Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Spine

SACRAL ANGLE AND STABILISING MUSCLE FORCES IN PERSONS WITH DIFFERENT SPINAL SHAPES

The Society for Back Pain Research (SBPR) Annual General Meeting 2014



Abstract

Background and Aim

Spinal stability is associated with low back pain and affects the spines ability to support loads. Stability can be achieved if the applied force follows the curvature of the spine, passing close to the vertebral centroids. Previously we showed that calculated muscle forces required for stability in an idealised model increased with increasing and more evenly distributed lumbar curvatures. The purpose of this study was to calculate the muscle forces required for stability in standing in a group of healthy adults.

Methods

Positional MRI was used to acquire sagittal images of the lumbar spine in a standing posture in 30 healthy adults. Sacral inclination was measured and active shape modelling used to characterise lumbar spine shape. A two-dimensional model of the lumbar spine was constructed using vertebral centroid positions and a simplified representation of the lumbar extensor muscles. The muscle forces required at each level to produce a follower load were calculated using a force polygon.

Results

Sacral angle was positively correlated with the amount of overall curvature in the lumbar spine (P<0.001) but not the distribution of curvature. Muscle forces increased with increasing curvature at all lumbar levels (P<0.02). The distribution of curvature affected the muscle forces only at L3 (P<0.03).

Conclusion

In a sample of healthy adults, muscle forces required to maintain stability are determined by the overall curviness of the lumbar spine and, to a lesser extent, the distribution of curvature. Variations in spinal shape should be considered when modelling lumbar spine loading.

This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting.

Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest

Sources of funding: This work was supported by a studentship granted to the University and awarded to AVP. An NHS Endowment grant provided further funding.