Abstract
Introduction
Alpha angles have been used to identify the precise area on the femoral head/neck junction that causes cam-type FAI. Now, computer programs are available to calculate the precise motion pattern of a hip joint and identify areas of FAI, dysplasia and other morphological abnormalities. We hypothesise that one cannot rely on the alpha angle alone to predict the precise area of resection required to remove cam impingement.
Methods
We used Clinical Graphics software to analyse a cohort of 142 hips. We recorded the alpha angle at 12, 1, 2 and 3 o'clock and whether resection was recommended by the software at these points. We then removed the patients with acetabular influences on potential FAI (pure cam group).
Results
At the points recommended for resection alpha angles were found to be significantly higher than those where resection was not advised (52.88° v 49.29°, p=0.0001). However, of the alpha angles greater than 50°, resection was recommended in only 49%. Of the alpha angles less than 50°, resection was still recommended in 36%. In the pure cam-type FAI patients we found no statistically significant association between alpha angle and whether resection was or wasn't indicated (p=0.0536).
We further analysed each point on the femoral head/neck. Alpha angles were highest at the 1 and 2 o'clock position which would fit with the anatomical variation that most surgeons would associate with the area of impingement. However, the most common recommended area for resection was between 3 and 5 o'clock.
Conclusion
Alpha angle is a poor predictor of cam resection to remove FAI. The suggested location of osteochondroplasty required to remove impingement appears to be further anterior and inferior on the femoral neck than many surgeons might predict. Motional analysis software is a valuable tool in assisting surgeons to understand the morphological abnormalities that may affect the hip.
