes in response to Co-Cr nanoparticles in periprosthetic tissues may involve both a cytotoxic response and a type IV delayed hypersensitivity response.

Our aim was to establish whether differences in biological cascade activation exists in tissues of patients with end-stage OA compared to those with aseptic loosening of a metal on polyethylene (MoP) THR and those with ARMD from metal-on-metal (MoM) THR.

Patients & Methods

A microarray experiment (Illumina HT12-v4) was performed to identify the range of differential gene expression between 24 patients across 3 phenotypes: Primary OA (n=8), revision for aseptic loosening of MoP THR (n=8) and ARMD associated with MoM THR (n=8).

Results were validated using Taqman Low Density Array (TLDA) selecting the top 36 genes in terms of fold-change (FC)>2 and a significant difference (p<0.05) on ANOVA.

Pathways of cellular interaction were explored using Ingenuity IPA software.

Results

There is a similar pattern of gene expression between MoP and MoM phenotypes versus primary OA across 33,777 genes.

One hundred and thirty significantly differentially expressed genes across 3 phenotypes were identified. Fifteen pathways were associated with differentially expressed genes between MoP and MoM phenotypes.

TLDA demonstrated qualitative mirroring of the expression pattern observed in the microarray and consistency in the direction of change for individual genes.

Discussion

There were no signature pathways in which multiple genes are differentially expressed such that inferences between the contributions of innate macrophage and adaptive T-cell responses can be made. TIMP3 & MMP12 were consistently identified in 15 pathways that were associated with differential gene expression between MoP and MoM phenotypes.

Conclusion

Analyses of the expression of individual genes such as PRG4 (lubricin) have demonstrated patterns that may provide avenues for further research into biomarkers for periprosthetic osteolysis and ARMD.